Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1656861
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-09-01more like thismore than 2023-09-01
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions remove filter
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, if he will make an assessment of the effectiveness of PIP descriptors for the assessment of people with fluctuating conditions. more like this
tabling member constituency Gower more like this
tabling member printed
Tonia Antoniazzi remove filter
uin 196550 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-09-07more like thismore than 2023-09-07
answer text <p>The Personal Independence Payment (PIP) assessment criteria account for fluctuations by considering an individual’s ability to undertake 12 specific daily activities over a 12-month period.  It is essential for the assessment to accurately reflect the impact of variations in an individual's level of impairment - this is important for all health conditions and impairments, not only those which more typically fluctuate. For each activity, if a descriptor applies more than 50 per cent of the time, that descriptor should be chosen.</p><p> </p><p>All health professionals are required to assess individuals in line with the statutory requirements, including: whether an individual can complete each of the 12 activities; the manner in which they can do it; and whether they can complete each activity “safely, to an acceptable standard, repeatedly and in a reasonable time period”.</p><p> </p><p>Many of the changes set out in Transforming Support: The Health and Disability White Paper aim to improve our assessment of fluctuating conditions, such as the way we use medical evidence, and developing the capability of our assessors. We will also explore options for introducing a new way of gathering evidence of fluctuation in a person’s condition before their assessment.</p>
answering member constituency Corby more like this
answering member printed Tom Pursglove more like this
grouped question UIN 197202 more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-09-07T15:05:45.947Zmore like thismore than 2023-09-07T15:05:45.947Z
answering member
4369
label Biography information for Tom Pursglove remove filter
tabling member
4623
label Biography information for Tonia Antoniazzi more like this
1587148
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-02-20more like thismore than 2023-02-20
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions remove filter
hansard heading Carer's Allowance more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, for what reason carers allowance for unpaid carers is treated as an income for benefits purposes. more like this
tabling member constituency Gower more like this
tabling member printed
Tonia Antoniazzi remove filter
uin 148777 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-02-23more like thismore than 2023-02-23
answer text <p>This Government recognises and values the vital contribution made by carers in supporting some of the most vulnerable in society, including pensioners and those with disabilities.</p><p> </p><p>The principle that available income normally reduces entitlement to means-tested benefits is long established under successive Governments. Means-tested benefits essentially “top-up” other income. Means-tested benefits contain additional amounts for unpaid carers, worth around £2,000 a year, which recognise the additional contribution and responsibilities associated with caring and mean that those with caring responsibilities on low incomes can receive more than other claimants.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Corby more like this
answering member printed Tom Pursglove more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-02-23T09:58:43.217Zmore like thismore than 2023-02-23T09:58:43.217Z
answering member
4369
label Biography information for Tom Pursglove remove filter
tabling member
4623
label Biography information for Tonia Antoniazzi more like this