Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

92327

registered interest
date	26/09/2014
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many officials in his Department of what (a) gender, (b) ethnicity and (c) age received the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System's (i) exceeded, (ii) met and (iii) must improve performance mark in 2013-14.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	209494
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/10/2014 answer text <p /> <p>DWP demonstrates its commitment to diversity and inclusion by, amongst other things, offering a range of flexible employment policies that enable under-represented groups to experience fulfilling public service careers. As a consequence of these policies, DWP has recruited a diverse workforce made up of 69% female, 43% part-time, at least 11% black and minority ethnic, and at least 7% disabled employees.</p><p> </p><p>The requested data is in the tables below. The figures for performance ratings relate to the workforce at 31 March 2014. The figures for performance-related pay relates to the workforce at 31 August 2014. Changes in the workforce in the intervening period largely accounts for differences in the data.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by gender</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Female</p></td><td><p>13,786</p></td><td><p>45,715</p></td><td><p>3,962</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Male</p></td><td><p>5,371</p></td><td><p>20,110</p></td><td><p>3,006</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by declared ethnicity</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>White</p></td><td><p>13,781</p></td><td><p>45,236</p></td><td><p>4,550</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ethnic</p></td><td><p>1,414</p></td><td><p>5,998</p></td><td><p>777</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by age</strong></p><p> </p><table><thead><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><p>16-24</p></td><td><p>192</p></td><td><p>585</p></td><td><p>80</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>25-29</p></td><td><p>1,088</p></td><td><p>2,558</p></td><td><p>239</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>30-34</p></td><td><p>1,855</p></td><td><p>5,015</p></td><td><p>461</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>35-39</p></td><td><p>2,154</p></td><td><p>6,109</p></td><td><p>528</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>40-44</p></td><td><p>3,198</p></td><td><p>8,813</p></td><td><p>715</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>45-49</p></td><td><p>4,302</p></td><td><p>12,692</p></td><td><p>1,113</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>50-54</p></td><td><p>3,682</p></td><td><p>13,557</p></td><td><p>1,339</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>55-59</p></td><td><p>2,116</p></td><td><p>10,565</p></td><td><p>1,315</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>60-64</p></td><td><p>490</p></td><td><p>4,784</p></td><td><p>869</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>65+</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>1,147</p></td><td><p>309</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by declared disability</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Non-disabled</p></td><td><p>15,589</p></td><td><p>52,949</p></td><td><p>5,322</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Disabled</p></td><td><p>801</p></td><td><p>3,965</p></td><td><p>649</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by work pattern</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Full time</p></td><td><p>13,092</p></td><td><p>35,920</p></td><td><p>3,789</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Part time</p></td><td><p>6,065</p></td><td><p>29,905</p></td><td><p>3,179</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Performance-related pay 2013-14</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Payments made</p></td><td><p>85,900</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Payments not made</p></td><td><p>9,546</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p> answering member constituency Thornbury and Yate answering member printed Steve Webb grouped question UIN 209641 209663 question first answered 14/10/2014 10:58:15 answering member 220 label Biography information for Steve Webb
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

92328

registered interest
date	26/09/2014
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many officials in his Department completed the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System in 2013-14; how many and what proportion of those officials received the (a) exceeded, (b) met and (c) must improve performance mark; and how many and what proportion (i) did and (ii) did not qualify for a bonus under that process.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	209663
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/10/2014 answer text <p>DWP demonstrates its commitment to diversity and inclusion by, amongst other things, offering a range of flexible employment policies that enable under-represented groups to experience fulfilling public service careers. As a consequence of these policies, DWP has recruited a diverse workforce made up of 69% female, 43% part-time, at least 11% black and minority ethnic, and at least 7% disabled employees.</p><p> </p><p>The requested data is in the tables below. The figures for performance ratings relate to the workforce at 31 March 2014. The figures for performance-related pay relates to the workforce at 31 August 2014. Changes in the workforce in the intervening period largely accounts for differences in the data.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by gender</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Female</p></td><td><p>13,786</p></td><td><p>45,715</p></td><td><p>3,962</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Male</p></td><td><p>5,371</p></td><td><p>20,110</p></td><td><p>3,006</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by declared ethnicity</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>White</p></td><td><p>13,781</p></td><td><p>45,236</p></td><td><p>4,550</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ethnic</p></td><td><p>1,414</p></td><td><p>5,998</p></td><td><p>777</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by age</strong></p><p> </p><table><thead><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><p>16-24</p></td><td><p>192</p></td><td><p>585</p></td><td><p>80</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>25-29</p></td><td><p>1,088</p></td><td><p>2,558</p></td><td><p>239</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>30-34</p></td><td><p>1,855</p></td><td><p>5,015</p></td><td><p>461</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>35-39</p></td><td><p>2,154</p></td><td><p>6,109</p></td><td><p>528</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>40-44</p></td><td><p>3,198</p></td><td><p>8,813</p></td><td><p>715</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>45-49</p></td><td><p>4,302</p></td><td><p>12,692</p></td><td><p>1,113</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>50-54</p></td><td><p>3,682</p></td><td><p>13,557</p></td><td><p>1,339</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>55-59</p></td><td><p>2,116</p></td><td><p>10,565</p></td><td><p>1,315</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>60-64</p></td><td><p>490</p></td><td><p>4,784</p></td><td><p>869</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>65+</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>1,147</p></td><td><p>309</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by declared disability</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Non-disabled</p></td><td><p>15,589</p></td><td><p>52,949</p></td><td><p>5,322</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Disabled</p></td><td><p>801</p></td><td><p>3,965</p></td><td><p>649</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by work pattern</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Full time</p></td><td><p>13,092</p></td><td><p>35,920</p></td><td><p>3,789</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Part time</p></td><td><p>6,065</p></td><td><p>29,905</p></td><td><p>3,179</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Performance-related pay 2013-14</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Payments made</p></td><td><p>85,900</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Payments not made</p></td><td><p>9,546</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p> answering member constituency Thornbury and Yate answering member printed Steve Webb grouped question UIN 209494 209641 question first answered 14/10/2014 10:58:15 answering member 220 label Biography information for Steve Webb
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

92329

registered interest
date	26/09/2014
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many officials in his Department who received the (a) exceeded, (b) met and (c) must improve performance mark under the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System (i) had a disability, (ii) worked full-time and (iii) worked part-time in 2013-14.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	209641
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/10/2014 answer text <p>DWP demonstrates its commitment to diversity and inclusion by, amongst other things, offering a range of flexible employment policies that enable under-represented groups to experience fulfilling public service careers. As a consequence of these policies, DWP has recruited a diverse workforce made up of 69% female, 43% part-time, at least 11% black and minority ethnic, and at least 7% disabled employees.</p><p> </p><p>The requested data is in the tables below. The figures for performance ratings relate to the workforce at 31 March 2014. The figures for performance-related pay relates to the workforce at 31 August 2014. Changes in the workforce in the intervening period largely accounts for differences in the data.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by gender</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Female</p></td><td><p>13,786</p></td><td><p>45,715</p></td><td><p>3,962</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Male</p></td><td><p>5,371</p></td><td><p>20,110</p></td><td><p>3,006</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by declared ethnicity</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>White</p></td><td><p>13,781</p></td><td><p>45,236</p></td><td><p>4,550</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ethnic</p></td><td><p>1,414</p></td><td><p>5,998</p></td><td><p>777</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by age</strong></p><p> </p><table><thead><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><p>16-24</p></td><td><p>192</p></td><td><p>585</p></td><td><p>80</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>25-29</p></td><td><p>1,088</p></td><td><p>2,558</p></td><td><p>239</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>30-34</p></td><td><p>1,855</p></td><td><p>5,015</p></td><td><p>461</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>35-39</p></td><td><p>2,154</p></td><td><p>6,109</p></td><td><p>528</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>40-44</p></td><td><p>3,198</p></td><td><p>8,813</p></td><td><p>715</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>45-49</p></td><td><p>4,302</p></td><td><p>12,692</p></td><td><p>1,113</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>50-54</p></td><td><p>3,682</p></td><td><p>13,557</p></td><td><p>1,339</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>55-59</p></td><td><p>2,116</p></td><td><p>10,565</p></td><td><p>1,315</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>60-64</p></td><td><p>490</p></td><td><p>4,784</p></td><td><p>869</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>65+</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>1,147</p></td><td><p>309</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by declared disability</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Non-disabled</p></td><td><p>15,589</p></td><td><p>52,949</p></td><td><p>5,322</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Disabled</p></td><td><p>801</p></td><td><p>3,965</p></td><td><p>649</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by work pattern</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Full time</p></td><td><p>13,092</p></td><td><p>35,920</p></td><td><p>3,789</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Part time</p></td><td><p>6,065</p></td><td><p>29,905</p></td><td><p>3,179</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Performance-related pay 2013-14</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Payments made</p></td><td><p>85,900</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Payments not made</p></td><td><p>9,546</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p> answering member constituency Thornbury and Yate answering member printed Steve Webb grouped question UIN 209494 209663 question first answered 14/10/2014 10:58:15 answering member 220 label Biography information for Steve Webb
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

58448

registered interest
date	05/06/2014
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Social Security Benefits
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment he has made of the potential effects of removing dedicated funding for local welfare assistance; and if he will review the current local welfare assistance arrangements introduced in 2013 before any such change is made.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	199275
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 11/06/2014 answer text <p /> <p /> <p>In the next spending round period, from April 2015, central government will continue to provide support to local authorities through general funds, as part of the coalition Government's commitment to reducing ring-fencing and ending top-down Whitehall control.</p><p> </p><p>It was always the intention that 2014-15 would be the last year of separate funding for local welfare provision from the Department for Work and Pensions. Councils will continue to provide support to those in their community who face financial difficulties or who find themselves in unavoidable circumstances.</p><p> </p><p>In contrast to a centralised grant system that was poorly targeted, councils can now choose how to best support local welfare needs within their areas. As this is an administrative change only no assessment has been made of the effects. However we are carrying out a review of the current arrangements, working with the Local Government Association and the Department for Communities and Local Government. Once completed it is our intention to place a copy of the findings in the House Library. <br></p> answering member constituency Thornbury and Yate answering member printed Steve Webb question first answered 11/06/2014 11:23:55 answering member 220 label Biography information for Steve Webb
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey