Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

388821
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-07-09more like thismore than 2015-07-09
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health remove filter
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Social Services: Finance more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the effect of planned reductions in social care budgets for 2015–16 on local authorities and social care providers. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top more like this
uin HL1298 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-20more like thismore than 2015-07-20
answer text <p>The Department monitors local authority budget data and expenditure on adult social care as routine. We will continue to work closely with local government and providers to understand current and future funding requirements to support decisions relating to the upcoming Spending Review.</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>This year, the Better Care Fund will provide £5.3 billion of investment in better integrated care, based on joint plans that have been developed locally and putting resources where the local NHS and social services think it is needed. Social care protection is a national condition of the Better Care Fund.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-20T10:37:57.037Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-20T10:37:57.037Z
answering member
127
label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton remove filter
tabling member
4150
label Biography information for Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top more like this
388430
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-07-08more like thismore than 2015-07-08
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health remove filter
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Diabetes: Research more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government how much is currently being spent on research into Type 1 diabetes. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Morris of Aberavon more like this
uin HL1205 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-20more like thismore than 2015-07-20
answer text <p>In 2014-15, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) spent £2.7 million on type 1 diabetes research through its research programmes, research centres and units, and research fellowships. Total spend by the NIHR on type 1 diabetes is higher than this figure because expenditure by the NIHR Clinical Research Network (CRN) on specific diseases and topics cannot be separated from total CRN expenditure.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Medical Research Council spent £3.3 million on type 1 diabetes in 2013-14. A figure for 2014-15 is not yet available.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-20T10:36:41.25Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-20T10:36:41.25Z
answering member
127
label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton remove filter
tabling member
565
label Biography information for Lord Morris of Aberavon more like this
388431
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-07-08more like thismore than 2015-07-08
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health remove filter
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading NHS England more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what specific role NHS England has in supporting Clinical Commissioning Groups; and what plans, if any, they have to change this role. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Morris of Aberavon more like this
uin HL1206 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-14more like thismore than 2015-07-14
answer text <p>Clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) commission the majority of NHS services in England. As such, NHS England is responsible for ensuring that every CCG can access excellent affordable commissioning support services. Its principal vehicles for delivering this are through the Lead Provider Framework for commissioning support which enables CCGs to draw down a range of support services from nine high quality providers and through the oversight of NHS Commissioning Support Units, which NHS England hosts.</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>NHS England also has a statutory duty to produce commissioning guidance, which CCGs must have regard to, and continues to promote good commissioning through its CCG assurance framework.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>NHS England continues to review its support of CCGs to ensure they are well supported organisations. There are no immediate plans to change this offer.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-14T15:29:44.86Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-14T15:29:44.86Z
answering member
127
label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton remove filter
tabling member
565
label Biography information for Lord Morris of Aberavon more like this
388446
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-07-08more like thismore than 2015-07-08
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health remove filter
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Dental Services: Fees and Charges more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is their response to the Which? investigation that found that prospective NHS dental patients are being forced to pay a deposit before being allowed to book an appointment. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath more like this
uin HL1221 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-15more like thismore than 2015-07-15
answer text <p>Patients may not be charged a deposit for National Health Service care. NHS dental charges are specified in regulations and may only be levied once a course of treatment has begun. Asking for a deposit or any other advance payment before the course of treatment has begun is a breach of contract. The Department expects NHS England, which is responsible for commissioning NHS dental services, to act appropriately where there is evidence that patients have been mischarged.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-15T15:14:34.517Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-15T15:14:34.517Z
answering member
127
label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton remove filter
tabling member
2024
label Biography information for Lord Hunt of Kings Heath more like this
388460
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-07-08more like thismore than 2015-07-08
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health remove filter
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Folic Acid more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government how the serum total folate levels for women of child-bearing age shown in the latest National Diet and Nutrition Survey supplementary report vary between the constituent parts of the United Kingdom, and whether those levels are above or below the World Health Organisation thresholds. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Rooker more like this
uin HL1235 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-20more like thismore than 2015-07-20
answer text <p>For women of child bearing age (16 to 49 years), mean serum total folate concentration was 17.4 nanomoles per litre (nmol/L) in Scotland, 18.8 nmol/L in Wales and 16.3 nmol/L in Northern Ireland. The proportion with concentrations below 10 nmol/L, the World Health Organization (WHO) threshold indicating biochemical folate deficiency was 24.4% in Scotland, 14.5% in Wales and 30.6% in Northern Ireland. In the United Kingdom as a whole, mean serum total folate concentration was 20.0 nmol/L, and 16.5% had concentrations below the WHO threshold.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-20T10:30:42.553Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-20T10:30:42.553Z
answering member
127
label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton remove filter
tabling member
302
label Biography information for Lord Rooker more like this
388461
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-07-08more like thismore than 2015-07-08
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health remove filter
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Folic Acid more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what discussions have taken place with the governments of Scotland and Wales regarding the information contained in the National Diet and Nutrition Survey supplementary report of 20 March. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Rooker more like this
uin HL1236 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-20more like thismore than 2015-07-20
answer text <p>Departmental officials meet regularly with their counterparts in Scotland and Wales and have discussed the results of the National Diet and Nutrition Survey as part of these ongoing communications.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-20T10:37:12.81Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-20T10:37:12.81Z
answering member
127
label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton remove filter
tabling member
302
label Biography information for Lord Rooker more like this
388036
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-07-07more like thismore than 2015-07-07
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health remove filter
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Human Papillomavirus: Vaccination more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether post-marketing surveillance has been conducted on the administration of (1) Gardasil, and (2) Cervarix; if so, by whom, over what period, and with what results; and if not, why not. more like this
tabling member printed
The Countess of Mar more like this
uin HL1162 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-20more like thismore than 2015-07-20
answer text <p>All licensed medicines and vaccines, including Gardasil and Cervarix, are subject to post-marketing surveillance (also known as pharmacovigilance). Gardasil and Cervarix are authorised via the centralised procedure with the European Commission as Licensing Authority. The post-marketing surveillance for centrally authorised products is underpinned by European Legislation (Regulation (EU) No 1027/2012) which puts requirements on national competent authorities in member states, the European Medicines Agency and marketing authorisation holders to collect data on safety of medicines and vaccines, assess any new issues, take action to minimise risks and monitor the effectiveness of any action taken.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Gardasil and Cervarix have been subject to post-marketing surveillance since the time of marketing. Gardasil and Cervarix have a very good safety record, and surveillance shows they have contributed to a significant decrease in rates of infection with the two main cancer-causing human papillomaviruses. The United Kingdom programme is eventually expected to prevent hundreds of deaths from cervical cancer every year.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-20T10:31:31.987Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-20T10:31:31.987Z
answering member
127
label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton remove filter
tabling member
1861
label Biography information for The Countess of Mar more like this
388037
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-07-07more like thismore than 2015-07-07
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health remove filter
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Human Papillomavirus: Vaccination more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government why the outcome of 75 per cent of reported serious adverse events arising from taking Cervarix is unknown, in the light of the fact that the vaccine has a black triangle warning on its packaging indicating that increased pharmacovigilance is required. more like this
tabling member printed
The Countess of Mar more like this
uin HL1163 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-20more like thismore than 2015-07-20
answer text <p>As of 7 July 2015, adverse events with an unknown outcome make up 22% of the total number of serious suspected adverse events reported in association with Cervarix.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Black Triangle Scheme for intensive monitoring of medicines ran for many years in the United Kingdom but was replaced by the European equivalent in 2012.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Cervarix was first authorised in September 2007. For the first two years of the Cervarix immunisation programme in the UK, to complement the Black Triangle Scheme, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) put in place an ‘enhanced’ safety monitoring strategy involving a multi-disciplinary team of scientists. Cumulative safety summaries were published on the MHRA website each week for the public to see.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Black Triangle Scheme, when it was in place, intensively monitored new medicines to ensure that any new safety hazards were identified promptly. The Commission on Human Medicines and the MHRA encouraged the reporting of all suspected reactions to newer drugs and vaccines, which were denoted by an inverted black triangle symbol.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Every reporter to the Yellow Card scheme receives an acknowledgement which asks that any new information relating to the case be reported. Follow up procedures for Yellow Card reports are in place and are designed to ensure that relevant information is sought if this is missing from reports of serious reactions which could potentially be new signals. While in an ideal world full details would be obtained for every report, given there are over 750,000 reports on the database with around 30,000 new reports each year, it will never be possible to ensure all reports on the database are complete. There are a number of difficulties with achieving satisfactory follow up. Time pressure on potential reporters has been identified as one of the reasons for under-reporting adverse reactions through the Yellow Card Scheme. This issue also applies to requests for follow up information and therefore there is a need to be selective and focussed about the reports for which follow up information is requested.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-20T10:29:57.397Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-20T10:29:57.397Z
answering member
127
label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton remove filter
tabling member
1861
label Biography information for The Countess of Mar more like this
388038
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-07-07more like thismore than 2015-07-07
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health remove filter
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Human Papillomavirus: Vaccination more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government why only 16.8 per cent of reports of serious adverse events relating to human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines under the Yellow Card Scheme have been followed up, according to the response by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency to a freedom of information request on 25 June; how this compares to the percentage of yellow-card reports followed up for all vaccines; and whether they now plan to follow up all reported serious adverse events relating to HPV vaccines in order to ascertain recovery rates. more like this
tabling member printed
The Countess of Mar more like this
uin HL1164 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-20more like thismore than 2015-07-20
answer text <p>A total of 2,624 spontaneous suspected serious adverse reaction reports (ADRs) with human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines have been reported to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) via the Yellow Card Scheme up to 7 July 2015.</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>To date more than eight million doses of HPV vaccine have been given in the United Kingdom since 2008, with close to 90% eligible teenagers vaccinated. The vast majority of suspected side effects reported so far relate to those we would expect with most types of vaccine; these are most commonly dizziness, headache, nausea, sore arms, vomiting, general malaise, tiredness, fever, and rashes. These tend to be mild and transient. Many serious reports relate to immediate fainting, which is not necessarily a side effect of the vaccine but a response that any type of needle insertion can provoke in some people.</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>The following table provides a breakdown of UK suspected spontaneous ADRs received via the Yellow card Scheme in association with all vaccines on the immunisation schedule. The table provides the total number of reports, the total number of serious reports and the number of serious reports followed up.</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>UK suspected spontaneous ADRs received via the Yellow card Scheme in association with all vaccines on the immunisation schedule.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Vaccine Brand</p></td><td><p>Total number of reports</p></td><td><p>Number of serious reports</p></td><td><p>Number of serious reports followed up</p></td><td><p>% of serious reports followed up*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)</p></td><td><p>8,276</p></td><td><p>2,624</p></td><td><p>441</p></td><td><p>17%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Diphtheria,tetanus, pertussis, polio and <em>Haemophilus influenza </em>type b (DTaP/IPV/Hib)</p></td><td><p>1,382</p></td><td><p>713</p></td><td><p>103</p></td><td><p>14%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tetanus, diphtheria and polio (Td/IPV)</p></td><td><p>1,152</p></td><td><p>671</p></td><td><p>95</p></td><td><p>14%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Diphtheria,tetanus, pertussis and polio (DTaP/IPV)</p></td><td><p>1,326</p></td><td><p>509</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>12%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rotavirus (Rotarix)</p></td><td><p>452</p></td><td><p>283</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>25%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Pneumococcal disease (PCV)</p></td><td><p>1,611</p></td><td><p>882</p></td><td><p>85</p></td><td><p>10%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Meningococcal group C disease (Men C)</p></td><td><p>14,671</p></td><td><p>4,241</p></td><td><p>81</p></td><td><p>2%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hib/Men C</p></td><td><p>285</p></td><td><p>155</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>15%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Measles, mumps and rubella (MMR)</p></td><td><p>5,492</p></td><td><p>2,804</p></td><td><p>88</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Pneumococcal disease (PPV)</p></td><td><p>1,726</p></td><td><p>985</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Fluenz/ Fluenz Tetra</p></td><td><p>877</p></td><td><p>381</p></td><td><p>74</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Zostavax</p></td><td><p>646</p></td><td><p>408</p></td><td><p>105</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Influenza virus</p></td><td><p>5,745</p></td><td><p>3807</p></td><td><p>483</p></td><td><p>13%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>* Percentage provided to the nearest whole number</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>It should be noted that a Yellow Card report is not proof of a side effect occurring, but a suspicion by the reporter that the vaccine may have been the cause. Yellow Card data cannot be used as a reliable indicator of the frequency of suspected ADRs to vaccines or medicines. The level of ADR reporting may fluctuate between given years due to a variety of reasons such as a medicine being new (reporting rates are generally higher when a product is first introduced), stimulated interest/publicity and variations in exposure to the medicine. Comparisons of ADR reporting rates would be an invalid estimate of relative vaccine safety.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Every reporter to the Yellow Card scheme receives an acknowledgement which asks that any new information relating to the case be reported. Follow up procedures for Yellow Card reports are in place and are designed to ensure that relevant information is sought if this is missing from reports of serious reactions which could potentially be new signals. While in an ideal world full details would be obtained for every report, given there are over 750,000 reports on the database with around 30,000 new reports each year, it will never be possible to ensure all reports on the database are complete. There are a number of difficulties with achieving satisfactory follow up. Time pressure on potential reporters has been identified as one of the reasons for under-reporting adverse reactions through the Yellow Card Scheme. This issue also applies to requests for follow up information and therefore there is a need to be selective and focussed about the reports for which follow up information is requested.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The HPV vaccine has a very good safety record, and surveillance shows it has contributed to a significant decrease in rates of infection with the two main cancer-causing human papillomaviruses. The UK programme is eventually expected to prevent hundreds of deaths from cervical cancer every year.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-20T10:35:53.857Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-20T10:35:53.857Z
answering member
127
label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton remove filter
tabling member
1861
label Biography information for The Countess of Mar more like this
387712
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-07-06more like thismore than 2015-07-06
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health remove filter
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Medical Records: Transgender People more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps are being taken to ensure that the Health and Social Care Information Centre informs transsexual patients whose health data has been wrongly disclosed to third parties. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Barker more like this
uin HL1089 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-20more like thismore than 2015-07-20
answer text <p>The Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) takes every precaution to ensure compliance with legislation and that identifiable data is not disclosed without a legal basis to do so. There are strict controls set out within the Data Protection Act that govern the disclosure of sensitive data.</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>In all scenarios involving patient’s health data being wrongly disclosed, irrespective of the personal circumstances of a patient, HSCIC would seek to ensure appropriate reporting, investigations and corrective actions took place.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
grouped question UIN HL1090 more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-20T10:38:41.97Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-20T10:38:41.97Z
answering member
127
label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton remove filter
tabling member
2501
label Biography information for Baroness Barker more like this