Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

692584
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-02-21more like thismore than 2017-02-21
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Cancer Drugs Fund more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons remove filter
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to the Answer of 20 February 2017 to Question 63820, if he will take steps to increase the maximum length of time for which data can be collected on treatments funded from the Cancer Drugs Fund from two to three years. more like this
tabling member constituency Mid Derbyshire remove filter
tabling member printed
Pauline Latham more like this
uin 64926 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-03-01more like thismore than 2017-03-01
answer text <p>There is no maximum length of time for which data can be collected on treatments funded from the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF). The duration in the CDF for a cancer drug is determined on an individual basis by the time required for such data development/collection to take place. This will depend on the disease concerned, the data that needs to be examined, the clinical trials that may be already running, and considerations of cancer treatment pathways in England. The time that a drug stays in the CDF is therefore individually assessed and agreed with NHS England, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and the company concerned. The timeframe will normally be up to two years, but will be considered on a case by case basis.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Oxford West and Abingdon more like this
answering member printed Nicola Blackwood more like this
question first answered
remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2017-03-01T13:42:43.127Z
answering member
4019
label Biography information for Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford remove filter
tabling member
4025
label Biography information for Mrs Pauline Latham more like this
688010
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-02-09more like thismore than 2017-02-09
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Cancer Drugs Fund more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons remove filter
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health, if he will take steps to increase the length of time that data is collected on the evaluation of treatment funded by the Cancer Drugs Fund. more like this
tabling member constituency Mid Derbyshire remove filter
tabling member printed
Pauline Latham more like this
uin 63820 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-02-20more like thismore than 2017-02-20
answer text <p>NHS England has advised that cancer drugs that are assessed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) as having both key clinical uncertainties and plausible cost effectiveness can enter the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF) for evaluation with a view to future NICE re-appraisal once there is sufficient data from continuing clinical trials and/or data collection in the CDF.</p><p> </p><p>The duration in the CDF for a cancer drug is determined on an individual basis by the time required for such data development/collection to take place. This will depend on the disease concerned, the data that needs to be examined, the clinical trials that may be already running, and considerations of cancer treatment pathways in England. The time that a drug stays in the CDF is therefore individually assessed and agreed with NHS England, NICE and the company concerned.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Oxford West and Abingdon more like this
answering member printed Nicola Blackwood more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-02-20T12:02:54.843Zmore like thismore than 2017-02-20T12:02:54.843Z
answering member
4019
label Biography information for Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford remove filter
tabling member
4025
label Biography information for Mrs Pauline Latham more like this
657941
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-12-13more like thismore than 2016-12-13
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Medical Treatments: Access more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons remove filter
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what steps his Department is taking to prevent NHS England from imposing restrictions on patients' access to NICE-approved treatments for melanoma and other conditions; and if he will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency Mid Derbyshire remove filter
tabling member printed
Pauline Latham more like this
uin 57299 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-12-20more like thismore than 2016-12-20
answer text <p>The Department has placed no restrictions on patients accessing treatments for advanced (stage 4) melanoma.</p><p> </p><p>The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has published guidance on the following treatments for melanoma. National Health Service commissioners are legally required to fund drugs and treatments recommended by NICE for eligible patients within three months of final guidance.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Appraisal number</p></td><td><p>Year of publication</p></td><td><p>Technology/condition</p></td><td><p>Recommendation</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA268</p></td><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>Ipilimumab for previously treated advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma</p></td><td><p>Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA269</p></td><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>Vemurafenib for locally advanced or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation-positive malignant melanoma</p></td><td><p>Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA319</p></td><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>Ipilimumab for previously untreated advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma</p></td><td><p>Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA321</p></td><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>Dabrafenib for unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation‑positive melanoma</p></td><td><p>Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA357<sup>1</sup></p></td><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>Pembrolizumab for advanced melanoma after disease progression with ipilimumab</p></td><td><p>Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA366<sup>1</sup></p></td><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>Pembrolizumab for advanced melanoma not previously treated with ipilimumab</p></td><td><p>Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA384</p></td><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>Nivolumab for advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma</p></td><td><p>Recommended in line with marketing authorisation.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA396</p></td><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>Trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for unresectable or metastatic melanoma</p></td><td><p>Recommended in line with marketing authorisation.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA400</p></td><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>Nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab for advanced melanoma</p></td><td><p>Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA410</p></td><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>Talimogene laherparepvec for unresectable metastatic melanoma</p></td><td><p>Optimised recommendation for talimogene laherparepvec as an option for treating unresectable, regionally or distantly metastatic (Stage IIIB, IIIC or IVM1a) melanoma that has not spread to bone, brain, lung or other internal organs, only if: - treatment with systemically administered immunotherapies is not suitable; and - the company provides talimogene laherparepvec with the discount agreed in the patient access scheme.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA414</p></td><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>Cobimetinib in combination with vemurafenib for unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma</p></td><td><p>At the time of appraisal, the technology was not considered to be an appropriate use of NHS resources based on the data available.</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><sup>1</sup> pembrolizumab within its licensed indication was appraised across two separate appraisals.</p><p> </p><p>NHS England has advised that it has carefully translated the evidence base on which NICE has based its recommendations of clinical and cost effectiveness into practical clarifications which directly relate to how the recommended drug indication is incorporated into known treatment pathways in use in England.</p><p> </p><p>Each set of clarifications is in keeping with the NICE recommendations within the marketing authorisation of the relevant drug.</p><p> </p><p>The treatment criteria for both Cancer Drugs Fund and baseline-funded drug indications are set out in the National Cancer Drugs Fund List which is available at:</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/national-cdf-list-v1-15.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/national-cdf-list-v1-15.pdf</a></p>
answering member constituency Oxford West and Abingdon more like this
answering member printed Nicola Blackwood more like this
grouped question UIN 57212 more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-12-20T10:28:45.56Zmore like thismore than 2016-12-20T10:28:45.56Z
answering member
4019
label Biography information for Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford remove filter
tabling member
4025
label Biography information for Mrs Pauline Latham more like this
657942
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-12-13more like thismore than 2016-12-13
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust: Disciplinary Proceedings more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons remove filter
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many people have been suspended from the Derbyshire Mental Health Trust in the last two years; and for how long those suspensions were active. more like this
tabling member constituency Mid Derbyshire remove filter
tabling member printed
Pauline Latham more like this
uin 57293 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-12-19more like thismore than 2016-12-19
answer text <p>The information requested is not available centrally. It may be obtained from Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. We have written to Richard Gregory, Chair of the Trust, informing him of the hon. Member’s enquiry. He will reply shortly and a copy of the letter will be placed in the Library.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Oxford West and Abingdon more like this
answering member printed Nicola Blackwood more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-12-19T15:17:15.87Zmore like thismore than 2016-12-19T15:17:15.87Z
answering member
4019
label Biography information for Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford remove filter
tabling member
4025
label Biography information for Mrs Pauline Latham more like this
657124
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-12-12more like thisremove minimum value filter
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Skin Cancer: Medical Treatments more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons remove filter
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what restrictions have been placed on patients accessing treatments for advanced (stage 4) melanoma by (a) NHS England, (b) his Department and (c) NICE. more like this
tabling member constituency Mid Derbyshire remove filter
tabling member printed
Pauline Latham more like this
uin 57212 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-12-20more like thismore than 2016-12-20
answer text <p>The Department has placed no restrictions on patients accessing treatments for advanced (stage 4) melanoma.</p><p> </p><p>The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has published guidance on the following treatments for melanoma. National Health Service commissioners are legally required to fund drugs and treatments recommended by NICE for eligible patients within three months of final guidance.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Appraisal number</p></td><td><p>Year of publication</p></td><td><p>Technology/condition</p></td><td><p>Recommendation</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA268</p></td><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>Ipilimumab for previously treated advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma</p></td><td><p>Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA269</p></td><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>Vemurafenib for locally advanced or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation-positive malignant melanoma</p></td><td><p>Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA319</p></td><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>Ipilimumab for previously untreated advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma</p></td><td><p>Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA321</p></td><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>Dabrafenib for unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation‑positive melanoma</p></td><td><p>Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA357<sup>1</sup></p></td><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>Pembrolizumab for advanced melanoma after disease progression with ipilimumab</p></td><td><p>Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA366<sup>1</sup></p></td><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>Pembrolizumab for advanced melanoma not previously treated with ipilimumab</p></td><td><p>Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA384</p></td><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>Nivolumab for advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma</p></td><td><p>Recommended in line with marketing authorisation.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA396</p></td><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>Trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for unresectable or metastatic melanoma</p></td><td><p>Recommended in line with marketing authorisation.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA400</p></td><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>Nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab for advanced melanoma</p></td><td><p>Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA410</p></td><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>Talimogene laherparepvec for unresectable metastatic melanoma</p></td><td><p>Optimised recommendation for talimogene laherparepvec as an option for treating unresectable, regionally or distantly metastatic (Stage IIIB, IIIC or IVM1a) melanoma that has not spread to bone, brain, lung or other internal organs, only if: - treatment with systemically administered immunotherapies is not suitable; and - the company provides talimogene laherparepvec with the discount agreed in the patient access scheme.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TA414</p></td><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>Cobimetinib in combination with vemurafenib for unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma</p></td><td><p>At the time of appraisal, the technology was not considered to be an appropriate use of NHS resources based on the data available.</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><sup>1</sup> pembrolizumab within its licensed indication was appraised across two separate appraisals.</p><p> </p><p>NHS England has advised that it has carefully translated the evidence base on which NICE has based its recommendations of clinical and cost effectiveness into practical clarifications which directly relate to how the recommended drug indication is incorporated into known treatment pathways in use in England.</p><p> </p><p>Each set of clarifications is in keeping with the NICE recommendations within the marketing authorisation of the relevant drug.</p><p> </p><p>The treatment criteria for both Cancer Drugs Fund and baseline-funded drug indications are set out in the National Cancer Drugs Fund List which is available at:</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/national-cdf-list-v1-15.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/national-cdf-list-v1-15.pdf</a></p>
answering member constituency Oxford West and Abingdon more like this
answering member printed Nicola Blackwood more like this
grouped question UIN 57299 more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-12-20T10:28:45.483Zmore like thismore than 2016-12-20T10:28:45.483Z
answering member
4019
label Biography information for Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford remove filter
tabling member
4025
label Biography information for Mrs Pauline Latham more like this
657133
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-12-12more like thisremove minimum value filter
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Skin Cancer: Medical Treatments more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons remove filter
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what steps are being taken to ensure melanoma patients have access to the most clinically effective treatment options if they have (a) brain metastases and (b) previously taken part in a clinical trial. more like this
tabling member constituency Mid Derbyshire remove filter
tabling member printed
Pauline Latham more like this
uin 57206 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-12-20more like thismore than 2016-12-20
answer text <p>The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has recommended a number of drugs for use in the treatment of melanoma. National Health Service patients have a right in the NHS Constitution to drugs and treatments that have been recommended by NICE, where clinically appropriate.</p><p> </p><p>NHS England has advised that it has carefully translated the evidence base on which NICE has based its recommendations of clinical and cost effectiveness for drugs and treatments for melanoma into practical clarifications which directly relate to how the recommended drug indication is incorporated into known treatment pathways in use in England.</p><p> </p><p>Each set of clarifications is in keeping with the NICE recommendations within the marketing authorisation of the relevant drug.</p><p> </p><p>The treatment criteria for both Cancer Drugs Fund and baseline-funded drug indications are set out in the National Cancer Drugs Fund List which is available at:</p><p><a href="https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/national-cdf-list-v1-15.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/national-cdf-list-v1-15.pdf</a></p><p> </p><p>Discussions are taking place with NHS regional and National Cancer Research Institute experts on melanoma on formulating chemotherapy algorithms for the treatment of advanced or metastatic melanoma. These discussions relate in part to the drug treatment of brain metastases and the need to preserve recruitment to clinical trials and whether the qualifications that NHS England has applied in terms of treatment criteria for melanoma drugs within their respective marketing authorisations should be changed.</p>
answering member constituency Oxford West and Abingdon more like this
answering member printed Nicola Blackwood more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-12-20T10:30:04.3Zmore like thismore than 2016-12-20T10:30:04.3Z
answering member
4019
label Biography information for Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford remove filter
tabling member
4025
label Biography information for Mrs Pauline Latham more like this
657164
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-12-12more like thisremove minimum value filter
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Patients' Rights: Medical Treatments more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons remove filter
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what his policy is on ensuring that patients have the right set out in the NHS Constitution to access any NICE-approved treatments that are clinically appropriate for them. more like this
tabling member constituency Mid Derbyshire remove filter
tabling member printed
Pauline Latham more like this
uin 57204 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-12-16more like thismore than 2016-12-16
answer text <p>National Health Service patients’ right in the NHS Constitution to drugs and treatments recommended in National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) technology appraisal and highly specialised technology guidance, where clinically appropriate, is underpinned by the legal requirement for NHS commissioners to fund such treatments, normally within three months of NICE issuing its final guidance.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Oxford West and Abingdon more like this
answering member printed Nicola Blackwood more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-12-16T12:11:23.307Zmore like thismore than 2016-12-16T12:11:23.307Z
answering member
4019
label Biography information for Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford remove filter
tabling member
4025
label Biography information for Mrs Pauline Latham more like this