Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1180656
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2020-02-25more like thismore than 2020-02-25
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Judicial Review remove filter
unstar this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many judicial reviews were conducted in England and Wales in each year from 1990 to 2019. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Patten more like this
star this property uin HL1884 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2020-03-10more like thismore than 2020-03-10
unstar this property answer text <p>The table sets out the number of judicial reviews that were conducted in the High Court (Administrative Court) of England and Wales each year between 1999- Q3 2019. These are substantive hearings, and not applications for permission to apply for judicial review. They include all outcomes, including the substantive decision of ‘withdraw’. Unfortunately, statistics from before this time were unobtainable in the time available. Data for Q4 2019 is due to be published on 5th March 2020.</p><p>The table also includes the number of judicial review disposals in the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum) Chamber from 2013 (when cases started to be heard there) and until Q3 2019. Importantly, this statistic includes all applications for permission to apply for judicial review, and not just the substantive hearings in stark contrast to the above number quoted for the Administrative Court, which only accounts for substantive hearings. The figures cannot be broken down into hearings conducted in the time available.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>Judicial review in the High Court (Administrative Court)</p></td><td><p>Judicial reviews in the UTIAC (Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Substantive cases heard</p></td><td><p>Disposals (inc.applications rejected)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1999</p></td><td><p>1,117</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2000</p></td><td><p>1,207</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2001</p></td><td><p>729</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2002</p></td><td><p>420</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2003</p></td><td><p>420</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2004</p></td><td><p>334</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2005</p></td><td><p>392</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2006</p></td><td><p>461</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2007</p></td><td><p>421</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2008</p></td><td><p>419</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009</p></td><td><p>488</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010</p></td><td><p>477</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011</p></td><td><p>485</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>541</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>546</p></td><td><p>329</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>392</p></td><td><p>12,708</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>374</p></td><td><p>18,788</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>331</p></td><td><p>15,012</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>315</p></td><td><p>11,488</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>219</p></td><td><p>9,971</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019 Q1-Q3</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>6,529</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TOTAL</p></td><td><p>10,145</p></td><td><p>74,825</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p>
unstar this property answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-03-10T17:47:57.5Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-10T17:47:57.5Z
star this property answering member
4538
star this property label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property tabling member
1137
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Patten more like this
1183079
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2020-03-05more like thismore than 2020-03-05
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Judicial Review remove filter
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to the oral contribution of the Attorney General of 16 January 2020, Official Report, columns 1143-1144, what plans he has for a review into the judicial review process; who will lead that review; what his timetable is for that review; whether that review will be conducted as part of the Constitution, Democracy and Human Rights Commission; and how he plans to consult (a) Members and (b) the public. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Brighton, Pavilion more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Caroline Lucas more like this
star this property uin 25645 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2020-03-12more like thismore than 2020-03-12
unstar this property answer text <p>As set out in our manifesto, the Government will ensure that judicial review is available to protect the rights of the individuals against an overbearing state, while ensuring that it is not abused to conduct politics by another means or to create needless delays.</p><p> </p><p>Discussions on how to meet this commitment are continuing within Government and further details will be announced in due course.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Croydon South more like this
unstar this property answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-03-12T14:05:25.1Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-12T14:05:25.1Z
star this property answering member
4503
star this property label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
star this property tabling member
3930
unstar this property label Biography information for Caroline Lucas more like this
1230719
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2020-09-02more like thismore than 2020-09-02
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Judicial Review remove filter
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, who the independent panel considering judicial review will be consulting with. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency East Lothian more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Kenny MacAskill more like this
star this property uin 84356 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2020-09-07more like thismore than 2020-09-07
unstar this property answer text <p>The Independent Panel on Administrative Law commenced its work in July 2020 which is expected to run until the end of the year. The panel intends to gather evidence from a wide range of interested and representative parties including legal bodies, academia, professional associations, trade bodies, as well as from those who act for claimants and those who defend judicial reviews, amongst others. This will be a time limited exercise and anyone who wishes to submit comments or evidence may do so before the 19 October 2020. Details for how to submit are available on GOV.UK. A copy of the call for evidence will be deposited in the libraries of both Houses.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Cheltenham more like this
unstar this property answering member printed Alex Chalk more like this
star this property grouped question UIN 84357 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-09-07T17:48:05.35Zmore like thismore than 2020-09-07T17:48:05.35Z
star this property answering member
4481
star this property label Biography information for Alex Chalk more like this
star this property tabling member
4772
unstar this property label Biography information for Kenny MacAskill more like this
1230720
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2020-09-02more like thismore than 2020-09-02
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Judicial Review remove filter
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the planned timescale is for the consultation period of the independent panel to look at judicial review. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency East Lothian more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Kenny MacAskill more like this
star this property uin 84357 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2020-09-07more like thismore than 2020-09-07
unstar this property answer text <p>The Independent Panel on Administrative Law commenced its work in July 2020 which is expected to run until the end of the year. The panel intends to gather evidence from a wide range of interested and representative parties including legal bodies, academia, professional associations, trade bodies, as well as from those who act for claimants and those who defend judicial reviews, amongst others. This will be a time limited exercise and anyone who wishes to submit comments or evidence may do so before the 19 October 2020. Details for how to submit are available on GOV.UK. A copy of the call for evidence will be deposited in the libraries of both Houses.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Cheltenham more like this
unstar this property answering member printed Alex Chalk more like this
star this property grouped question UIN 84356 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-09-07T17:48:05.397Zmore like thismore than 2020-09-07T17:48:05.397Z
star this property answering member
4481
star this property label Biography information for Alex Chalk more like this
star this property tabling member
4772
unstar this property label Biography information for Kenny MacAskill more like this
1230722
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2020-09-02more like thismore than 2020-09-02
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Judicial Review remove filter
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what discussions he had with representatives of the judiciary in England and Wales ahead of the announcement of the launch of the independent panel to look at judicial review on 31 July 2020. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency East Lothian more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Kenny MacAskill more like this
star this property uin 84358 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2020-09-07more like thismore than 2020-09-07
unstar this property answer text <p>The Lord Chancellor meets regularly with senior judges in England and Wales to discuss matters related to the administration of the justice system and the courts and tribunals.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Cheltenham more like this
unstar this property answering member printed Alex Chalk more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-09-07T17:48:16.263Zmore like thismore than 2020-09-07T17:48:16.263Z
star this property answering member
4481
star this property label Biography information for Alex Chalk more like this
star this property tabling member
4772
unstar this property label Biography information for Kenny MacAskill more like this
1259654
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2020-12-09more like thismore than 2020-12-09
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Judicial Review remove filter
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to any published criteria or guidance including, but not limited to, the Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide 2020 and Practice Direction 54E (Planning Court Claims), what the process is for the allocation of cases identified as Aarhus Convention claims in Form N461 to judges in the Planning and Administrative Courts; and if he will make a statement. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Bristol East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Kerry McCarthy more like this
star this property uin 127495 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2020-12-18more like thismore than 2020-12-18
unstar this property answer text <p>Judges dealing with Planning Court cases are authorised to do so by the President of the Queen’s Bench Division, based on their experience and expertise in dealing with such matters. Cases requiring planning expertise are allocated to an available Planning Court Judge.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Croydon South more like this
unstar this property answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-12-18T14:00:17.04Zmore like thismore than 2020-12-18T14:00:17.04Z
star this property answering member
4503
star this property label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
star this property tabling member
1491
unstar this property label Biography information for Kerry McCarthy more like this
1330290
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2021-06-07more like thismore than 2021-06-07
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Judicial Review remove filter
unstar this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to reform judicial review. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick more like this
star this property uin HL793 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2021-06-21more like thismore than 2021-06-21
unstar this property answer text <p>The Independent Review of Administrative Law made recommendations for reform and the Government consulted on these and other proposals. We are considering the responses to the consultation before deciding on the measures to take forward but the Government will introduce legislation in the current session.</p> more like this
unstar this property answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2021-06-21T15:41:24.833Zmore like thismore than 2021-06-21T15:41:24.833Z
star this property answering member
4901
star this property label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
star this property tabling member
4130
unstar this property label Biography information for Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick more like this
1379020
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2021-11-16more like thismore than 2021-11-16
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Judicial Review remove filter
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the oral contribution by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice of 9 November 2021, Official Report , column 160, what assessment his Department has made of the effect of Cart-type judicial review cases on the Crown Court backlog. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Tottenham more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr David Lammy more like this
star this property uin 75806 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2021-11-23more like thismore than 2021-11-23
unstar this property answer text <p>In the oral contribution by the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Justice to which he refers, the PUS refers to the ‘precious resource’ of High Court Judges. As it states on judiciary.uk: ‘High Court judges can hear the most serious and sensitive cases in the Crown Court (for example murder)’. Our impact assessment sets out the Cart judicial review measure will save 172-180 judge days per year in the High Court and Upper Tribunal. A High Court Judge, who would otherwise be devoting time to considering Cart judicial review, may therefore instead devote that time to considering other serious cases in the Crown Court.</p><p> </p><p>We continue to take action to tackle the impact the pandemic has had on our criminal justice system, including Crown Court backlog.</p><p> </p><p>The Judicial Review and Courts Bill provides the Crown Court with increased flexibility to return certain cases to the magistrates’ court, helping support court recovery by saving an estimated 400 Crown Court sitting days per year.</p><p> </p><p>We have allocated over a quarter of a billion pounds on recovery in the last financial year, making court buildings safe, rolling out new technology for remote hearings, recruiting additional staff and opening Nightingale courtrooms, including retaining 32 Nightingale Court rooms until the end of March 2022.</p><p> </p><p>The Ministry of Justice’s Spending Review settlement provides £477 million to improve waiting times for victims and to reduce Crown Court backlogs caused by the pandemic.</p>
star this property answering member constituency South Suffolk more like this
unstar this property answering member printed James Cartlidge more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2021-11-23T16:48:41.11Zmore like thismore than 2021-11-23T16:48:41.11Z
star this property answering member
4519
star this property label Biography information for James Cartlidge more like this
star this property tabling member
206
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr David Lammy more like this
1379858
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2021-11-18more like thismore than 2021-11-18
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Judicial Review remove filter
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what progress he has made in reforming the law of judicial review. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Hendon more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Dr Matthew Offord more like this
star this property uin 77416 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2021-11-26more like thismore than 2021-11-26
unstar this property answer text <p>The Judicial Review and Courts Bill delivers on the Government’s manifesto commitment to ensure that judicial review is available to protect the rights of individuals against an overbearing state, while ensuring that it is not abused to conduct politics by another means or to create needless delays.</p><p> </p><p>The Bill creates new powers for the courts to modify quashing orders in Judicial Review proceedings and improves the flexibility of the courts to provide proportionate remedies, increasing the tools in their toolbox.</p><p> </p><p>Specifically, the power to suspend a quashing order allows the courts to give time for transitional arrangements to be made, or give Parliament the opportunity to pass legislation in response to a decision to quash.</p><p> </p><p>The Bill also allows for the retrospective effect of quashing orders to be removed or limited. This measure allows the court to protect third parties that have relied on decisions in the past, and whose legal position may be compromised if that decision is quashed retrospectively.</p><p> </p><p>Finally, the Bill removes <em>Cart</em> judicial reviews, by way of a narrow and carefully worded ouster clause. We want to remove <em>Cart </em>reviews because the situation is, in the Government’s firm view, a disproportionate use of resources in our justice system. Out of around 750 applications a year only 3.4% are successful, and these cases take up around 180 days of precious judicial resource a year.</p><p> </p><p>The Bill finished its Commons Committee stage on 23 November.</p>
star this property answering member constituency South Suffolk more like this
unstar this property answering member printed James Cartlidge more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2021-11-26T14:58:10.59Zmore like thismore than 2021-11-26T14:58:10.59Z
star this property answering member
4519
star this property label Biography information for James Cartlidge more like this
star this property tabling member
4006
unstar this property label Biography information for Dr Matthew Offord more like this
168350
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2014-12-05more like thismore than 2014-12-05
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Judicial Review remove filter
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to his contribution of 1 December 2014, Official Report, column 72, on the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill, what estimate he has made of the number of applications for judicial review which were granted on minor technicalities since 2010. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Hammersmith more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Andy Slaughter more like this
star this property uin 217565 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2015-02-10more like thismore than 2015-02-10
unstar this property answer text <p>The Government has not made an estimate of the number of applications for judicial review which are granted on procedural defects or minor technicalities. Judicial review applications are not recorded in an accessible and reliable electronic form, but rather in paper case files which would need to be manually searched and as such there is no central figure. However, those involved in judicial reviews, including government departments, local authorities and businesses, are fully aware of the ways in which the judicial review process can be misused.</p><p>One of the reforms we are taking forward in the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill (clause 84 of the print of the Bill currently awaiting Royal Assent) is to improve the way the courts deal with judicial reviews based on procedural defects. This is an important part of the Government’s programme to tackle public burdens, promote growth and stimulate economic recovery.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency North West Cambridgeshire more like this
unstar this property answering member printed Mr Shailesh Vara more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-02-10T17:40:55.533Zmore like thismore than 2015-02-10T17:40:55.533Z
star this property answering member
1496
star this property label Biography information for Shailesh Vara more like this
star this property tabling member
1516
unstar this property label Biography information for Andy Slaughter more like this