Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1315404
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-05-18more like thismore than 2021-05-18
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Administration of Justice: Government more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text What recent discussions he has had with Cabinet colleagues on plans to review the relationship between Government and the courts. more like this
tabling member constituency Motherwell and Wishaw remove filter
tabling member printed
Marion Fellows more like this
uin 900185 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-05-18more like thismore than 2021-05-18
answer text <p>Her Majesty last week announced that there will be a bill in this session. our aim in any measures we take forward following our recent consultation will not be to curtail the power of the courts, as the Government’s critics have suggested, but rather to enhance it, and to restore the proper balance between courts, parliament and the executive.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Croydon South remove filter
answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-05-18T14:57:23.253Zmore like thismore than 2021-05-18T14:57:23.253Z
answering member
4503
label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
tabling member
4440
label Biography information for Marion Fellows more like this
1176528
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-02-05more like thismore than 2020-02-05
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Asylum: Finance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether her Department plans to extend the contract with Sodexo for the provision of Aspen cards to asylum seekers. more like this
tabling member constituency Motherwell and Wishaw remove filter
tabling member printed
Marion Fellows more like this
uin 13048 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-04-06more like thismore than 2020-04-06
answer text <p>A new supplier will provide payment card services following transition from the current provider, Sodexo. Timelines are currently being finalised.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Croydon South remove filter
answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-04-06T16:30:00.31Zmore like thismore than 2020-04-06T16:30:00.31Z
answering member
4503
label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
tabling member
4440
label Biography information for Marion Fellows more like this
1196462
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-05-18more like thismore than 2020-05-18
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Asylum: Finance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what plans her Department has to extend its contract for ASPEN cards. more like this
tabling member constituency Motherwell and Wishaw remove filter
tabling member printed
Marion Fellows more like this
uin 48509 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-06-02more like thismore than 2020-06-02
answer text <p>The Home Office’s contract to provide financial support to asylum seekers through an Aspen Card has been extended until 27 February 2021.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Croydon South remove filter
answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-02T07:55:25.993Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-02T07:55:25.993Z
answering member
4503
label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
tabling member
4440
label Biography information for Marion Fellows more like this
1179587
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-02-21more like thismore than 2020-02-21
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Social Security and Child Support Tribunal more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many hearings of the (a) first tier and (b) upper tier Social Security and Child Support Tribunals were adjourned in each of the last five years, and for what reasons those hearings were adjourned. more like this
tabling member constituency Motherwell and Wishaw remove filter
tabling member printed
Marion Fellows more like this
uin 18859 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-02more like thismore than 2020-03-02
answer text <p>(1) (a) Data about adjournments for appeals to the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) (SSCS), are published annually, in June, at: www.gov.uk/government/collections/tribunals-statistics. The table below contains a breakdown of the reasons for adjournments.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><p><strong>Number and reasons</strong><strong><sup>1</sup></strong><strong> for adjournments in </strong><strong>First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) hearings</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2"><p> </p></td><td colspan="5"><p>Financial Years – April to March</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014_2015</p></td><td><p>2015_2016</p></td><td><p>2016_2017</p></td><td><p>2017_2018</p></td><td><p>2018_2019</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Adjournment reason/category</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1st Tier Not Ready to Proceed</p></td><td><p>291</p></td><td><p>165</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Adjourned, All Elements Adjourned</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Adjourned, Element(s) Outstanding</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>~</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Admin Not Ready to Proceed</p></td><td><p>1,119</p></td><td><p>629</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Appellant Not Ready to Proceed</p></td><td><p>5,507</p></td><td><p>3,760</p></td><td><p>63</p></td><td><p>46</p></td><td><p>31</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Appellant to attend - oral hearing requested - did not attend - no reason</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>316</p></td><td><p>1,041</p></td><td><p>1,276</p></td><td><p>1,785</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Appellant to attend - oral hearing requested - did not attend - reason given</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1,109</p></td><td><p>3,297</p></td><td><p>3,319</p></td><td><p>3,594</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Appellant to attend - paper requested or no Enquiry Form returned</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>487</p></td><td><p>1,828</p></td><td><p>2,307</p></td><td><p>2,638</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Documents supplied but not before the Tribunal at the hearing</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>107</p></td><td><p>301</p></td><td><p>332</p></td><td><p>335</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Evidence or further Response from Respondent required</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>1,124</p></td><td><p>2,999</p></td><td><p>3,509</p></td><td><p>3,451</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Evidence or submission from Appellant required</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>720</p></td><td><p>2,113</p></td><td><p>2,159</p></td><td><p>2,147</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Further medical evidence essential</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2,943</p></td><td><p>11,972</p></td><td><p>15,755</p></td><td><p>16,298</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Insufficient time to deal with case</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>384</p></td><td><p>1,320</p></td><td><p>1,324</p></td><td><p>1,217</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>No Interpreter</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>316</p></td><td><p>1,236</p></td><td><p>989</p></td><td><p>1,186</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other administrative errors</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>240</p></td><td><p>927</p></td><td><p>1,203</p></td><td><p>1,226</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other reasons for adjourning</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>1,674</p></td><td><p>5,974</p></td><td><p>7,933</p></td><td><p>7,976</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Part Allowed</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Presenting Officer to attend</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>84</p></td><td><p>212</p></td><td><p>183</p></td><td><p>128</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Respondent failed to comply with directions</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>46</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>51</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tribunal Not Ready to Proceed</p></td><td><p>20,468</p></td><td><p>14,161</p></td><td><p>563</p></td><td><p>426</p></td><td><p>278</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Adjournments as a % of hearings listed<sup>2</sup></p></td><td><p>17%</p></td><td><p>17%</p></td><td><p>17%</p></td><td><p>18%</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><sup>1 </sup>Prior to November 2015 there were four adjournment categories: First Tier Not Ready to Proceed; Admin Not Ready to Proceed; Appellant Not Ready to Proceed; and Tribunal Not Ready to Proceed. The additional categories as above were introduced from November 2015.</p><p>~ Equates to a value of fewer than five.</p><p><sup>2 </sup>Proportion of listed hearings for the totals are weighted averages.</p><p> </p><p>The data may differ slightly to that of the published statistics where reports were run on a different date.</p><p> </p><p>(1) (b) The data for the Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeal Chamber) which hears appeals against decisions made by SSCS are not held centrally, and could only be provided at disproportionate cost.</p><p> </p><p>(2) (a) and (b) these data are not held centrally.</p><p> </p><p>The decision to adjourn a hearing is a judicial function. The panel will only proceed when it is</p><p>satisfied it has all the evidence it needs to make a fair and just decision and that may</p><p>include further medical evidence.</p>
answering member constituency Croydon South remove filter
answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
grouped question UIN 18860 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-02T13:06:23.027Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-02T13:06:23.027Z
answering member
4503
label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
tabling member
4440
label Biography information for Marion Fellows more like this
1179588
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-02-21more like thismore than 2020-02-21
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Social Security and Child Support Tribunal more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many hearings of the (a) first tier and (b) upper tier Social Security and Child Support Tribunals were adjourned due to the appellant not receiving their appeal bundle in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member constituency Motherwell and Wishaw remove filter
tabling member printed
Marion Fellows more like this
uin 18860 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-02more like thismore than 2020-03-02
answer text <p>(1) (a) Data about adjournments for appeals to the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) (SSCS), are published annually, in June, at: www.gov.uk/government/collections/tribunals-statistics. The table below contains a breakdown of the reasons for adjournments.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><p><strong>Number and reasons</strong><strong><sup>1</sup></strong><strong> for adjournments in </strong><strong>First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) hearings</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2"><p> </p></td><td colspan="5"><p>Financial Years – April to March</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014_2015</p></td><td><p>2015_2016</p></td><td><p>2016_2017</p></td><td><p>2017_2018</p></td><td><p>2018_2019</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Adjournment reason/category</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1st Tier Not Ready to Proceed</p></td><td><p>291</p></td><td><p>165</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Adjourned, All Elements Adjourned</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Adjourned, Element(s) Outstanding</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>~</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Admin Not Ready to Proceed</p></td><td><p>1,119</p></td><td><p>629</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Appellant Not Ready to Proceed</p></td><td><p>5,507</p></td><td><p>3,760</p></td><td><p>63</p></td><td><p>46</p></td><td><p>31</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Appellant to attend - oral hearing requested - did not attend - no reason</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>316</p></td><td><p>1,041</p></td><td><p>1,276</p></td><td><p>1,785</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Appellant to attend - oral hearing requested - did not attend - reason given</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1,109</p></td><td><p>3,297</p></td><td><p>3,319</p></td><td><p>3,594</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Appellant to attend - paper requested or no Enquiry Form returned</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>487</p></td><td><p>1,828</p></td><td><p>2,307</p></td><td><p>2,638</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Documents supplied but not before the Tribunal at the hearing</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>107</p></td><td><p>301</p></td><td><p>332</p></td><td><p>335</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Evidence or further Response from Respondent required</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>1,124</p></td><td><p>2,999</p></td><td><p>3,509</p></td><td><p>3,451</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Evidence or submission from Appellant required</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>720</p></td><td><p>2,113</p></td><td><p>2,159</p></td><td><p>2,147</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Further medical evidence essential</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2,943</p></td><td><p>11,972</p></td><td><p>15,755</p></td><td><p>16,298</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Insufficient time to deal with case</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>384</p></td><td><p>1,320</p></td><td><p>1,324</p></td><td><p>1,217</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>No Interpreter</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>316</p></td><td><p>1,236</p></td><td><p>989</p></td><td><p>1,186</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other administrative errors</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>240</p></td><td><p>927</p></td><td><p>1,203</p></td><td><p>1,226</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other reasons for adjourning</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>1,674</p></td><td><p>5,974</p></td><td><p>7,933</p></td><td><p>7,976</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Part Allowed</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Presenting Officer to attend</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>84</p></td><td><p>212</p></td><td><p>183</p></td><td><p>128</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Respondent failed to comply with directions</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>46</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>51</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tribunal Not Ready to Proceed</p></td><td><p>20,468</p></td><td><p>14,161</p></td><td><p>563</p></td><td><p>426</p></td><td><p>278</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Adjournments as a % of hearings listed<sup>2</sup></p></td><td><p>17%</p></td><td><p>17%</p></td><td><p>17%</p></td><td><p>18%</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><sup>1 </sup>Prior to November 2015 there were four adjournment categories: First Tier Not Ready to Proceed; Admin Not Ready to Proceed; Appellant Not Ready to Proceed; and Tribunal Not Ready to Proceed. The additional categories as above were introduced from November 2015.</p><p>~ Equates to a value of fewer than five.</p><p><sup>2 </sup>Proportion of listed hearings for the totals are weighted averages.</p><p> </p><p>The data may differ slightly to that of the published statistics where reports were run on a different date.</p><p> </p><p>(1) (b) The data for the Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeal Chamber) which hears appeals against decisions made by SSCS are not held centrally, and could only be provided at disproportionate cost.</p><p> </p><p>(2) (a) and (b) these data are not held centrally.</p><p> </p><p>The decision to adjourn a hearing is a judicial function. The panel will only proceed when it is</p><p>satisfied it has all the evidence it needs to make a fair and just decision and that may</p><p>include further medical evidence.</p>
answering member constituency Croydon South remove filter
answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
grouped question UIN 18859 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-02T13:06:23.107Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-02T13:06:23.107Z
answering member
4503
label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
tabling member
4440
label Biography information for Marion Fellows more like this
1277589
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-01-18more like thismore than 2021-01-18
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Children: Maintenance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many cases regarding the Child Maintenance Service have been heard at the Social Security and Child Support Tribunal in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member constituency Motherwell and Wishaw remove filter
tabling member printed
Marion Fellows more like this
uin 139050 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-01-21more like thismore than 2021-01-21
answer text <p>Information about Child Maintenance Service appeals received into the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) (SSCS) is published at www.gov.uk/government/collections/tribunals-statistics.</p><p> </p><p>The latest period for which data are available is January to March 2020. The most recent tribunal statistics publications covering the period April to September 2020 do not include SSCS data due to issues identified as the Tribunal was being migrated to a new operational system. The data will be made available as soon as this is resolved and the data quality assured.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Croydon South remove filter
answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-01-21T17:57:57.667Zmore like thismore than 2021-01-21T17:57:57.667Z
answering member
4503
label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
tabling member
4440
label Biography information for Marion Fellows more like this