Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1174921
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2020-01-30more like thismore than 2020-01-30
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Crown Court more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many Crown court sitting days there were in each of the court circuits in England and Wales in (a) 2017, (b) 2018 and (c) 2019. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Bolton South East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Yasmin Qureshi more like this
star this property uin 10344 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction true more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2020-02-04more like thismore than 2020-02-04
star this property answer text <p>The number of days sat in the Crown Court for each of the court circuits in England and Wales in (a) 2017, (b) 2018 and (c) 2019 are set out in the attached spreadsheet.</p><p>Sitting days are based on the number of cases we expect the court to hear and, with fewer cases making it to the Crown Court, were reduced accordingly. The number of outstanding Crown Court cases has reduced by almost 40% since 2014.</p><p>We keep sitting days under constant review and in November allocated an extra 850 days to the Crown Court to ease immediate pressure on the court. We have allocated a minimum of 87,000 to inform listing decisions in the first half of 2020/21 which is an increase of 4,700 on last year’s allocation.</p><p><strong>Notes:</strong></p><ul><li><p>The attached HMCTS data covers the number of days in which a Crown Court room was sat by any number of judges.</p><p> </p></li><li><p>In some circumstances, judges will ‘share’ a courtroom to conduct judicial business; in most instances this will involve a returning judge for sentencing purposes only. These figures may therefore differ from the number of <em>judicial sitting days</em> at Crown Court as published in MoJ official statistics (which can, for example, also include days sat in chambers).</p></li></ul><p> </p><p>The information for 2019 covers January to March, as the National Statistics on judge sitting days for 2019 are due to be released in June 2020. Access to statistics before their publication is strictly controlled, with rules and principles on pre-release access set out in the Pre-release Access to Official Statistics Order 2008.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Croydon South more like this
star this property answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-02-04T15:53:29.303Zmore like thismore than 2020-02-04T15:53:29.303Z
star this property question first ministerially corrected
less than 2020-02-05T10:16:37.993Zmore like thismore than 2020-02-05T10:16:37.993Z
star this property answering member
4503
star this property label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
star this property attachment
1
star this property file name PQ10344.xlsx more like this
star this property title Table for 10344 more like this
star this property previous answer version
4799
star this property answering member constituency Croydon South remove filter
unstar this property answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
star this property answering member
4503
star this property label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
star this property tabling member
3924
unstar this property label Biography information for Yasmin Qureshi more like this
1327821
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2021-05-25more like thismore than 2021-05-25
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Family Courts: Disclosure of Information more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps his Department is taking to improve transparency in the Family Court process. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Harlow more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Robert Halfon more like this
star this property uin 7149 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction true more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2021-06-07more like thismore than 2021-06-07
star this property answer text <p>Ensuring that decisions made in family proceedings are open and transparent to the public is something to which this Government<del class="ministerial"> has</del> give<ins class="ministerial">s</ins><del class="ministerial">n</del> careful consideration. We recognise that there is a delicate balance to be struck between ensuring that family proceedings are open and transparent to ensure adequate public scrutiny and the principle of public justice, whilst also ensuring that <del class="ministerial">the</del> we protect the privacy of vulnerable children and families who are party to such proceedings.</p><p><ins class="ministerial">In terms of attendance at hearings, most family proceedings are held in private. However, ‘accredited media representatives’ have been permitted to attend most types of hearings in family proceedings for several years. In addition, a pilot scheme to allow duly authorised lawyers, attending for journalistic, research or public legal educational purposes (colloquially referred to as 'legal bloggers') access to those same types of hearings was initiated in October 2018. That pilot scheme is scheduled to end in December 2021, but it is intended that it should be replaced by permanent provision in court rules, before that end date.</ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial">In terms of disclosure of information from family proceedings, for example by reporting it in the press or online, there are various legal provisions which determine if and when it is possible to disclose such information. These include laws on reporting restrictions and contempt of court. Judges dealing with cases have discretion to allow publication of information from family proceedings. In addition, court rules include provision about when it is possible to make disclosures of information without this being a potential contempt of court.</ins></p><p><del class="ministerial">This Government has taken several steps to increase transparency in family proceedings where appropriate. This has included continuing to support a pilot which allows accredited representatives of media outlets to have access to proceedings. The pilot allows legal bloggers access to proceedings with permission of the presiding judge. It also allows the blogger to write about their experiences at court but requires that names and personal information are kept anonymous.</del></p><p><ins class="ministerial">The livestreaming of some Court of Appeal family proceedings is also now possible as a result of amendments made by the Court of Appeal (Recording and Broadcasting) (Amendment) Order 2020, which extended the existing livestreaming provision to cover family proceedings. Under this scheme, members of the public may view selected Court of Appeal family cases on the internet. Members of the judiciary select suitable cases for livestreaming, having taken into account the public interest. Proceedings involving litigants in person, and those with specific reporting restrictions, will not be selected. Participants in all selected hearings will be given the opportunity beforehand to object or to obtain further information.</ins></p><p><del class="ministerial">We have also allowed the livestreaming of Court of Appeal family proceedings. This became a permanent arrangement in June 2020 through the Live Streaming Court of Appeal SI 2020 and allows anyone to view a Court of Appeal family case on the internet (again, whilst protecting the anonymity of the parties involved).</del></p><p>Further recommendations for increasing transparency will be carefully considered to ensure that the children and families who use the family courts continue to be protected, whilst also ensuring adequate scrutiny is given to the family courts.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Croydon South more like this
star this property answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2021-06-07T16:18:44.23Zmore like thismore than 2021-06-07T16:18:44.23Z
star this property question first ministerially corrected
less than 2021-07-29T08:31:40.413Zmore like thismore than 2021-07-29T08:31:40.413Z
star this property answering member
4503
star this property label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
star this property previous answer version
4558
star this property answering member constituency Croydon South remove filter
unstar this property answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
star this property answering member
4503
star this property label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
star this property tabling member
3985
unstar this property label Biography information for Robert Halfon more like this