Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1182690
unstar this property answering dept short name House of Commons Commission more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>Excluding staff in the Parliamentary Digital Service, the nationalities represented among House of Commons staff are in the Table attached.</p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-03-10T18:28:05.113Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-10T18:28:05.113Z
star this property answering member
1440
unstar this property label Biography information for Pete Wishart more like this
star this property tabling member
4634
unstar this property label Biography information for Christine Jardine more like this
1277736
unstar this property answering dept short name House of Commons Commission more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>Levels of sickness absence are regularly reviewed and discussed weekly in the Covid operations group and in the weekly Trade Union meetings.</p><p>Sickness data is recorded for staff where they are unavailable to work due to illness. As the estate has seen different levels of required staff attendance over the last 12 months, comparison between periods is of limited use.</p><p>Absence rates have been reviewed against those from other areas of the public sector. Increases in absence can be identified in March 2020, December 2020 and January 2021.</p><p>The absence rates in the House have remained at comparable levels to previous years and below the wider public sector.</p><p /><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Description</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>APR</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>MAY</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>JUN</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>JUL</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>AUG</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>SEPT</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>OCT</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NOV</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>DEC</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average working days lost per employee</p></td><td><p>5.09</p></td><td><p>4.94</p></td><td><p>4.71</p></td><td><p>4.66</p></td><td><p>4.58</p></td><td><p>4.43</p></td><td><p>4.33</p></td><td><p>4.23</p></td><td><p>5.39</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>% long term sick</p></td><td><p>58.55%</p></td><td><p>59.24%</p></td><td><p>59.09%</p></td><td><p>61.33%</p></td><td><p>62.01%</p></td><td><p>62.10%</p></td><td><p>63.68%</p></td><td><p>66.06%</p></td><td><p>52.61%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p /><p>Please note the data is based on a rolling 12-month period, so the data for December 2020 is from 01/01/2020 to 31/12/2020.</p><p>The average working days lost per employee is the number of working days lost in the rolling 12-month period divided by the staff headcount.</p><p>The % long term sick is the percentage of sickness absences which were part of a period of absence of over 28 calendar days in the rolling 12-month period.</p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2021-01-26T18:39:32.447Zmore like thismore than 2021-01-26T18:39:32.447Z
star this property answering member
1440
unstar this property label Biography information for Pete Wishart more like this
star this property tabling member
3973
unstar this property label Biography information for Grahame Morris more like this
1278378
unstar this property answering dept short name House of Commons Commission more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>Public Health England has supported the House in responding to Covid-19 throughout the past 12 months. Its advice, in conjunction with the working safely guidance which is available to all workplaces, has been incorporated into the <em>Working safely on the Parliamentary estate during the coronavirus outbreak risk assessment</em>. This document has been updated to reflect any changes any in the situation, with the most recent published on 14 January. The assessment is available for anyone to view on the Parliamentary website:</p><p><a href="https://www.parliament.uk/contentassets/d23db9b1eb174243ae97bda14ca82613/hop-v4-hop-covid-risk-assessment--issued.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.parliament.uk/contentassets/d23db9b1eb174243ae97bda14ca82613/hop-v4-hop-covid-risk-assessment--issued.pdf</a></p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2021-01-26T17:42:39.123Zmore like thismore than 2021-01-26T17:42:39.123Z
star this property answering member
1440
unstar this property label Biography information for Pete Wishart more like this
star this property tabling member
4463
unstar this property label Biography information for Chris Stephens more like this
1278380
unstar this property answering dept short name House of Commons Commission more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>Public Health England has confirmed that the measures put in place to ensure the House remains Covid secure are appropriate to manage the risk of infection. As the risks are being managed, Public Health England has issued no advice around where suspension of work on the estate may be necessary.</p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2021-01-26T17:44:08.587Zmore like thismore than 2021-01-26T17:44:08.587Z
star this property answering member
1440
unstar this property label Biography information for Pete Wishart more like this
star this property tabling member
4463
unstar this property label Biography information for Chris Stephens more like this
1170507
unstar this property answering dept short name House of Commons Commission more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>The costs associated with striking Big Ben on Remembrance Sunday and New Year's Eve in 2019 were £14.2k including VAT <ins class="ministerial">in total.</ins> <del class="ministerial">on each occasion.</del></p><p>The striking of Big Ben on these occasions was coordinated around the planned works so as to minimise the impact on the project costs and to ensure it did not result in any delay. If the project team are required to strike the bell with less notice, the costs would substantially increase due to the unexpected impact on the project schedule.</p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-01-16T20:09:42.277Zmore like thismore than 2020-01-16T20:09:42.277Z
star this property answering member
103
unstar this property label Biography information for Sir Paul Beresford more like this
star this property tabling member
1444
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr Mark Francois more like this
1038476
unstar this property answering dept short name House of Commons Commission more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>There are currently no plans to add to the existing information currently displayed on the House of Commons Annunciator system whose capacity to carry more information is limited.</p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-01-31T11:28:56.403Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-31T11:28:56.403Z
star this property answering member
151
unstar this property label Biography information for Tom Brake more like this
star this property tabling member
1200
unstar this property label Biography information for Sir Greg Knight more like this
1041331
unstar this property answering dept short name House of Commons Commission more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>The House of Commons has a debt management process regarding the recovery of monies owed by all parties. In relation to Members’ catering accounts, all sums due are expected to be settled within six weeks. Statements are sent out monthly and undisputed amounts owed are charged ten days later to the Members nominated card. Any amounts outstanding after the settlement date are followed up by emails, letters and telephone calls.</p><p>As shown in table 1, a total sum of £440 currently outstanding against catering and banqueting accounts is related to Member expenditure. There are no amounts outstanding in relation to former Members.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>Amount outstanding relating to Members</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>Amount outstanding relating to former Members</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>FY 2018/19 Budget</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>£</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>% of budget</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>£</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>% of budget</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Banqueting</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td><td><p>£6,502,522</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Catering</p></td><td><p>£440</p></td><td><p>0.009%</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td><td><p>£4,668,756</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>£440</p></td><td><p>0.004%</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td><td><p>£11,171,278</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><br>Table 2 sets out the outstanding amounts owed to the House, broken into Member and non-member categories, where non-members consist of trade and internal customers.<strong> </strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>Outstanding – Trade and internal customers</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>Outstanding - Members</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>FY 2018/19 Budget</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>£</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>% of budget</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>£</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>% of budget</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Banqueting</p></td><td><p>£278,815</p></td><td><p>4.29%</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td><td><p>£6,502,522</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Catering</p></td><td><p>£7,233</p></td><td><p>0.15%</p></td><td><p>£440</p></td><td><p>0.009%</p></td><td><p>£4,668,756</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>£286,048</p></td><td><p>2.56%</p></td><td><p>£440</p></td><td><p>0.004%</p></td><td><p>£11,171,278</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-01-30T11:23:19.847Zmore like thisremove minimum value filter
star this property answering member
151
unstar this property label Biography information for Tom Brake more like this
star this property tabling member
252
unstar this property label Biography information for Dr David Drew more like this
1054999
unstar this property answering dept short name House of Commons Commission more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>The terms and conditions and rates of overtime pay for House of Commons security staff have not been altered.</p><p>Approximately 55% of security staff in the Parliamentary Security Department, are former employees of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) and transferred to the House Service on 1 April 2016. Their MPS terms and conditions are honoured under the Transfer of Undertaking (Protection of Employment) Regulations (TUPE). New recruits are employed on House of Commons terms and conditions which differ in a number of ways including the rates of overtime paid. The overall value of these terms is broadly equivalent to the MPS TUPE terms.</p><p>In late 2016, an error was identified in the contracts for a small number of staff employed on House of Commons terms which resulted in overtime being paid at an incorrect rate. Affected staff were informed of the error and given a notice period for a variation to their contracts during which they were paid at the higher rate. Any overtime paid during the relevant period (between date of appointment and date of variation to contract) was paid at the higher rate and not recovered. This issue was also heard at an Employment Tribunal which ruled in favour of the House.</p><p>The unions have asked us to consider changes to overtime rates for those staff on House of Commons contracts which we will consider as part of pay negotiations for 2019/20.</p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-02-12T12:19:10.037Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-12T12:19:10.037Z
star this property answering member
151
unstar this property label Biography information for Tom Brake more like this
star this property tabling member
252
unstar this property label Biography information for Dr David Drew more like this
1123431
unstar this property answering dept short name House of Commons Commission more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>No Huawei equipment is used in the parliamentary telecoms, communications, security or surveillance networks.</p><p>The only use of Huawei kit is for mobile cellular enhancement. Firstly, this is in devices (commonly referenced as MiFi devices) that are used to boost access to the parliamentary mobile phone provider’s network (O2) where signal strength is problematic. The MiFi devices do not connect to the Parliamentary network and should be viewed as extensions to the O2 mobile phone network. This equipment is branded O2 rather than Huawei.</p><p>Secondly, there already is, and there will be some additional, Huawei equipment installed by the four Mobile Network Operators to provide cellular signal enhancement in Parliament.</p><p>Huawei components are used by all the major mobile telephony networks in the UK. Parliament has no evidence on which to base a recommendation either in favour of or against the use of Huawei kit on such networks. The risk of mobile phone telecommunications networks use of Huawei kit is managed at a national level by the National Cyber Security Centre, Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure and the private sector, and Parliament takes its lead from the national stance on the risks present from its use.</p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-07T10:34:40.983Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-07T10:34:40.983Z
star this property answering member
151
unstar this property label Biography information for Tom Brake more like this
star this property tabling member
4673
unstar this property label Biography information for Jo Platt more like this
1126139
unstar this property answering dept short name House of Commons Commission more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>Management information from Parliament’s waste contractor demonstrates that between April 2018 to April 2019, Parliament generated 235,595 kgs of food waste. This represents a 12% reduction from 2017/18 when 266,749 kgs of food waste was generated. Food waste from prepared dishes in Commons catering outlets is approximately 3% against sales, well below the national industry average (5%).</p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-21T17:58:33.203Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-21T17:58:33.203Z
star this property answering member
151
unstar this property label Biography information for Tom Brake more like this
star this property tabling member
308
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr Jim Cunningham more like this