 |
answer text |
<p>It is the long-standing policy of the UK Government that any judgment as to whether
genocide has occurred is a matter for a competent court. The US has a different process
that is not linked to a court decision. The UK's approach, shared by many countries
around the world, does not prevent us from taking action to address serious human
rights violations, as we have done in the case of Xinjiang.</p><p>On 22 March, the
Foreign Secretary announced that the UK had imposed, under the Global Human Rights
sanctions regime, asset freezes and travel bans against four Chinese government officials,
as well as the Public Security Bureau of the Xinjiang Production and Construction
Corps. These measures were taken alongside the US, Canada and the EU, sending a clear
message to the Chinese Government that the international community will not turn a
blind eye to such serious and systematic violations of basic human rights.</p><p>The
UK has also led international efforts to holding China to account at the United Nations.
On 22 June, a global UK diplomatic effort helped deliver the support of over 40 countries
for a statement on Xinjiang at the UN Human Rights Council calling on China to grant
unfettered access to the region for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. We
also led the first joint statements on this issue at the UN Human Rights Council in
June 2020 and the UN General Assembly Third Committee in October 2019. The growing
caucus of international concern reflects UK diplomatic leadership.</p>
|
|
