Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1672031
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2023-11-21more like thismore than 2023-11-21
star this property answering body
Restoration and Renewal Client Board more like this
star this property answering dept id 213 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Restoration and Renewal Client Board more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Restoration and Renewal Client Board more like this
star this property hansard heading Palace of Westminster: Repairs and Maintenance remove filter
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask the Senior Deputy Speaker, following the professional and technical advice received by both Houses that a partial decant is both more risky and expensive than a full decant, why a partial decant is still being considered as an option for Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Earl Attlee more like this
star this property uin HL458 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer remove filter
star this property answer text <p>In July 2023 the Restoration and Renewal (R&amp;R) Client Board endorsed the R&amp;R Programme Board’s recommended shortlist of R&amp;R delivery options. This included a “full decant” option where both Houses move out of the Palace at the same time (with the Commons prioritised for earlier return) and an option whereby the House of Commons would maintain a “continued presence” in varying locations in the Palace during the works and the House of Lords would move out of the Palace. The Client Board has also requested that a fallback option of enhanced maintenance and improvement forms part of further detailed design work on these options to inform a decision on the preferred way forward in due course, currently expected in 2025.</p><p>The Client Board considered it important that more than one option should be subject to further detailed design work and analysis in order to meet the spirit of the new mandate for R&amp;R agreed by both Houses last year and to reflect that members of both Houses have differing views about how the programme can best be delivered.</p>
star this property answering member printed Lord Gardiner of Kimble remove filter
star this property question first answered
less than 2023-11-29T17:55:12.747Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-29T17:55:12.747Z
star this property answering member
4161
star this property label Biography information for Lord Gardiner of Kimble more like this
star this property tabling member
3425
unstar this property label Biography information for Earl Attlee more like this