Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member printed question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

1123736

	registered interest
	date	29/04/2019
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Legal Aid Scheme: Housing
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of legal aid fees for housing cases not being increased for 20 years on the number of solicitors' firms providing advice and representation; for what reason they has been no increase in such fees; whether they intend to increase those fees; and if not, why not.
	tabling member printed	Lord Beecham
	uin	HL15374
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/05/2019 answer text <p>In February 2019 the Post Implementation Review (PIR) of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) was published. This included an evidence based assessment of the impact of changes to civil fees made as part of The Legal Aid Reform Programme.</p><p> </p><p>The PIR found that for the vast majority of England and Wales there is sufficient coverage of legal provision. This is regularly monitored by the LAA and action is taken where gaps in services are identified or where demand is greater than the available supply.</p><p> </p><p>It is also worth noting that wherever you are in England and Wales, legal advice for housing remains available through the telephone gateway.</p> answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie question first answered 14/05/2019 15:41:17 answering member 4538 label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie
	tabling member	4181 label Biography information for Lord Beecham

1123738

	registered interest
	date	29/04/2019
	answering body	Home Office
	answering dept id	1
	answering dept short name	Home Office
	answering dept sort name	Home Office
	hansard heading	Thames House: Pedestrian Areas
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Williams of Trafford on 11 April (HL1894), on what advice from the Security Service they concluded that there were national security grounds on which they refuse to answer questions about pedestrian access on Horseferry Road.
	tabling member printed	Lord Blencathra
	uin	HL15376
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/05/2019 answer text <p>The government regularly consults with the Security Service about the disclosure of information that relates to the Security Service. The longstanding policy of not commenting on matters relating to the intelligence agencies has been agreed to be appropriate in this case because the changes to the pedestrian access have been made for reasons of building security.</p><p>We cannot comment further on these reasons other than to say that the Security Service has taken all appropriate and reasonable steps to ensure the safety of pedestrians and any potential liability for negligence would be the same as with any public organisation. The Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament provides the means for the scrutiny of the policies, expenditure, administration and operations of the intelligence agencies on behalf of Parliament.</p> answering member printed Baroness Williams of Trafford question first answered 14/05/2019 15:38:17 answering member 4311 label Biography information for Baroness Williams of Trafford
	tabling member	497 label Biography information for Lord Blencathra

1123744

	registered interest
	date	29/04/2019
	answering body	Home Office
	answering dept id	1
	answering dept short name	Home Office
	answering dept sort name	Home Office
	hansard heading	Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what are their priorities for the European Migration Fund; and what is the size of the fund in the present financial year.
	tabling member printed	Lord Dubs
	uin	HL15382
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/05/2019 answer text <p>The EU Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF), to which this question presumably relates, is operated in the UK by the AMIF UK Responsible Authority. The total value of the fund to the UK is currently €538.2m.</p><p>AMIF operates on a funding year different to the financial year, the AMIF year runs 16 October to 15 October, furthermore funding is allocated for the full 7-year programme.</p><p>In agreeing the AMIF UK National Programme with the European Commission, the UK proposed an even spending plan across the programme, and the funds can be utilised flexibly across the programme, so the spending plan is only a rough guide.</p><p>There is not a set amount allocated for the current financial year. To date the UK has utilised €372m, this figure includes both expenditure and funding committed by grant agreement. In addition, the Responsible Authority is currently undertaking an open call for proposals for integration related activities for a value of up to £50m.</p><p> </p> answering member printed Baroness Williams of Trafford question first answered 14/05/2019 15:39:59 answering member 4311 label Biography information for Baroness Williams of Trafford
	tabling member	805 label Biography information for Lord Dubs

1123745

	registered interest
	date	29/04/2019
	answering body	Home Office
	answering dept id	1
	answering dept short name	Home Office
	answering dept sort name	Home Office
	hansard heading	Refugees: Syria
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to continue the Vulnerable Persons Refugee Scheme after 2020.
	tabling member printed	Lord Dubs
	uin	HL15383
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/05/2019 answer text <p>We are making positive progress in our work with key stakeholders and international organisations on our future Asylum and Resettlement Strategy. This includes consideration of the UK’s resettlement offer beyond 2020.</p> answering member printed Baroness Williams of Trafford question first answered 14/05/2019 15:40:15 answering member 4311 label Biography information for Baroness Williams of Trafford
	tabling member	805 label Biography information for Lord Dubs

1123746

	registered interest
	date	29/04/2019
	answering body	Department of Health and Social Care
	answering dept id	17
	answering dept short name	Health and Social Care
	answering dept sort name	Health and Social Care
	hansard heading	Antibiotics: Drug Resistance
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the effectiveness of their 2013–18 antimicrobial resistance strategy at addressing the problem of multi-resistant E. coli-like bacteria; what assessment they have made of recent trends in the number of multi-resistant E. coli-like bacteria in the UK; and what factors inform their view of the balance between efforts to reduce transmission and efforts to reduce the use of antibiotics.
	tabling member printed	Baroness Gardner of Parkes
	uin	HL15384
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/05/2019 answer text <p>While we can count many successes from our 2013-18 Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) Strategy, resistance has continued to increase. In the United Kingdom we have seen a 35% increase in resistant blood stream infections in humans from 2013-17.</p><p>The number of bloodstream infections (BSIs) is increasing each year. Although the proportion of antibiotic resistant BSIs remain stable year to year, the burden on resistance increases. This is mostly due to increasing prevalence of E.coli bloodstream infections.</p><p>Estimates of the multi-resistant cases can be made, however not all the bacteria are tested against the same antibiotics, so a definitive number of cases cannot be given. The Public Health England Fingertips tool also has an indicator showing the rolling quarterly average proportion of E. coli blood specimens non-susceptible to at least three of the key antimicrobials (gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, piperacillin/tazobactam, 3rd-generation cephalosporins or carbapenems). For England this is 5.5% with little fluctuation over time.</p><p>This is exactly why the UK’s five-year national action plan for AMR, published alongside the UK 20-year vision for AMR on 24 January 2019, includes a strengthened focus on infection prevention and control, renewing our commitment to halve levels of healthcare associated Gram-negative blood stream infections (mostly E.coli) by 2023-24. The plan also sets a world-first target to reduce the actual numbers of resistant infections, with the aim to reduce them by 10% by 2025.</p><p>We are working with the devolved health administrations to develop consistent methodologies for reporting the incidence and mortality of key antibiotic resistant infections and antimicrobial use to allow us to report progress on the ambitions of the AMR national action plan.</p><p>As reductions in inappropriate prescribing also reduces the risk of promoting the growth of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, interventions to reduce antibiotic prescribing or transmission of the bacteria are complementary.</p><p> </p> answering member printed Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford question first answered 14/05/2019 16:29:42 answering member 4019 label Biography information for Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford
	tabling member	3596 label Biography information for Baroness Gardner of Parkes

1123766

	registered interest
	date	29/04/2019
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	hansard heading	Community Infrastructure Levy
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government which local authorities in England make use of the Community Infrastructure Levy; and what is the latest annual revenue for each local authority from that charge.
	tabling member printed	Lord Marlesford
	uin	HL15404
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/05/2019 answer text <p>There are currently 161 Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) charging authorities in England. Of these, 151 charging authorities were obliged to report on revenues for 2017-18. (Ten authorities started charging CIL during the reporting year and will report their first CIL data in 2018/19).</p><p>The 151 authorities reporting in 2017/18 comprised of 148 Local Authorities 1 National Park,1 Mayoral Development Corporation in London (London Legacy Development Corporation) and the Mayor of London (MCIL) which is accounted for separately</p><p>The MCIL revenue broken down by borough is published on the Mayor of London website <a href="https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/mcil_annual_receipt_update_2012-2018.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/mcil_annual_receipt_update_2012-2018.pdf</a></p><p> </p><p>The revenue for each charging authority is listed below</p><p><strong>The latest reported data for CIL Charging Authorities</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>CIL Charging Authorities</p></td><td><p><strong>2017-18</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Babergh</p></td><td><p>£514,446.85</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barnet</p></td><td><p>£11,215,000.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Basingstoke &amp; Deane</p></td><td><p>First revenue will be reported in 2018/19</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bassetlaw</p></td><td><p>£734,775.37</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bath &amp; North-East Somerset</p></td><td><p>£5,080,557.07</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bedford</p></td><td><p>£3,203,351.91</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Birmingham</p></td><td><p>£2,207,929.60</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bournemouth BC</p></td><td><p>£992,707.37</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bracknell Forest</p></td><td><p>£4,366,101.09</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bradford</p></td><td><p>£0.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Brent</p></td><td><p>£28,890,719.27</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bristol</p></td><td><p>£3,736,616.37</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Broadland</p></td><td><p>£1,778,525.41</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cannock Chase</p></td><td><p>£211,434.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Chelmsford</p></td><td><p>£4,796,444.11</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cheltenham</p></td><td><p>First revenue will be reported in 2018/19</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cheshire East</p></td><td><p>First revenue will be reported in 2018/19</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cheshire West &amp; Chester</p></td><td><p>£0.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Chesterfield</p></td><td><p>£718,070.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Chichester DC</p></td><td><p>£2,852,376.37</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Chorley</p></td><td><p>£1,810,580.84</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Christchurch</p></td><td><p>£130,626.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>City of London</p></td><td><p>£5,109,817.89</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cornwall</p></td><td><p>First revenue will be reported in 2018/19</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Crawley</p></td><td><p>£80,605.40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Croydon</p></td><td><p>£10,389,000.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dacorum</p></td><td><p>£1,020,632.72</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dartford</p></td><td><p>£915,999.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Daventry DC</p></td><td><p>£989,653.96</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dudley</p></td><td><p>£78,936.09</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>East Cambridgeshire</p></td><td><p>£2,718,931.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>East Devon</p></td><td><p>£396,086.35</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>East Dorset</p></td><td><p>£114,135.67</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>East Hampshire</p></td><td><p>£999,755.01</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Eastbourne BC</p></td><td><p>£57,807.65</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Elmbridge</p></td><td><p>£5,963,000.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Enfield</p></td><td><p>£502,861.61</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Epsom &amp; Ewell</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Exeter</p></td><td><p>£6,510,742.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Fareham</p></td><td><p>£1,764,562.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gateshead</p></td><td><p>£34,009.23</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gedling</p></td><td><p>£417,212.34</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gloucester City</p></td><td><p>First revenue will be reported in 2018/19</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gosport BC</p></td><td><p>£85,054.03</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hambleton DC</p></td><td><p>£838,404.32</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hammersmith &amp; Fulham</p></td><td><p>£2,707,031.27</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Haringey</p></td><td><p>£1,887,688.21</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Harrow</p></td><td><p>£4,685,689.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Havant</p></td><td><p>£1,517,620.13</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hertsmere</p></td><td><p>£1,913,203.51</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hillingdon</p></td><td><p>£3,636,863.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Horsham</p></td><td><p>£28,822.51</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hull (Kingston-Upon-Hull)</p></td><td><p>£0.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Huntingdonshire</p></td><td><p>£6,173,921.25</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Islington</p></td><td><p>£8,247,191.50</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kings Lynn &amp; West Norfolk</p></td><td><p>£116,052.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kingston-Upon-Thames, LB</p></td><td><p>£504,983.04</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lambeth</p></td><td><p>£2,786,078.10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LB Barking and Dagenham</p></td><td><p>£829,421.19</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LB Bexley</p></td><td><p>£1,918,210.06</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LB Camden</p></td><td><p>£1,130,005.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LB Greenwich</p></td><td><p>£2,756,431.28</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LB Hackney</p></td><td><p>£9,885,003.57</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LB Hounslow</p></td><td><p>£3,847,417.73</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LB Kensington &amp; Chelsea</p></td><td><p>£4,948,148.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LB Southwark</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LB Tower Hamlets</p></td><td><p>£13,991,577.67</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Leeds</p></td><td><p>£4,151,410.86</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lewes</p></td><td><p>£2,667,782.93</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lewisham</p></td><td><p>£3,359,091.04</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lichfield</p></td><td><p>£286,797.04</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lincoln City</p></td><td><p>£0.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London Legacy Development Corporation</p></td><td><p>£2,805,206.62</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Maidstone</p></td><td><p>First revenue will be reported in 2018/19</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Malvern Hills</p></td><td><p>£522,456.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Merton</p></td><td><p>£2,613,369.66</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mid Suffolk</p></td><td><p>£767,976.72</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mole Valley</p></td><td><p>£456,465.21</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>New Forest DC</p></td><td><p>£1,084,989.09</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Newark &amp; Sherwood</p></td><td><p>£543,708.74</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Newcastle</p></td><td><p>£3,204,857.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Newham</p></td><td><p>£7,225,689.17</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>North Kestevan</p></td><td><p>£0.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>North Somerset</p></td><td><p>£0.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>North Tyneside</p></td><td><p>First revenue will be reported in 2018/19</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Northampton</p></td><td><p>£0.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Norwich</p></td><td><p>£793,805.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oxford</p></td><td><p>£4,995,586.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Peterborough City Council</p></td><td><p>£496,541.93</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Plymouth</p></td><td><p>£1,347,113.86</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Poole</p></td><td><p>£3,583,593.38</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Portsmouth</p></td><td><p>£2,040,791.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Preston</p></td><td><p>£4,671,592.50</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Purbeck</p></td><td><p>£383,100.82</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Reading BC</p></td><td><p>£4,452,136.82</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Redbridge</p></td><td><p>£490,656.47</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Reigate &amp; Banstead</p></td><td><p>£965,418.45</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Richmond-Upon-Thames</p></td><td><p>£2,392,107.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rother</p></td><td><p>£406,111.36</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rotherham</p></td><td><p>£0.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rutland County Council DC</p></td><td><p>£265,730.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ryedale DC</p></td><td><p>£57,176.66</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sandwell</p></td><td><p>£224,433.20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sedgemoor BC</p></td><td><p>£470,567.34</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Selby</p></td><td><p>£478,243.31</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sevenoaks</p></td><td><p>£3,064,576.85</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sheffield</p></td><td><p>£3,634,677.16</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Shepway ( Folkestone and Hythe)</p></td><td><p>£25,689.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Shropshire</p></td><td><p>£8,159,345.15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Solihull</p></td><td><p>£872,794.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Downs NP</p></td><td><p>£197,481.49</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Gloucestershire</p></td><td><p>£2,051,165.87</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Lakeland</p></td><td><p>£160,805.60</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Norfolk</p></td><td><p>£1,691,906.60</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Northamptonshire</p></td><td><p>£366,112.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Oxfordshire</p></td><td><p>£2,190,161.72</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Ribble</p></td><td><p>553,388.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Somerset</p></td><td><p>£0.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Southampton</p></td><td><p>£4,659,899.27</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Southend-On-Sea Borough Council</p></td><td><p>£300,390.86</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Spelthorne BC</p></td><td><p>£1,155,129.31</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Stratford-On-Avon</p></td><td><p>£0.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Stroud</p></td><td><p>£26,608.47</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Suffolk Coastal</p></td><td><p>£2,263,573.95</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Surrey Heath</p></td><td><p>£4,999,872.77</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sutton</p></td><td><p>£1,736,709.92</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Swindon</p></td><td><p>£735,431.08</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tamworth</p></td><td><p>First revenue will be reported in 2018/19</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tandridge</p></td><td><p>£1,092,244.45</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Taunton Deane</p></td><td><p>£1,020,799.29</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Teignbridge</p></td><td><p>£2,105,061.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Test Valley</p></td><td><p>£405,863.44</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tewkesbury</p></td><td><p>First revenue will be reported in 2018/19</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Three Rivers BC</p></td><td><p>£1,623,639.07</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Torbay</p></td><td><p>£180.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Trafford</p></td><td><p>£1,067,425.22</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Vale of White Horse</p></td><td><p>£70,014.12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wakefield</p></td><td><p>£1,277,009.58</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Waltham Forest</p></td><td><p>£6,706,177.45</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wandsworth</p></td><td><p>£24,919,139.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Warwick</p></td><td><p>£0.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Watford BC</p></td><td><p>£762,986.63</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Waveney</p></td><td><p>£669,315.87</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Waverley</p></td><td><p>First revenue will be reported in 2018/19</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wealden</p></td><td><p>£4,798,864.04</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>West Berkshire BC</p></td><td><p>£1,678,294.15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>West Dorset</p></td><td><p>£246,320.40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>West Lancashire</p></td><td><p>£2,257,038.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>West Lindsay</p></td><td><p>£0.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Westminster</p></td><td><p>£14,998,766.32</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Weymouth &amp; Portland</p></td><td><p>£127,050.08</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wiltshire County Council</p></td><td><p>£3,779,931.65</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Winchester</p></td><td><p>£2,833,034.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Windsor &amp; Maidenhead</p></td><td><p>£823,912.20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Woking BC</p></td><td><p>£1,280,088.10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wokingham</p></td><td><p>£11,231,644.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Worcester City</p></td><td><p>£0.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Worthing</p></td><td><p>£267,274.53</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wychavon</p></td><td><p>£745,854.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wycombe</p></td><td><p>£4,513,827.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total CIL</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>£348,100,791.43</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>MCIL</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>£108,994,589.00</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>To note:</p><p>1. this information has been gathered by MHCLG from council websites, for monitoring purposes and so the data has not been subject to the full quality assurance required for Government statistics.</p><p>2. Where there is no figure for CIL revenue in the table, authorities have yet to report their 2017-18 CIL revenue.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth question first answered 14/05/2019 15:34:22 answering member 4282 label Biography information for Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth
	tabling member	1854 label Biography information for Lord Marlesford

1123767

	registered interest
	date	29/04/2019
	answering body	Home Office
	answering dept id	1
	answering dept short name	Home Office
	answering dept sort name	Home Office
	hansard heading	Home Office: Staff
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government whether any Home Office staff have been convicted of criminal offences since 9 April 2018; and if so, in each case, what was the (1) nature of the offence, (2) date of conviction, and (3) sentence received.
	tabling member printed	Lord Marlesford
	uin	HL15405
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/05/2019 answer text <p>Since 9 April 2018 three Home Office staff have been convicted of criminal offences. All were subject to appropriate disciplinary procedures and were dismissed by the point of conviction. The following table shows the breakdown of convictions and dates:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Nature of offence</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Date of conviction</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Sentence received</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Assisting unlawful immigration</p></td><td><p>09/04/2018</p></td><td><p>11 years</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Smuggling of drugs/firearms</p></td><td><p>16/11/2018</p></td><td><p>23 years</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bribery</p></td><td><p>11/04/2019</p></td><td><p>3 years and 9 months</p></td></tr></tbody></table> answering member printed Baroness Williams of Trafford question first answered 14/05/2019 15:41:55 answering member 4311 label Biography information for Baroness Williams of Trafford
	tabling member	1854 label Biography information for Lord Marlesford

1123768

	registered interest
	date	29/04/2019
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Judge Advocate General
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government how many Judge Advocates sit in civilian courts; and how many are licensed to try (1) murder, and (2) rape cases.
	tabling member printed	Lord Morris of Aberavon
	uin	HL15406
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/05/2019 answer text <p>All six currently serving Judge Advocates are eligible to sit in the Crown Court and do so regularly. The Judge Advocate General is a Senior Circuit Judge and the Vice-Judge Advocate General and one Assistant-Judge Advocate General also hold appointments as Recorders. The other three Assistant-Judge Advocate Generals are entitled to sit under the Armed Forces Act 2011 s26.</p><p> </p><p>The Judge Advocate General is ticketed to try murder cases in the Crown Court. The Judge Advocate General, the Vice-Judge Advocate General and one Assistant-Judge Advocate General are ticketed to try rape cases.</p><p> </p><p>Judge Advocates attend the same training as a Circuit Judge sitting in the Crown Court.</p> answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie question first answered 14/05/2019 16:35:16 answering member 4538 label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie
	tabling member	565 label Biography information for Lord Morris of Aberavon

1123769

	registered interest
	date	29/04/2019
	answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
	answering dept id	29
	answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
	answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
	hansard heading	Eastman Kodak: Pensions Protection Fund
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government who is responsible for oversight of matters regarding the Pensions Protection Fund (PPF) and Kodak; and whether they plan to commission an independent review of the handling of Kodak by the PPF and the Pensions Regulator and the advice received by both.
	tabling member printed	Lord Myners
	uin	HL15407
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/05/2019 answer text <p>The Pension Protection Fund is a statutory public corporation led by its Board and accountable to Parliament through the Secretary of State for the Department for Work and Pensions.</p><p> </p><p>The original decision in the Kodak case, which provided savers with the potential to receive benefits above Pension Protection Fund levels, was finely balanced and carefully assessed with the benefit of the due diligence carried out for the trustees. Regulated Apportionment Arrangements, a restructuring mechanism which allows a financially troubled employer to detach itself from its liabilities in respect of a defined benefit scheme, are rare and The Pensions Regulator will only agree to them if stringent criteria are met, with entry into the Pension Protection Fund the expected outcome, and the Pension Protection Fund must not object to the Regulated Apportionment Arrangements. The Pensions Regulator published a section 89 regulatory intervention report in November 2014 describing in detail the considerations leading to the decision in this case.</p><p> </p><p>As a condition of approving the successor Kodak pension scheme in 2014, a memorandum of understanding was put in place giving The Pensions Regulator the power to closely monitor the progress of the scheme and if necessary trigger its wind up. This has allowed The Pensions Regulator, with the Pension Protection Fund, to remain actively involved in discussions about the scheme’s future. Due to underperformance of the underlying business it was concluded that the scheme would be unable to meet its long term funding requirements. Action has therefore been taken to bring the scheme into a Pension Protection Fund assessment period which commenced on the 25 March 2019.</p><p> </p><p>Specialist firms with extensive Pension Protection Fund experience have been brought in to manage the administration of the pension scheme and to oversee its efficient passage through the assessment process.</p><p> </p><p>Whilst the Kodak case is a significant claim, the Pension Protection Fund remains in a robust financial position. In its last reported accounts, the Pension Protection Fund had a £6.7 billion reserve and is currently on track to reach its funding objective. There has been no immediate impact on the Pension Protection Fund Levy arising from this case. The Pension Protection Fund aims to collect £500m in levy in 2019/20 which is £50m lower than it aimed to collect in 2018/19.</p><p> </p><p>The Pensions Regulator aims to learn from every major pensions restructuring case and has refined its approach to complex pension restructurings in light of the lessons learned in the Kodak case and successive cases. A letter was sent on the 17<sup>th</sup> October 2018 from Lesley Titcomb, the then Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of The Pensions Regulator, addressed to the Chair of the Work and Pensions Select Committee, Rt Hon Frank Field MP, summarising the lessons learnt in the Kodak case.</p> answering member printed Baroness Buscombe question first answered 14/05/2019 15:29:45 answering member 3349 label Biography information for Baroness Buscombe
	tabling member	3869 label Biography information for Lord Myners

1123772

	registered interest
	date	29/04/2019
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	hansard heading	Buildings: Climate Change
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their assessment of the announcement made on 22 April by the New York City Mayor that he intends to ban glass clad skyscrapers because of their contribution to global warming; and whether they consider it to have any implications for future construction of high rise buildings in the UK.
	tabling member printed	Lord Patten
	uin	HL15410
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/05/2019 answer text <p>The Building Regulations set minimum energy performance standards for new homes and non-domestic buildings. They are deliberately couched in performance terms and do not prescribe the technologies, materials or fuels to be used, allowing builders the flexibility to innovate and select the most practical and cost effective solutions in particular circumstances. We plan to consult in the coming months on improving energy efficiency requirements in new and existing buildings where the evidence suggests it is cost effective, affordable, practical and safe to do so.</p> answering member printed Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth question first answered 14/05/2019 15:30:17 answering member 4282 label Biography information for Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth
	tabling member	1137 label Biography information for Lord Patten