Show Search Form

Search Results

human indexable	true false
published	true false
registered interest	true false
answer date	exactly: or between: and
date	exactly: or between: and
date tabled	exactly: or between: and
ddp created	exactly: or between: and
answering body
question status
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
ddp modified
hansard heading
house id
identifier
legislature
parliament number
question first answered
question text
session
session number
tabling member printed
title
type
uin
version
written parliamentary question type
answer
creator	label
publisher
tabling member	label

Search

1134690

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	09/07/2019
	date	25/06/2019
	date tabled	25/06/2019
	ddp created	25/06/2019 20:40:58
	answering body	Foreign and Commonwealth Office
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	16
	answering dept short name	Foreign and Commonwealth Office
	answering dept sort name	Foreign and Commonwealth Office
	ddp modified	25/06/2019 20:46:04 09/07/2019 12:54:04
	hansard heading	Jamal Khashoggi
	house id	2
	identifier	HL16657
	legislature	25277
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	09/07/2019 12:22:15
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the findings in the report of the UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions Investigation into the unlawful death of Mr. Jamal Khashoggi, published on 19 June, that (1) Jamal Khashoggi was the victim of a premeditated extrajudicial execution, for which the State of Saudi Arabia is responsible, (2) there is "credible evidence, warranting further investigation of high-level Saudi officials’ individual liability, including that of the Crown Prince's", (3) the Human Rights Council, the Security Council or the UN Secretary-General should conduct an international follow-up criminal investigation for the purpose of determining individual liability and identifying options towards judicial accountability, and (4) there have been few effective international responses, whether legal, political or diplomatic, to date.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member printed	The Marquess of Lothian
	title	House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 HL16657
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	HL16657
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer
	creator	259 label Biography information for The Marquess of Lothian
	publisher	25277
	tabling member	259 label Biography information for The Marquess of Lothian

1134707

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	09/07/2019
	date	25/06/2019
	date tabled	25/06/2019
	ddp created	25/06/2019 20:41:23
	answering body	Foreign and Commonwealth Office
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	16
	answering dept short name	Foreign and Commonwealth Office
	answering dept sort name	Foreign and Commonwealth Office
	ddp modified	25/06/2019 20:46:47 09/07/2019 12:50:01
	hansard heading	Bahrain: Freedom of Expression
	house id	2
	identifier	HL16674
	legislature	25277
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	09/07/2019 12:18:56
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon on 24 June (HL16330), what further representations they will make to the government of Bahrain about protecting freedom of expression for all Bahrainis in line with its international obligations; and what specific representations they have made to that government after it threatened Bahrainis with legal action if they follow anti-government social media accounts.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member printed	Lord Scriven
	title	House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 HL16674
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	HL16674
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer
	creator	4333 label Biography information for Lord Scriven
	publisher	25277
	tabling member	4333 label Biography information for Lord Scriven

1134719

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	09/07/2019
	date	25/06/2019
	date tabled	25/06/2019
	ddp created	25/06/2019 20:41:41
	answering body	Foreign and Commonwealth Office
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	16
	answering dept short name	Foreign and Commonwealth Office
	answering dept sort name	Foreign and Commonwealth Office
	ddp modified	25/06/2019 20:47:13 09/07/2019 12:56:02
	hansard heading	Russia: Warships
	house id	2
	identifier	HL16686
	legislature	25277
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	09/07/2019 12:24:06
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon on 20 June (HL16343), what assessment they have made of the case for reviewing (1) the Agreement Between the Government of The United States of America and the Government of The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Prevention of Incidents On and Over the High Seas (INCSEA), and (2) the Agreement Between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics concerning the Prevention of Incidents at Sea beyond the Territorial Sea, following the recent close naval encounter and near collision of United States and Russian ships in the East China Sea.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member printed	Lord West of Spithead
	title	House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 HL16686
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	HL16686
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer
	creator	3834 label Biography information for Lord West of Spithead
	publisher	25277
	tabling member	3834 label Biography information for Lord West of Spithead