Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1128446
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-06-04more like thismore than 2019-06-04
star this property date less than 2019-05-23more like thismore than 2019-05-23
star this property date tabled less than 2019-05-23more like thismore than 2019-05-23
star this property ddp created less than 2019-05-24T09:05:27.777Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-24T09:05:27.777Z
star this property answering body
Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 90 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-05-24T12:25:09.338Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-24T12:25:09.338Z
less than 2019-06-05T10:07:01.800Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-05T10:07:01.800Z
star this property hansard heading Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority: Buildings more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 257645 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-05T09:35:36.71Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-05T09:35:36.71Z
star this property question text To ask the hon. Member for Broxbourne, representing the Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, pursuant to the Answer of 20 May 2019 to Question 253493 on Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority: Location, how many staff are located in the new premises at 85 Strand; how much floor space those staff occupy; at what rate per square metre; which locations were considered outside London for new premises; and what the comparable cost would have been in locating those staff outside London. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Warley more like this
star this property tabling member printed
John Spellar more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 257645 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 257645 more like this
star this property version 2 remove filter
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property answer text <p>I have asked IPSA to reply.</p><p>IPSA currently has 69 members of staff. It included in its office requirements space for up to 76 staff in order to provide flexibility for periods where there is a higher volume of work and therefore a need for additional temporary staff, such as General Election periods.</p><p>To disclose the size of the office or rate paid per square metre would be prejudicial to commercial interests. IPSA’s annual accounts are laid in Parliament and published each year, and will provide information about operational costs.</p><p>Before choosing its offices at 85 Strand, IPSA considered potential premises in Croydon and Milton Keynes, as well as Stratford and Canary Wharf in London, but determined that the selected location provided the prospect of better support to MPs and better value for money for the taxpayer.</p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-05T09:35:36.71Zmore like thisremove minimum value filter
star this property creator
318
star this property label Biography information for John Spellar more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
318
unstar this property label Biography information for John Spellar more like this
1132886
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-06-20more like thismore than 2019-06-20
star this property date less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
star this property date tabled less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
star this property ddp created less than 2019-06-18T18:28:35.373Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-18T18:28:35.373Z
star this property answering body
Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 90 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-06-19T16:45:08.015Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-19T16:45:08.015Z
less than 2019-06-25T15:28:03.658Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-25T15:28:03.658Z
star this property hansard heading Members: Internet more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 266190 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-25T14:56:09.553Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-25T14:56:09.553Z
star this property question text To ask the hon. Member for Broxbourne, representing the Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, what estimate his Department has made on the potential cost incurred by MPs' offices in answering web-based inquiries generated by (a) 38 Degrees and (b) other websites in the last 12 months. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Southampton, Itchen more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Royston Smith more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 266190 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 266190 more like this
star this property version 2 remove filter
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property answer text <p>I have asked IPSA to provide this reply.</p><p>IPSA is the statutory body responsible for regulating and paying the salaries, business costs and expenses of MPs. This includes regulating and paying the salaries of staff members who work for MPs.</p><p> </p><p>Each MP is allocated a budget from which their staffing costs are paid. The current staffing budget for MPs in London constituencies is £166,930; and for non-London MPs, the budget is £155,930.</p><p> </p><p>In the 2018-19 financial year, MPs spent £91.1 million on staffing costs, including employment costs and other staffing services.</p><p> </p><p>IPSA does not hold information on the cost attributable to staff members carrying out specific activities such as responding to web-based inquiries generated by 38 Degrees or other websites.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-25T14:56:09.553Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-25T14:56:09.553Z
star this property creator
4478
star this property label Biography information for Royston Smith more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4478
unstar this property label Biography information for Royston Smith more like this
1131079
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-06-12more like thismore than 2019-06-12
star this property date less than 2019-06-10more like thismore than 2019-06-10
star this property date tabled less than 2019-06-10more like thismore than 2019-06-10
star this property ddp created less than 2019-06-10T22:03:00.083Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-10T22:03:00.083Z
star this property answering body
Church Commissioners more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 9 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Church Commissioners more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Church Commissioners more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-06-11T14:55:05.887Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-11T14:55:05.887Z
less than 2019-06-13T15:41:01.564Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-13T15:41:01.564Z
star this property hansard heading Church of England: Scotland more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 262403 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-13T15:10:01.327Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-13T15:10:01.327Z
star this property question text To ask the right hon. Member for Meriden, representing the Church Commissioners, what estimate the Church of England has made of the profits from its operations in Scotland in the last 12 months for which information is available. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Edinburgh North and Leith more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Deidre Brock more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 262403 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 262403 more like this
star this property version 2 remove filter
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property answer text <p>The Church Commissioners recieved a total net income of £8,858,429 from forestry and windfarms between 1st January 2018 to the 31st December 2018.</p><p>We are unable to provide a figure for profit in the equivalent period as liabilities, including for restocking, will be borne over a number of years and the cost of purchasing the asset should be taken into consideration.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-13T15:10:01.327Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-13T15:10:01.327Z
star this property creator
4417
star this property label Biography information for Deidre Brock more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4417
unstar this property label Biography information for Deidre Brock more like this
1131249
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-06-13more like thismore than 2019-06-13
star this property date less than 2019-06-11more like thismore than 2019-06-11
star this property date tabled less than 2019-06-11more like thismore than 2019-06-11
star this property ddp created less than 2019-06-11T17:57:03.857Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-11T17:57:03.857Z
star this property answering body
Church Commissioners more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 9 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Church Commissioners more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Church Commissioners more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-06-12T14:15:12.810Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T14:15:12.810Z
less than 2019-06-13T14:26:04.551Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-13T14:26:04.551Z
star this property hansard heading Churches: Coal more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 263116 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-13T13:54:40.053Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-13T13:54:40.053Z
star this property question text To ask the right hon. Member for Meriden, representing the Church Commissioners, what assessment she made of the economic effect on churches and vicarages of the ban on house coal. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Shipley more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Philip Davies more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 263116 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 263116 more like this
star this property version 2 remove filter
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property answer text <p>The economic effect on churches and vicarages of the ban on the use of house coal has been negligible.</p><p> </p><p>Bishops’ see houses and vicarages have not used house coal for many years and the Church Commissioners are not aware of any churches that still use coal as a form of heating.</p><p>The Church of England supports the aim of the Government to improve air quality and public health; the Church has launched several initiatives to support this policy, which include planting more trees on its properties and encouraging churches to increase the biodiversity of their churchyards and green spaces.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-13T13:54:40.053Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-13T13:54:40.053Z
star this property creator
1565
star this property label Biography information for Philip Davies more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
1565
unstar this property label Biography information for Philip Davies more like this
1129073
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-06-05more like thismore than 2019-06-05
star this property date less than 2019-06-03more like thismore than 2019-06-03
star this property date tabled less than 2019-06-03more like thismore than 2019-06-03
star this property ddp created less than 2019-06-03T16:34:56.290Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-03T16:34:56.290Z
star this property answering body
Attorney General more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 88 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-06-04T15:55:17.557Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-04T15:55:17.557Z
less than 2019-06-12T15:44:01.481Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T15:44:01.481Z
star this property hansard heading Sexual Offences: Disclosure of Information more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 259168 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-12T15:12:37.927Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T15:12:37.927Z
star this property question text To ask the Attorney General, whether the Sub-Group to the Criminal Justice Board and Review of the Criminal Justice Response to Rape and Serious Sexual Offences plans to make an assessment of the (a) effectiveness and (b) effect on survivors of rape of the legal guidance issued by the CPS on rape and sexual offence in relation to disclosure of medical records and counselling notes. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Brighton, Pavilion more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Caroline Lucas more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 259168 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 259168 more like this
star this property version 2 remove filter
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property answer text <p>The Crown Prosecution Service is working with the police, government departments and third sector stakeholders on the Government’s review into how the criminal justice system responds to rape and serious sexual offences. The Crown Prosecution Service is committed to working with all involved in the Review, including stakeholders, to identify and address any issues that are identified.</p><p>Complainants are entitled to protection from unnecessary and unjustified invasion of their private lives. CPS guidance is clear that where it is a reasonable line of enquiry in the investigation, the police should obtain complainants’ informed consent to gain access to medical records and counselling notes. Prosecutors will robustly apply the relevant statutory provisions when deciding whether such material should be disclosed to the defence.</p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-12T15:12:37.927Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T15:12:37.927Z
star this property creator
3930
star this property label Biography information for Caroline Lucas more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
3930
unstar this property label Biography information for Caroline Lucas more like this
1129271
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-06-06more like thismore than 2019-06-06
star this property date less than 2019-06-03more like thismore than 2019-06-03
star this property date tabled less than 2019-06-03more like thismore than 2019-06-03
star this property ddp created less than 2019-06-03T16:43:46.497Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-03T16:43:46.497Z
star this property answering body
Attorney General more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 88 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-06-05T14:45:10.572Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-05T14:45:10.572Z
less than 2019-06-06T11:49:02.145Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-06T11:49:02.145Z
star this property hansard heading Rape: Mental Health Services more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 259357 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-06T11:17:26.04Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-06T11:17:26.04Z
star this property question text To ask the Attorney General, if the Government will review the CPS guidance given to victims of rape on seeking therapy. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Ealing Central and Acton more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Dr Rupa Huq more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 259357 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 259357 more like this
star this property version 2 remove filter
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property answer text <p>It is vital that victims are confident they will be treated with the utmost fairness by the justice system. CPS committed, as part of the cross-Government Victims Strategy, to launch new guidance on pre-trial therapy to reduce the perception amongst victims, therapists and criminal justice professionals that it will damage the prosecution case. This is due to be published this summer. Additionally, a new toolkit for prosecutors on the support that an individual suffering from a mental health condition will require was launched in August 2018.</p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-06T11:17:26.04Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-06T11:17:26.04Z
star this property creator
4511
star this property label Biography information for Dr Rupa Huq more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4511
unstar this property label Biography information for Dr Rupa Huq more like this
1130703
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-06-11more like thismore than 2019-06-11
star this property date less than 2019-06-07more like thismore than 2019-06-07
star this property date tabled less than 2019-06-07more like thismore than 2019-06-07
star this property ddp created less than 2019-06-07T14:10:56.067Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-07T14:10:56.067Z
star this property answering body
Attorney General more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 88 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-06-10T15:15:16.771Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-10T15:15:16.771Z
less than 2019-06-17T15:41:01.986Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-17T15:41:01.986Z
star this property hansard heading Rape: Prosecutions more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 261500 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-17T15:09:46.827Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-17T15:09:46.827Z
star this property question text To ask the Attorney General, (a) how many and (b) what proportion of cases of rape reported to the CPS were administratively finalised in each year since 2010. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Ashfield more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Gloria De Piero more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 261500 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 261500 more like this
star this property version 2 remove filter
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property answer text <p>It is important to stress that ’administrative finalisation’ is not a prosecutorial decision. It is an administrative process where cases are closed on CPS’ electronic case management system. It does not necessarily mean the proceedings are at an end. Such cases may be reopened, if at a later date, new material is provided to the prosecution enabling a charging decision to be made.</p><p> </p><p>Proceedings are administratively finalised when:</p><p> </p><ul><li>The police seek early investigative advice from the CPS and did not resubmit the case to the CPS for a charging decision. In these instances, the case enters the CPS records but was never actually referred for a charging decision.</li></ul><p> </p><ul><li>The police do refer a case to the police but there is insufficient evidence to bring a charge, sothe CPS ask the police to complete an action plan in order to improve the evidence. If the police are unable to respond to the action plan or decide not to pursue the matter, then the case will be ‘administratively finalised’ on the CPS system because the police cannot bring forward a case with sufficient evidence to charge.</li></ul><p>There was a 9% reduction in referrals from the police between 2016/17 and 2017/18. During this period, the percentage of cases resulting in no further action remained largely unchanged. There was, however, a significant increase in both the volume and percentage of cases administratively finalised. This is largely because of internal CPS administrative processes, reminding users to ‘administratively finalise’ cases where the police had requested early advice but had not resubmitted.</p><p>This coincided with an increase in the number of cases where the police have not responded to early investigative advice or an action plan has resulted in a rise in the number of administrative finalisations.</p><p>The table below shows the outcome of all referrals from the police for a pre charge decision, and show both the volume and the rates of these outcomes</p><p>TABLE KEY:</p><p> </p><ul><li>Decision to charge: Prosecutors must be satisfied there is enough evidence to provide a &quot;realistic prospect of conviction&quot; against each defendant and that the prosecution is in the public interest.</li></ul><p> </p><ul><li>Take no further action: This is a prosecutorial decision based on an assessment that there is insufficient evidence to provide a “realistic prospect of conviction” or that a prosecution is not in the public interest. The case may be reopened if the police provide further evidence or the victim successfully appeals the decision under the victims right to review;</li></ul><p> </p><ul><li>Out of Court Disposal: Out of court disposals include a caution, conditional caution or the recommendation that the offence is taken into consideration with other charges;</li></ul><p> </p><ul><li>Other: the result of the charging decision is not known or has not been given for that suspect.</li></ul><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Volumes &amp; Rates as %</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Charge</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>No Further Action</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Out of Court Disposal</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Admin Finalised</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Other</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2010-2011</strong></p></td><td><p>3,387 (42%)</p></td><td><p>4,339 (53%)</p></td><td><p>65 (1%)</p></td><td><p>321 (4%)</p></td><td><p>18 (0%)</p></td><td><p>8,130</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2011-2012</strong></p></td><td><p>3,213 (47%)</p></td><td><p>3,281 (48%)</p></td><td><p>42 (1%)</p></td><td><p>275 (4%)</p></td><td><p>11 (0%)</p></td><td><p>6,822</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2012-2013</strong></p></td><td><p>2,889 (53%)</p></td><td><p>2,195 (41%)</p></td><td><p>34 (1%)</p></td><td><p>281 (5%)</p></td><td><p>5 (0%)</p></td><td><p>5,404</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2013-2014</strong></p></td><td><p>3,621 (62%)</p></td><td><p>1,857 (32%)</p></td><td><p>23 (0%)</p></td><td><p>341 (6%)</p></td><td><p>8 (0%)</p></td><td><p>5,850</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2014-2015</strong></p></td><td><p>3,648 (59%)</p></td><td><p>1,997 (32%)</p></td><td><p>29 (0%)</p></td><td><p>484 (8%)</p></td><td><p>1 (0%)</p></td><td><p>6,159</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015-2016</strong></p></td><td><p>3,910 (57%)</p></td><td><p>2,271 (33%)</p></td><td><p>24 (0%)</p></td><td><p>645 (9%)</p></td><td><p>5 (0%)</p></td><td><p>6,855</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016-2017</strong></p></td><td><p>3,671 (56%)</p></td><td><p>2,145 (32%)</p></td><td><p>30 (0%)</p></td><td><p>761 (12%)</p></td><td><p>4 (0%)</p></td><td><p>6,611</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017-2018</strong></p></td><td><p>2,822 (47%</p></td><td><p>1,851 (31%)</p></td><td><p>26 (0%)</p></td><td><p>1,307 (22%)</p></td><td><p>6 (0%)</p></td><td><p>6,012</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data Source: CPS Case Management Information System</p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-17T15:09:46.827Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-17T15:09:46.827Z
star this property creator
3915
star this property label Biography information for Gloria De Piero more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
3915
unstar this property label Biography information for Gloria De Piero more like this
1132159
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-06-17more like thismore than 2019-06-17
star this property date less than 2019-06-13more like thismore than 2019-06-13
star this property date tabled less than 2019-06-13more like thismore than 2019-06-13
star this property ddp created less than 2019-06-13T17:17:22.453Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-13T17:17:22.453Z
star this property answering body
Attorney General more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 88 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-06-18T14:55:05.503Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-18T14:55:05.503Z
less than 2019-06-20T14:33:01.865Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-20T14:33:01.865Z
star this property hansard heading Randox Testing Services more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 264437 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-20T14:01:35.983Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-20T14:01:35.983Z
star this property question text To ask the Attorney General, what recent estimate his Department has made of the number of cases of forensic manipulation at Randox that resulted in a conviction being overturned; and in how many of those cases had a custodial sentence already been served. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Sheffield, Heeley more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Louise Haigh more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 264437 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 264437 more like this
star this property version 2 remove filter
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property answer text <p>There is an ongoing investigation into data manipulation at Randox Testing Services. The Crown Prosecution Service will continue to support this process to ensure that fairness and transparency in the system is maintained.</p><p> </p><p>The Crown Prosecution Service can only comment on cases that it is responsible for prosecuting. For the cases which it prosecutes, the Crown Prosecution Service does not maintain a central record of the number of cases of forensic manipulation at Randox that resulted in a conviction being overturned or a record of how many of those cases involved a custodial sentence. Such information could only be obtained through a manual search of records which would incur disproportionate cost.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-20T14:01:35.983Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-20T14:01:35.983Z
star this property creator
4473
star this property label Biography information for Louise Haigh more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4473
unstar this property label Biography information for Louise Haigh more like this
1132830
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-06-20more like thismore than 2019-06-20
star this property date less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
star this property date tabled less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
star this property ddp created less than 2019-06-18T18:26:21.500Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-18T18:26:21.500Z
star this property answering body
Attorney General more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 88 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-06-19T13:55:06.983Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-19T13:55:06.983Z
less than 2019-06-26T10:56:05.204Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-26T10:56:05.204Z
star this property hansard heading Prosecutions: South Yorkshire more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 266094 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-26T10:24:58.863Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-26T10:24:58.863Z
star this property question text To ask the Attorney General, what the average number of days taken from the date of offence to a decision to charge an individual in South Yorkshire in each year since 2010 was. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 266094 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 266094 more like this
star this property version 2 remove filter
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property answer text <p>The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) works closely with the Police to ensure that cases are thoroughly investigated before charges are brought. There has been an increase in the complexity of cases investigated by the police, with investigations often involving large amounts of electronic material (social media, emails, text messages, video and photographs) which needs to be reviewed by prosecutors before a charging decision can be made. This impacts on the average number of consultations and length of time taken for prosecutors to reach a charging decision.</p><p> </p><p>The CPS does not maintain a record of the average number of days taken from offence through to a decision to charge. However, data is held on the average number of days from submission of a case by the police to the CPS to the date of the CPS decision to charge.</p><p> </p><p>Data relating to to all cases in South Yorkshire, summary only cases in South Yorkshire, and indictable only cases in South Yorkshire is shown in Annex A.</p><p> </p><p>The data in Annex A relating to summary only cases provides figures for only a minority of summary only cases. This is because the CPS is only responsible for charging a small minority of summary only matters, with the majority charged by the police. In 2017-18 the police charged 75% of all summary only matters with only 25% charged by CPS, while for indicatable only offences the CPS charged 95% of these cases.</p><p> </p><p>There are a number of reasons for the steady increase in the average number of days and average number of consultations per case since 2010/11. Police are now more regularly encouraged to seek ‘early investigative advice’ to help determine what evidence is required for a charge. Early investigative advice helps to ensure that cases are thoroughly investigated and the evidence to be brought before the court is strong. As a result, the CPS is more often involved at an earlier stage in proceedings which impacts on the average number of consultations and overall timeliness.</p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-26T10:24:58.863Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-26T10:24:58.863Z
star this property creator
400
star this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
400
unstar this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
1132831
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-06-20more like thismore than 2019-06-20
star this property date less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
star this property date tabled less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
star this property ddp created less than 2019-06-18T18:26:24.577Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-18T18:26:24.577Z
star this property answering body
Attorney General more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 88 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-06-19T13:55:10.376Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-19T13:55:10.376Z
less than 2019-06-26T10:56:03.733Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-26T10:56:03.733Z
star this property hansard heading Prosecutions: South Yorkshire more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 266095 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-26T10:24:58.927Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-26T10:24:58.927Z
star this property question text To ask the Attorney General, what the average number of days taken from the date of an offence to a decision to charge and individual for summary offences in South Yorkshire in each year since 2010 was. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 266095 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 266095 more like this
star this property version 2 remove filter
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property answer text <p>The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) works closely with the Police to ensure that cases are thoroughly investigated before charges are brought. There has been an increase in the complexity of cases investigated by the police, with investigations often involving large amounts of electronic material (social media, emails, text messages, video and photographs) which needs to be reviewed by prosecutors before a charging decision can be made. This impacts on the average number of consultations and length of time taken for prosecutors to reach a charging decision.</p><p> </p><p>The CPS does not maintain a record of the average number of days taken from offence through to a decision to charge. However, data is held on the average number of days from submission of a case by the police to the CPS to the date of the CPS decision to charge.</p><p> </p><p>Data relating to to all cases in South Yorkshire, summary only cases in South Yorkshire, and indictable only cases in South Yorkshire is shown in Annex A.</p><p> </p><p>The data in Annex A relating to summary only cases provides figures for only a minority of summary only cases. This is because the CPS is only responsible for charging a small minority of summary only matters, with the majority charged by the police. In 2017-18 the police charged 75% of all summary only matters with only 25% charged by CPS, while for indicatable only offences the CPS charged 95% of these cases.</p><p> </p><p>There are a number of reasons for the steady increase in the average number of days and average number of consultations per case since 2010/11. Police are now more regularly encouraged to seek ‘early investigative advice’ to help determine what evidence is required for a charge. Early investigative advice helps to ensure that cases are thoroughly investigated and the evidence to be brought before the court is strong. As a result, the CPS is more often involved at an earlier stage in proceedings which impacts on the average number of consultations and overall timeliness.</p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-26T10:24:58.927Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-26T10:24:58.927Z
star this property creator
400
star this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
400
unstar this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this