Show Search Form

Search Results

human indexable	true false
published	true false
registered interest	true false
answer date	exactly: or between: and
date	exactly: or between: and
date tabled	exactly: or between: and
ddp created	exactly: or between: and
answering body
question status
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
ddp modified
hansard heading
house id
identifier
legislature
parliament number
question first answered
question text
session
session number
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
title
type
uin
version
written parliamentary question type
answer	is ministerial correction true false answer text question first answered
creator	label
publisher
tabling member	label

Search

1038908

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	24/01/2019
	date	10/01/2019
	date tabled	10/01/2019
	ddp created	10/01/2019 19:59:26
	answering body	Leader of the House of Lords
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	92
	answering dept short name
	answering dept sort name	Leader of the House of Lords
	ddp modified	10/01/2019 20:05:32 21/01/2019 17:55:02
	hansard heading	Brexit: Parliamentary Scrutiny
	house id	2
	identifier	HL12745
	legislature	25277
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	21/01/2019 17:24:00
	question text	To ask the Leader of the House whether she intends to invite the House of Lords to sit on Fridays until 29 March in order to allow time for proper scrutiny of pre-Brexit legislation.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member printed	Lord Jones of Cheltenham
	title	House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 HL12745
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	HL12745
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>The next scheduled Friday sitting is for 1 February, as advertised in Forthcoming Business. Further sittings will be advertised in due course. There are currently no plans to consider Government business on Fridays, but as is always the case the sittings of the House are subject to the progress of business.</p> question first answered 21/01/2019 17:24:00
	creator	248 label Biography information for Lord Jones of Cheltenham
	publisher	25277
	tabling member	248 label Biography information for Lord Jones of Cheltenham

1045479

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	24/01/2019
	date	21/01/2019
	date tabled	21/01/2019
	ddp created	21/01/2019 22:39:40
	answering body	Attorney General
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	88
	answering dept short name	Attorney General
	answering dept sort name	Attorney General
	ddp modified	21/01/2019 22:45:44 24/01/2019 09:58:01
	hansard heading	Bhanu Choudhrie and Sudhir Choudhrie
	house id	1
	identifier	210433
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	24/01/2019 09:26:50
	question text	To ask the Attorney General, what representations the Serious Fraud Office has received on (a) Sudhir Choudhrie, (b) Bhanu Choudrie and (c) other related parties.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Luton North
	tabling member printed	Kelvin Hopkins
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 210433
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	210433
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	NamedDay
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) is aware of the allegations made publicly about Sudhir and Bhanu Choudhrie. The SFO can neither confirm nor deny if Sudhir or Bhanu Choudhrie are currently subject to investigation by the SFO, or what, if any, representations the SFO has received about them.</p><p> </p><p>In order to protect the investigative process it is not always possible, or even desirable for investigative bodies to confirm whether or not an individual or organisation is subject to an investigation, or provide any details of matters under investigation.</p><p> </p><p>The SFO proactively publishes information about its cases on its website whenever it is appropriate.</p> question first answered 24/01/2019 09:26:50
	creator	2 label Biography information for Kelvin Hopkins
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	2 label Biography information for Kelvin Hopkins

1045980

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	24/01/2019
	date	22/01/2019
	date tabled	22/01/2019
	ddp created	22/01/2019 19:58:45
	answering body	Attorney General
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	88
	answering dept short name	Attorney General
	answering dept sort name	Attorney General
	ddp modified	22/01/2019 20:17:29 30/01/2019 18:11:16
	hansard heading	Attorney General: Cleaning Services
	house id	1
	identifier	211107
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	30/01/2019 17:39:34
	question text	To ask the Attorney General, which service providers are contracted to carry out third party cleaning contracts for his (a) Department and (b) executive agencies; if he will list all of the services delivered by third party contractors to his (i) Department and (ii) executive agencies; and how many people working for those third party contractors are paid less than the Living Wage as defined by the Living Wage Foundation.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Birkenhead
	tabling member printed	Frank Field
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 211107
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	211107
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>The Attorney General’s Office (AGO) does not hold third party cleaning contracts. Cleaning services for the AGO are provided by Ministry of Justice contractors and the buildings’ landlords. The Attorney General’s Office holds no information on rates of pay for third party contractors. Specific rates of pay are a matter for each individual contractor.</p><p>The Government Legal Department (GLD) contracts with two service providers for the provision of its cleaning services; Mitie Cleaning Services for its offices at One Kemble Street (London) and Sussex Cleaning Services for Southern House (Croydon). GLD requires its contracted cleaning providers to pay the London living wage to all of their staff. HMCPSI staff located within One Kemble Street are covered by the same cleaning provision.</p><p>The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) does not hold third party cleaning contracts. The majority of buildings on the CPS estate are managed and maintained by the Ministry of Justice. Cleaning services are either provided by Ministry of Justice contractors or the buildings’ landlords. The CPS holds no information on rates of pay for third party contractors. Specific rates of pay are a matter for each individual contractor.</p><p>The Serious Fraud Office’s (SFO) cleaning services are contracted out to Julius Rutherford &amp; Co Ltd who pay the London Living Wage to all of the staff providing cleaning services to the SFO.</p><p>A list of all services delivered by third party contractors to the Department is not held in a centralised location, the information requested could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.</p> question first answered 30/01/2019 17:39:34
	creator	478 label Biography information for Lord Field of Birkenhead
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	478 label Biography information for Lord Field of Birkenhead

1045566

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	24/01/2019
	date	21/01/2019
	date tabled	21/01/2019
	ddp created	21/01/2019 22:43:15
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	ddp modified	21/01/2019 22:55:29 24/01/2019 17:07:03
	hansard heading	Housing: Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty
	house id	1
	identifier	210512
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	24/01/2019 16:35:10
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what planning restrictions for house building there are in areas of outstanding natural beauty.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Central Suffolk and North Ipswich
	tabling member printed	Dr Dan Poulter
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 210512
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	210512
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	NamedDay
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>The National Planning Policy Framework makes clear the importance the Government attaches to Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty. <br> <br> The Framework says that great weight should be given to conserving and enhancing landscape and scenic beauty in these areas, which have the highest status of protection. <br> <br> It makes clear that the scale and extent of any development – including housing - in these areas should be limited. Local authorities are expected to refuse planning permission for major development there, other than in exceptional circumstances and where the development would be in the public interest.</p> question first answered 24/01/2019 16:35:10
	creator	3932 label Biography information for Dr Dan Poulter
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	3932 label Biography information for Dr Dan Poulter

1045567

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	24/01/2019
	date	21/01/2019
	date tabled	21/01/2019
	ddp created	21/01/2019 22:43:17
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	ddp modified	21/01/2019 22:55:31 24/01/2019 17:07:06
	hansard heading	Housing: Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty
	house id	1
	identifier	210513
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	24/01/2019 16:35:10
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what development restrictions there are in areas of outstanding natural beauty.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Central Suffolk and North Ipswich
	tabling member printed	Dr Dan Poulter
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 210513
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	210513
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	NamedDay
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>The National Planning Policy Framework makes clear the importance the Government attaches to Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty. <br> <br> The Framework says that great weight should be given to conserving and enhancing landscape and scenic beauty in these areas, which have the highest status of protection. <br> <br> It makes clear that the scale and extent of any development – including housing - in these areas should be limited. Local authorities are expected to refuse planning permission for major development there, other than in exceptional circumstances and where the development would be in the public interest.</p> question first answered 24/01/2019 16:35:10
	creator	3932 label Biography information for Dr Dan Poulter
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	3932 label Biography information for Dr Dan Poulter

1045734

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	24/01/2019
	date	21/01/2019
	date tabled	21/01/2019
	ddp created	21/01/2019 22:51:15
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	ddp modified	21/01/2019 23:01:30 24/01/2019 17:09:06
	hansard heading	High Rise Flats: Insulation
	house id	1
	identifier	210545
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	24/01/2019 16:37:21
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant to his Answer of 2 July 2018 to Question 158171, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of the response of Abacus Land 4 Ltd to tenants of Heysmoor Heights, Liverpool who have been charged in relation to replacement of cladding following the Grenfell Tower disaster; and if will he make a statement.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Liverpool, Riverside
	tabling member printed	Dame Louise Ellman
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 210545
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	210545
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	NamedDay
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>We understand that leaseholders in Heysmoor Heights have been protected from a substantial proportion of the overall remediation costs due to a warranty claim being accepted. However, we continue to set our strong expectation that leaseholders should be protected from all remediation costs. We have written to, and continue to engage with, individual building owners to reiterate this expectation.</p> question first answered 24/01/2019 16:37:21
	creator	484 label Biography information for Dame Louise Ellman
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	484 label Biography information for Dame Louise Ellman

1045502

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	24/01/2019
	date	21/01/2019
	date tabled	21/01/2019
	ddp created	21/01/2019 22:40:39
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	ddp modified	22/01/2019 19:55:06 24/01/2019 17:22:06
	hansard heading	Females: Antisemitism
	house id	1
	identifier	210562
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	24/01/2019 16:50:27
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps the Government is taking to tackle antisemitism against women.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Dewsbury
	tabling member printed	Paula Sherriff
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 210562
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	210562
	version	3
	written parliamentary question type	NamedDay
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>The Government was pleased to support the Sara Conference in November 2018. The conference focused specifically on the intersectionality between antisemitism and sexism, looking particularly at the experience of Jewish women in public life. The conference brought together an excellent cross-section of policy makers, academics, and other experts, and set the agenda for what key organisations in this regard, such as the Antisemitism Policy Trust, will do going forward. The Government will continue to work closely with the Antisemitism Policy Trust, to understand this specific threat and to support their work.</p> question first answered 24/01/2019 16:50:27
	creator	4426 label Biography information for Paula Sherriff
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4426 label Biography information for Paula Sherriff

1045503

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	24/01/2019
	date	21/01/2019
	date tabled	21/01/2019
	ddp created	21/01/2019 22:40:42
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	ddp modified	22/01/2019 19:55:10 24/01/2019 17:16:03
	hansard heading	Females: Judaism
	house id	1
	identifier	210563
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	24/01/2019 16:44:58
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, with reference to the Sara conference of 26 November 2018, what plans his Department has to encourage more Jewish women to participate in public life.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Dewsbury
	tabling member printed	Paula Sherriff
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 210563
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	210563
	version	3
	written parliamentary question type	NamedDay
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>The Government was pleased to support the Sara Conference in November 2018. It was an important platform for policy-makers, public figures, and experts to discuss the intersectionality between antisemitism and sexism, and an important start to understanding how antisemitic abuse targeted at women can be tackled. The conference set the future direction for organisations dedicated to this issue, such as the Antisemitism Policy Trust. We will continue to work closely with the Antisemitism Policy Trust as they develop this important work and encourage women to enter public life.</p> question first answered 24/01/2019 16:44:58
	creator	4426 label Biography information for Paula Sherriff
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4426 label Biography information for Paula Sherriff

1045580

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	24/01/2019
	date	21/01/2019
	date tabled	21/01/2019
	ddp created	21/01/2019 22:43:47
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	ddp modified	21/01/2019 22:55:58 24/01/2019 17:11:03
	hansard heading	Council Housing: Pets
	house id	1
	identifier	210595
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	24/01/2019 16:39:22
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what information his Department holds on the number of local authorities that allow their tenants to keep pets.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Croydon North
	tabling member printed	Mr Steve Reed
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 210595
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	210595
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	NamedDay
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>The Department does not hold information on the number of local authorities that allow their tenants to keep pets. <br> <br> Local authorities may hold this information if contacted directly.</p> question first answered 24/01/2019 16:39:22
	creator	4268 label Biography information for Steve Reed
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4268 label Biography information for Steve Reed

1045581

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	24/01/2019
	date	21/01/2019
	date tabled	21/01/2019
	ddp created	21/01/2019 22:43:49
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	ddp modified	21/01/2019 22:56:00 24/01/2019 17:10:02
	hansard heading	Housing Associations: Pets
	house id	1
	identifier	210596
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	24/01/2019 16:38:29
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what information his Department holds on the number of housing associations that allow their tenants to keep pets.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Croydon North
	tabling member printed	Mr Steve Reed
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 210596
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	210596
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	NamedDay
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>The Regulator of Social Housing does not hold information on the number of housing associations that allow their tenants to keep pets. <br> <br> Housing associations might be able to provide this information if contacted directly.</p> question first answered 24/01/2019 16:38:29
	creator	4268 label Biography information for Steve Reed
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4268 label Biography information for Steve Reed