Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1133053
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-07-02more like thismore than 2019-07-02
star this property date less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
star this property date tabled less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
star this property ddp created remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2019-06-18T20:30:01.753Z
star this property answering body
Leader of the House of Lords more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 92 more like this
star this property answering dept short name
star this property answering dept sort name Leader of the House of Lords more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-06-18T20:36:10.002Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-18T20:36:10.002Z
less than 2019-07-03T13:00:03.530Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-03T13:00:03.530Z
star this property hansard heading Select Committee Reports (Government Responses) more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property identifier HL16471 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-07-03T12:28:49.65Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-03T12:28:49.65Z
star this property question text To ask the Leader of the House how many, and which, reports from House of Lords select committees published since January 2018 have not received a substantive Government response within two months of publication. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Norton of Louth more like this
star this property title House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 HL16471 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin HL16471 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property answer text <p>Since 1 January 2018, there have been 25 reports which did not receive Government responses within two months of publication. There are currently five reports that have yet to receive a substantive Government response within two months of publication. These are: Brexit: The Customs Challenge (EU External Affairs Sub-Committee); Brexit: The Withdrawal Agreement and Political Declaration (EU Committee); Measuring Inflation (Economic Affairs Committee); Beyond Brexit: How to win friends and influence people (EU Committee); and Forensic science and the criminal justice system: a blueprint for change (Science and Technology Committee).</p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-07-03T12:28:49.65Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-03T12:28:49.65Z
star this property creator
3187
star this property label Biography information for Lord Norton of Louth more like this
star this property publisher 25277
star this property tabling member
3187
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Norton of Louth more like this
1132886
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-06-20more like thismore than 2019-06-20
star this property date less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
star this property date tabled less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
star this property ddp created less than 2019-06-18T18:28:35.373Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-18T18:28:35.373Z
star this property answering body
Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 90 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-06-19T16:45:08.015Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-19T16:45:08.015Z
less than 2019-06-25T15:28:03.658Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-25T15:28:03.658Z
star this property hansard heading Members: Internet more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 266190 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-25T14:56:09.553Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-25T14:56:09.553Z
star this property question text To ask the hon. Member for Broxbourne, representing the Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, what estimate his Department has made on the potential cost incurred by MPs' offices in answering web-based inquiries generated by (a) 38 Degrees and (b) other websites in the last 12 months. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Southampton, Itchen more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Royston Smith more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 266190 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 266190 more like this
star this property version 2 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property answer text <p>I have asked IPSA to provide this reply.</p><p>IPSA is the statutory body responsible for regulating and paying the salaries, business costs and expenses of MPs. This includes regulating and paying the salaries of staff members who work for MPs.</p><p> </p><p>Each MP is allocated a budget from which their staffing costs are paid. The current staffing budget for MPs in London constituencies is £166,930; and for non-London MPs, the budget is £155,930.</p><p> </p><p>In the 2018-19 financial year, MPs spent £91.1 million on staffing costs, including employment costs and other staffing services.</p><p> </p><p>IPSA does not hold information on the cost attributable to staff members carrying out specific activities such as responding to web-based inquiries generated by 38 Degrees or other websites.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-25T14:56:09.553Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-25T14:56:09.553Z
star this property creator
4478
star this property label Biography information for Royston Smith more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4478
unstar this property label Biography information for Royston Smith more like this
1131868
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-06-17more like thismore than 2019-06-17
star this property date less than 2019-06-12more like thismore than 2019-06-12
star this property date tabled less than 2019-06-12more like thismore than 2019-06-12
star this property ddp created less than 2019-06-12T20:21:25.960Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T20:21:25.960Z
star this property answering body
Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 90 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-06-12T20:35:28.170Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T20:35:28.170Z
less than 2019-06-20T12:43:01.756Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-20T12:43:01.756Z
star this property hansard heading Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority: Working Hours more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 263670 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-20T12:11:25.877Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-20T12:11:25.877Z
star this property question text To ask the hon. Member for Broxbourne, representing the Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, what steps he is taking to help ensure that IPSA has sufficient resources to extend its working hours so that (a) telephone calls can be answered during the hours the House sits and (b) responses can be given to emails from MPs within three to five working days. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Christchurch more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Sir Christopher Chope more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 263670 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 263670 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property answer text <p>IPSA’s December 2018 user survey found that 68 per cent of MPs and their staff were satisfied with the support that they receive from IPSA on the phone, up from 53 per cent in 2017. Since the introduction of its new online finance and expenses system in April 2019, IPSA has experienced a higher-than-normal volume of calls, with some calls taking up to 45 minutes as MPs and their staff familiarise themselves with the new system. To respond to this increased demand, IPSA has recruited five temporary staff to answer the phone to MPs, and has temporarily closed its phone lines at 4pm in order to respond to the queries raised. IPSA expects to re-open its phone lines until 5pm when this demand subsides.</p><p>IPSA has a key performance target to respond to 90 per cent of emails within five days. In 2018-19, IPSA responded to over 85 per cent of the 54,500 letters and emails that were received within five working days of receipt. In April 2019, following the introduction on the new system, IPSA only replied to 70 per cent of emails within this target. The additional temporary staff will also address this increased demand.</p><p>IPSA’s performance is monitored by the Speaker’s Committee for the IPSA which approves IPSA’s budget and targets, including how it responds to MPs’ queries.</p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-20T12:11:25.877Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-20T12:11:25.877Z
star this property creator
242
star this property label Biography information for Sir Christopher Chope more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
242
unstar this property label Biography information for Sir Christopher Chope more like this
1131867
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-06-17more like thismore than 2019-06-17
star this property date less than 2019-06-12more like thismore than 2019-06-12
star this property date tabled less than 2019-06-12more like thismore than 2019-06-12
star this property ddp created less than 2019-06-12T20:21:23.373Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T20:21:23.373Z
star this property answering body
Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 90 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-06-12T20:35:25.903Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T20:35:25.903Z
less than 2019-06-20T12:41:02.165Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-20T12:41:02.165Z
star this property hansard heading Members: Email more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 263669 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-20T12:09:53.93Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-20T12:09:53.93Z
star this property question text To ask the hon. Member for Broxbourne, representing the Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, what estimate he has made of the number of emails from hon. Members sent to IPSA in June 2019 that have not received a response within three days; and if he will make a statement. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Christchurch more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Sir Christopher Chope more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 263669 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 263669 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property answer text <p>IPSA has a key performance target to respond to 90 per cent of emails within five working days. Between 1 June and 13 June, IPSA responded to 88 per cent of the 563 emails received within this target. IPSA has recently brought in five temporary staff to help improve its response times following the introduction of a new finance, payroll and expenses system in April 2019.</p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-20T12:09:53.93Zmore like thisremove minimum value filter
star this property creator
242
star this property label Biography information for Sir Christopher Chope more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
242
unstar this property label Biography information for Sir Christopher Chope more like this
1131865
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-06-17more like thismore than 2019-06-17
star this property date less than 2019-06-12more like thismore than 2019-06-12
star this property date tabled less than 2019-06-12more like thismore than 2019-06-12
star this property ddp created less than 2019-06-12T20:21:17.853Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T20:21:17.853Z
star this property answering body
Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 90 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-06-12T20:35:20.674Zmore like thisremove minimum value filter
less than 2019-06-20T12:44:01.975Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-20T12:44:01.975Z
star this property hansard heading Members: Allowances more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 263668 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-20T12:12:33.917Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-20T12:12:33.917Z
star this property question text To ask the hon. Member for Broxbourne, representing the Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, if he will make an assessment of the effectiveness of the system for reimbursing MPs expenses; and if IPSA will make it its policy to reinstate the previous system for the reimbursement of expenses. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Christchurch more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Sir Christopher Chope more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 263668 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 263668 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property answer text <p>IPSA considered a range of options for its new system of reimbursing MPs’ business costs and expenses. The system selected is more integrated and efficient than its predecessor systems, and holds the personal data of MPs and their staff more securely. The software selected is widely used in the United Kingdom, including in many public bodies. Prior to its launch in April, the effectiveness of the system was thoroughly tested, including by MPs and their staff. Its benefits include:</p><p> </p><p>- A ‘single sign-on’ capability to allow MPs and their staff to access the system directly through their secure parliamentary account without an additional logon.</p><p>- MPs and staff no longer need to send paper receipts and invoices to IPSA, but can scan or photograph them and upload them digitally onto the system. This improves data security and means that IPSA can process and reimburse claims more quickly.</p><p>- MPs’ staff members can now be reimbursed directly by IPSA for their own expenses rather than via their MPs.</p><p>- MPs and their staff are now able to amend their personal details, including any change of name or address, on the new system themselves, without needing to submit a form to IPSA.</p><p>- The new system allows claims from different budgets to be submitted on the same form, rather than having to submit multiple forms.</p><p>- MPs and their staff have constant access to financial information about the amounts left in their budgets and the status of any repayments or amounts owed, rather than waiting a monthly financial statement from IPSA.</p><p> </p><p>As of 13 June, 612 MPs have successfully submitted claims on the new system. IPSA is committed to supporting and training MPs and their staff as they become accustomed to the new online claims system. IPSA does not intend to make it its policy to reinstate the previous system.</p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-20T12:12:33.917Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-20T12:12:33.917Z
star this property creator
242
star this property label Biography information for Sir Christopher Chope more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
242
unstar this property label Biography information for Sir Christopher Chope more like this
1132935
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-06-24more like thismore than 2019-06-24
star this property date less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
star this property date tabled less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
star this property ddp created less than 2019-06-18T18:30:33.147Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-18T18:30:33.147Z
star this property answering body
Attorney General more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 88 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-06-18T18:40:32.648Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-18T18:40:32.648Z
less than 2019-06-24T17:06:01.927Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-24T17:06:01.927Z
star this property hansard heading Rape: Prosecutions more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 266233 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-24T16:34:49.637Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-24T16:34:49.637Z
star this property question text To ask the Attorney General, what proportion of reported rape cases in 2017-18 passed to the CPS by the police forces of England and Wales were returned to the police for further evidence to be gathered, and were not subsequently returned to the CPS with that further evidence. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Torfaen more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Nick Thomas-Symonds more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 266233 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 266233 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property answer text <p>The CPS recognises that rape and serious sexual offences have a significant and profound impact on victims. It is vital to ensure that cases are investigated thoroughly in order to bring them to justice. To achieve this, it is necessary in many cases to seek further information before a prosecutor is able to determine whether or not to charge. In such cases, an action plan requesting further evidence will be provided to the police by the CPS.</p><p> </p><p>When the Police are unable to respond to the action plan, the case is administratively finalised. This is an administrative process where cases are closed on the CPS’s Case Management System if, after reminders from the CPS, the Police do not submit further information. Such cases may be reopened if, at a later date, new material is provided to the CPS by the Police enabling them to decide whether to charge.</p><p> </p><p>The Police may also seek ‘early investigative advice’ from the CPS to assist in determining the evidence required for a charge. In these cases the CPS may also administratively finalise a case if after receiving CPS advice, the Police do not re-submit the case.</p><p> </p><p>In 2017/18, 22% of all rape cases referred to the CPS were administratively finalised.</p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-24T16:34:49.637Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-24T16:34:49.637Z
star this property creator
4479
star this property label Biography information for Nick Thomas-Symonds more like this
star this property written parliamentary question
1132928
1132935
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member 4479
1132928
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-06-24more like thismore than 2019-06-24
star this property date less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
star this property date tabled less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
star this property ddp created less than 2019-06-18T18:30:15.600Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-18T18:30:15.600Z
star this property answering body
Attorney General more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 88 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-06-18T18:40:16.357Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-18T18:40:16.357Z
less than 2019-06-24T15:58:03.098Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-24T15:58:03.098Z
star this property hansard heading Rape: Prosecutions more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 266227 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-24T15:26:16.1Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-24T15:26:16.1Z
star this property question text To ask the Attorney General, what proportion of reported rape cases that were passed to the Crown Prosecution Service by the police forces of England and Wales were returned to the police for further evidence to be gathered in 2017-18. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Torfaen more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Nick Thomas-Symonds more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 266227 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 266227 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property answer text <p>Rape is a horrific crime which has a significant and profound impact on victims. It is vital to ensure that cases are investigated thoroughly in order to bring them to justice. To achieve this, it is necessary in many cases to seek further information before a prosecutor is able to determine whether or not to charge. This process ensures that cases are as robust as possible once they reach the court.</p><p>In 2017-18, cases were referred back to the Police for 61% of suspects in cases recorded as rape in the system. Whilst one situation where the CPS may refer a case back to the Police is to request further evidence, it could also be in instances when the Police have sought ‘early investigative advice’ from the CPS to assist in determining the evidence required for a charge. It is not possible to separate cases where the CPS has requested further evidence and when the Police have sought early investigative advice.</p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-24T15:26:16.1Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-24T15:26:16.1Z
star this property creator 4479
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member 4479
1132834
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-06-20more like thismore than 2019-06-20
star this property date less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
star this property date tabled less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
star this property ddp created less than 2019-06-18T18:26:31.943Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-18T18:26:31.943Z
star this property answering body
Attorney General more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 88 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-06-19T13:55:13.861Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-19T13:55:13.861Z
less than 2019-06-26T10:56:02.172Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-26T10:56:02.172Z
star this property hansard heading Prosecutions: South Yorkshire more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 266096 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-26T10:24:58.987Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-26T10:24:58.987Z
star this property question text To ask the Attorney General, what the average number of days taken from the date of an offence to a decision to charge an individual for an indictable offence in South Yorkshire in each year since 2010 was. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 266096 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 266096 more like this
star this property version 2 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property answer text <p>The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) works closely with the Police to ensure that cases are thoroughly investigated before charges are brought. There has been an increase in the complexity of cases investigated by the police, with investigations often involving large amounts of electronic material (social media, emails, text messages, video and photographs) which needs to be reviewed by prosecutors before a charging decision can be made. This impacts on the average number of consultations and length of time taken for prosecutors to reach a charging decision.</p><p> </p><p>The CPS does not maintain a record of the average number of days taken from offence through to a decision to charge. However, data is held on the average number of days from submission of a case by the police to the CPS to the date of the CPS decision to charge.</p><p> </p><p>Data relating to to all cases in South Yorkshire, summary only cases in South Yorkshire, and indictable only cases in South Yorkshire is shown in Annex A.</p><p> </p><p>The data in Annex A relating to summary only cases provides figures for only a minority of summary only cases. This is because the CPS is only responsible for charging a small minority of summary only matters, with the majority charged by the police. In 2017-18 the police charged 75% of all summary only matters with only 25% charged by CPS, while for indicatable only offences the CPS charged 95% of these cases.</p><p> </p><p>There are a number of reasons for the steady increase in the average number of days and average number of consultations per case since 2010/11. Police are now more regularly encouraged to seek ‘early investigative advice’ to help determine what evidence is required for a charge. Early investigative advice helps to ensure that cases are thoroughly investigated and the evidence to be brought before the court is strong. As a result, the CPS is more often involved at an earlier stage in proceedings which impacts on the average number of consultations and overall timeliness.</p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-26T10:24:58.987Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-26T10:24:58.987Z
star this property creator
400
star this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
400
unstar this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
1132831
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-06-20more like thismore than 2019-06-20
star this property date less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
star this property date tabled less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
star this property ddp created less than 2019-06-18T18:26:24.577Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-18T18:26:24.577Z
star this property answering body
Attorney General more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 88 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-06-19T13:55:10.376Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-19T13:55:10.376Z
less than 2019-06-26T10:56:03.733Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-26T10:56:03.733Z
star this property hansard heading Prosecutions: South Yorkshire more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 266095 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-26T10:24:58.927Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-26T10:24:58.927Z
star this property question text To ask the Attorney General, what the average number of days taken from the date of an offence to a decision to charge and individual for summary offences in South Yorkshire in each year since 2010 was. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 266095 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 266095 more like this
star this property version 2 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property answer text <p>The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) works closely with the Police to ensure that cases are thoroughly investigated before charges are brought. There has been an increase in the complexity of cases investigated by the police, with investigations often involving large amounts of electronic material (social media, emails, text messages, video and photographs) which needs to be reviewed by prosecutors before a charging decision can be made. This impacts on the average number of consultations and length of time taken for prosecutors to reach a charging decision.</p><p> </p><p>The CPS does not maintain a record of the average number of days taken from offence through to a decision to charge. However, data is held on the average number of days from submission of a case by the police to the CPS to the date of the CPS decision to charge.</p><p> </p><p>Data relating to to all cases in South Yorkshire, summary only cases in South Yorkshire, and indictable only cases in South Yorkshire is shown in Annex A.</p><p> </p><p>The data in Annex A relating to summary only cases provides figures for only a minority of summary only cases. This is because the CPS is only responsible for charging a small minority of summary only matters, with the majority charged by the police. In 2017-18 the police charged 75% of all summary only matters with only 25% charged by CPS, while for indicatable only offences the CPS charged 95% of these cases.</p><p> </p><p>There are a number of reasons for the steady increase in the average number of days and average number of consultations per case since 2010/11. Police are now more regularly encouraged to seek ‘early investigative advice’ to help determine what evidence is required for a charge. Early investigative advice helps to ensure that cases are thoroughly investigated and the evidence to be brought before the court is strong. As a result, the CPS is more often involved at an earlier stage in proceedings which impacts on the average number of consultations and overall timeliness.</p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-26T10:24:58.927Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-26T10:24:58.927Z
star this property creator
400
star this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
400
unstar this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
1132830
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-06-20more like thismore than 2019-06-20
star this property date less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
star this property date tabled less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
star this property ddp created less than 2019-06-18T18:26:21.500Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-18T18:26:21.500Z
star this property answering body
Attorney General more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 88 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-06-19T13:55:06.983Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-19T13:55:06.983Z
less than 2019-06-26T10:56:05.204Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-26T10:56:05.204Z
star this property hansard heading Prosecutions: South Yorkshire more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 266094 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-26T10:24:58.863Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-26T10:24:58.863Z
star this property question text To ask the Attorney General, what the average number of days taken from the date of offence to a decision to charge an individual in South Yorkshire in each year since 2010 was. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 266094 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 266094 more like this
star this property version 2 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property answer text <p>The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) works closely with the Police to ensure that cases are thoroughly investigated before charges are brought. There has been an increase in the complexity of cases investigated by the police, with investigations often involving large amounts of electronic material (social media, emails, text messages, video and photographs) which needs to be reviewed by prosecutors before a charging decision can be made. This impacts on the average number of consultations and length of time taken for prosecutors to reach a charging decision.</p><p> </p><p>The CPS does not maintain a record of the average number of days taken from offence through to a decision to charge. However, data is held on the average number of days from submission of a case by the police to the CPS to the date of the CPS decision to charge.</p><p> </p><p>Data relating to to all cases in South Yorkshire, summary only cases in South Yorkshire, and indictable only cases in South Yorkshire is shown in Annex A.</p><p> </p><p>The data in Annex A relating to summary only cases provides figures for only a minority of summary only cases. This is because the CPS is only responsible for charging a small minority of summary only matters, with the majority charged by the police. In 2017-18 the police charged 75% of all summary only matters with only 25% charged by CPS, while for indicatable only offences the CPS charged 95% of these cases.</p><p> </p><p>There are a number of reasons for the steady increase in the average number of days and average number of consultations per case since 2010/11. Police are now more regularly encouraged to seek ‘early investigative advice’ to help determine what evidence is required for a charge. Early investigative advice helps to ensure that cases are thoroughly investigated and the evidence to be brought before the court is strong. As a result, the CPS is more often involved at an earlier stage in proceedings which impacts on the average number of consultations and overall timeliness.</p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-26T10:24:58.863Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-26T10:24:58.863Z
star this property creator
400
star this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
400
unstar this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this