 |
answer text |
<p>The relaxation of COVID-19 restrictions across respective parts of Great Britain
this summer has allowed courts and tribunals to operate more flexibly, and so increasingly
efficiently. But notwithstanding the success of the Government’s vaccine rollout,
some safety measures must continue to remain in place.</p><p>There has never been
a legal requirement to wear face coverings in a court or tribunal building. Regulations
on the wearing of face coverings in place before 19 July in England, imposing criminal
sanctions backed by appropriate enforcement powers, applied only in prescribed sectors
like retail and transport. However, Public Health guidance has for some time made
clear the benefits associated with face coverings, which other sectors have been encouraged
to follow. Face coverings can help to minimise exposure to the virus, and therefore
reduce the risk of transmission. Accordingly, and alongside a range of other measures
embedded to manage Covid risks, in July 2020 HM Courts and Tribunals Service introduced
a policy asking that face coverings be worn (unless exempt) across its estate, for
the reasons set out in its <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1012423/HMCTS589_Organisational_Risk_Assessment_A4L_Aug21_v1.pdf"
target="_blank">Organisational Risk Assessment</a>.</p><p>Given the lack of any prescribed
legal requirement to wear face coverings in court and tribunal buildings, the compliance
and enforcement options open to HMCTS before the 19th July are essentially the same
as those after 19<sup>th</sup> July. In determining its policy, HMCTS has considered
a range of factors, including the clear balance to be struck between ensuring reasonable
compliance of the policy on face coverings, and not damaging the efficacy of proceedings
before the court (for example, allowing those who are legally compelled to attend
court to avoid that appearance by refusing to wear a covering).</p><p>Insofar as members
of staff are concerned, HMCTS employees will continue to be required to wear face
coverings in court and tribunal buildings, unless exemptions apply. All HMCTS employees
have an obligation to follow HR policies. The consequences of non-compliance would
be dealt with, as appropriate, under usual personnel management procedures. Members
of the judiciary are similarly asked to wear face coverings in certain areas of court
and tribunal buildings (not including, for example, whilst presiding in hearing rooms).
Any compliance issues would be a matter for the leadership judiciary, not HMCTS.</p><p>For
court and tribunal users including parties, witnesses, jurors, and members of the
public, Court and Tribunal Security Officers (CTSOs) will ask that face coverings
are worn upon entry into the buildings and will provide free face coverings if needed.
Signage around the buildings make clear where face coverings are to be worn. Ultimately,
under the Courts Act 2003 section 53, CTSOs have the power to exclude or remove any
person from a building for the purposes of securing the safety of those in the building
– which includes for these purposes considering non-compliance with reasonable requests
in respect of face coverings introduced and maintained in line with prevailing Public
Health guidance. In assessing the need for (and proportionality of) deploying those
exclusion/removal powers, CTSOs (acting in consultation with HMCTS managers and the
judiciary as necessary) will have regard to the balance between furthering public
safety, and ensuring the ongoing efficacy of proceedings, as described above.</p>
|
|
