Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1644828
unstar this property registered interest false remove filter
star this property date less than 2023-06-14more like thismore than 2023-06-14
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 remove filter
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Special Educational Needs: Appeals remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many appeals to the First -Tier Tribunal for Special Educational Needs and Disability against decisions by (a) Dorset and (b) Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council on special educational needs (i) were decided in each of the last six months for which data is available and (ii) are awaiting a hearing; and what is the (A) average time and (B) maximum time between an appeal being made and heard. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Christchurch more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Sir Christopher Chope more like this
unstar this property uin 189479 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2023-06-19more like thismore than 2023-06-19
star this property answer text <p>Information about appeals to the First -Tier Tribunal for Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) is published at: <a href="http://www.gov.uk/government/collections/tribunals-statistics" target="_blank">www.gov.uk/government/collections/tribunals-statistics</a>.</p><p> </p><p>The table below sets out the number of appeals to the SEND Tribunal against decisions by (a) Dorset and (b) Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council for the period 1 December 2022 to 14 June 2023 (the latest period for which data are available):</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Dorset (a)</p></td><td><p>Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole (b)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dec 2022</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan 2023</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Feb 2023</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mar 2023</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Apr 2023</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May 2023</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jun 2023 (up to 14/06/23)</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>The table below sets out the number of SEND appeals as at 14 June 2003 (the latest period for which data are available) for (a) Dorset and (b) Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (ii) awaiting a hearing; and (A) the average time and (B) the maximum time between an appeal being made and heard as at the same date.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Dorset (a)</p></td><td><p>Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole (b)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of appeals awaiting a hearing (ii)</p></td><td><p>38 live appeals</p></td><td><p>15 live appeals</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average time between an appeal being made and heard (A)</p></td><td><p>26 weeks</p></td><td><p>28 weeks</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Maximum time between an appeal being made and heard (B)</p></td><td><p>65 weeks</p></td><td><p>43 weeks</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
star this property answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green more like this
star this property answering member printed Mike Freer more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2023-06-19T14:06:59.347Zmore like thismore than 2023-06-19T14:06:59.347Z
star this property answering member
4004
unstar this property label Biography information for Mike Freer more like this
star this property tabling member
242
star this property label Biography information for Sir Christopher Chope more like this
1584964
unstar this property registered interest false remove filter
star this property date less than 2023-02-07more like thismore than 2023-02-07
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 remove filter
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Special Educational Needs: Appeals remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what data his Department holds the proportion of decisions on ECH plans assessments that were overturned at a tribunal in England for each of the last three years; and if he will make a statement. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Tewkesbury more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Laurence Robertson more like this
unstar this property uin 141340 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2023-02-20more like thismore than 2023-02-20
star this property answer text <p>An appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber) may contain an appeal against one or more Local Authority decisions and will, for statistical purposes, be classed as being in favour of the appellant if the appeal succeeds in full or in part.</p><p>The table below shows the number of appeals determined at hearing in each of the last three statistical years and of those the number and percentage of cases found in favour of the appellant.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>Number of appeals determined at hearing</p></td><td><p>Number of appeals in favour of the appellant</p></td><td><p>%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021/22</p></td><td><p>5600</p></td><td><p>5393</p></td><td><p>96%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020/21</p></td><td><p>4825</p></td><td><p>4651</p></td><td><p>93%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019/20</p></td><td><p>3770</p></td><td><p>3577</p></td><td><p>95%</p></td></tr></tbody></table> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green more like this
star this property answering member printed Mike Freer more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2023-02-20T13:47:15.093Zmore like thismore than 2023-02-20T13:47:15.093Z
star this property answering member
4004
unstar this property label Biography information for Mike Freer more like this
star this property tabling member
253
star this property label Biography information for Mr Laurence Robertson more like this
1270859
unstar this property registered interest false remove filter
star this property date less than 2020-12-14more like thismore than 2020-12-14
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 remove filter
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Special Educational Needs: Appeals remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many parents have taken local education authorities (LEAs) to appeal at a tribunal against an Education, Care and Health Plan decision in (a) Stoke-on-Trent and (b) Staffordshire in each of the last five years; and what proportion of those appeals were determined in favour of the (a) parents and (b) LEA. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Stoke-on-Trent North more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Jonathan Gullis more like this
unstar this property uin 129130 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2020-12-22more like thismore than 2020-12-22
star this property answer text <p>The number of appeals brought against EHCP decisions (including the refusal to assess a child or young person; the refusal to issue an EHCP after an assessment; and the content of the EHCP) in the LEAs of (a) Stoke-on-Trent and (b) Staffordshire; and the proportion of those appeals determined in favour of the (a) parents and (b) LEA is shown in the table below. For context, the number of appeals withdrawn or conceded before, and those still awaiting, hearing is also included.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="2"><p><strong>Local Authority/year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Appeals received on grounds of refusal to assess, issue an EHCP and the content of the plan</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Found in favour<sup>1</sup> of the parents or young person at hearing </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Found in favour of the LEA at hearing</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>Withdrawn</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>LEA Conceded prior to the hearing</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Awaiting hearing</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Stoke on Trent</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015-16</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p>7</p></td><td><p>1 (50%)</p></td><td><p>1 (50%)</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016-17</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p>15</p></td><td><p>4 (56%)</p></td><td><p>3 (43%)</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>4</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017-18</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p>14</p></td><td><p>4 (100%)</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2018-19</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p>20</p></td><td><p>6 (100%)</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>12</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2019-20</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p>26</p></td><td><p>8 (100%)</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>11</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Staffordshire</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015-16</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p>76</p></td><td><p>12 (100%)</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>34</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016-17</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p>106</p></td><td><p>28 (74%)</p></td><td><p>10 (26%)</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>42</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017-18</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p>97</p></td><td><p>35 (67%)</p></td><td><p>16 (33%)</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>26</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2018-19</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p>81</p></td><td><p>35 (83%)</p></td><td><p>7 (17%)</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>23</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2019-20</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p>111</p></td><td><p>58 (95%)</p></td><td><p>3 (5%)</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>14</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="9" rowspan="2"><p><strong>¹ Appeals found in favour of the parent or young person are those in which the appellant was successful in all or part of the appeal<br> The data are extracted from GAPS2- the Tribunal’s case management system</strong> The years referred to above are school years from 1 September to 31 August the following year.</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p>
star this property answering member constituency Croydon South more like this
star this property answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-12-22T16:21:55.023Zmore like thismore than 2020-12-22T16:21:55.023Z
star this property answering member
4503
unstar this property label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
star this property tabling member
4814
star this property label Biography information for Jonathan Gullis more like this
1253824
unstar this property registered interest false remove filter
star this property date less than 2020-11-19more like thismore than 2020-11-19
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 remove filter
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Special Educational Needs: Appeals remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many parents in each local authority area have taken Local Education Authorities (LEA) to appeal at a tribunal against an Education, Care and Health Plan decision in each of the last five years; and what proportion of those appeals were determined in favour of the (a) parents and (b) LEA. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency North West Durham more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Richard Holden more like this
unstar this property uin 118124 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2020-11-24more like thismore than 2020-11-24
star this property answer text <p>Due to the volume of data required to answer the question in respect of appeals against special education needs decisions made by local authorities, the information is attached as an annex to this answer.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Croydon South more like this
star this property answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-11-24T15:05:19.86Zmore like thismore than 2020-11-24T15:05:19.86Z
star this property answering member
4503
unstar this property label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
star this property attachment
1
star this property file name Appeals by LA for decisions 5 Year PQ.xls more like this
star this property title Annex more like this
star this property tabling member
4813
star this property label Biography information for Mr Richard Holden more like this
1181819
unstar this property registered interest false remove filter
star this property date less than 2020-03-02more like thismore than 2020-03-02
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 remove filter
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Special Educational Needs: Appeals remove filter
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to reduce the number of cancellations of first hearings in Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunals. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Lingfield more like this
unstar this property uin HL2081 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2020-03-13more like thismore than 2020-03-13
star this property answer text <p>The Ministry of Justice recognises that there is a high level of postponements in the Special Educational Needs and Disability jurisdiction of the First-tier Tribunal (“the SEND Tribunal”). Statistics show that 77% of cases listed for hearing in 2018/19 were postponed, compared with 76% in 2017/18. The number of postponements (2,900 in 2018/19) is due to two factors. The first is that there has been a significant increase in the number of appeals received (an increase of more than in the last three years); and the second is related to the listing policy currently in place where cases are listed for hearing upon receipt and hearings have to be postponed if the date is unsuitable to the parties involved.</p><p> </p><p>The SEND Tribunal has increased the number of administrative staff, legal advisers, salaried and fee-paid judges in the course of the past year. A campaign to recruit a further 50 fee-paid judges and 100 specialist members is being taken forward by the Judicial Appointments Commission. The posts will be filled in the next financial year.</p><p> </p><p>The tribunal will introduce a revised listing process in April 2020 under which parties will be asked to identify, in a two-week window, dates on which they will be able to attend. This will enable a mutually convenient date to be identified in advance of the hearing being fixed.</p><p> </p><p>These two measures will reduce the number of cases which are postponed after they have been listed for hearing.</p>
star this property answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-03-13T13:37:38.99Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-13T13:37:38.99Z
star this property answering member
4538
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property tabling member
4194
star this property label Biography information for Lord Lingfield more like this
1181820
unstar this property registered interest false remove filter
star this property date less than 2020-03-02more like thismore than 2020-03-02
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 remove filter
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Special Educational Needs: Appeals remove filter
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they have taken to compensate parents who have appealed to the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal but whose first hearing was cancelled without adequate notice and as a result have incurred expense. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Lingfield more like this
unstar this property uin HL2082 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2020-03-10more like thismore than 2020-03-10
star this property answer text <p>The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) is free to access and use, but where appellants have incurred and can evidence financial loss as a consequence of the postponement of a hearing they may apply for a compensatory payment. Each application for an ex-gratia payment is treated on its own merits and dealt with in accordance with HM Courts &amp; Tribunals Service’s complaints procedure.</p><p> </p><p>Examples of the types of claims which might be made include the payment of any legal expenses incurred and, where the hearing has been postponed at short notice, the payment of loss of earnings of witnesses who have been unable to find other remunerative employment on the date in question.</p><p> </p><p>In 2018/19 there were 17 applications for a compensatory payment, 14 of which related to the cancellation of the first hearing. The average sum paid was £2,347.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-03-10T16:40:18.837Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-10T16:40:18.837Z
star this property answering member
4538
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property tabling member
4194
star this property label Biography information for Lord Lingfield more like this
1141548
unstar this property registered interest false remove filter
star this property date less than 2019-07-23more like thismore than 2019-07-23
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 remove filter
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Special Educational Needs: Appeals remove filter
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact on appellants of First-Tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) hearings being cancelled; and what plans they have to mitigate this impact, including any plans to offer financial compensation. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Lingfield more like this
unstar this property uin HL17416 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-08-02more like thismore than 2019-08-02
star this property answer text <p>Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunal Service has assessed the impact on all its customers of hearings being cancelled, and has listened to the views of users at recent user groups.</p><p> </p><p>To mitigate this, the SEND Tribunal has increased the number of administrative staff, legal advisers and judges to reduce the number of cases which are postponed after they have been listed for hearing and is recruiting additional judges.</p><p> </p><p>SEND Tribunals are free to access and use, but where appellants have incurred and can evidence financial loss as a consequence of the postponement of a hearing they may apply for a compensatory payment. Each application for an ex-gratia payment is treated on its own merits.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-08-02T13:21:07.04Zmore like thismore than 2019-08-02T13:21:07.04Z
star this property answering member
4538
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property tabling member
4194
star this property label Biography information for Lord Lingfield more like this
1134312
unstar this property registered interest false remove filter
star this property date less than 2019-06-24more like thismore than 2019-06-24
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 remove filter
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Special Educational Needs: Appeals remove filter
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of HM Courts and Tribunal Services statistics released in relation to the First Tier (Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal) and in particular the level of fixed SENDIST hearings which have been postponed at least once; and what assessment they have made of the reasons for the level of postponements. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Lingfield more like this
unstar this property uin HL16597 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-07-08more like thismore than 2019-07-08
star this property answer text <p>The Ministry of Justice recognises that there is a high level of postponements in the Special Educational Needs and Disability jurisdiction of the First-tier Tribunal (“the SEND Tribunal”). Statistics show that 77% of cases listed for hearing in 2018/19 were postponed, compared with 76% in 2017/18. The number of postponements (2,900 in 2018/19) is due to two factors. The first is that there has been a significant increase in the number of appeals received (a 50% increase over the last three years); and the second is related to the listing policy currently in place where cases are listed for hearing upon receipt and hearings have to be postponed if the date is unsuitable to the parties involved.</p><p> </p><p>The SEND Tribunal has increased the number of administrative staff, legal advisers and judges to reduce the number of cases which are postponed after they have been listed for hearing.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-07-08T15:57:32.283Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-08T15:57:32.283Z
star this property answering member
4538
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property tabling member
4194
star this property label Biography information for Lord Lingfield more like this
1133465
unstar this property registered interest false remove filter
star this property date less than 2019-06-19more like thismore than 2019-06-19
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 remove filter
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Special Educational Needs: Appeals remove filter
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether the First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) has sufficient (1) resources, and (2) judges, to cope with the number of cases before it; and what plans they have to (a) provide more resources, and (b) increase the number of judges, where they have found these to be insufficient. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Lingfield more like this
unstar this property uin HL16500 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-07-02more like thismore than 2019-07-02
star this property answer text <p>The Special Educational Needs and Disability jurisdiction of the First-tier Tribunal (“the SEND Tribunal”) has seen a 50% increase in appeals over a 3-year period. In response to this, the SEND Tribunal has increased the number of administrative staff from 25 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) members of staff in May 2016, to 43.5 FTE in May 2019. The Legal Advisers team has also increased from 2.6 FTE at the beginning of 2018, to 4.6 FTE in June 2019.</p><p>10 new judges were assigned to SEND in September 2018 and a further exercise will be launched in September 2019 for an additional 20 fee paid judges. Parallel to this, HMCTS and the judiciary have been working closely with the Judicial Appointments Commission to recruit judges. In March 2019 21 new fee paid Judges were successfully recruited.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-07-02T15:33:42.523Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-02T15:33:42.523Z
star this property answering member
4538
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property tabling member
4194
star this property label Biography information for Lord Lingfield more like this
1028692
unstar this property registered interest false remove filter
star this property date less than 2018-12-19more like thismore than 2018-12-19
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 remove filter
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Special Educational Needs: Appeals remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many tribunals there have been involving SEND appeals in each of the last five years; and what proportion of those appeals were successful in each of those years. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency South Shields more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mrs Emma Lewell-Buck more like this
unstar this property uin 203904 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-01-07more like thismore than 2019-01-07
star this property answer text <p>Information about the number of appeals received by the First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) and the proportion of those appeals which were successful is published at www.gov.uk/government/collections/tribunals-statistics.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-01-07T15:00:06.913Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-07T15:00:06.913Z
star this property answering member
4517
unstar this property label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property tabling member
4277
star this property label Biography information for Mrs Emma Lewell-Buck more like this