Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label attachment file name title previous answer version answering member constituency answering member printed answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

61895

	registered interest
	date	13/06/2014
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Agency Workers
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how much his Department has spent on agency workers to cover clerical staff in each month since January 2014.
	tabling member constituency	Tooting
	tabling member printed	Sadiq Khan
	uin	200708
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p /> <p>Since April 2010 we have cut our overall spend on temporary staff by £35.5m. We only use temporary staff to fill business-critical posts and essential frontline services where they can provide a fast, flexible and efficient way to obtain necessary skills that are not currently available in-house. We will continue to examine our use of contractors and look for further reductions.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>In responding to each question we have utilised data provided by our contracted supplier of temporary clerical staff and contracted supplier of temporary operational staff. As the data provided has been supplied by two different third parties there is a slight difference in the way that the answer to question 3 and 4 has been presented.</p><p> </p><p>Temporary operational staff relate to Operational Support Grades (OSGs) used within HM Prison Service. We have contracts in place to provide temporary OSGs to fill in gaps in requirements, for building projects or to fill vacancies short term. Temporary OSGs are a very small proportion of our staff complement.</p><p> </p><p>Uniform operational support staff are Operational Support Grades (OSGs).These are uniformed staff who undertake a wide range of duties in prisons, for example operating prison gates, working in security and managing stores areas. They also escort contractors and their vehicles.</p><p> </p><p>1) The following amounts (exclusive of VAT) have been spent on clerical agency staff across -</p><p> </p><p>January 2014 - £2,983,633.14 (5 week period)</p><p>February 2014 - £2,613,023.10 (4 week period)</p><p>March 2014 - £2,591,678.87 (4 week period)</p><p>April 2014 - £2,900,742.70 (5 week period)</p><p>May 2014 - £2,398,053.57 (4 week period)</p><p>June 2014 - £658,700.28 (1 week period)</p><p> </p><p>2) The following amounts (exclusive of VAT) have been spent on uniform operational support staff –</p><p> </p><p>January 2014 - £1,082,247 (5 week period)</p><p>February 2014 - £1,420,329 (4 week period)</p><p>March 2014 - £1,137,834 (4 week period)</p><p>April 2014 - £1,249,908 (4 week period)</p><p>May 2014 - £2,282,468 (5 week period)</p><p> </p><p>The spend for May 2014 also includes the backdated annual pay rise for eligible workers from 1<sup>st</sup> April 2014.</p><p> </p><p>3) The following number of clerical agency staff have been utilised –</p><p> </p><p>January 2014 - 1571 (Average headcount)</p><p>February 2014 - 1634 (Average headcount)</p><p>March 2014 - 1624 (Average headcount)</p><p>April 2014 - 1578 (Average headcount)</p><p>May 2014 - 1644 (Average headcount)</p><p>June 2014 - 1674 (Average headcount)</p><p> </p><p>4) The following number of uniform operational support staff have been utilised –</p><p> </p><p>January 2014 - 697 (Peak worker number)</p><p>February 2014 - 845 (Peak worker number)</p><p>March 2014 - 867 (Peak worker number)</p><p>April 2014 - 853 (Peak worker number)</p><p>May 2014 - 855 (Peak worker number)</p><p>June 2014 - Peak worker number not available yet.</p> answering member constituency South West Bedfordshire answering member printed Andrew Selous question first answered 21/10/2014 16:35:53 answering member 1453 label Biography information for Andrew Selous
	tabling member	1577 label Biography information for Sadiq Khan

89512

	registered interest
	date	29/08/2014
	answering body	Department for Communities and Local Government
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Communities and Local Government
	hansard heading	Offences against Children: Rotherham
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, what steps he plans to take to implement the recommendations made in the Independent Inquiry into child sexual exploitation in Rotherham from 1997 to 2013.
	tabling member constituency	Birmingham, Selly Oak
	tabling member printed	Steve McCabe
	uin	207398
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p>I refer the hon.Members to the written statement made on 10 September, <em>Official Report</em>, Column 37WS, in which my rt. hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (Eric Pickles), indicated his intention to write to leaders of principal councils asking them to consider the implications of the Jay report for their own authority. In the event he wrote jointly with my rt. hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Education (Nicky Morgan) on 24 September with copies to Chairmen of all Health and Wellbeing Boards in England. A copy of this letter can be seen at:</p><p>https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/358979/140924_-_Rotherham_letter_joint_final.pdf.</p><p> </p><p>My rt. hon. Friend the Home Secretary (Theresa May) has also written in similar terms to Chief Constables with copies to Police and Crime Commissioners.</p><p> </p><p>Copies of both letters are attached.</p> answering member constituency Keighley answering member printed Kris Hopkins grouped question UIN 207872 question first answered 21/10/2014 16:36:24 answering member 4043 label Biography information for Kris Hopkins attachment 1 file name 207398 McCabe.pdf title Letters from DCLG/DfE and Home Office
	tabling member	298 label Biography information for Steve McCabe

89802

	registered interest
	date	29/08/2014
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Prisons: Employment
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many and what proportion of prisoners in each prison in England and Wales were working in industrial activity in each year since 2010-11.
	tabling member constituency	Exeter
	tabling member printed	Mr Ben Bradshaw
	uin	207329
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p /> <p>Work in prisons is a key priority to ensure prisoners are engaged in real work whilst they are in custody. It also gives them the opportunity to learn skills and a work ethic which can increase their chances of finding employment on release, a key element to reducing reoffending.</p><p> </p><p>The number of prisoners working in industrial activity reported by public sector prisons increased from around 8,600 in 2010-11 (the first year for which figures are available) to around 9,900 in 2013-14. This delivered an increase in the total hours worked in industrial activities from 10.6 million hours to 14.2 million hours, as published in the <em>National Offender Management Service Annual Report 2013-14: Management Information Addendum </em> <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/prison-and-probation-trusts-performance-statistics-201314" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/prison-and-probation-trusts-performance-statistics-201314</a>.</p><p> </p><p>Private sector prisons have also been supporting this agenda and have reported that they delivered over 1½ million prisoner working hours in commercial and industrial workshops in 2012-13 which provided work for over 1,200 prisoners.</p><p> </p><p>An establishment-level breakdown of the average number of prisoners is set out in the table attached for the years 2010-11 to 2013-14, alongside the average population and the proportion of population that were working in industrial activities at each public sector prison site.</p><p> </p><p>The variation between levels of industrial activity at each site is influenced by a number of factors, chiefly by the category and role of the prison and the types of prisoner available to work. For example the transient nature of the prisoner population in local establishments, as well as the requirements of commercial customers, mean that this is a more challenging, and often less suitable environment into which to introduce work.</p><p> </p><p>The physical capacity of prisons – primarily available space and operating environment – is an additional limiting factor. Many prisoners were built without large work shops.</p><p> </p><p>These differences in capacity and capability are reflected in prison Service Level Agreements and in the performance framework; establishments with higher capacity and capability to deliver industrial activity will have higher target hours and this will carry a higher weighting in the prison rating system than for establishments with lower levels of capacity.</p><p> </p><p>In addition to industrial work, prisoners also take part in a large number of other activities including education, training and offending behaviour programmes. There are also a large number of prisoners who work in areas that contribute to the upkeep of the prison, for example food preparation and serving as well as cleaning.</p><p> </p><p>Prison Rule 31 (1) specifies that a convicted prisoner shall be required to do useful work for not more than 10 hours a day and arrangements shall be made to allow prisoners to work, where possible, outside the cells and in association with one another.</p><p> </p><p>The regime in prisons is changing for convicted prisoners as NOMS implements the benchmark core day and the opportunities it provides to extend the working day as well as the potential to increase time in other activities including education. To support this, recreational activities will take place outside the main working part of the day.</p><p> </p><p>Under our reforms to the Incentives and Earned Privileges national policy framework, came into effect in adult prisons on 1 November 2013, prisoners are expected to engage in purposeful activity, as well as demonstrate a commitment towards their rehabilitation, reduce their risk of reoffending, behave well and help others if they are to earn privileges.</p> answering member constituency South West Bedfordshire answering member printed Andrew Selous question first answered 21/10/2014 16:49:57 answering member 1453 label Biography information for Andrew Selous attachment 1 file name Prisoners Working in Industrial Activities.xls title Prisoners Working in Industrial Activities
	tabling member	230 label Biography information for Mr Ben Bradshaw

90294

	registered interest
	date	02/09/2014
	answering body	Department for Communities and Local Government
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Communities and Local Government
	hansard heading	Social Services: Children
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, what steps he is taking to ensure that all councils review their procedures for dealing with the sexual exploitation of children following the report on Rotherham Council; and if he will make a statement.
	tabling member constituency	Warrington North
	tabling member printed	Helen Jones
	uin	207872
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p>I refer the hon.Members to the written statement made on 10 September, <em>Official Report</em>, Column 37WS, in which my rt. hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (Eric Pickles), indicated his intention to write to leaders of principal councils asking them to consider the implications of the Jay report for their own authority. In the event he wrote jointly with my rt. hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Education (Nicky Morgan) on 24 September with copies to Chairmen of all Health and Wellbeing Boards in England. A copy of this letter can be seen at:</p><p>https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/358979/140924_-_Rotherham_letter_joint_final.pdf.</p><p> </p><p>My rt. hon. Friend the Home Secretary (Theresa May) has also written in similar terms to Chief Constables with copies to Police and Crime Commissioners.</p><p> </p><p>Copies of both letters are attached.</p> answering member constituency Keighley answering member printed Kris Hopkins grouped question UIN 207398 question first answered 21/10/2014 16:36:23 answering member 4043 label Biography information for Kris Hopkins attachment 1 file name 207398 McCabe.pdf title Letters from DCLG/DfE and Home Office previous answer version 18505 answering member constituency Keighley answering member printed Kris Hopkins answering member 4043 label Biography information for Kris Hopkins
	tabling member	432 label Biography information for Helen Jones

91204

	registered interest
	date	09/09/2014
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Prisoners' Release
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many prisoners convicted of what offence and with what period of sentence left to serve who were released from prison in error (a) have and (b) have not been returned to custody in each of the last five years.
	tabling member constituency	Shipley
	tabling member printed	Philip Davies
	uin	208714
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p>Releases in error are taken very seriously and action has been taken to tighten processes associated with this area of performance. Incidents are infrequent and all are subject to investigation.</p><p> </p><p>The number of prisoners released in error from prison in each of the last five financial years is set out in the three tables below. Table 1 records this information by offence type; table 2 by legal status; and table 3 records the nature of the error.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="2"><p>Table 1: Releases in error, 2009/10 to 2013/14 by offence</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Offence Type</p></td><td><p>2009/10</p></td><td><p>2010/11</p></td><td><p>2011/12</p></td><td><p>2012/13</p></td><td><p>2013/14</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Burglary</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Drugs Offences</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Fraud And Forgery</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Motoring Offences</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Not Known</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>17</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Robbery</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sexual Offences</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Theft And Handling</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Violence Against The Person</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="3"><p>Table 2: Releases in error, 2009/10 to 2013/14, by legal status</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Legal status</p></td><td><p>2009/10</p></td><td><p>2010/11</p></td><td><p>2011/12</p></td><td><p>2012/13</p></td><td><p>2013/14</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Remand</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sentenced</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>25</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unknown/Not recorded</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="6"><p>Note: does not include persons released in error who were held in custody as a detainee, civil or other prisoner.</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="3"><p>Table 3: Releases in error, 2009/10 to 2013/14, by nature of error</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Reason</p></td><td><p>2009/10</p></td><td><p>2010/11</p></td><td><p>2011/12</p></td><td><p>2012/13</p></td><td><p>2013/14</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Adjudication Award Not Processed</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bail Condition Not Applied</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Calculation Error</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Early Release</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Error At Court</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Identity Issue</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Incorrect Documentation</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Licence Recall</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Misapplication Of Policy</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Misfiled Warrant</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Paperwork Error</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Recall Issue</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Remand Issue</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unclear</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unresolved Immigration Issues</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Fail To Appear Warrant Overlooked</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Release Condition Not Met</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Outstanding Absconder</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unknown/Not Recorded/Under Investigation</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>This data has been drawn from live incident files and is accurate on 30 September 2014. It is, however, subject to variance due to the nature of the live reporting system.</p><p> </p><p>Information on the number of prisoners, their offence(s) and period of sentence left to serve at the point at which they were released from prison in error that (a) have and (b) have not been returned to custody in each of the last five years is not readily available. In order to obtain this information, manual interrogation of the prisoners’ records and of a central administrative system would need to be carried out. This could only be achieved at disproportionate cost.</p> answering member constituency South West Bedfordshire answering member printed Andrew Selous grouped question UIN 208711 question first answered 21/10/2014 16:37:45 answering member 1453 label Biography information for Andrew Selous
	tabling member	1565 label Biography information for Sir Philip Davies

91206

	registered interest
	date	09/09/2014
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Prisoners' Release
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many prisoners sentenced for what offence have been released from prison in error while (a) being held on remand and (b) serving a custodial sentence in each of the last five years; and what the nature of the error was in each case.
	tabling member constituency	Shipley
	tabling member printed	Philip Davies
	uin	208711
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p /> <p>Releases in error are taken very seriously and action has been taken to tighten processes associated with this area of performance. Incidents are infrequent and all are subject to investigation.</p><p> </p><p>The number of prisoners released in error from prison in each of the last five financial years is set out in the three tables below. Table 1 records this information by offence type; table 2 by legal status; and table 3 records the nature of the error.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="2"><p>Table 1: Releases in error, 2009/10 to 2013/14 by offence</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Offence Type</p></td><td><p>2009/10</p></td><td><p>2010/11</p></td><td><p>2011/12</p></td><td><p>2012/13</p></td><td><p>2013/14</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Burglary</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Drugs Offences</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Fraud And Forgery</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Motoring Offences</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Not Known</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>17</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Robbery</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sexual Offences</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Theft And Handling</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Violence Against The Person</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="3"><p>Table 2: Releases in error, 2009/10 to 2013/14, by legal status</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Legal status</p></td><td><p>2009/10</p></td><td><p>2010/11</p></td><td><p>2011/12</p></td><td><p>2012/13</p></td><td><p>2013/14</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Remand</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sentenced</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>25</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unknown/Not recorded</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="6"><p>Note: does not include persons released in error who were held in custody as a detainee, civil or other prisoner.</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="3"><p>Table 3: Releases in error, 2009/10 to 2013/14, by nature of error</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Reason</p></td><td><p>2009/10</p></td><td><p>2010/11</p></td><td><p>2011/12</p></td><td><p>2012/13</p></td><td><p>2013/14</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Adjudication Award Not Processed</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bail Condition Not Applied</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Calculation Error</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Early Release</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Error At Court</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Identity Issue</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Incorrect Documentation</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Licence Recall</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Misapplication Of Policy</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Misfiled Warrant</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Paperwork Error</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Recall Issue</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Remand Issue</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unclear</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unresolved Immigration Issues</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Fail To Appear Warrant Overlooked</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Release Condition Not Met</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Outstanding Absconder</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unknown/Not Recorded/Under Investigation</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>This data has been drawn from live incident files and is accurate on 30 September 2014. It is, however, subject to variance due to the nature of the live reporting system.</p><p> </p><p>Information on the number of prisoners, their offence(s) and period of sentence left to serve at the point at which they were released from prison in error that (a) have and (b) have not been returned to custody in each of the last five years is not readily available. In order to obtain this information, manual interrogation of the prisoners’ records and of a central administrative system would need to be carried out. This could only be achieved at disproportionate cost.</p> answering member constituency South West Bedfordshire answering member printed Andrew Selous grouped question UIN 208714 question first answered 21/10/2014 16:37:45 answering member 1453 label Biography information for Andrew Selous
	tabling member	1565 label Biography information for Sir Philip Davies

92177

	registered interest
	date	26/09/2014
	answering body	Ministry of Defence
	answering dept id	11
	answering dept short name	Defence
	answering dept sort name	Defence
	hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many officials in his Department of each (a) gender, (b) ethnicity and (c) age received the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System's (i) exceeded, (ii) met and (iii) must improve performance mark in 2013-14.
	tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
	tabling member printed	John Healey
	uin	209477
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p>41,130 Ministry of Defence (MOD) civilian personnel below the Senior Civil Service were the subject of a Performance Appraisal Report (PAR) for reporting year 2013-14 and therefore took part in Performance Management.</p><p> </p><p>The moderated performance outcomes are as follows:</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td> </td><td><p>Box 1</p></td><td><p>Box 2</p></td><td><p>Box 3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Submitted PARs:</p></td><td><p>9,690</p></td><td><p>28,940</p></td><td><p>2,510</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion:</p></td><td><p>23.5%</p></td><td><p>70.4%</p></td><td><p>6.1%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>A non-consolidated performance award has been made to those individuals who received a Box 1 outcome.</p><p> </p><p>The MOD will publish an annual report on the outcome of the performance management process later this year; this will include a thorough analysis of the 2013-14 data broken down by declared protected characteristics. It will also show the relevant declaration rates in support of this data analysis.</p> answering member constituency Broxtowe answering member printed Anna Soubry grouped question UIN 209625 209647 question first answered 21/10/2014 16:38:58 answering member 3938 label Biography information for Anna Soubry previous answer version 22788 answering member constituency Broxtowe answering member printed Anna Soubry answering member 3938 label Biography information for Anna Soubry
	tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

92179

	registered interest
	date	26/09/2014
	answering body	Ministry of Defence
	answering dept id	11
	answering dept short name	Defence
	answering dept sort name	Defence
	hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many officials in his Department completed the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System in 2013-14; how many and what proportion of those officials received the (a) exceeded, (b) met and (c) must improve performance mark; and how many and what proportion (i) did and (ii) did not qualify for a bonus under that process.
	tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
	tabling member printed	John Healey
	uin	209647
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p>41,130 Ministry of Defence (MOD) civilian personnel below the Senior Civil Service were the subject of a Performance Appraisal Report (PAR) for reporting year 2013-14 and therefore took part in Performance Management.</p><p> </p><p>The moderated performance outcomes are as follows:</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td> </td><td><p>Box 1</p></td><td><p>Box 2</p></td><td><p>Box 3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Submitted PARs:</p></td><td><p>9,690</p></td><td><p>28,940</p></td><td><p>2,510</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion:</p></td><td><p>23.5%</p></td><td><p>70.4%</p></td><td><p>6.1%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>A non-consolidated performance award has been made to those individuals who received a Box 1 outcome.</p><p> </p><p>The MOD will publish an annual report on the outcome of the performance management process later this year; this will include a thorough analysis of the 2013-14 data broken down by declared protected characteristics. It will also show the relevant declaration rates in support of this data analysis.</p> answering member constituency Broxtowe answering member printed Anna Soubry grouped question UIN 209477 209625 question first answered 21/10/2014 16:38:58 answering member 3938 label Biography information for Anna Soubry previous answer version 22787 answering member constituency Broxtowe answering member printed Anna Soubry answering member 3938 label Biography information for Anna Soubry
	tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

92180

	registered interest
	date	26/09/2014
	answering body	Ministry of Defence
	answering dept id	11
	answering dept short name	Defence
	answering dept sort name	Defence
	hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many officials in his Department who received the (a) exceeded, (b) met and (c) must improve performance mark under the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System (i) had a disability, (ii) worked full-time and (iii) worked part-time in 2013-14.
	tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
	tabling member printed	John Healey
	uin	209625
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p>41,130 Ministry of Defence (MOD) civilian personnel below the Senior Civil Service were the subject of a Performance Appraisal Report (PAR) for reporting year 2013-14 and therefore took part in Performance Management.</p><p> </p><p>The moderated performance outcomes are as follows:</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td> </td><td><p>Box 1</p></td><td><p>Box 2</p></td><td><p>Box 3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Submitted PARs:</p></td><td><p>9,690</p></td><td><p>28,940</p></td><td><p>2,510</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion:</p></td><td><p>23.5%</p></td><td><p>70.4%</p></td><td><p>6.1%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>A non-consolidated performance award has been made to those individuals who received a Box 1 outcome.</p><p> </p><p>The MOD will publish an annual report on the outcome of the performance management process later this year; this will include a thorough analysis of the 2013-14 data broken down by declared protected characteristics. It will also show the relevant declaration rates in support of this data analysis.</p> answering member constituency Broxtowe answering member printed Anna Soubry grouped question UIN 209477 209647 question first answered 21/10/2014 16:38:58 answering member 3938 label Biography information for Anna Soubry previous answer version 22786 answering member constituency Broxtowe answering member printed Anna Soubry answering member 3938 label Biography information for Anna Soubry
	tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

92844

	registered interest
	date	13/10/2014
	answering body	Department of Health
	answering dept id	17
	answering dept short name	Health
	answering dept sort name	Health
	hansard heading	General Practitioners
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what the average pay for a GP working in the NHS was in each of the last 10 years.
	tabling member constituency	Vale of Clwyd
	tabling member printed	Chris Ruane
	uin	210053
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p>The requested information is contained in the attached tables. When interpreting the figures, it is important to note that the nature of general practitioner (GP) contracts and their work has changed over time. Since the start of the new General Medical Services (GMS) contract in 2004-05, there have been some major changes to income, work streams and investment in general practice which is not directly comparable to previous years. The time series tables are presented in cash terms for contractor and salaried GPs under a GMS or Personal Medical Service (PMS) contract. The data covers earnings, expenses and income from both National Health Service and private sources where a GP has at least some NHS earnings.</p> answering member constituency Central Suffolk and North Ipswich answering member printed Dr Daniel Poulter question first answered 21/10/2014 17:27:51 answering member 3932 label Biography information for Dr Dan Poulter attachment 1 file name Average pay for a GP working in NHS.docx title Average Pay for GPs
	tabling member	534 label Biography information for Chris Ruane