Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1140556
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-07-24more like thismore than 2019-07-24
star this property date less than 2019-07-19more like thismore than 2019-07-19
star this property date tabled less than 2019-07-19more like thismore than 2019-07-19
star this property ddp created less than 2019-07-19T14:26:12.453Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-19T14:26:12.453Z
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-07-22T14:25:49.596Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-22T14:25:49.596Z
less than 2019-07-26T10:55:02.415Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-26T10:55:02.415Z
star this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 279441 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-07-26T10:23:16.69Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-26T10:23:16.69Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the Supreme Court ruling of July 2019, if her Department will review the assessment criteria for personal independence payments for claimants with mental health illnesses that requires assessors to make a distinction between whether a claimant needs prompting to engage with other people or social support. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Motherwell and Wishaw more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Marion Fellows more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 279441 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 279441 more like this
star this property version 2 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>The Supreme Court handed down its decision on the case known as MM (SSWP v MM) on 18 July 2019. The case concerns the definition of ‘social support’ when engaging with other people face to face under activity 9 of the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) Regulations, and how far in advance that support can be provided.</p><p> </p><p>The Department will carefully consider the judgment and work with stakeholders to implement it fully so that claimants get the PIP support they are entitled to. This will include reviewing and updating where needed the guidance used for PIP assessments.</p> more like this
star this property creator
4440
star this property label Biography information for Marion Fellows more like this
star this property publisher
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property tabling member
4440
unstar this property label Biography information for Marion Fellows more like this
1139404
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-07-22more like thismore than 2019-07-22
star this property date less than 2019-07-16more like thismore than 2019-07-16
star this property date tabled less than 2019-07-16more like thismore than 2019-07-16
star this property ddp created less than 2019-07-16T18:33:08.297Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-16T18:33:08.297Z
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-07-16T18:42:14.516Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-16T18:42:14.516Z
less than 2019-07-22T13:40:02.062Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-22T13:40:02.062Z
star this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 277656 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-07-22T13:08:44.92Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-22T13:08:44.92Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what estimate he has made of the proportion of personal independence payment reports completed by ATOS that were categorised as (a) unacceptable and (b) learning required in each of the last four years. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Vale of Clwyd more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Chris Ruane more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 277656 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 277656 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>Independent Assessment Services (IAS), previously Atos Healthcare carries out Personal Independence Payment (PIP) consultations in Scotland, North East and North West England, London and Southern England. Capita carry out PIP consultations in Wales and Central England.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>PIP reports are graded as either ‘acceptable’, ‘acceptable with feedback’, ‘acceptable with amendments’ or ‘unacceptable’. The table below provides IAS figures for all these categories and is only available from April 2016.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Grades</p></td><td><p>Apr 16- Mar 17</p></td><td><p>Apr 17-Mar 18</p></td><td><p>Apr 18-Mar 19</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Acceptable</p></td><td><p>7,300</p></td><td><p>7,930</p></td><td><p>7,480</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Acceptable with Feedback</p></td><td><p>1,380</p></td><td><p>1,820</p></td><td><p>1,990</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Acceptable with Amendments</p></td><td><p>650</p></td><td><p>1,220</p></td><td><p>1,780</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unacceptable</p></td><td><p>460</p></td><td><p>620</p></td><td><p>500</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total Audited</p></td><td><p>9,790</p></td><td><p>11,590</p></td><td><p>11,750</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Figures rounded to the nearest 10</p><p>Data obtained from the CHES MI Team</p>
star this property creator
534
star this property label Biography information for Chris Ruane more like this
star this property publisher
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property tabling member
534
unstar this property label Biography information for Chris Ruane more like this
1138928
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-07-18more like thismore than 2019-07-18
star this property date less than 2019-07-15more like thismore than 2019-07-15
star this property date tabled less than 2019-07-15more like thismore than 2019-07-15
star this property ddp created less than 2019-07-15T18:44:05.933Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-15T18:44:05.933Z
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-07-16T14:25:25.180Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-16T14:25:25.180Z
less than 2019-07-18T13:49:02.841Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-18T13:49:02.841Z
star this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 277206 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-07-18T13:18:35.433Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-18T13:18:35.433Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the average time taken was to process a claim for personal independence payment in the last 12 months for which information is available. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Cardiff Central more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Jo Stevens more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 277206 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 277206 more like this
star this property version 2 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>The median clearance time from registration to DWP decision for Personal Independence Payment claims cleared under normal rules from 1<sup>st</sup> May 2018 – 30<sup>th</sup> April 2019, the latest 12-month period for which data is available is 100 calendar days, which is approximately 14 weeks. The median clearance time for claims decided in April 2019 was 13 weeks, down by over two thirds since July 2014.</p><p> </p><p>Source: PIP ADS</p><p> </p><p><strong>Notes:</strong></p><ul><li>The status of claims as 'normal rules' is shown as at the DWP decision. It is possible for claims to transition between normal/special rules during the course of the claimant journey.</li><li>The 'Registration to DWP decision (end to end)' clearance time is measured as the average time between the date of registration of the claim and the date of the DWP decision to either award or disallow the claim. It does not include claims that were withdrawn by the claimant or claims that were disallowed by DWP pre-referral to the Assessment Providers (e.g. for failure to meet basic eligibility criteria or failure to return the Part 2 form within the time limit).</li><li>The median time is the middle value if you were to order all the times within the distribution from lowest value to highest value. The median is presented here instead of the mean because the mean can be unduly affected by outlying cases (e.g. cases were the person has been hard to reach due to being in prison, hospital, failed to attend the assessment on numerous occasions etc.)</li><li>Great Britain only.</li><li>This is unpublished data. It should be used with caution and it may be subject to future revision.</li><li>The median clearance time is rounded to the nearest whole day.</li></ul>
star this property creator
4425
star this property label Biography information for Jo Stevens more like this
star this property publisher
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property tabling member
4425
unstar this property label Biography information for Jo Stevens more like this
1138046
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-07-15more like thismore than 2019-07-15
star this property date less than 2019-07-10more like thismore than 2019-07-10
star this property date tabled less than 2019-07-10more like thismore than 2019-07-10
star this property ddp created less than 2019-07-10T18:09:06.310Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-10T18:09:06.310Z
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-07-10T18:15:08.782Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-10T18:15:08.782Z
less than 2019-07-15T15:34:03.182Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-15T15:34:03.182Z
star this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 275788 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-07-15T15:02:23.55Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-15T15:02:23.55Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, for what reasons claimants of personal independence payments who have received a tribunal decision since the Upper Tribunal’s judgments on MH and RJ have been excluded from the administrative review. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Glenrothes more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Peter Grant more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 275788 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 275788 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>Following the MH and RJ judgments, the Department updated its guidance on Personal Independence Payment (PIP). In June 2018 it began an administrative exercise to identify claimants assessed using previous guidance to identify those who may be entitled to more support under PIP.</p><p> </p><p>Claimants who have had a tribunal decision since the judgments are not being reviewed as part of the MH RJ administrative exercise. The tribunals are obliged to apply the law as it stands (including the MH and RJ Upper Tribunal judgments) to all appeals, and to award claimants accordingly. The Department does not have the legal powers to override tribunal decisions.</p> more like this
star this property creator
4466
star this property label Biography information for Peter Grant more like this
star this property publisher
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property tabling member
4466
unstar this property label Biography information for Peter Grant more like this
1138075
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-07-15more like thismore than 2019-07-15
star this property date less than 2019-07-10more like thismore than 2019-07-10
star this property date tabled less than 2019-07-10more like thismore than 2019-07-10
star this property ddp created less than 2019-07-10T18:10:25.380Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-10T18:10:25.380Z
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-07-10T18:17:41.609Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-10T18:17:41.609Z
less than 2019-07-15T13:49:01.686Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-15T13:49:01.686Z
star this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 275796 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-07-15T13:17:27.86Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-15T13:17:27.86Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to the Answer of 8 July 2019 to Questions 272897 and 272898, what assessment she has made of whether the feedback of Presenting Officers has led to (a) an increase in successful mandatory reconsiderations for claimants, (b) more correct decisions resulting in fewer successful appeals and (c) fewer claims reaching appeal stage. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Hove more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Peter Kyle more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 275796 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 275796 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>Feedback from Presenting Officers has contributed to our new approach which includes contacting claimants, where appropriate, to see if there is information that would enable us to change the decision ourselves. To support this, we are investing additional time for communication, evidence gather and review. This approach supports our aim - to make the right decision as early as possible - so claimants don’t need to progress to the Appeal stage.</p><p> </p><p>It is still too early to assess the full impact of this approach. However initial feedback has been positive and the recently published PIP Official Statistics up to April 2019 showed an increase in the proportion of decisions changed at the Mandatory Reconsideration stage since the approach was implemented.</p> more like this
star this property creator
4505
star this property label Biography information for Peter Kyle more like this
star this property publisher
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property tabling member
4505
unstar this property label Biography information for Peter Kyle more like this
1138241
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-07-15more like thismore than 2019-07-15
star this property date less than 2019-07-10more like thismore than 2019-07-10
star this property date tabled less than 2019-07-10more like thismore than 2019-07-10
star this property ddp created less than 2019-07-10T18:18:41.120Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-10T18:18:41.120Z
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-07-11T15:45:41.476Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-11T15:45:41.476Z
less than 2019-07-15T15:28:01.441Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-15T15:28:01.441Z
star this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 275652 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-07-15T14:56:44.217Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-15T14:56:44.217Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, when his Department plans to implement the Order made by Judge Ashley in the Poole First Tier Tribunal on 28 May 2019, reference SC238/18/01260, on the awarding of personal independence payment with effect from 17 October 2018 to the person with National Insurance Number YY146593D. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Christchurch more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Sir Christopher Chope more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 275652 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 275652 more like this
star this property version 2 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>The decision made by the First Tier Tribunal on 28 May 2019 was implemented for the claimant on 9 July 2019.</p><p><strong> </strong></p> more like this
star this property creator
242
star this property label Biography information for Sir Christopher Chope more like this
star this property publisher
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property tabling member
242
unstar this property label Biography information for Sir Christopher Chope more like this
1137747
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-07-15more like thismore than 2019-07-15
star this property date less than 2019-07-09more like thismore than 2019-07-09
star this property date tabled less than 2019-07-09more like thismore than 2019-07-09
star this property ddp created less than 2019-07-09T18:10:06.673Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-09T18:10:06.673Z
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-07-09T18:25:41.485Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-09T18:25:41.485Z
less than 2019-07-15T15:38:02.821Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-15T15:38:02.821Z
star this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 275180 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-07-15T15:06:58.813Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-15T15:06:58.813Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to the Answer of 8 July 2019 to Question 272815 on Personal Independence Payment, what assessment he has made of the effect of the quality-driven approach to personal independence payment on the number of cases going to tribunal. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Easington more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Grahame Morris more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 275180 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 275180 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>It is still too early to assess the full impact of this approach. However initial feedback has been positive and the recently published PIP Official Statistics up to April 2019 showed an increase in the proportion of decisions changed at the Mandatory Reconsideration stage since the approach was implemented.</p> more like this
star this property creator
3973
star this property label Biography information for Grahame Morris more like this
star this property publisher
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property tabling member
3973
unstar this property label Biography information for Grahame Morris more like this
1137626
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-07-10more like thismore than 2019-07-10
star this property date less than 2019-07-08more like thismore than 2019-07-08
star this property date tabled less than 2019-07-08more like thismore than 2019-07-08
star this property ddp created less than 2019-07-08T21:33:37.167Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-08T21:33:37.167Z
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-07-08T21:42:37.413Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-08T21:42:37.413Z
less than 2019-07-15T16:59:01.846Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-15T16:59:01.846Z
star this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 274638 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-07-15T16:27:06.047Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-15T16:27:06.047Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the Personal Independence Payment Administrative Exercise data release of 4 July 2019, what accounts for the difference between her Department’s original Equality Impact Assessment in 2017 of 14 per cent of claimants being affected following review, and the figures published by her Department showing that only 0.8 per cent of cases have received an increased award after being reviewed. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Battersea more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Marsha De Cordova more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 274638 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 274638 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>Our published estimates were produced before knowing the full detail of which claimants would be eligible for additional payments following the MH legal judgment.</p><p> </p><p>There was significant uncertainty around the estimates prior to the start of the administrative exercise in June 2018, from which point we had revised guidance in place to reflect the judgment, having consulted with key stakeholders. Our estimates remain subject to change as we monitor the outcomes of the exercise.</p><p> </p><p>We are intent on making sure everyone who is affected by the judgement is identified and are committed to ensuring that disabled people get the support they are entitled to.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property creator
4676
star this property label Biography information for Marsha De Cordova more like this
star this property publisher
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property tabling member
4676
unstar this property label Biography information for Marsha De Cordova more like this
1137628
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-07-10more like thismore than 2019-07-10
star this property date less than 2019-07-08more like thismore than 2019-07-08
star this property date tabled less than 2019-07-08more like thismore than 2019-07-08
star this property ddp created less than 2019-07-08T21:33:42.397Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-08T21:33:42.397Z
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-07-09T15:35:10.433Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-09T15:35:10.433Z
less than 2019-07-15T16:50:04.723Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-15T16:50:04.723Z
star this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 274639 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-07-15T16:19:01.743Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-15T16:19:01.743Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the Personal Independence Payment Administrative Exercise data release, published by her Department on 4 July 2019, if she will commission an independent comparative assessment of the estimate of the number of claimants that would be affected in Equality Impact Assessment published in 2017 and the figures published by her Department on 4 July 2019. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Battersea more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Marsha De Cordova more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 274639 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 274639 more like this
star this property version 2 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>We have no plans to commission an independent assessment. Our original estimates were based on the best available information at the time, and we were clear that they were very likely to change as the guidance implementing the judgement was produced and data was gathered from the administrative exercise to implement it.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property creator
4676
star this property label Biography information for Marsha De Cordova more like this
star this property publisher
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property tabling member
4676
unstar this property label Biography information for Marsha De Cordova more like this
1137007
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-07-08more like thismore than 2019-07-08
star this property date less than 2019-07-04more like thismore than 2019-07-04
star this property date tabled less than 2019-07-04more like thismore than 2019-07-04
star this property ddp created less than 2019-07-04T17:31:07.213Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-04T17:31:07.213Z
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-07-05T11:45:16.015Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-05T11:45:16.015Z
less than 2019-07-10T15:50:03.080Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-10T15:50:03.080Z
star this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 273493 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-07-10T15:18:58.573Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-10T15:18:58.573Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what estimate he has made of the number of people who decided not to pursue an appeal for personal independence payments due to the length of the waiting time for an appeal. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Weaver Vale more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mike Amesbury more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 273493 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 273493 more like this
star this property version 2 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>There is no administrative data held that could determine the reasons why an individual, if dissatisfied with the decision received after their MR is completed, might not choose to pursue an appeal with HMCTS.</p><p> </p><p>There is already some data in the public domain that may be of interest. The Personal Independent Payment (PIP) Official Statistics holds information on the volumes of Mandatory Reconsiderations (MRs) registered (<em>Table 7A</em>) and cleared (<em>Table 7B</em>), and can be found here:</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/personal-independence-payment-april-2013-to-april-2019" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/personal-independence-payment-april-2013-to-april-2019</a></p><p> </p><p>The Ministry of Justice Tribunal Statistics Quarterly publication contains the number of PIP cases for which an appeal is lodged with Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunal Service (HMCTS) (<em>Table SSCS1</em>), and can be found here:</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/tribunal-statistics-quarterly-january-to-march-2019" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/tribunal-statistics-quarterly-january-to-march-2019</a></p><p> </p><p>HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HCMTS) is taking positive steps to reduce the waiting time for appeals to be heard in the Social Security and Child Support (SSCS) jurisdiction. In 2018, 232 medical members and 118 disability-qualified members were additionally appointed to the SSCS jurisdiction and an extra 129 fee-paid judges have recently been appointed. The SSCS jurisdiction will also benefit from 100 salaried judges and 170 fee-paid judges being recruited across tribunals more widely. In addition, HMCTS is developing a new digital system with a view to enabling speedier processing of appeals and a better service for all parties to the proceedings. Case-management “triage” sessions are also being conducted, with the aim of reducing the number of cases that need to progress to an oral hearing.</p>
star this property creator
4667
star this property label Biography information for Mike Amesbury more like this
star this property publisher
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property tabling member
4667
unstar this property label Biography information for Mike Amesbury more like this