Show Search Form

Search Results

human indexable	true false
published	true false
registered interest	true false
answer date	exactly: or between: and
date	exactly: or between: and
date tabled	exactly: or between: and
ddp created	exactly: or between: and
answering body
question status
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
ddp modified
hansard heading
house id
identifier
legislature
parliament number
question first answered
question text
session
session number
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
title
type
uin
version
written parliamentary question type
answer	answer text
creator	label
publisher
tabling member	label

Search

1698247

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	25/03/2024
	date	19/03/2024
	date tabled	19/03/2024
	ddp created	25/03/2024 15:47:51
	answering body	Ministry of Defence
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	11
	answering dept short name	Defence
	answering dept sort name	Defence
	ddp modified	25/03/2024 15:55:23 25/03/2024 17:31:27
	hansard heading	Armed Forces: Workplace Pensions
	house id	1
	identifier	902183
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	58
	question first answered	25/03/2024 16:57:48
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what recent assessment he has made of the potential implications for his policies of pension inequality among armed forces veterans.
	session	2023/24
	session number	4
	tabling member constituency	Linlithgow and East Falkirk
	tabling member printed	Martyn Day
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2023/24 902183
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	902183
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	NamedDay
	answer	answer answer text <p>Pension schemes develop over time in response to changing circumstances, but the Armed Forces Pension Schemes are designed to be generous, fair and equitable. It is a principle of public service pensions policy, upheld by successive Governments, that improvements to public service pension schemes should not be applied retrospectively.</p>
	creator	4488 label Biography information for Martyn Day
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4488 label Biography information for Martyn Day

1419863

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	08/02/2022
	date	04/02/2022
	date tabled	04/02/2022
	ddp created	04/02/2022 15:35:40
	answering body	Ministry of Defence
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	11
	answering dept short name	Defence
	answering dept sort name	Defence
	ddp modified	04/02/2022 15:48:41 14/02/2022 11:04:08
	hansard heading	Israel and Pakistan: Nuclear Weapons
	house id	1
	identifier	118589
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	58
	question first answered	14/02/2022 10:32:18
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what recent estimate his Department has made of the strength of (a) Pakistan's and (b) Israel's nuclear arsenal.
	session	2021/22
	session number	2
	tabling member constituency	Linlithgow and East Falkirk
	tabling member printed	Martyn Day
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2021/22 118589
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	118589
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>The hon. Member’s question is a matter for the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office.</p><p> </p><p> </p>
	creator	4488 label Biography information for Martyn Day
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4488 label Biography information for Martyn Day

1419864

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	08/02/2022
	date	04/02/2022
	date tabled	04/02/2022
	ddp created	04/02/2022 15:35:42
	answering body	Ministry of Defence
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	11
	answering dept short name	Defence
	answering dept sort name	Defence
	ddp modified	04/02/2022 15:48:44 10/02/2022 15:00:14
	hansard heading	Syria and Turkey: Defence Equipment
	house id	1
	identifier	118590
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	58
	question first answered	10/02/2022 14:29:35
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether military equipment supplied by the UK has been used by Turkey in Syria.
	session	2021/22
	session number	2
	tabling member constituency	Linlithgow and East Falkirk
	tabling member printed	Martyn Day
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2021/22 118590
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	118590
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>The UK does not undertake end-use monitoring of controlled items that have been exported. Our current approach is to focus on a rigorous forward looking risk assessment before a licence is issued and to consider whether goods might be used in a way which is inconsistent with the Strategic Export Licensing Criteria.</p><p> </p>
	creator	4488 label Biography information for Martyn Day
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4488 label Biography information for Martyn Day

1403587

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	19/01/2022
	date	17/01/2022
	date tabled	17/01/2022
	ddp created	17/01/2022 22:52:13
	answering body	Ministry of Defence
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	11
	answering dept short name	Defence
	answering dept sort name	Defence
	ddp modified	17/01/2022 23:17:59 24/01/2022 12:22:09
	hansard heading	Armed Forces: Furs
	house id	1
	identifier	105647
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	58
	question first answered	24/01/2022 11:51:00
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps his Department is taking to replace real bearskins with faux fur in attire worn by service personnel.
	session	2021/22
	session number	2
	tabling member constituency	Linlithgow and East Falkirk
	tabling member printed	Martyn Day
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2021/22 105647
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	105647
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>I refer the hon. Member to the answer I provided to Question 87697 answered on 14 December 2021.</p>
	creator	4488 label Biography information for Martyn Day
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4488 label Biography information for Martyn Day

1403632

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	19/01/2022
	date	17/01/2022
	date tabled	17/01/2022
	ddp created	17/01/2022 22:54:05
	answering body	Ministry of Defence
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	11
	answering dept short name	Defence
	answering dept sort name	Defence
	ddp modified	17/01/2022 23:19:50 24/01/2022 11:50:20
	hansard heading	Children: Maintenance
	house id	1
	identifier	105648
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	58
	question first answered	24/01/2022 11:18:41
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 17 January 2022 to Question 100622 on Children: Maintenance, how many deduction of earning requests made by the Child Maintenance Service have been declined by Defence Business Services in the financial year 2020-21; and what the reasons for those requests being declined were.
	session	2021/22
	session number	2
	tabling member constituency	Linlithgow and East Falkirk
	tabling member printed	Martyn Day
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2021/22 105648
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	105648
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>In financial year 2020-21 a total of 554 deduction of earning requests were received from the Child Maintenance Service for Service personnel; of these, 142 could not be processed. The reasons for the rejections were:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>No. of Rejections</p></td><td><p>Reason for Rejection</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>118</p></td><td><p>A deduction of earning order was issued, rather than a deduction of earning request</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>Service person had been discharged</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>Service person was a reservist</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Service Person not in receipt of pay</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>Service person in Operational Zone</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Request addressed to a Service person directly and not to Defence Business Services</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>For Ministry of Defence (MOD) civilian staff, the number of deductions of earning orders declined is not held centrally and could only be provided at disproportionate cost, however, a deduction of earning order would only be rejected if an individual was no longer employed by the MOD or if they were in receipt of insufficient earnings to meet the request.</p><p> </p>
	creator	4488 label Biography information for Martyn Day
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4488 label Biography information for Martyn Day

1401351

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	12/01/2022
	date	10/01/2022
	date tabled	10/01/2022
	ddp created	10/01/2022 22:45:45
	answering body	Ministry of Defence
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	11
	answering dept short name	Defence
	answering dept sort name	Defence
	ddp modified	10/01/2022 23:10:15 17/01/2022 15:43:08
	hansard heading	Children: Maintenance
	house id	1
	identifier	100622
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	58
	question first answered	17/01/2022 15:11:59
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many deduction of earning requests made by the Child Maintenance Service have been declined by Defence Business Services in the last five years; and what the reasons for those requests being declined were.
	session	2021/22
	session number	2
	tabling member constituency	Linlithgow and East Falkirk
	tabling member printed	Martyn Day
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2021/22 100622
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	100622
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>Since January 2017 to 12 January 2022 a total of 3,456 deduction of earning requests were received from the Child Maintenance Service for Service personnel; of these, 668 could not be processed. The reasons for the rejections were:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>No. of Rejections</p></td><td><p>Reason for Rejection</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>394</p></td><td><p>A deduction of earning order was issued, rather than a deduction of earning request</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>144</p></td><td><p>Service person had been discharged</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>88</p></td><td><p>Service person was a reservist</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>No trace of individual</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>Service Person not in receipt of pay</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>Service person in Operational Zone</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>Request addressed to a Service person directly and not to Defence Business Services</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>For MOD civilian staff, the number of deductions of earning orders declined is not held centrally and could only be provided at disproportionate cost, however, a deduction of earning order would only be rejected if an individual was no longer employed by the MOD or if they were in receipt of insufficient earnings to meet the request.</p><p> </p><p> </p>
	creator	4488 label Biography information for Martyn Day
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4488 label Biography information for Martyn Day

1383727

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	03/12/2021
	date	01/12/2021
	date tabled	01/12/2021
	ddp created	01/12/2021 18:58:58
	answering body	Ministry of Defence
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	11
	answering dept short name	Defence
	answering dept sort name	Defence
	ddp modified	01/12/2021 19:26:24 08/12/2021 13:14:07
	hansard heading	Queen's Guards: Uniforms
	house id	1
	identifier	85327
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	58
	question first answered	08/12/2021 12:42:22
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment his Department has made of the quality of the new faux bear fur that has been manufactured as an alternative to real bear fur to make the Queen’s Guard’s caps; and if he will make a statement.
	session	2021/22
	session number	2
	tabling member constituency	Linlithgow and East Falkirk
	tabling member printed	Martyn Day
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2021/22 85327
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	85327
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>Our analysis of recent tests conducted on a fake fur fabric commissioned by PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), showed it met one of the five requirements to be considered as a viable alternative for ceremonial caps. Whilst it met the basic standard for water absorption, it showed unacceptable rates of water shedding and performed poorly on the visual assessment. As the man-made fur sadly didn't meet the standards required for a ceremonial cap which is worn throughout the year and in all weathers, the Ministry of Defence has no plans to take this man-made fabric forward.</p>
	creator	4488 label Biography information for Martyn Day
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4488 label Biography information for Martyn Day

1311871

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	28/04/2021
	date	23/04/2021
	date tabled	23/04/2021
	ddp created	23/04/2021 14:10:56
	answering body	Ministry of Defence
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	11
	answering dept short name	Defence
	answering dept sort name	Defence
	ddp modified	23/04/2021 14:21:12 28/04/2021 14:39:08
	hansard heading	Ministry of Defence: Oman
	house id	1
	identifier	186190
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	58
	question first answered	28/04/2021 14:07:41
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will list all the Chiefs of the Defence staff that attended the Sultan's Privy Council in Oman while serving in the UK. UK.military.
	session	2019/21
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Linlithgow and East Falkirk
	tabling member printed	Martyn Day
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2019/21 186190
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	186190
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	NamedDay
	answer	answer answer text <p>I can confirm the following Chiefs of Defence Staff have attended the Oman Privy Council whilst serving in the UK military:</p><p>Gen Sir Charles Guthrie GCB LVO OBE ADC Gen</p><p>Gen Sir Nicholas Houghton GCB CBE ADC Gen</p><p>Air Chief Marshal Sir Stuart Peach GBE KCB ADC Gen</p><p>Gen Sir Nick Carter GCB CBE DSO ADC Gen</p>
	creator	4488 label Biography information for Martyn Day
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4488 label Biography information for Martyn Day

1280310

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	28/01/2021
	date	25/01/2021
	date tabled	25/01/2021
	ddp created	25/01/2021 23:10:32
	answering body	Ministry of Defence
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	11
	answering dept short name	Defence
	answering dept sort name	Defence
	ddp modified	25/01/2021 23:30:36 29/01/2021 10:32:18
	hansard heading	Saudi Arabia: Military Aid
	house id	1
	identifier	143011
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	58
	question first answered	28/01/2021 11:39:20
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 13 January 2021 to Question 134500, on Saudi Arabia: Training, if he will publish a breakdown of the (a) dates between which the training covered by these funds took place, (b) locations where that training took place and (c) names of each course provided to the (i) Royal Saudi Air Force, (ii) Royal Saudi Land Forces, (iii) Royal Saudi Naval Forces, (iv) Border Guard, (v) Saudi Arabia National Guard, (vi) Joint Incident Assessment, (vii) Security Forces and (viii) Joint Forces Command.
	session	2019/21
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Linlithgow and East Falkirk
	tabling member printed	Martyn Day
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2019/21 143011
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	143011
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	NamedDay
	answer	answer answer text <p>I am withholding the information as its disclosure would or would be likely to prejudice relations between the United Kingdom and another state.</p>
	creator	4488 label Biography information for Martyn Day
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4488 label Biography information for Martyn Day

1274800

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	13/01/2021
	date	08/01/2021
	date tabled	08/01/2021
	ddp created	08/01/2021 15:29:08
	answering body	Ministry of Defence
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	11
	answering dept short name	Defence
	answering dept sort name	Defence
	ddp modified	08/01/2021 15:48:41 13/01/2021 17:03:06
	hansard heading	Saudi Arabia: Training
	house id	1
	identifier	134500
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	58
	question first answered	13/01/2021 16:31:05
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to Deposited Paper DEP2020-0835 committed on 9 December 2020, which Saudi bodies and/or units have benefited from training funded by the streams referred to in that paper during each financial year since 2016-17.
	session	2019/21
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Linlithgow and East Falkirk
	tabling member printed	Martyn Day
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2019/21 134500
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	134500
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	NamedDay
	answer	answer answer text <p>The UK Armed Forces provides training to security partners internationally and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is one such partner. Pursuant to the funding streams mentioned in Deposited Paper DEP2020-0835 committed on 9 December 2020, we have provided training advice and assistance to the Royal Saudi Air Force, Royal Saudi Land Forces, Royal Saudi Naval Forces, Border Guard, Saudi Arabia National Guard, Joint Incident Assessment, Security Forces and Joint Forces Command. Unfortunately, we do not hold sufficient information to detail this by financial year.</p>
	creator	4488 label Biography information for Martyn Day
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4488 label Biography information for Martyn Day