Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1123281
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false remove filter
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-10more like thismore than 2019-05-10
star this property date less than 2019-04-25more like thismore than 2019-04-25
star this property date tabled less than 2019-04-25more like thismore than 2019-04-25
star this property ddp created less than 2019-04-25T19:03:26.153Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-25T19:03:26.153Z
star this property answering body
Department for Transport more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 27 remove filter
unstar this property answering dept short name Transport more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Transport more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-04-25T19:05:08.136Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-25T19:05:08.136Z
less than 2019-05-08T15:41:01.838Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T15:41:01.838Z
star this property hansard heading Driving under Influence more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property identifier HL15337 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-08T15:09:37.543Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T15:09:37.543Z
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Sugg on 2 April (HL14846), whether they will also monitor the results of the December 2014 reduction in the legal blood alcohol limit for motorists in Scotland from 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood to 50 milligrams; and what assessment they have made of the possible effects of introducing such a reduction for motorists in the rest of the UK. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Earl Attlee more like this
star this property title House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 HL15337 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin HL15337 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>An independent report of the impact of the Scottish limit reduction, led by the University of Glasgow, was published on 12 December 2018. The study found that lowering the drink drive limit was not associated with any reduction in total road traffic accident rates or serious and fatal road traffic accident rates.</p><p> </p><p>There are no current plans to lower the drink drive limit in England and Wales. The Government believes that rigorous enforcement and serious penalties for drink drivers are a more effective deterrent than changing the drink driving limit.</p> more like this
star this property creator
3425
star this property label Biography information for Earl Attlee more like this
star this property publisher 25277
star this property tabling member
3425
unstar this property label Biography information for Earl Attlee more like this
1123283
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false remove filter
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-10more like thismore than 2019-05-10
star this property date less than 2019-04-25more like thismore than 2019-04-25
star this property date tabled less than 2019-04-25more like thismore than 2019-04-25
star this property ddp created less than 2019-04-25T19:03:30.910Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-25T19:03:30.910Z
star this property answering body
Department for Transport more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 27 remove filter
unstar this property answering dept short name Transport more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Transport more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-04-25T19:05:12.474Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-25T19:05:12.474Z
less than 2019-05-08T14:00:03.457Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T14:00:03.457Z
star this property hansard heading Road Traffic Offences: Mobile Phones more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property identifier HL15339 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-08T13:28:38.917Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T13:28:38.917Z
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many drivers using mobile phones while driving have been convicted of causing death or serious injury in the last five years; and what assessment they have made of whether drivers using hands-free or other mobile devices have a greater risk of causing an accident. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Berkeley more like this
star this property title House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 HL15339 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin HL15339 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>The Ministry of Justice court proceedings database does not distinguish convictions involving mobile phone use from the broader offences of causing death/serious injury by dangerous driving.</p><p> </p><p>The Department for Transport has not carried out an assessment of hands-free mobile phone use, or use of other mobile devices such as satellite navigation equipment, while driving. The Highway Code stresses the importance of proper concentration while driving. If someone drives poorly because they are distracted by a phone conversation, for example, even if using hands-free, then the police can take enforcement action for failing to have proper control of the vehicle.</p> more like this
star this property creator
3526
star this property label Biography information for Lord Berkeley more like this
star this property publisher 25277
star this property tabling member
3526
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Berkeley more like this
1123284
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false remove filter
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-10more like thismore than 2019-05-10
star this property date less than 2019-04-25more like thismore than 2019-04-25
star this property date tabled less than 2019-04-25more like thismore than 2019-04-25
star this property ddp created less than 2019-04-25T19:03:32.277Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-25T19:03:32.277Z
star this property answering body
Department for Transport more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 27 remove filter
unstar this property answering dept short name Transport more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Transport more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-04-25T19:05:14.421Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-25T19:05:14.421Z
less than 2019-05-08T15:32:10.282Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T15:32:10.282Z
star this property hansard heading Shipping: Inspections more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property identifier HL15340 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-08T15:00:04.683Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T15:00:04.683Z
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, following the announcement by the Maritime and Coastguard Agency that four foreign flagged ships remained under detention in UK ports in March after failing Port State Control inspection, who is responsible for paying (1) port, and (2) other, charges incurred by those ships during the detention period. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Berkeley more like this
star this property title House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 HL15340 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin HL15340 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p><strong> </strong>The ship operator (owner or manager) has the responsibility for paying all costs incurred while the ship is under detention.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property creator
3526
star this property label Biography information for Lord Berkeley more like this
star this property publisher 25277
star this property tabling member
3526
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Berkeley more like this
1122883
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false remove filter
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-09more like thismore than 2019-05-09
star this property date less than 2019-04-24more like thismore than 2019-04-24
star this property date tabled less than 2019-04-24more like thismore than 2019-04-24
star this property ddp created less than 2019-04-24T21:26:04.307Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-24T21:26:04.307Z
star this property answering body
Department for Transport more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 27 remove filter
unstar this property answering dept short name Transport more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Transport more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-04-24T21:35:12.538Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-24T21:35:12.538Z
less than 2019-05-09T13:38:03.096Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-09T13:38:03.096Z
star this property hansard heading High Speed 2 Line: Railway Stations more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property identifier HL15274 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-09T13:06:09.783Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-09T13:06:09.783Z
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Sugg on 10 April (HL14857), whether the proposed height of station platforms above rail for dedicated HS2 train platforms complies with the EU Technical Standards for Interoperability; and if not, whether the Department for Transport has (1) applied for, and (2) received, a derogation for non-compliance. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Berkeley more like this
star this property title House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 HL15274 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin HL15274 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>The proposed height of station platforms above rail for dedicated HS2 train platforms has been designed to ensure level access for all passengers. It does not comply with the current EU Technical Specification for Interoperability regarding platform heights. However, the HS2 network does comply with the relevant EU (‘GC’) loading gauge. No derogation has been applied for as this is not needed at this stage. Further consideration will be given to whether it is necessary to apply for a derogation, depending on the extent to which EU legislation applies in the UK at the point when the platforms are put into use.</p> more like this
star this property creator
3526
star this property label Biography information for Lord Berkeley more like this
star this property publisher 25277
star this property tabling member
3526
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Berkeley more like this
1122892
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false remove filter
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-09more like thismore than 2019-05-09
star this property date less than 2019-04-24more like thismore than 2019-04-24
star this property date tabled less than 2019-04-24more like thismore than 2019-04-24
star this property ddp created less than 2019-04-24T21:26:15.997Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-24T21:26:15.997Z
star this property answering body
Department for Transport more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 27 remove filter
unstar this property answering dept short name Transport more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Transport more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-04-24T21:35:32.228Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-24T21:35:32.228Z
less than 2019-05-09T14:25:03.519Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-09T14:25:03.519Z
star this property hansard heading Monarch Airlines: Insolvency more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property identifier HL15283 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-09T14:24:37.97Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-09T14:24:37.97Z
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government when they last talked with Greybull Capital about it contributing to the costs incurred by the Government in repatriating Monarch passengers after the airline collapsed. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Myners more like this
star this property title House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 HL15283 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin HL15283 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>Greybull Capital is not itself a shareholder in Monarch Airlines but it does perform an advisory and management role for the principal shareholder, Petrol Jersey Limited. There is no formal legal mechanism we can use to oblige Greybull to contribute towards the cost of repatriating passengers.</p><p> </p><p>However Marc Meyohas, partner at Greybull, wrote to the Transport Select Committee acknowledging a moral obligation (if they make a profit) to contribute and help to defray the costs incurred by the Government in repatriating Monarch customers.</p><p> </p><p>Discussions with Greybull in relation to recovering the costs of the repatriation operation have been in writing. Ministers last wrote to Greybull on this matter on 5 December 2018.</p><p> </p><p>The extent of any profit or loss from Greybull Capital and Petrol Jersey Limited’s investment in Monarch Airlines will depend on the outcome of the administration process, which is not due to conclude until October 2020.</p><p> </p><p>I refer to the Written Ministerial Statement made by the Secretary of State on 9 May 2019, which reported that the final cost to the taxpayer from the Monarch repatriation have been assessed to be £40.5m. This does not include any contribution from Greybull Capital or the principal shareholder, Petrol Jersey Limited. We do not expect any material change to the final cost to the taxpayer.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
star this property creator
3869
star this property label Biography information for Lord Myners more like this
star this property publisher 25277
star this property tabling member
3869
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Myners more like this
1122900
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false remove filter
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-09more like thismore than 2019-05-09
star this property date less than 2019-04-24more like thismore than 2019-04-24
star this property date tabled less than 2019-04-24more like thismore than 2019-04-24
star this property ddp created less than 2019-04-24T21:26:25.850Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-24T21:26:25.850Z
star this property answering body
Department for Transport more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 27 remove filter
unstar this property answering dept short name Transport more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Transport more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-04-24T21:35:49.841Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-24T21:35:49.841Z
less than 2019-05-01T12:14:02.361Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-01T12:14:02.361Z
star this property hansard heading West Coast Partnership Rail Franchise more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property identifier HL15291 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-01T11:42:29.52Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-01T11:42:29.52Z
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what priority they give to at least one of the shortlisted bidders for the West Coast rail franchise being a British company; and what steps, if any, they have taken to achieve this. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Greaves more like this
star this property title House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 HL15291 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin HL15291 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>The key aspect of competition is that it is fair and open to all companies. This approach has been followed throughout the West Coast Partnership competition and all bidders have been, and continue to be, treated equally. This allows for the greatest level of competition, which will contribute to us securing both the best value for money for the taxpayer and benefits for the passenger from the franchise.</p> more like this
star this property creator
2569
star this property label Biography information for Lord Greaves more like this
star this property publisher 25277
star this property tabling member
2569
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Greaves more like this
1122901
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false remove filter
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-09more like thismore than 2019-05-09
star this property date less than 2019-04-24more like thismore than 2019-04-24
star this property date tabled less than 2019-04-24more like thismore than 2019-04-24
star this property ddp created less than 2019-04-24T21:26:27.080Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-24T21:26:27.080Z
star this property answering body
Department for Transport more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 27 remove filter
unstar this property answering dept short name Transport more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Transport more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-04-24T21:35:52.147Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-24T21:35:52.147Z
less than 2019-05-09T13:32:02.009Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-09T13:32:02.009Z
star this property hansard heading Railways: Franchises more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property identifier HL15292 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-09T13:00:41.393Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-09T13:00:41.393Z
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the likelihood of all the rail franchises in England and Wales being held by companies owned and controlled in other countries; and whether they consider such a situation to be desirable. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Greaves more like this
star this property title House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 HL15292 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin HL15292 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>Ownership by non-UK governments accounts for 29% of the DfT-managed franchise market (based on notional share of passenger revenues during 2017/18). This calculation excludes train operators other than DfT-managed franchisees.</p><p> </p><p>All franchise bidders and operators are required to be UK tax registered firms, registered with Companies House and at arms-length from owners. Train operating companies pay tax here in the UK and, most importantly, have been awarded franchises through open competitions precisely because they offer the best deal for UK passengers and taxpayers. Private sector franchisees continue to support key investments to improve services to passengers, including expanded car parking provision, station upgrades, and major new train fleets.</p> more like this
star this property creator
2569
star this property label Biography information for Lord Greaves more like this
star this property publisher 25277
star this property tabling member
2569
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Greaves more like this
1122902
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false remove filter
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-09more like thismore than 2019-05-09
star this property date less than 2019-04-24more like thismore than 2019-04-24
star this property date tabled less than 2019-04-24more like thismore than 2019-04-24
star this property ddp created less than 2019-04-24T21:26:28.283Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-24T21:26:28.283Z
star this property answering body
Department for Transport more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 27 remove filter
unstar this property answering dept short name Transport more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Transport more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-04-24T21:35:54.460Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-24T21:35:54.460Z
less than 2019-05-09T14:25:01.989Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-09T14:25:01.989Z
star this property hansard heading Monarch Airlines: Insolvency more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property identifier HL15293 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-09T14:24:38.003Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-09T14:24:38.003Z
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Sugg on 12 March (HL14267), whether the contribution promised by Greybull to meet part of the cost incurred by taxpayers in repatriating customers of Monarch Airlines is dependent on the completion of the administration of the Monarch group of companies; and when ministers last met Greybull in connection with Greybull's contribution to costs. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Myners more like this
star this property title House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 HL15293 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin HL15293 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>Greybull Capital is not itself a shareholder in Monarch Airlines but it does perform an advisory and management role for the principal shareholder, Petrol Jersey Limited. There is no formal legal mechanism we can use to oblige Greybull to contribute towards the cost of repatriating passengers.</p><p> </p><p>However Marc Meyohas, partner at Greybull, wrote to the Transport Select Committee acknowledging a moral obligation (if they make a profit) to contribute and help to defray the costs incurred by the Government in repatriating Monarch customers.</p><p> </p><p>Discussions with Greybull in relation to recovering the costs of the repatriation operation have been in writing. Ministers last wrote to Greybull on this matter on 5 December 2018.</p><p> </p><p>The extent of any profit or loss from Greybull Capital and Petrol Jersey Limited’s investment in Monarch Airlines will depend on the outcome of the administration process, which is not due to conclude until October 2020.</p><p> </p><p>I refer to the Written Ministerial Statement made by the Secretary of State on 9 May 2019, which reported that the final cost to the taxpayer from the Monarch repatriation have been assessed to be £40.5m. This does not include any contribution from Greybull Capital or the principal shareholder, Petrol Jersey Limited. We do not expect any material change to the final cost to the taxpayer.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
star this property creator
3869
star this property label Biography information for Lord Myners more like this
star this property publisher 25277
star this property tabling member
3869
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Myners more like this
1122903
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false remove filter
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-09more like thismore than 2019-05-09
star this property date less than 2019-04-24more like thismore than 2019-04-24
star this property date tabled less than 2019-04-24more like thismore than 2019-04-24
star this property ddp created less than 2019-04-24T21:26:29.503Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-24T21:26:29.503Z
star this property answering body
Department for Transport more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 27 remove filter
unstar this property answering dept short name Transport more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Transport more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-04-24T21:35:56.674Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-24T21:35:56.674Z
less than 2019-05-09T13:32:04.243Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-09T13:32:04.243Z
star this property hansard heading Railways: Franchises more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property identifier HL15294 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-09T13:00:41.347Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-09T13:00:41.347Z
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what proportion of rail franchises currently in operation are held, in whole or in part, by companies wholly or partly owned by foreign governments; and what percentage of total ownership of rail franchises this represents. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Greaves more like this
star this property title House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 HL15294 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin HL15294 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>Ownership by non-UK governments accounts for 29% of the DfT-managed franchise market (based on notional share of passenger revenues during 2017/18). This calculation excludes train operators other than DfT-managed franchisees.</p><p> </p><p>All franchise bidders and operators are required to be UK tax registered firms, registered with Companies House and at arms-length from owners. Train operating companies pay tax here in the UK and, most importantly, have been awarded franchises through open competitions precisely because they offer the best deal for UK passengers and taxpayers. Private sector franchisees continue to support key investments to improve services to passengers, including expanded car parking provision, station upgrades, and major new train fleets.</p> more like this
star this property creator
2569
star this property label Biography information for Lord Greaves more like this
star this property publisher 25277
star this property tabling member
2569
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Greaves more like this
1123100
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false remove filter
star this property answer date less than 2019-04-30more like thismore than 2019-04-30
star this property date less than 2019-04-24more like thismore than 2019-04-24
star this property date tabled less than 2019-04-24more like thismore than 2019-04-24
star this property ddp created less than 2019-04-25T16:57:21.153Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-25T16:57:21.153Z
star this property answering body
Department for Transport more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 27 remove filter
unstar this property answering dept short name Transport more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Transport more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-04-26T12:55:15.827Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-26T12:55:15.827Z
less than 2019-04-30T14:22:01.810Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-30T14:22:01.810Z
star this property hansard heading Kew Palace: Boats more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 247692 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-04-30T13:50:58.097Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-30T13:50:58.097Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, when he last met the (a) Royal Botanic Gardens and (b) Historic Royal Palaces to discuss the potential effect of the Maritime and Coastguard Agency’s proposals for older UK passenger boats on tourism and visitor numbers at (i) Kew Gardens and (ii) Kew Palace. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Richmond Park more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Zac Goldsmith more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 247692 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 247692 more like this
star this property version 2 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>The Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) consulted upon an Impact Assessment (IA) during a public consultation which ran from 6 November 2018 to 29 January 2019. Consultees were invited to comment on the validity of the analysis in the IA and encouraged to provide information that would help to strengthen this. The IA is now being updated to reflect the range of further information provided through consultee feedback.</p><p> </p><p>This process is ongoing and policy officials in the MCA are happy to discuss impacts with any interested parties and take onboard relevant evidence for the assessment.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property creator
4062
star this property label Biography information for Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4062
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park more like this