Show Search Form

Search Results

human indexable	true false
published	true false
registered interest	true false
answer date	exactly: or between: and
date	exactly: or between: and
date tabled	exactly: or between: and
ddp created	exactly: or between: and
answering body
question status
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
ddp modified
hansard heading
house id
identifier
legislature
parliament number
question first answered
question text
session
session number
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
title
type
uin
version
written parliamentary question type
answer	is ministerial correction true false answer text question first answered
creator	label
publisher
tabling member	label

Search

1128446

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	04/06/2019
	date	23/05/2019
	date tabled	23/05/2019
	ddp created	24/05/2019 09:05:27
	answering body	Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	90
	answering dept short name	Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority
	answering dept sort name	Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority
	ddp modified	24/05/2019 12:25:09 05/06/2019 10:07:01
	hansard heading	Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority: Buildings
	house id	1
	identifier	257645
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	05/06/2019 09:35:36
	question text	To ask the hon. Member for Broxbourne, representing the Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, pursuant to the Answer of 20 May 2019 to Question 253493 on Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority: Location, how many staff are located in the new premises at 85 Strand; how much floor space those staff occupy; at what rate per square metre; which locations were considered outside London for new premises; and what the comparable cost would have been in locating those staff outside London.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Warley
	tabling member printed	John Spellar
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 257645
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	257645
	version	2
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>I have asked IPSA to reply.</p><p>IPSA currently has 69 members of staff. It included in its office requirements space for up to 76 staff in order to provide flexibility for periods where there is a higher volume of work and therefore a need for additional temporary staff, such as General Election periods.</p><p>To disclose the size of the office or rate paid per square metre would be prejudicial to commercial interests. IPSA’s annual accounts are laid in Parliament and published each year, and will provide information about operational costs.</p><p>Before choosing its offices at 85 Strand, IPSA considered potential premises in Croydon and Milton Keynes, as well as Stratford and Canary Wharf in London, but determined that the selected location provided the prospect of better support to MPs and better value for money for the taxpayer.</p> question first answered 05/06/2019 09:35:36
	creator	318 label Biography information for John Spellar
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	318 label Biography information for John Spellar

1131249

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	13/06/2019
	date	11/06/2019
	date tabled	11/06/2019
	ddp created	11/06/2019 17:57:03
	answering body	Church Commissioners
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	9
	answering dept short name	Church Commissioners
	answering dept sort name	Church Commissioners
	ddp modified	12/06/2019 14:15:12 13/06/2019 14:26:04
	hansard heading	Churches: Coal
	house id	1
	identifier	263116
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	13/06/2019 13:54:40
	question text	To ask the right hon. Member for Meriden, representing the Church Commissioners, what assessment she made of the economic effect on churches and vicarages of the ban on house coal.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Shipley
	tabling member printed	Philip Davies
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 263116
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	263116
	version	2
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>The economic effect on churches and vicarages of the ban on the use of house coal has been negligible.</p><p> </p><p>Bishops’ see houses and vicarages have not used house coal for many years and the Church Commissioners are not aware of any churches that still use coal as a form of heating.</p><p>The Church of England supports the aim of the Government to improve air quality and public health; the Church has launched several initiatives to support this policy, which include planting more trees on its properties and encouraging churches to increase the biodiversity of their churchyards and green spaces.</p><p> </p> question first answered 13/06/2019 13:54:40
	creator	1565 label Biography information for Sir Philip Davies
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	1565 label Biography information for Sir Philip Davies

1131079

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	12/06/2019
	date	10/06/2019
	date tabled	10/06/2019
	ddp created	10/06/2019 22:03:00
	answering body	Church Commissioners
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	9
	answering dept short name	Church Commissioners
	answering dept sort name	Church Commissioners
	ddp modified	11/06/2019 14:55:05 13/06/2019 15:41:01
	hansard heading	Church of England: Scotland
	house id	1
	identifier	262403
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	13/06/2019 15:10:01
	question text	To ask the right hon. Member for Meriden, representing the Church Commissioners, what estimate the Church of England has made of the profits from its operations in Scotland in the last 12 months for which information is available.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Edinburgh North and Leith
	tabling member printed	Deidre Brock
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 262403
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	262403
	version	2
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>The Church Commissioners recieved a total net income of £8,858,429 from forestry and windfarms between 1st January 2018 to the 31st December 2018.</p><p>We are unable to provide a figure for profit in the equivalent period as liabilities, including for restocking, will be borne over a number of years and the cost of purchasing the asset should be taken into consideration.</p><p> </p> question first answered 13/06/2019 15:10:01
	creator	4417 label Biography information for Deidre Brock
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4417 label Biography information for Deidre Brock

1129271

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	06/06/2019
	date	03/06/2019
	date tabled	03/06/2019
	ddp created	03/06/2019 16:43:46
	answering body	Attorney General
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	88
	answering dept short name	Attorney General
	answering dept sort name	Attorney General
	ddp modified	05/06/2019 14:45:10 06/06/2019 11:49:02
	hansard heading	Rape: Mental Health Services
	house id	1
	identifier	259357
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	06/06/2019 11:17:26
	question text	To ask the Attorney General, if the Government will review the CPS guidance given to victims of rape on seeking therapy.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Ealing Central and Acton
	tabling member printed	Dr Rupa Huq
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 259357
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	259357
	version	2
	written parliamentary question type	NamedDay
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>It is vital that victims are confident they will be treated with the utmost fairness by the justice system. CPS committed, as part of the cross-Government Victims Strategy, to launch new guidance on pre-trial therapy to reduce the perception amongst victims, therapists and criminal justice professionals that it will damage the prosecution case. This is due to be published this summer. Additionally, a new toolkit for prosecutors on the support that an individual suffering from a mental health condition will require was launched in August 2018.</p> question first answered 06/06/2019 11:17:26
	creator	4511 label Biography information for Dr Rupa Huq
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4511 label Biography information for Dr Rupa Huq

1129073

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	05/06/2019
	date	03/06/2019
	date tabled	03/06/2019
	ddp created	03/06/2019 16:34:56
	answering body	Attorney General
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	88
	answering dept short name	Attorney General
	answering dept sort name	Attorney General
	ddp modified	04/06/2019 15:55:17 12/06/2019 15:44:01
	hansard heading	Sexual Offences: Disclosure of Information
	house id	1
	identifier	259168
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	12/06/2019 15:12:37
	question text	To ask the Attorney General, whether the Sub-Group to the Criminal Justice Board and Review of the Criminal Justice Response to Rape and Serious Sexual Offences plans to make an assessment of the (a) effectiveness and (b) effect on survivors of rape of the legal guidance issued by the CPS on rape and sexual offence in relation to disclosure of medical records and counselling notes.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Brighton, Pavilion
	tabling member printed	Caroline Lucas
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 259168
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	259168
	version	2
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>The Crown Prosecution Service is working with the police, government departments and third sector stakeholders on the Government’s review into how the criminal justice system responds to rape and serious sexual offences. The Crown Prosecution Service is committed to working with all involved in the Review, including stakeholders, to identify and address any issues that are identified.</p><p>Complainants are entitled to protection from unnecessary and unjustified invasion of their private lives. CPS guidance is clear that where it is a reasonable line of enquiry in the investigation, the police should obtain complainants’ informed consent to gain access to medical records and counselling notes. Prosecutors will robustly apply the relevant statutory provisions when deciding whether such material should be disclosed to the defence.</p> question first answered 12/06/2019 15:12:37
	creator	3930 label Biography information for Caroline Lucas
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	3930 label Biography information for Caroline Lucas

1130732

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	12/06/2019
	date	07/06/2019
	date tabled	07/06/2019
	ddp created	07/06/2019 14:12:03
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	ddp modified	10/06/2019 14:55:11 12/06/2019 14:32:01
	hansard heading	Buildings: Insulation
	house id	1
	identifier	261509
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	12/06/2019 14:00:43
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, on what date his Department plans to write to building owners eligible for the aluminium composite material cladding fund.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Manchester Central
	tabling member printed	Lucy Powell
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 261509
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	261509
	version	2
	written parliamentary question type	NamedDay
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>On 17 May 2019, we sent letters to all building owners eligible for the private sector remediation fund. We will continue to engage with building owners, managing agents, developers, local authorities and others to establish the fund.</p> question first answered 12/06/2019 14:00:43
	creator	4263 label Biography information for Lucy Powell
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4263 label Biography information for Lucy Powell

1130733

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	12/06/2019
	date	07/06/2019
	date tabled	07/06/2019
	ddp created	07/06/2019 14:12:05
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	ddp modified	10/06/2019 14:55:13 12/06/2019 14:33:07
	hansard heading	Buildings: Insulation
	house id	1
	identifier	261510
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	12/06/2019 14:01:11
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what criteria his Department is using to determine whether building owners should be sent a letter regarding the aluminium composite material Cladding Fund.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Manchester Central
	tabling member printed	Lucy Powell
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 261510
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	261510
	version	2
	written parliamentary question type	NamedDay
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>The fund will include all high-rise (over 18 metres) residential private sector buildings with unsafe Aluminium Composite Material (ACM) cladding, except where a warranty claim has been accepted.</p> question first answered 12/06/2019 14:01:11
	creator	4263 label Biography information for Lucy Powell
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4263 label Biography information for Lucy Powell

1130734

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	12/06/2019
	date	07/06/2019
	date tabled	07/06/2019
	ddp created	07/06/2019 14:12:07
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	ddp modified	10/06/2019 14:55:15 12/06/2019 14:33:05
	hansard heading	Buildings: Insulation
	house id	1
	identifier	261511
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	12/06/2019 14:01:34
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what the timescale is for (a) the testing regime for non-aluminium composite material cladding to be completed and (b) publishing the results from the testing regime for non-aluminium composite material cladding.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Manchester Central
	tabling member printed	Lucy Powell
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 261511
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	261511
	version	2
	written parliamentary question type	NamedDay
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>I refer the Rt Hon Member to the written ministerial statement HCWS1533 made on 1 May 2019.</p> question first answered 12/06/2019 14:01:34
	creator	4263 label Biography information for Lucy Powell
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4263 label Biography information for Lucy Powell

1130735

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	12/06/2019
	date	07/06/2019
	date tabled	07/06/2019
	ddp created	07/06/2019 14:12:10
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	ddp modified	10/06/2019 14:55:18 12/06/2019 14:33:03
	hansard heading	Buildings: Insulation
	house id	1
	identifier	261512
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	12/06/2019 14:02:15
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps his Department plans to take in cases where building owners eligible for the aluminium composite material Cladding Fund do not apply within three months of being written to.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Manchester Central
	tabling member printed	Lucy Powell
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 261512
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	261512
	version	2
	written parliamentary question type	NamedDay
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>We are engaging with all relevant building owners to encourage swift applications. We are backing local authorities to take enforcement action where building owners are refusing to remediate high-rise buildings with unsafe cladding, including by establishing a Joint Inspection Team to support local authorities and give them the confidence to pursue enforcement action.</p> question first answered 12/06/2019 14:02:15
	creator	4263 label Biography information for Lucy Powell
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4263 label Biography information for Lucy Powell

1130426

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	11/06/2019
	date	06/06/2019
	date tabled	06/06/2019
	ddp created	06/06/2019 16:58:12
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	ddp modified	07/06/2019 12:55:08 11/06/2019 17:25:03
	hansard heading	High Rise Flats: Insulation
	house id	1
	identifier	261285
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	11/06/2019 16:53:41
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant to the Answers of 8 May 2019 and 15 May 2019 to Questions 250034 and 252869, if he will publish an updated regional breakdown of (a) blocks with aluminium composite material cladding systems unlikely to meet building regulations which are yet to be remediated and (b) dwellings in those blocks as of May 2019 based on the building safety programme figures due to be published on 10 June 2019.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Croydon Central
	tabling member printed	Sarah Jones
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 261285
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	261285
	version	2
	written parliamentary question type	NamedDay
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>Table 1 shows the regional breakdown of private and social sector high-rise residential buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations which are yet to be remediated, as at 31 May 2019. This excludes hotels, student accommodation and public buildings.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 1: Regional breakdown of private and social sector high-rise residential buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations which are yet to be remediated </strong>- 31 May, 2019.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Region</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Number of high-rise residential buildings yet to be remediated</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>East Midlands</p></td><td><p>1-5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>East of England</p></td><td><p>6-10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>Over 20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>North East</p></td><td><p>1-5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>North West</p></td><td><p>Over 20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>11-20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South West</p></td><td><p>6-10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Yorkshire and The Humber</p></td><td><p>11-20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>265</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Table 2 shows total numbers of dwellings in high-rise residential buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations by region, as at 31 May 2019. This excludes hotels, student accommodation and public buildings.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 2: Numbers of dwellings in private and social sector high-rise residential buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations which are yet to be remediated, by region </strong>- 31 May, 2019.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Region</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Number of estimated dwellings in yet to be remediated buildings</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>East Midlands</p></td><td><p>200</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>East of England</p></td><td><p>500</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>12,600-15,800</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>North East</p></td><td><p>200</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>North West</p></td><td><p>4,100-4,300</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>1,400</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South West</p></td><td><p>600</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Yorkshire and The Humber</p></td><td><p>1,500-1,900</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total (does not sum due to rounding)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>21,000-24,900</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table> question first answered 11/06/2019 16:53:41
	creator	4631 label Biography information for Sarah Jones
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4631 label Biography information for Sarah Jones