Show Search Form

Search Results

human indexable	true false
published	true false
registered interest	true false
answer date	exactly: or between: and
date	exactly: or between: and
date tabled	exactly: or between: and
ddp created	exactly: or between: and
answering body
question status
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
ddp modified
hansard heading
house id
identifier
legislature
parliament number
question first answered
question text
session
session number
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
title
type
uin
version
written parliamentary question type
answer	answer text
creator	label
publisher
tabling member	label

Search

1123367

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	30/04/2019
	date	26/04/2019
	date tabled	26/04/2019
	ddp created	26/04/2019 14:25:56
	answering body	Home Office
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	1
	answering dept short name	Home Office
	answering dept sort name	Home Office
	ddp modified	26/04/2019 14:36:37 07/05/2019 16:50:04
	hansard heading	Lancashire Constabulary: Expenditure
	house id	1
	identifier	247984
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	07/05/2019 16:18:50
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how much Lancashire Constabulary spent on providing policing resources to sporting events throughout Lancashire in (a) 2018 and (b) 2014.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Preston
	tabling member printed	Sir Mark Hendrick
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 247984
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	247984
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>Spending information of this nature is not held centrally by the Home Office.</p><p>It is for elected Police and Crime Commissioners and Chief Constables to decide how their force’s resources are deployed, including those to provide public order support to sporting events.</p>
	creator	473 label Biography information for Sir Mark Hendrick
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	473 label Biography information for Sir Mark Hendrick

1123368

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	30/04/2019
	date	26/04/2019
	date tabled	26/04/2019
	ddp created	26/04/2019 14:26:00
	answering body	Home Office
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	1
	answering dept short name	Home Office
	answering dept sort name	Home Office
	ddp modified	26/04/2019 14:36:40 07/05/2019 16:51:01
	hansard heading	Police: Horses
	house id	1
	identifier	247985
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	07/05/2019 16:19:55
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many police horses have died as a result of injuries sustained whilst on active duty in (a) England and (b) Lancashire in each of the in the last five years.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Preston
	tabling member printed	Sir Mark Hendrick
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 247985
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	247985
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>The Home Office does not hold centrally any information on the number of police horses injured whilst on duty in service of police forces.</p>
	creator	473 label Biography information for Sir Mark Hendrick
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	473 label Biography information for Sir Mark Hendrick

1123380

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	30/04/2019
	date	26/04/2019
	date tabled	26/04/2019
	ddp created	26/04/2019 14:26:33
	answering body	Home Office
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	1
	answering dept short name	Home Office
	answering dept sort name	Home Office
	ddp modified	26/04/2019 14:37:09 07/05/2019 16:48:01
	hansard heading	Alcoholic Drinks: Sales
	house id	1
	identifier	248072
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	07/05/2019 16:16:16
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what plans his Department has to review the requirement for holographic ID for the purchase of alcohol.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Leigh
	tabling member printed	Jo Platt
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 248072
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	248072
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>The Home Office has no plans to review the requirement for a holographic mark or an ultra-violet feature on identification used for the purchase of alcohol. In due course, the mandatory licensing condition that includes this requirement will need to be amended to allow the use of digital forms of identification. However, at present there are no industry standards on which to base such an amendment.</p>
	creator	4673 label Biography information for Jo Platt
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4673 label Biography information for Jo Platt

1123147

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	29/04/2019
	date	25/04/2019
	date tabled	25/04/2019
	ddp created	25/04/2019 16:59:19
	answering body	Home Office
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	1
	answering dept short name	Home Office
	answering dept sort name	Home Office
	ddp modified	25/04/2019 17:09:29 15/05/2019 17:26:28
	hansard heading	Proscribed Organisations: British Nationals Abroad
	house id	1
	identifier	247667
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	15/05/2019 16:54:53
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of amending Section 63A of the Terrorism Act 2000 to extend extrajudicial jurisdiction to the offence of a UK national supporting a proscribed organisation while overseas.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Hendon
	tabling member printed	Dr Matthew Offord
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 247667
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	247667
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>The offence of membership of a proscribed organisation has had extra-territorial jurisdiction since 2006. The Counter Terrorism and Border Security Act 2019 extended extra-territorial jurisdiction-limited to UK nationals and residents-to the offences of inviting support, reckless expressions of support, and displaying in a public place and publishing an image of a flag or logo.</p>
	creator	4006 label Biography information for Dr Matthew Offord
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4006 label Biography information for Dr Matthew Offord

1123280

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	10/05/2019
	date	25/04/2019
	date tabled	25/04/2019
	ddp created	25/04/2019 19:03:23
	answering body	Home Office
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	1
	answering dept short name	Home Office
	answering dept sort name	Home Office
	ddp modified	25/04/2019 19:05:05 10/05/2019 13:11:04
	hansard heading	Islamic State: British Nationals Abroad
	house id	2
	identifier	HL15336
	legislature	25277
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	10/05/2019 12:39:30
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by the Home Secretary on 18 February (HC Deb, col 1198), what consideration they have given to updating the Treason Act 1945 to provide a tenable basis for the prosecution of British citizens who (1) participate in, (2) help to fund, and (3) organise, ISIS inspired atrocities overseas.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member printed	Lord Alton of Liverpool
	title	House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 HL15336
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	HL15336
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>To prosecute terrorists for treason risks giving their actions a political status or glamour they do not deserve, rather than treating them merely as criminals. The UK has a comprehensive range of terrorism offences and other powers, which we consider the most appropriate means of dealing with foreign terrorist fighters. Additionally, the Government has just passed the Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act, which updates terrorism offences and introduces new powers, to reflect the threat we face today from foreign terrorist fighters. This will provide the police and intelligence services with the powers they need to protect the public.</p>
	creator	738 label Biography information for Lord Alton of Liverpool
	publisher	25277
	tabling member	738 label Biography information for Lord Alton of Liverpool

1123282

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	10/05/2019
	date	25/04/2019
	date tabled	25/04/2019
	ddp created	25/04/2019 19:03:28
	answering body	Home Office
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	1
	answering dept short name	Home Office
	answering dept sort name	Home Office
	ddp modified	25/04/2019 19:05:10 10/05/2019 12:58:01
	hansard heading	Visas: Commonwealth
	house id	2
	identifier	HL15338
	legislature	25277
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	10/05/2019 12:26:10
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government how visa applications fees for Commonwealth veterans are calculated; and why visa application fees have risen by 1,441 per cent since 2003.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member printed	Lord Beecham
	title	House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 HL15338
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	HL15338
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>The fees for applications from Commonwealth citizens who have served in the armed forces are the same as applications from Commonwealth applicants who have not.</p><p>When setting fees, the Home Office takes into account the cost of processing the application, the wider cost of running Border, Immigration and Citizenship (BIC) system and the benefits the Home Office believes are likely to accrue from a successful application</p><p>Application fees have increased in recent years as the Home Office aims to reduce the overall level of funding that comes from general taxation.</p>
	creator	4181 label Biography information for Lord Beecham
	publisher	25277
	tabling member	4181 label Biography information for Lord Beecham

1123297

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	10/05/2019
	date	25/04/2019
	date tabled	25/04/2019
	ddp created	25/04/2019 19:03:57
	answering body	Home Office
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	1
	answering dept short name	Home Office
	answering dept sort name	Home Office
	ddp modified	26/04/2019 15:15:05 10/05/2019 13:10:02
	hansard heading	British Nationality: British Overseas Territories
	house id	2
	identifier	HL15353
	legislature	25277
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	10/05/2019 12:39:00
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what progress is being made in the consultation process with the governments of British Overseas Territories concerning the provision of a retrospective registration route for British and British Overseas Territories citizenship for the children born abroad, out of wedlock, to fathers from British Overseas Territories before 1 July 2006.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member printed	Baroness Lister of Burtersett
	title	House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 HL15353
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	HL15353
	version	2
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>We have engaged with the British Overseas Territories to seek their views on possible future changes on the matter. This matter is under consideration.</p>
	creator	4234 label Biography information for Baroness Lister of Burtersett
	publisher	25277
	tabling member	4234 label Biography information for Baroness Lister of Burtersett

1123301

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	10/05/2019
	date	25/04/2019
	date tabled	25/04/2019
	ddp created	25/04/2019 19:04:04
	answering body	Home Office
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	1
	answering dept short name	Home Office
	answering dept sort name	Home Office
	ddp modified	25/04/2019 19:05:56 10/05/2019 13:10:05
	hansard heading	Home Office: Fees and Charges
	house id	2
	identifier	HL15357
	legislature	25277
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	10/05/2019 12:38:11
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to their response to the report by the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration An inspection of the policies and practices of the Home Office’s Borders, Immigration and Citizenship Systems relating to charging and fees June 2018–January 2019, published on 4 April, which specific areas they plan to consult on; whether they intend to publish a children’s best interests impact assessment when proposing fees levels and increases; and what is their response to the Chief Inspector’s recommendation that they include consideration of extending eligibility for fee waivers, including for all child Leave to Remain and nationality applications, in a full review of the fee waiver process.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member printed	Baroness Lister of Burtersett
	title	House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 HL15357
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	HL15357
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>As detailed within the official Home Office response, there are no plans to run a full public consultation. A consultation in specific areas may be useful and we will undertake to do this before we take decisions which would result in fundamental changes to the way the system is funded.</p><p>There are no plans to produce a separate children’s best interest impact assessment at this point in time, but as we set out in the Home Office responses to the ICIBI report, we will consider publication of fee-related Policy Equality Statements on a case by case basis going forward.</p><p>In respect of the Chief Inspector’s recommendation to consider extending eligibility for fee waivers, the Home Office response is as detailed within the published response. We have recently reviewed the fee waiver policy, invested in recruitment and continued process improvement and also engaged with Local Authorities on how we may identify and, where required, prioritise fee waiver applications from those who are most vulnerable. Current fee levels and policies remain under consideration.</p>
	creator	4234 label Biography information for Baroness Lister of Burtersett
	publisher	25277
	tabling member	4234 label Biography information for Baroness Lister of Burtersett

1123303

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	10/05/2019
	date	25/04/2019
	date tabled	25/04/2019
	ddp created	25/04/2019 19:04:08
	answering body	Home Office
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	1
	answering dept short name	Home Office
	answering dept sort name	Home Office
	ddp modified	25/04/2019 19:06:01 10/05/2019 13:10:03
	hansard heading	Oluwole Ilesanmi
	house id	2
	identifier	HL15359
	legislature	25277
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	10/05/2019 12:38:43
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Baroness Williams of Trafford on 3 April (HL Deb, col 170), whether they are aware of the circumstances of the arrest of Pastor Olu; whether any action is being taken against the police who arrested him; if so, what; and what assessment they have made of the implications for free speech of his arrest.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member printed	Lord Pearson of Rannoch
	title	House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 HL15359
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	HL15359
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>The Government does not prevent individuals from following their religious beliefs or cultural traditions provided that they do so within the law. The diversity of modern Britain is one of our strengths and many British people of different faiths follow religious codes and practices.</p><p>The right to freedom of expression is a vital part of a democratic society. It is a long-standing tradition in this country that people are free to share their views with others.</p><p>Decisions on arrests are an operational matter for the police working within the provisions of the legal framework set by Parliament.</p><p>Decisions on whether to investigate individual officers for a potential breach of the standards of professional behaviour are a matter for the force.</p>
	creator	3153 label Biography information for Lord Pearson of Rannoch
	publisher	25277
	tabling member	3153 label Biography information for Lord Pearson of Rannoch

1123305

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	10/05/2019
	date	25/04/2019
	date tabled	25/04/2019
	ddp created	25/04/2019 19:04:13
	answering body	Home Office
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	1
	answering dept short name	Home Office
	answering dept sort name	Home Office
	ddp modified	25/04/2019 19:06:07 10/05/2019 13:16:05
	hansard heading	Police: Data Protection
	house id	2
	identifier	HL15361
	legislature	25277
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	10/05/2019 12:44:49
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Williams of Trafford on 24 April (HL15195), what guidance they have provided to police forces in England following the concerns raised by the Information Commissioner’s Office about the introduction of technology allowing the police to gather data from mobile phones or laptops by overriding passwords possibly being unlawful.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member printed	Lord Scriven
	title	House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 HL15361
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	HL15361
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>The police are operationally independent of the Home Office and the use of their powers to investigate crime, including operational guidance, is a matter for them.</p><p>Current guidance issued by the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) stresses that decisions to access mobile phones have to be made on a case-by-case basis, balancing reasonable lines of inquiry with the right to privacy. Mobile phones of complainants and witnesses may only be accessed with their informed consent.</p><p>The NPCC and the CPS will engage with stakeholders, including the In-formation Commissioner’s Office, on this issue.</p>
	creator	4333 label Biography information for Lord Scriven
	publisher	25277
	tabling member	4333 label Biography information for Lord Scriven