Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

747995
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-07-04more like thismore than 2017-07-04
star this property answering body
Department for Exiting the European Union more like this
star this property answering dept id 203 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Exiting the European Union more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Exiting the European Union more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text Her Majesty's Government how many (1) legally qualified staff, and (2) staff without legal qualifications, now working in the Department for Exiting the European Union (a) have been transferred from, or (b) are on secondment from, the Ministry of Justice. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames more like this
unstar this property uin HL449 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-07-17more like thismore than 2017-07-17
star this property answer text <p>The Department is recruiting the brightest and the best from across the civil service, the wider public sector and the private sector. The Department for Exiting the European Union now has over 450 staff, and is growing fast. The Department for Exiting the European Union obtains its legal advice from the Government Legal Department. We will not be providing a running commentary on particular groups of staff as recruitment is ongoing and numbers are regularly changing. We will ensure we have the right skills to get the best deal for the UK.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Baroness Anelay of St Johns more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-07-17T15:55:08.307Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-17T15:55:08.307Z
star this property answering member
3474
star this property label Biography information for Baroness Anelay of St Johns more like this
unstar this property tabling member
4206
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames remove filter
792929
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-11-21more like thismore than 2017-11-21
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Prisoners more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many prisoners currently in prison in England and Wales are serving sentences of a year or less; and of these, how many prisoners are expected to still be serving their sentence on 25 December. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames more like this
unstar this property uin HL3453 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-12-04more like thismore than 2017-12-04
star this property answer text <p>Prison population data is published on an end of month basis. The prison population for those serving a sentence of less than a year on 31 December 2016 was 5,954. This information is contained in Offender Management Statistics Quarterly (OMSQ), Table 1.1, available at: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/654646/prison-population-30-september-2017.xlsx" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/654646/prison-population-30-september-2017.xlsx</a></p><p>As at 30 September 2017, there were 6,141 prisoners serving sentences of less than a year; of whom, 624 had a release date on, or after, the 27 December 2017 and would therefore normally be serving their sentence in custody on 25 December.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property grouped question UIN HL3452 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-12-04T16:05:54.867Zmore like thismore than 2017-12-04T16:05:54.867Z
star this property answering member
4538
star this property label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property attachment
1
unstar this property file name Table 1.1 HL3453 2.xlsx more like this
star this property title Table more like this
unstar this property tabling member
4206
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames remove filter
792930
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-11-21more like thismore than 2017-11-21
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Reoffenders more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many prisoners in England and Wales who had been released after serving a prison sentence of less than a year went on to re-offend in each of the last five years. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames more like this
unstar this property uin HL3454 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-12-06more like thismore than 2017-12-06
star this property answer text <p>The proven reoffending data for the last five years, for those released from a custodial sentence of less than 12 months is contained in the table below:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p><em>New Data Source</em></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Jan-Mar 2011</p></td><td><p>Apr-Jun 2011</p></td><td><p>Jul-Sep 2011</p></td><td><p>Oct-Dec 2011</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Adult offenders</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)</p></td><td><p><strong>62.5</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>62.2</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>62.8</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>61.4</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Adjusted<sub>2011</sub> proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)</em></p></td><td><p>62.5</p></td><td><p>62.3</p></td><td><p>62.6</p></td><td><p>61.4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average OGRS4/G score</p></td><td><p>55.6</p></td><td><p>55.5</p></td><td><p>55.8</p></td><td><p>55.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average number of reoffences per reoffender</p></td><td><p>5.53</p></td><td><p>5.43</p></td><td><p>5.50</p></td><td><p>5.47</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffences</p></td><td><p>28,160</p></td><td><p>29,026</p></td><td><p>30,157</p></td><td><p>29,827</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffenders</p></td><td><p>5,096</p></td><td><p>5,341</p></td><td><p>5,483</p></td><td><p>5,448</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of offenders in cohort</p></td><td><p>8,148</p></td><td><p>8,586</p></td><td><p>8,726</p></td><td><p>8,876</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Juvenile offenders</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)</p></td><td><p><strong>79.7</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>80.8</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>74.1</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>71.8</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average number of reoffences per reoffender</p></td><td><p>5.01</p></td><td><p>4.70</p></td><td><p>4.49</p></td><td><p>4.48</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffences</p></td><td><p>1,237</p></td><td><p>1,171</p></td><td><p>1,077</p></td><td><p>1,196</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffenders</p></td><td><p>247</p></td><td><p>249</p></td><td><p>240</p></td><td><p>267</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of offenders in cohort</p></td><td><p>310</p></td><td><p>308</p></td><td><p>324</p></td><td><p>372</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>All offenders</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)</p></td><td><p><strong>63.2</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>62.9</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>63.2</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>61.8</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average number of reoffences per reoffender</p></td><td><p>5.50</p></td><td><p>5.40</p></td><td><p>5.46</p></td><td><p>5.43</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffences</p></td><td><p>29,397</p></td><td><p>30,197</p></td><td><p>31,234</p></td><td><p>31,023</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffenders</p></td><td><p>5,343</p></td><td><p>5,590</p></td><td><p>5,723</p></td><td><p>5,715</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of offenders in cohort</p></td><td><p>8,458</p></td><td><p>8,894</p></td><td><p>9,050</p></td><td><p>9,248</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Jan-Mar 2012</p></td><td><p>Apr-Jun 2012</p></td><td><p>Jul-Sep 2012</p></td><td><p>Oct-Dec 2012</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Adult offenders</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)</p></td><td><p><strong>61.6</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>62.6</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>62.2</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>62.1</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Adjusted<sub>2011</sub> proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)</em></p></td><td><p>60.7</p></td><td><p>61.8</p></td><td><p>61.5</p></td><td><p>61.4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average OGRS4/G score</p></td><td><p>56.4</p></td><td><p>56.4</p></td><td><p>56.2</p></td><td><p>56.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average number of reoffences per reoffender</p></td><td><p>5.45</p></td><td><p>5.58</p></td><td><p>5.70</p></td><td><p>5.68</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffences</p></td><td><p>29,585</p></td><td><p>30,320</p></td><td><p>30,811</p></td><td><p>30,957</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffenders</p></td><td><p>5,426</p></td><td><p>5,429</p></td><td><p>5,407</p></td><td><p>5,452</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of offenders in cohort</p></td><td><p>8,814</p></td><td><p>8,675</p></td><td><p>8,698</p></td><td><p>8,775</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Juvenile offenders</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)</p></td><td><p><strong>74.5</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>69.1</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>81.6</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>74.8</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average number of reoffences per reoffender</p></td><td><p>4.58</p></td><td><p>4.60</p></td><td><p>4.50</p></td><td><p>4.49</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffences</p></td><td><p>1,109</p></td><td><p>865</p></td><td><p>1,080</p></td><td><p>812</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffenders</p></td><td><p>242</p></td><td><p>188</p></td><td><p>240</p></td><td><p>181</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of offenders in cohort</p></td><td><p>325</p></td><td><p>272</p></td><td><p>294</p></td><td><p>242</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>All offenders</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)</p></td><td><p><strong>62.0</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>62.8</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>62.8</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>62.5</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average number of reoffences per reoffender</p></td><td><p>5.42</p></td><td><p>5.55</p></td><td><p>5.65</p></td><td><p>5.64</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffences</p></td><td><p>30,694</p></td><td><p>31,185</p></td><td><p>31,891</p></td><td><p>31,769</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffenders</p></td><td><p>5,668</p></td><td><p>5,617</p></td><td><p>5,647</p></td><td><p>5,633</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of offenders in cohort</p></td><td><p>9,139</p></td><td><p>8,947</p></td><td><p>8,992</p></td><td><p>9,017</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Jan-Mar 2013</p></td><td><p>Apr-Jun 2013</p></td><td><p>Jul-Sep 2013</p></td><td><p>Oct-Dec 2013</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Adult offenders</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)</p></td><td><p><strong>63.7</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>63.9</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>64.4</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>63.7</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Adjusted<sub>2011</sub> proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)</em></p></td><td><p>62.2</p></td><td><p>62.5</p></td><td><p>62.6</p></td><td><p>61.7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average OGRS4/G score</p></td><td><p>57.1</p></td><td><p>57.0</p></td><td><p>57.5</p></td><td><p>57.6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average number of reoffences per reoffender</p></td><td><p>5.82</p></td><td><p>5.71</p></td><td><p>5.98</p></td><td><p>5.92</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffences</p></td><td><p>29,430</p></td><td><p>30,303</p></td><td><p>31,101</p></td><td><p>31,014</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffenders</p></td><td><p>5,053</p></td><td><p>5,309</p></td><td><p>5,199</p></td><td><p>5,239</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of offenders in cohort</p></td><td><p>7,934</p></td><td><p>8,307</p></td><td><p>8,067</p></td><td><p>8,221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Juvenile offenders</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)</p></td><td><p><strong>78.8</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>73.7</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>77.5</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>79.3</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average number of reoffences per reoffender</p></td><td><p>4.81</p></td><td><p>5.28</p></td><td><p>5.04</p></td><td><p>4.86</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffences</p></td><td><p>875</p></td><td><p>665</p></td><td><p>675</p></td><td><p>724</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffenders</p></td><td><p>182</p></td><td><p>126</p></td><td><p>134</p></td><td><p>149</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of offenders in cohort</p></td><td><p>231</p></td><td><p>171</p></td><td><p>173</p></td><td><p>188</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>All offenders</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)</p></td><td><p><strong>64.1</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>64.1</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>64.7</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>64.1</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average number of reoffences per reoffender</p></td><td><p>5.79</p></td><td><p>5.70</p></td><td><p>5.96</p></td><td><p>5.89</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffences</p></td><td><p>30,305</p></td><td><p>30,968</p></td><td><p>31,776</p></td><td><p>31,738</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffenders</p></td><td><p>5,235</p></td><td><p>5,435</p></td><td><p>5,333</p></td><td><p>5,388</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of offenders in cohort</p></td><td><p>8,165</p></td><td><p>8,478</p></td><td><p>8,240</p></td><td><p>8,409</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Jan-Mar 2014</p></td><td><p>Apr-Jun 2014</p></td><td><p>Jul-Sep 2014</p></td><td><p>Oct-Dec 2014</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Adult offenders</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)</p></td><td><p><strong>65.1</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>64.0</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>64.0</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>64.4</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Adjusted<sub>2011</sub> proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)</em></p></td><td><p>62.7</p></td><td><p>61.5</p></td><td><p>62.3</p></td><td><p>61.9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average OGRS4/G score</p></td><td><p>58.0</p></td><td><p>58.1</p></td><td><p>57.3</p></td><td><p>58.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average number of reoffences per reoffender</p></td><td><p>6.09</p></td><td><p>6.13</p></td><td><p>6.14</p></td><td><p>6.08</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffences</p></td><td><p>30,614</p></td><td><p>29,777</p></td><td><p>30,493</p></td><td><p>30,313</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffenders</p></td><td><p>5,025</p></td><td><p>4,856</p></td><td><p>4,967</p></td><td><p>4,982</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of offenders in cohort</p></td><td><p>7,722</p></td><td><p>7,591</p></td><td><p>7,760</p></td><td><p>7,741</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Juvenile offenders</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)</p></td><td><p><strong>78.0</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>77.6</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>75.6</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>79.6</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average number of reoffences per reoffender</p></td><td><p>4.98</p></td><td><p>5.13</p></td><td><p>5.50</p></td><td><p>5.54</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffences</p></td><td><p>777</p></td><td><p>728</p></td><td><p>666</p></td><td><p>693</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffenders</p></td><td><p>156</p></td><td><p>142</p></td><td><p>121</p></td><td><p>125</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of offenders in cohort</p></td><td><p>200</p></td><td><p>183</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p>157</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>All offenders</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)</p></td><td><p><strong>65.4</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>64.3</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>64.2</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>64.7</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average number of reoffences per reoffender</p></td><td><p>6.06</p></td><td><p>6.10</p></td><td><p>6.12</p></td><td><p>6.07</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffences</p></td><td><p>31,391</p></td><td><p>30,505</p></td><td><p>31,159</p></td><td><p>31,006</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffenders</p></td><td><p>5,181</p></td><td><p>4,998</p></td><td><p>5,088</p></td><td><p>5,107</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of offenders in cohort</p></td><td><p>7,922</p></td><td><p>7,774</p></td><td><p>7,920</p></td><td><p>7,898</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Jan-Mar 2015</p></td><td><p>Apr-Jun 2015</p></td><td><p>Jul-Sep 2015</p></td><td><p>Oct-Dec 2015</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Adult offenders</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)</p></td><td><p><strong>63.7</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>62.6</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>61.3</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>65.5</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Adjusted<sub>2011</sub> proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)</em></p></td><td><p>61.9</p></td><td><p>61.2</p></td><td><p>60.1</p></td><td><p>61.7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average OGRS4/G score</p></td><td><p>57.4</p></td><td><p>57.0</p></td><td><p>56.8</p></td><td><p>59.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average number of reoffences per reoffender</p></td><td><p>6.21</p></td><td><p>6.00</p></td><td><p>5.93</p></td><td><p>6.01</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffences</p></td><td><p>28,285</p></td><td><p>28,074</p></td><td><p>26,349</p></td><td><p>34,641</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffenders</p></td><td><p>4,558</p></td><td><p>4,682</p></td><td><p>4,441</p></td><td><p>5,767</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of offenders in cohort</p></td><td><p>7,157</p></td><td><p>7,479</p></td><td><p>7,247</p></td><td><p>8,798</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Juvenile offenders</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)</p></td><td><p><strong>78.6</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>75.6</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>70.4</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>69.4</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average number of reoffences per reoffender</p></td><td><p>5.60</p></td><td><p>5.73</p></td><td><p>5.71</p></td><td><p>5.86</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffences</p></td><td><p>677</p></td><td><p>567</p></td><td><p>639</p></td><td><p>545</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffenders</p></td><td><p>121</p></td><td><p>99</p></td><td><p>112</p></td><td><p>93</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of offenders in cohort</p></td><td><p>154</p></td><td><p>131</p></td><td><p>159</p></td><td><p>134</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>All offenders</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)</p></td><td><p><strong>64.0</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>62.8</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>61.5</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>65.6</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average number of reoffences per reoffender</p></td><td><p>6.19</p></td><td><p>5.99</p></td><td><p>5.93</p></td><td><p>6.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffences</p></td><td><p>28,962</p></td><td><p>28,641</p></td><td><p>26,988</p></td><td><p>35,186</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of reoffenders</p></td><td><p>4,679</p></td><td><p>4,781</p></td><td><p>4,553</p></td><td><p>5,860</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of offenders in cohort</p></td><td><p>7,311</p></td><td><p>7,610</p></td><td><p>7,406</p></td><td><p>8,932</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Notes</p><p>1. These figures have been derived from administrative IT systems, which as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p><p>2. A proven reoffence is defined as any offence committed in a one year follow-up period that leads to a court conviction, caution, reprimand or warning in the one year follow-up or within a further six month waiting period to allow the offence to be proven in court.</p><p>3. Number of offenders in each disposal category do not sum to the total number of offenders. This is due to a difference in methodology to provide a realistic and relevant view of proven reoffending by disposal type. The first event within each disposal is taken as the start point. Therefore, some offenders will appear in more than one disposal category.</p><p>4. From October 2015 onwards, reoffending data are collected using different data sources to previous quarters. Therefore, users should be cautious when making any comparison between the October to December 2015 cohort and earlier cohorts.</p><p>5. The average OGRS4/G (Offender Group Reconviction Scale) score is used to control for some differences in offender characteristics across different offender groups. OGRS4/G is based on a well-established, peer-reviewed methodology for assessing and representing reoffending risk.</p><p>6. Adjusted2011 proportion of offenders who reoffend (%) is the OGRS4/G-adjusted reoffending rate for a given cohort. It is calculated as the observed reoffending rate for that cohort plus any difference between the OGRS4/G score in that cohort and the 2011 baseline cohort. This calculation standardises the mix of offenders in each cohort to the 2011 mix for that same cohort.</p>
star this property answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-12-06T17:25:33.157Zmore like thismore than 2017-12-06T17:25:33.157Z
star this property answering member
4538
star this property label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
unstar this property tabling member
4206
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames remove filter
758550
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-09-07more like thismore than 2017-09-07
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Legal Representation more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of litigants in person on the court system. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames more like this
unstar this property uin HL1421 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-09-19more like thismore than 2017-09-19
star this property answer text <p>Information on numbers of litigants in person is not held centrally.</p><p>Unrepresented parties have always been a feature of the civil and family justice system. Since 2015, the Government has invested £5 million of funding to support litigants in person through a range of measures designed to provide additional information, support and guidance.</p><p>The Lord Chancellor is currently considering the planned post-implementation review of recent legal aid reforms. An announcement will be made in due course.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property grouped question UIN HL1423 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-09-19T12:59:09.7Zmore like thismore than 2017-09-19T12:59:09.7Z
star this property answering member
4538
star this property label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
unstar this property tabling member
4206
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames remove filter
758552
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-09-07more like thismore than 2017-09-07
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Legal Representation more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the increasing numbers of litigants in person since the reforms contained in the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 came into effect. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames more like this
unstar this property uin HL1423 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-09-19more like thismore than 2017-09-19
star this property answer text <p>Information on numbers of litigants in person is not held centrally.</p><p>Unrepresented parties have always been a feature of the civil and family justice system. Since 2015, the Government has invested £5 million of funding to support litigants in person through a range of measures designed to provide additional information, support and guidance.</p><p>The Lord Chancellor is currently considering the planned post-implementation review of recent legal aid reforms. An announcement will be made in due course.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property grouped question UIN HL1421 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-09-19T12:59:09.633Zmore like thismore than 2017-09-19T12:59:09.633Z
star this property answering member
4538
star this property label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
unstar this property tabling member
4206
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames remove filter
758551
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-09-07more like thismore than 2017-09-07
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government when they plan to launch a post-implementation consultation on the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames more like this
unstar this property uin HL1422 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-09-19more like thismore than 2017-09-19
star this property answer text <p>The Lord Chancellor is currently considering the planned post-implementation review of recent legal aid reforms. We will make an announcement in due course.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-09-19T12:58:03.13Zmore like thismore than 2017-09-19T12:58:03.13Z
star this property answering member
4538
star this property label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
unstar this property tabling member
4206
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames remove filter
792928
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-11-21more like thismore than 2017-11-21
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Prisoners more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, of those in prison in England and Wales on 25 December 2016, how many were serving sentences of less than a year. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames more like this
unstar this property uin HL3452 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-12-04more like thismore than 2017-12-04
star this property answer text <p>Prison population data is published on an end of month basis. The prison population for those serving a sentence of less than a year on 31 December 2016 was 5,954. This information is contained in Offender Management Statistics Quarterly (OMSQ), Table 1.1, available at: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/654646/prison-population-30-september-2017.xlsx" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/654646/prison-population-30-september-2017.xlsx</a></p><p>As at 30 September 2017, there were 6,141 prisoners serving sentences of less than a year; of whom, 624 had a release date on, or after, the 27 December 2017 and would therefore normally be serving their sentence in custody on 25 December.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property grouped question UIN HL3453 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-12-04T16:05:54.787Zmore like thismore than 2017-12-04T16:05:54.787Z
star this property answering member
4538
star this property label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property attachment
1
unstar this property file name Table 1.1 HL3453 2.xlsx more like this
star this property title Table more like this
unstar this property tabling member
4206
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames remove filter
424706
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2015-10-28more like thismore than 2015-10-28
star this property answering body
Home Office more like this
star this property answering dept id 1 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Home Office more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
star this property hansard heading Surveillance: Complaints more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many (1) complaints, and (2) claims, were submitted to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal in each year from 2010 to 2014 inclusive. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames more like this
unstar this property uin HL3076 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2015-11-11more like thismore than 2015-11-11
star this property answer text <p>The numbers of new cases received by the independent Investigatory Powers Tribunal each year are published on the Tribunal’s website at: http://www.ipt-uk.com/section.aspx?pageid=5 .</p><p>The numbers of complaints and claims for the years 2010 to 2014 are as follows.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>Human Rights Claims</p></td><td><p>Complaints</p></td><td><p>Both</p></td><td><p>Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010</p></td><td><p>49</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>75</p></td><td><p>164</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011</p></td><td><p>46</p></td><td><p>46</p></td><td><p>88</p></td><td><p>180</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>37</p></td><td><p>52</p></td><td><p>79</p></td><td><p>168</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>58</p></td><td><p>67</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>205</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>58</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>97</p></td><td><p>215</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>The Investigatory Powers Tribunal does not collate the information about the average length of time from a complaint or claim being submitted to the announcement of a ruling. The cases received by the Investigatory Powers Tribunal vary in scope and complexity. Each case is considered on its own merits and receives appropriate legal scrutiny.</p>
star this property answering member printed Lord Bates more like this
star this property grouped question UIN HL3077 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-11-11T17:27:09.343Zmore like thismore than 2015-11-11T17:27:09.343Z
star this property answering member
1091
star this property label Biography information for Lord Bates more like this
unstar this property tabling member
4206
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames remove filter
663123
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2016-12-21more like thismore than 2016-12-21
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Reoffenders more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many (1) men, and (2) women, are currently in prison having broken the terms of their licences on a fixed-term recall. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames more like this
unstar this property uin HL4338 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-01-09more like thismore than 2017-01-09
star this property answer text <p>We are unable to provide the data on the number of men and women currently in custody on fixed term recall. Whilst this information is held on individual case files, a manual exercise would be required to locate and collate this information. Such an exercise would incur disproportionate cost.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-01-09T17:59:02.947Zmore like thismore than 2017-01-09T17:59:02.947Z
star this property answering member
4538
star this property label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
unstar this property tabling member
4206
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames remove filter
663128
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2016-12-21more like thismore than 2016-12-21
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Prisoners: Suicide more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many female prisoners have been placed on 24-hour watch on at least one occasion in each women’s prison in each of the last 12 months. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames more like this
unstar this property uin HL4343 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-01-13more like thismore than 2017-01-13
star this property answer text <p>Information about the use of constant supervision in prisons is not centrally collected.</p><p>All prisons are required to have procedures in place to identify, manage and support people who are at risk of harm to themselves. These include the Assessment, Care in Custody and Teamwork (ACCT) process, which is a prisoner-centred, flexible care planning system for those identified as at risk of suicide or self-harm.</p><p>A prisoner will be placed under constant supervision where that is determined to be necessary to address an immediate suicidal crisis. Such supervision will be one of a number of supportive measures put in place to manage the risk and will remain in place only for so long as is strictly necessary.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-01-13T11:50:49.827Zmore like thismore than 2017-01-13T11:50:49.827Z
star this property answering member
4538
star this property label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
unstar this property tabling member
4206
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames remove filter