Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1133072
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-06-19more like thismore than 2019-06-19
star this property answering body
Department for Education more like this
star this property answering dept id 60 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Education more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Education more like this
star this property hansard heading Mathematics: Education remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what recent assessment his Department has made of children's progress in specialist maths schools. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency North East Hampshire more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Ranil Jayawardena more like this
star this property uin 911509 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-06-24more like thismore than 2019-06-24
star this property answer text <p>There are currently two open maths schools: Kings College London Mathematics School and Exeter Mathematics School. In 2018, both schools had A level progress scores that were ‘well above average’. Pupils achieved progress scores of 1.46 and 1.10 in A level mathematics in Kings College London and Exeter Mathematics Schools respectively. This means that pupils in these schools achieved, on average, a grade higher than similar pupils nationally. These outcomes place both schools in the top 1% of schools in England for progress in A level mathematics.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Bognor Regis and Littlehampton more like this
star this property answering member printed Nick Gibb more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-24T16:30:53.57Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-24T16:30:53.57Z
unstar this property answering member
111
star this property label Biography information for Nick Gibb more like this
star this property tabling member
4498
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr Ranil Jayawardena more like this
1128872
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-06-03more like thismore than 2019-06-03
star this property answering body
Department for Education more like this
star this property answering dept id 60 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Education more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Education more like this
star this property hansard heading Mathematics: Education remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to the Answer of 14 May 2019 to Question 251405, how many children classified as in scope for the 16-18 maths progress measure were from (a) disadvantaged and (b) non-disadvantaged backgrounds; and whether those children (i) did not enter an approved qualification and (ii) made positive progress in 2017-18. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Manchester Central more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lucy Powell more like this
star this property uin 259236 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-06-11more like thismore than 2019-06-11
star this property answer text <p>The number of state-funded students in scope for the 16-18 Maths measures and their attainment, split by disadvantage status[1] and prior attainment[2], can be found in tables 1-4, attached. These figures are for 2017/18. This expands on published data within the Department’s statistical release, available here: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/a-level-and-other-16-to-18-results-2017-to-2018-revised" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/a-level-and-other-16-to-18-results-2017-to-2018-revised</a>.</p><p>The number of state-funded students in scope for the 16-18 maths and English progress measures and their attainment, split by disadvantage status, prior attainment, and the type of qualification the student sat in their KS4 study[3], [4] are available in tables 5-8, attached. These figures are for 2017/18.</p><p>Disaggregating the published figures has necessitated a slightly different methodology to calculate the number of students with positive progress. In some cases this leads to a negligible difference when totals are compared to the published data within the Department’s statistical release[5].</p><p>For figures in 2016/17, tables 1-8 have been replicated in tables 9-16, attached.</p><p> </p><p>[1] Disadvantage status is taken from the census recorded completed for that student’s final year of key stage 4 study.</p><p>[2] In previous PQs 251400–251406, prior attainment was given based on three groups (‘entry level or fail’, ‘below grade 3/D’ and ‘grade 3/D’). In the attached tables with information relating to prior attainment points, these points are based on the student’s highest prior attainment in mathematics or English. ‘Entry level or fail’ is synonymous with points 0 and 0.4. ‘Below grade 3 or D’ is synonymous with points 0.8–3.0. ‘Grade 3 or D’ is synonymous with points 4.0. This is the case for all the tables provided.</p><p>[3] ‘GCSE or equivalent’ includes students whose highest prior attainment were in a GCSE, International GCSE or level 2 certificate. Qualifications are included in this group because they are all similarly graded on a 9-1 or A*-G scale and are included as part of the condition for funding calculations. ‘Other level 2 qualifications’ includes students whose highest prior attainment was in any other level 2 qualification. This includes level 2 functional skills and free standing maths that are included as part of the condition of funding calculations. This is the case for tables 5-8 and 13-16.</p><p>[4] The methodology used means that for a small number of students any entries into maths during their 16-18 study which did not reach the grade 4/C threshold (leaving them in scope), may have led to their prior attainment being reclassified. This will have had no noticeable effect on the overall figures. Due to the methodology used to assign points to English literature and language, a small number of students may be assigned to a different qualification type. This is the case for tables 5-8 and 13-16.</p><p> </p>
star this property answering member constituency Bognor Regis and Littlehampton more like this
star this property answering member printed Nick Gibb more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
259237 more like this
259238 more like this
259239 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-11T16:16:09.797Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-11T16:16:09.797Z
unstar this property answering member
111
star this property label Biography information for Nick Gibb more like this
star this property attachment
1
star this property file name 259236_259237_259238_259239_attainment_tables.pdf more like this
star this property title 259236_259237_259238_259239_pdf more like this
star this property tabling member
4263
unstar this property label Biography information for Lucy Powell more like this
1128873
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-06-03more like thismore than 2019-06-03
star this property answering body
Department for Education more like this
star this property answering dept id 60 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Education more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Education more like this
star this property hansard heading Mathematics: Education remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to the Answer of 14 May 2019 to Question 251405, how many children classified as in scope for the 16-18 maths progress measure were from (a) disadvantaged and (b) non-disadvantaged backgrounds by prior attainment points from 0 to 3; and whether those children (i) did not enter an approved qualification and (ii) made positive progress in 2017-18. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Manchester Central more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lucy Powell more like this
star this property uin 259237 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-06-11more like thismore than 2019-06-11
star this property answer text <p>The number of state-funded students in scope for the 16-18 Maths measures and their attainment, split by disadvantage status[1] and prior attainment[2], can be found in tables 1-4, attached. These figures are for 2017/18. This expands on published data within the Department’s statistical release, available here: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/a-level-and-other-16-to-18-results-2017-to-2018-revised" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/a-level-and-other-16-to-18-results-2017-to-2018-revised</a>.</p><p>The number of state-funded students in scope for the 16-18 maths and English progress measures and their attainment, split by disadvantage status, prior attainment, and the type of qualification the student sat in their KS4 study[3], [4] are available in tables 5-8, attached. These figures are for 2017/18.</p><p>Disaggregating the published figures has necessitated a slightly different methodology to calculate the number of students with positive progress. In some cases this leads to a negligible difference when totals are compared to the published data within the Department’s statistical release[5].</p><p>For figures in 2016/17, tables 1-8 have been replicated in tables 9-16, attached.</p><p> </p><p>[1] Disadvantage status is taken from the census recorded completed for that student’s final year of key stage 4 study.</p><p>[2] In previous PQs 251400–251406, prior attainment was given based on three groups (‘entry level or fail’, ‘below grade 3/D’ and ‘grade 3/D’). In the attached tables with information relating to prior attainment points, these points are based on the student’s highest prior attainment in mathematics or English. ‘Entry level or fail’ is synonymous with points 0 and 0.4. ‘Below grade 3 or D’ is synonymous with points 0.8–3.0. ‘Grade 3 or D’ is synonymous with points 4.0. This is the case for all the tables provided.</p><p>[3] ‘GCSE or equivalent’ includes students whose highest prior attainment were in a GCSE, International GCSE or level 2 certificate. Qualifications are included in this group because they are all similarly graded on a 9-1 or A*-G scale and are included as part of the condition for funding calculations. ‘Other level 2 qualifications’ includes students whose highest prior attainment was in any other level 2 qualification. This includes level 2 functional skills and free standing maths that are included as part of the condition of funding calculations. This is the case for tables 5-8 and 13-16.</p><p>[4] The methodology used means that for a small number of students any entries into maths during their 16-18 study which did not reach the grade 4/C threshold (leaving them in scope), may have led to their prior attainment being reclassified. This will have had no noticeable effect on the overall figures. Due to the methodology used to assign points to English literature and language, a small number of students may be assigned to a different qualification type. This is the case for tables 5-8 and 13-16.</p><p> </p>
star this property answering member constituency Bognor Regis and Littlehampton more like this
star this property answering member printed Nick Gibb more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
259236 more like this
259238 more like this
259239 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-11T16:16:09.877Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-11T16:16:09.877Z
unstar this property answering member
111
star this property label Biography information for Nick Gibb more like this
star this property attachment
1
star this property file name 259236_259237_259238_259239_attainment_tables.pdf more like this
star this property title 259236_259237_259238_259239_pdf more like this
star this property tabling member
4263
unstar this property label Biography information for Lucy Powell more like this
1128874
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-06-03more like thismore than 2019-06-03
star this property answering body
Department for Education more like this
star this property answering dept id 60 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Education more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Education more like this
star this property hansard heading Mathematics: Education remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to the Answers of 14 May 2019 to Question 251405 and Question 251401, if he will publish that data by (a) GCSE or international GCSE qualification at (i) grade 2/E, (ii) grade F, (iii) grade 1/G and (iv) grade fail and (b) any other qualification at (v) level 1 qualification, (vi) entry level and (vii) fail in 2017-18. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Manchester Central more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lucy Powell more like this
star this property uin 259238 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-06-11more like thismore than 2019-06-11
star this property answer text <p>The number of state-funded students in scope for the 16-18 Maths measures and their attainment, split by disadvantage status[1] and prior attainment[2], can be found in tables 1-4, attached. These figures are for 2017/18. This expands on published data within the Department’s statistical release, available here: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/a-level-and-other-16-to-18-results-2017-to-2018-revised" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/a-level-and-other-16-to-18-results-2017-to-2018-revised</a>.</p><p>The number of state-funded students in scope for the 16-18 maths and English progress measures and their attainment, split by disadvantage status, prior attainment, and the type of qualification the student sat in their KS4 study[3], [4] are available in tables 5-8, attached. These figures are for 2017/18.</p><p>Disaggregating the published figures has necessitated a slightly different methodology to calculate the number of students with positive progress. In some cases this leads to a negligible difference when totals are compared to the published data within the Department’s statistical release[5].</p><p>For figures in 2016/17, tables 1-8 have been replicated in tables 9-16, attached.</p><p> </p><p>[1] Disadvantage status is taken from the census recorded completed for that student’s final year of key stage 4 study.</p><p>[2] In previous PQs 251400–251406, prior attainment was given based on three groups (‘entry level or fail’, ‘below grade 3/D’ and ‘grade 3/D’). In the attached tables with information relating to prior attainment points, these points are based on the student’s highest prior attainment in mathematics or English. ‘Entry level or fail’ is synonymous with points 0 and 0.4. ‘Below grade 3 or D’ is synonymous with points 0.8–3.0. ‘Grade 3 or D’ is synonymous with points 4.0. This is the case for all the tables provided.</p><p>[3] ‘GCSE or equivalent’ includes students whose highest prior attainment were in a GCSE, International GCSE or level 2 certificate. Qualifications are included in this group because they are all similarly graded on a 9-1 or A*-G scale and are included as part of the condition for funding calculations. ‘Other level 2 qualifications’ includes students whose highest prior attainment was in any other level 2 qualification. This includes level 2 functional skills and free standing maths that are included as part of the condition of funding calculations. This is the case for tables 5-8 and 13-16.</p><p>[4] The methodology used means that for a small number of students any entries into maths during their 16-18 study which did not reach the grade 4/C threshold (leaving them in scope), may have led to their prior attainment being reclassified. This will have had no noticeable effect on the overall figures. Due to the methodology used to assign points to English literature and language, a small number of students may be assigned to a different qualification type. This is the case for tables 5-8 and 13-16.</p><p> </p>
star this property answering member constituency Bognor Regis and Littlehampton more like this
star this property answering member printed Nick Gibb more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
259236 more like this
259237 more like this
259239 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-11T16:16:09.937Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-11T16:16:09.937Z
unstar this property answering member
111
star this property label Biography information for Nick Gibb more like this
star this property attachment
1
star this property file name 259236_259237_259238_259239_attainment_tables.pdf more like this
star this property title 259236_259237_259238_259239_pdf more like this
star this property tabling member
4263
unstar this property label Biography information for Lucy Powell more like this
1128875
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-06-03more like thismore than 2019-06-03
star this property answering body
Department for Education more like this
star this property answering dept id 60 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Education more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Education more like this
star this property hansard heading Mathematics: Education remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to the Answer of 14 May 2019 to Question 251405 and Question 251401 on Mathematics: Education, for that data for the year 2016-2017. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Manchester Central more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lucy Powell more like this
star this property uin 259239 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-06-11more like thismore than 2019-06-11
star this property answer text <p>The number of state-funded students in scope for the 16-18 Maths measures and their attainment, split by disadvantage status[1] and prior attainment[2], can be found in tables 1-4, attached. These figures are for 2017/18. This expands on published data within the Department’s statistical release, available here: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/a-level-and-other-16-to-18-results-2017-to-2018-revised" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/a-level-and-other-16-to-18-results-2017-to-2018-revised</a>.</p><p>The number of state-funded students in scope for the 16-18 maths and English progress measures and their attainment, split by disadvantage status, prior attainment, and the type of qualification the student sat in their KS4 study[3], [4] are available in tables 5-8, attached. These figures are for 2017/18.</p><p>Disaggregating the published figures has necessitated a slightly different methodology to calculate the number of students with positive progress. In some cases this leads to a negligible difference when totals are compared to the published data within the Department’s statistical release[5].</p><p>For figures in 2016/17, tables 1-8 have been replicated in tables 9-16, attached.</p><p> </p><p>[1] Disadvantage status is taken from the census recorded completed for that student’s final year of key stage 4 study.</p><p>[2] In previous PQs 251400–251406, prior attainment was given based on three groups (‘entry level or fail’, ‘below grade 3/D’ and ‘grade 3/D’). In the attached tables with information relating to prior attainment points, these points are based on the student’s highest prior attainment in mathematics or English. ‘Entry level or fail’ is synonymous with points 0 and 0.4. ‘Below grade 3 or D’ is synonymous with points 0.8–3.0. ‘Grade 3 or D’ is synonymous with points 4.0. This is the case for all the tables provided.</p><p>[3] ‘GCSE or equivalent’ includes students whose highest prior attainment were in a GCSE, International GCSE or level 2 certificate. Qualifications are included in this group because they are all similarly graded on a 9-1 or A*-G scale and are included as part of the condition for funding calculations. ‘Other level 2 qualifications’ includes students whose highest prior attainment was in any other level 2 qualification. This includes level 2 functional skills and free standing maths that are included as part of the condition of funding calculations. This is the case for tables 5-8 and 13-16.</p><p>[4] The methodology used means that for a small number of students any entries into maths during their 16-18 study which did not reach the grade 4/C threshold (leaving them in scope), may have led to their prior attainment being reclassified. This will have had no noticeable effect on the overall figures. Due to the methodology used to assign points to English literature and language, a small number of students may be assigned to a different qualification type. This is the case for tables 5-8 and 13-16.</p><p> </p>
star this property answering member constituency Bognor Regis and Littlehampton more like this
star this property answering member printed Nick Gibb more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
259236 more like this
259237 more like this
259238 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-11T16:16:09.987Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-11T16:16:09.987Z
unstar this property answering member
111
star this property label Biography information for Nick Gibb more like this
star this property attachment
1
star this property file name 259236_259237_259238_259239_attainment_tables.pdf more like this
star this property title 259236_259237_259238_259239_pdf more like this
star this property tabling member
4263
unstar this property label Biography information for Lucy Powell more like this
1125079
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-05-07more like thismore than 2019-05-07
star this property answering body
Department for Education more like this
star this property answering dept id 60 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Education more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Education more like this
star this property hansard heading Mathematics: Education remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many children classified as in scope for the 16-18 maths progress measure from (a) disadvantaged and (b) non-disadvantaged backgrounds achieved a grade 4 in maths by the end of 16-18 study in 2017-18 by each prior attainment grade. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Manchester Central more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lucy Powell more like this
star this property uin 251403 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-05-14more like thismore than 2019-05-14
star this property answer text <p>The number of state-funded students in scope for the 16-18 mathematics and English measures and their attainment, split by disadvantage status<a href="https://educationgovuk.sharepoint.com/sites/cd/c/WorkplaceDocuments/Written%20PQ%20Team/Written%20PQ%20-%202017-19%20drafts/251400%20-%20241406%20QC%20090519.docx#_ftn1" target="_blank">[1]</a> and prior attainment, are provided in the attached tables. This expands on published data within the Department’s statistical release<a href="https://educationgovuk.sharepoint.com/sites/cd/c/WorkplaceDocuments/Written%20PQ%20Team/Written%20PQ%20-%202017-19%20drafts/251400%20-%20241406%20QC%20090519.docx#_ftn2" target="_blank">[2]</a>.</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://educationgovuk.sharepoint.com/sites/cd/c/WorkplaceDocuments/Written%20PQ%20Team/Written%20PQ%20-%202017-19%20drafts/251400%20-%20241406%20QC%20090519.docx#_ftnref1" target="_blank">[1]</a> Disadvantage status is taken from the census recorded completed for that student’s final year of key stage 4 study.</p><p><a href="https://educationgovuk.sharepoint.com/sites/cd/c/WorkplaceDocuments/Written%20PQ%20Team/Written%20PQ%20-%202017-19%20drafts/251400%20-%20241406%20QC%20090519.docx#_ftnref2" target="_blank">[2]</a> <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/a-level-and-other-16-to-18-results-2017-to-2018-revised" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/a-level-and-other-16-to-18-results-2017-to-2018-revised</a>. Main text, page 30-32.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Bognor Regis and Littlehampton more like this
star this property answering member printed Nick Gibb more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
251400 more like this
251401 more like this
251402 more like this
251405 more like this
251406 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-14T15:58:39.497Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-14T15:58:39.497Z
unstar this property answering member
111
star this property label Biography information for Nick Gibb more like this
star this property attachment
1
star this property file name 251400_251401_251402_251403_251405_251406_table.pdf more like this
star this property title 251400_251401_251402_251403_251405_251406_table more like this
star this property tabling member
4263
unstar this property label Biography information for Lucy Powell more like this
1125081
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-05-07more like thismore than 2019-05-07
star this property answering body
Department for Education more like this
star this property answering dept id 60 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Education more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Education more like this
star this property hansard heading Mathematics: Education remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, for a breakdown of the number of children classified as in scope for the 16-18 maths progress measure from (a) disadvantaged and (b) non-disadvantaged backgrounds by prior attainment qualification of (i) GCSE grade 3 or D (ii) other level 2 qualification; and whether they (A) did not enter an approved qualification, (B) achieved a grade 4 or above (or equivalent) and (C) made positive progress in 2017-18. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Manchester Central more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lucy Powell more like this
star this property uin 251405 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-05-14more like thismore than 2019-05-14
star this property answer text <p>The number of state-funded students in scope for the 16-18 mathematics and English measures and their attainment, split by disadvantage status<a href="https://educationgovuk.sharepoint.com/sites/cd/c/WorkplaceDocuments/Written%20PQ%20Team/Written%20PQ%20-%202017-19%20drafts/251400%20-%20241406%20QC%20090519.docx#_ftn1" target="_blank">[1]</a> and prior attainment, are provided in the attached tables. This expands on published data within the Department’s statistical release<a href="https://educationgovuk.sharepoint.com/sites/cd/c/WorkplaceDocuments/Written%20PQ%20Team/Written%20PQ%20-%202017-19%20drafts/251400%20-%20241406%20QC%20090519.docx#_ftn2" target="_blank">[2]</a>.</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://educationgovuk.sharepoint.com/sites/cd/c/WorkplaceDocuments/Written%20PQ%20Team/Written%20PQ%20-%202017-19%20drafts/251400%20-%20241406%20QC%20090519.docx#_ftnref1" target="_blank">[1]</a> Disadvantage status is taken from the census recorded completed for that student’s final year of key stage 4 study.</p><p><a href="https://educationgovuk.sharepoint.com/sites/cd/c/WorkplaceDocuments/Written%20PQ%20Team/Written%20PQ%20-%202017-19%20drafts/251400%20-%20241406%20QC%20090519.docx#_ftnref2" target="_blank">[2]</a> <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/a-level-and-other-16-to-18-results-2017-to-2018-revised" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/a-level-and-other-16-to-18-results-2017-to-2018-revised</a>. Main text, page 30-32.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Bognor Regis and Littlehampton more like this
star this property answering member printed Nick Gibb more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
251400 more like this
251401 more like this
251402 more like this
251403 more like this
251406 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-14T15:58:39.543Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-14T15:58:39.543Z
unstar this property answering member
111
star this property label Biography information for Nick Gibb more like this
star this property attachment
1
star this property file name 251400_251401_251402_251403_251405_251406_table.pdf more like this
star this property title 251400_251401_251402_251403_251405_251406_table more like this
star this property tabling member
4263
unstar this property label Biography information for Lucy Powell more like this
1125082
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-05-07more like thismore than 2019-05-07
star this property answering body
Department for Education more like this
star this property answering dept id 60 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Education more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Education more like this
star this property hansard heading Mathematics: Education remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many children classified as in scope for the 16-18 maths progress measure were from (a) disadvantaged and (b) non-disadvantaged backgrounds in 2017-18 by each prior attainment grade. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Manchester Central more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lucy Powell more like this
star this property uin 251406 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-05-14more like thismore than 2019-05-14
star this property answer text <p>The number of state-funded students in scope for the 16-18 mathematics and English measures and their attainment, split by disadvantage status<a href="https://educationgovuk.sharepoint.com/sites/cd/c/WorkplaceDocuments/Written%20PQ%20Team/Written%20PQ%20-%202017-19%20drafts/251400%20-%20241406%20QC%20090519.docx#_ftn1" target="_blank">[1]</a> and prior attainment, are provided in the attached tables. This expands on published data within the Department’s statistical release<a href="https://educationgovuk.sharepoint.com/sites/cd/c/WorkplaceDocuments/Written%20PQ%20Team/Written%20PQ%20-%202017-19%20drafts/251400%20-%20241406%20QC%20090519.docx#_ftn2" target="_blank">[2]</a>.</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://educationgovuk.sharepoint.com/sites/cd/c/WorkplaceDocuments/Written%20PQ%20Team/Written%20PQ%20-%202017-19%20drafts/251400%20-%20241406%20QC%20090519.docx#_ftnref1" target="_blank">[1]</a> Disadvantage status is taken from the census recorded completed for that student’s final year of key stage 4 study.</p><p><a href="https://educationgovuk.sharepoint.com/sites/cd/c/WorkplaceDocuments/Written%20PQ%20Team/Written%20PQ%20-%202017-19%20drafts/251400%20-%20241406%20QC%20090519.docx#_ftnref2" target="_blank">[2]</a> <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/a-level-and-other-16-to-18-results-2017-to-2018-revised" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/a-level-and-other-16-to-18-results-2017-to-2018-revised</a>. Main text, page 30-32.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Bognor Regis and Littlehampton more like this
star this property answering member printed Nick Gibb more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
251400 more like this
251401 more like this
251402 more like this
251403 more like this
251405 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-14T15:58:39.603Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-14T15:58:39.603Z
unstar this property answering member
111
star this property label Biography information for Nick Gibb more like this
star this property attachment
1
star this property file name 251400_251401_251402_251403_251405_251406_table.pdf more like this
star this property title 251400_251401_251402_251403_251405_251406_table more like this
star this property tabling member
4263
unstar this property label Biography information for Lucy Powell more like this
964256
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2018-09-03more like thismore than 2018-09-03
star this property answering body
Department for Education more like this
star this property answering dept id 60 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Education more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Education more like this
star this property hansard heading Mathematics: Education remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education if he will amend the eligibility criteria to lead a basic maths Centre for Excellence so that it is based on the total number of students with low prior attainment in maths rather than the number of students contained in the 2017 maths progress measure. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Scunthorpe more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Nic Dakin more like this
star this property uin 169337 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2018-09-11more like thismore than 2018-09-11
star this property answer text <p>There are no plans to amend the eligibility criteria for the basic maths Centres for Excellence programme. The Centres for Excellence programme will build on the success of the Maths Hubs model in schools, adapting it to improve the quality of teaching post-16.</p><p> </p><p>The eligibility criteria is for institutions to have a minimum of 250 maths students with prior attainment below a grade 4 included in the maths progress measure. This will make sure institutions have a substantial number of students at the end of their 16-19 study programme who have directly benefited from the programme as they work towards achieving a GCSE standard pass in maths. We view this as an important criterion as we trial teaching approaches and evaluate their impact on the quality of teaching and learning over the length of the study programme to inform a wider rollout.</p><p> </p><p>We have allowed and have actively encouraged institutions to partner up to be Centres for Excellence through consortium bids. This will also serve to encourage improved networking between a mix of institutions and institution types with a shared goal of improving maths teaching and attainment.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Guildford more like this
star this property answering member printed Anne Milton more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2018-09-11T10:26:26.317Zmore like thismore than 2018-09-11T10:26:26.317Z
unstar this property answering member
1523
star this property label Biography information for Anne Milton more like this
star this property tabling member
4056
unstar this property label Biography information for Nic Dakin more like this
943911
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2018-07-18more like thismore than 2018-07-18
star this property answering body
Department for Education more like this
star this property answering dept id 60 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Education more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Education more like this
star this property hansard heading Mathematics: Education remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to the Answer of 21 June 2018 to Question 153838, how many children classified as in scope for the 16-18 maths progress measure were from (a) disadvantaged and (b) non-disadvantaged backgrounds in 2016-17 by each prior attainment grade. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Manchester Central more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lucy Powell more like this
star this property uin 165578 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2018-07-23more like thismore than 2018-07-23
star this property answer text <p>The number of students in scope for the 16-18 English and maths progress measures are published as part of official Department for Education statistics. These can be found here: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/a-level-and-other-16-to-18-results-2016-to-2017-revised" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/a-level-and-other-16-to-18-results-2016-to-2017-revised</a>. The main text can be found in SFR03/2018, Section 5.</p><p>These statistics feature breakdowns by prior attainment groupings and disadvantage status. As the published data only shows the average progress point score, we have expanded on the published data by adding in the number of students that achieved a grade 4 or above as well as adding the number of students that made positive progress.</p><p>The English and maths progress measure is based on achievement of GCSEs and of approved stepping stone qualifications. These stepping stone qualifications include functional skills, free standing maths, English for speakers of other languages and AQA use of maths.</p><p>Each student’s exam results are assigned a capped point score. The point scores range from 0 to 8 points, depending on the type of qualification taken and the grade achieved by the student. For example, GCSE points range from 1 point for a grade G up to 8 points for an A* grade. Stepping stone qualifications do not attract as many points as GCSEs and typically fall between GCSE grades on the points scale. For example, a level 1 functional skill qualification is equal to 2.5 points. A fail in any qualification is worth 0 points, and students that do not enter any approved exams during 16-18 study automatically score -1 for the progress measure[1].</p><p> </p><ol><li>Information on how grades are assigned point scores can be found in the <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/16-to-19-accountability-headline-measures-technical-guide" target="_blank">16 to 18 technical guidance.</a></li><li>There is no data (N/A) for prior attainment scores 0.8 and 1.7 in English because there are currently no qualifications assigned these scores.</li></ol><p> </p>
star this property answering member constituency Stratford-on-Avon more like this
star this property answering member printed Nadhim Zahawi more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
165579 more like this
165580 more like this
165581 more like this
165582 more like this
165583 more like this
165584 more like this
165585 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2018-07-23T14:38:43.147Zmore like thismore than 2018-07-23T14:38:43.147Z
unstar this property answering member
4113
star this property label Biography information for Nadhim Zahawi more like this
star this property attachment
1
star this property file name Table_of_disadvantaged_and_non_disadvantaged_students_by prior_attainment -_PQ_165578.doc more like this
star this property title Table_for_grouped_PQ_165578 more like this
star this property tabling member
4263
unstar this property label Biography information for Lucy Powell more like this