Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

969138

	registered interest
	date	06/09/2018
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Courts
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether it is his policy that (a) HMCTS and (b) any employee or agent of HMCTS collect information from legal representatives attending court on their client's nationality.
	tabling member constituency	Manchester, Gorton
	tabling member printed	Afzal Khan
	uin	171415
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 11/09/2018 answer text <p>Section 86A of the Courts Act 2003, as inserted by Section 162 of the Policing and Crime Act 2017, requires defendants appearing in person before a criminal court to state their name, date of birth and nationality when requested to do so by the court. This information may be provided orally or in writing and could be submitted through the defendant’s legal representative at the hearing. HM Courts and Tribunals Service commenced use of this power in November 2017.</p> answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire answering member printed Lucy Frazer question first answered 11/09/2018 15:46:01 answering member 4517 label Biography information for Lucy Frazer
	tabling member	4671 label Biography information for Afzal Khan

872747

	registered interest
	date	27/03/2018
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Courts
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, which courts in the UK have been visited by Ministers of his Department since the beginning of the 2018.
	tabling member constituency	Cambridge
	tabling member printed	Daniel Zeichner
	uin	134560
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 16/04/2018 answer text <p>The list of Ministers and which courts they have visited is given in the table below. Lord Keen has not visited any courts.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>David Gauke</p></td><td><p>1 February 2018</p></td><td><p>Lavender Hill Magistrates’ Court</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>David Gauke</p></td><td><p>13 February 2018</p></td><td><p>Oxford Combined Court</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>David Gauke</p></td><td><p>19 February 2018</p></td><td><p>Arnhem House, Leicester</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rory Stewart OBE</p></td><td><p>1 February 2018</p></td><td><p>Woolwich Crown Court</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dr Phillip Lee</p></td><td><p>26 January 2018</p></td><td><p>Milton Keynes Magistrates’ Court</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lucy Frazer QC</p></td><td><p>1 February 2018</p></td><td><p>Bromley Magistrates’ Court and Woolwich Crown Court</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lucy Frazer QC</p></td><td><p>8 March 2018</p></td><td><p>Lavender Hill Magistrates’ Court</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p> answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire answering member printed Lucy Frazer question first answered 16/04/2018 16:37:22 answering member 4517 label Biography information for Lucy Frazer
	tabling member	4382 label Biography information for Daniel Zeichner

845440

	registered interest
	date	20/02/2018
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Courts
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the maximum acceptable (1) distance, and (2) travel time, for witnesses and parties to get to their nearest (a) Magistrates' Court, (b) County Court, and (c) Crown Court.
	tabling member printed	Lord Lisvane
	uin	HL5640
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 06/03/2018 answer text <p>On 18 January 2018, HM Courts &amp; Tribunals Service published a consultation document, <em>Fit for the future: transforming the Court and Tribunal Estate </em>(<a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/fit-for-the-future-transforming-the-court-and-tribunal-estate" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/fit-for-the-future-transforming-the-court-and-tribunal-estate</a>) inviting views on the proposed future strategy and approach to court and tribunal estate reform in England and Wales. The consultation contains the proposal that nearly all users should be able to attend a hearing on time and return within in a day, by public transport if necessary. The document also includes a national assessment of journey times for court users travelling to Magistrates’, County and Crown courts. The consultation is open until 29 March 2018.</p><p> </p><p>Ongoing investment in the transformation and modernisation of our courts and tribunals will enable the use of technology, such as video links and online services. These will improve access to justice by reducing the need to attend court in person.</p> answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie question first answered 06/03/2018 17:02:18 answering member 4538 label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie
	tabling member	4351 label Biography information for Lord Lisvane

835980

	registered interest
	date	02/02/2018
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Courts
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to paragraph 5.21 on page 49 of his Department's consultation, Fit for the future: transforming the court and tribunal estate, what the evidential basis is for the conclusion that the proposed strategy will have no direct impact on service delivery.
	tabling member constituency	Leeds East
	tabling member printed	Richard Burgon
	uin	126335
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 09/02/2018 answer text <p>In the recently published; <em>Fit for the Future: transforming the court and tribunal estate </em>consultation document, HM Courts &amp; Tribunals Service (HMCTS) set out its proposed future strategy and approach to court and tribunal estate reform. This was set within the wider context of work to modernise services, and outlined the ways in which technology and new ways of working can be utilised to make the justice system more accessible, efficient and flexible.</p><p> </p><p>The paragraph referred to relates to equalities assessments. These assessments are made when there are specific and measureable proposals against which assessments can be made. The strategic consultation published invites views on our proposed principles which will guide future decisions on the estate but it does not contain specific proposals for changes to the estate. We will conduct equalities assessments on any future specific proposals when we consult publicly on such changes.</p> answering member constituency Bracknell answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee question first answered 09/02/2018 17:07:08 answering member 3921 label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee
	tabling member	4493 label Biography information for Richard Burgon