Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

947081
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2018-07-23more like thismore than 2018-07-23
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Buscombe on 19 July (HL9263), on what evidence they determined that gender is relevant to the needs arising from long-term health conditions or disabilities while ethnicity is not; and whether they will place a copy of that evidence in the Library of the House. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Boateng more like this
star this property uin HL9771 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2018-07-31more like thismore than 2018-07-31
unstar this property answer text <p>Whilst designing Personal Independence Payment (PIP), the Department considered the relevance of what data should be collected and recorded to support the good management of a PIP claim. PIP is based on needs arising from a long-term health condition or disability so gender is not a factor in the decision making process in PIP.</p><p> </p><p>However, the collection of data on gender supports the good management of PIP claims as it supports our communications with claimants.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Baroness Buscombe more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2018-07-31T13:49:29.9Zmore like thismore than 2018-07-31T13:49:29.9Z
star this property answering member
3349
star this property label Biography information for Baroness Buscombe more like this
star this property tabling member
147
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Boateng more like this
947080
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2018-07-23more like thismore than 2018-07-23
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Buscombe on 19 July (HL9263), whether they will publish the outcome of their consideration of how to give assurance that the assessment process for Personal Independent Payments does not disproportionately affect BAME communities. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Boateng more like this
star this property uin HL9770 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2018-07-31more like thismore than 2018-07-31
unstar this property answer text <p>We are currently considering the approach we will take to this work and will decide on the most suitable method of disseminating the outcomes as part of that activity.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Baroness Buscombe more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2018-07-31T13:49:04.307Zmore like thismore than 2018-07-31T13:49:04.307Z
star this property answering member
3349
star this property label Biography information for Baroness Buscombe more like this
star this property tabling member
147
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Boateng more like this
935146
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2018-07-05more like thismore than 2018-07-05
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Buscombe on 4 July (HL9015), what assessment, if any, they have made of (1) the relevance of ethnicity in ensuring good management of claims for Personal Independence Payments; and (2) on what basis gender is considered relevant for the collection of data and good management of claims, while ethnicity is not. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Boateng more like this
star this property uin HL9263 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2018-07-19more like thismore than 2018-07-19
unstar this property answer text <p>Whilst designing Personal Independence Payment (PIP), the Department considered the relevance of what data should be collected and recorded to support the good management of a PIP claim. PIP is based on needs arising from a long-term health condition or disability so ethnicity is not a factor in the decision making process in PIP. However, DWP does collect data on ethnicity from other sources, such as the Family Resources Survey, and are considering how we can better use this information, and review other activities, to give assurance that the assessment process does not disproportionately impact on BAME communities</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Baroness Buscombe more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2018-07-19T14:34:44.387Zmore like thismore than 2018-07-19T14:34:44.387Z
star this property answering member
3349
star this property label Biography information for Baroness Buscombe more like this
star this property tabling member
147
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Boateng more like this
932041
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2018-06-27more like thismore than 2018-06-27
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they plan to collect data on race alongside disability, gender and age as part of their monitoring of the Personal Independent Payments caseload. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Boateng more like this
star this property uin HL9015 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2018-07-04more like thismore than 2018-07-04
unstar this property answer text <p>The Department for Work and Pensions only collects data which determines benefit entitlement or which contributes to the good management of a claim, we therefore do not ask for those details. We have no plans to change these arrangements.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Baroness Buscombe more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2018-07-04T17:01:27.797Zmore like thismore than 2018-07-04T17:01:27.797Z
star this property answering member
3349
star this property label Biography information for Baroness Buscombe more like this
star this property tabling member
147
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Boateng more like this
384514
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2015-06-22more like thismore than 2015-06-22
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the recent High Court ruling regarding delays in Personal Independence Payments. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Baroness Kennedy of Cradley more like this
star this property uin HL725 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2015-06-30more like thismore than 2015-06-30
unstar this property answer text <p>The Court rejected two of the three legal grounds brought by the claimants, finding that their human rights had not been breached and not awarding damages.</p><p> </p><p>Where the Court found that the historic delay for the two claimants was unlawful, they also ruled that they are not “test cases” and it would be inappropriate to make wider findings.</p><p> </p><p>The Court accepted that the Government had made significant improvements to the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) process and there are now no inherent failings in the system.</p><p> </p><p>As a result of these improvements, the average time taken for a claimant to be assessed by an assessment provider has fallen by more than three quarters since June 2014. In April 2015, the average new claimant was waiting 5 weeks for their PIP assessment – well within the 16 week target set by the Secretary of State.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Baroness Altmann more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-06-30T15:50:02.813Zmore like thismore than 2015-06-30T15:50:02.813Z
star this property answering member
4533
star this property label Biography information for Baroness Altmann more like this
star this property tabling member
4303
unstar this property label Biography information for Baroness Kennedy of Cradley more like this
470650
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2016-03-14more like thismore than 2016-03-14
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many Personal Independent Payment claimants have so far been awarded the top level of mobility support; and of those, what percentage were awarded that support as a result of points from (1) the "planning and following a journey" activity, (2) the "moving around" activity, or (3) a combination of the two. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Baroness Doocey more like this
star this property uin HL6990 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2016-03-30more like thismore than 2016-03-30
unstar this property answer text <p>At the end of January 2016 there were 218,279 people in receipt of the enhanced rate mobility component of PIP. The latest available data on the proportion of awards of the enhanced rate mobility component by activity are in the table below:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Activities/scores</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Proportion</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>12 or more points on the “planning and following a journey” activity</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>12 or more points on the “moving around” activity</p></td><td><p>51%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>12 or more points on both “moving around” and “planning and following a journey”</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>12 or more points from a combination of these activities.</p></td><td><p>25%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><em>Notes:</em></p><p><em>Figures relate to Normal Rules assessments only.</em></p><p><em>Data at 31 December 2015.</em></p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Baroness Altmann more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2016-03-30T14:44:24.023Zmore like thismore than 2016-03-30T14:44:24.023Z
star this property answering member
4533
star this property label Biography information for Baroness Altmann more like this
star this property tabling member
4197
unstar this property label Biography information for Baroness Doocey more like this
470648
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2016-03-14more like thismore than 2016-03-14
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many disabled people who receive Disability Living Allowance (DLA) have so far been reassessed for Personal Independence Payment (PIP), and of those that have been reassessed, how many have lost the top level of mobility allowance as they move from DLA to PIP, in each case broken down by disability. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Baroness Doocey more like this
star this property uin HL6989 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2016-03-22more like thismore than 2016-03-22
unstar this property answer text <p>The Department intends to provide detailed breakdowns of DLA to PIP reassessment outcomes in due course. The Department is working to guidelines set by the UK Statistics Authority to ensure we are able to publish statistics that meet high quality standards at the earliest opportunity.</p><p> </p><p>The latest available data on Personal Independence Payment (PIP) claims in payment, registrations, clearances and awards for both new claims and reassessed claims (for those previously in receipt of Disability Living Allowance (DLA)) are published on the Gov.UK website. Breakdowns of reassessed claims in payment by type and rate of awards can be found through Stat-Xplore, a statistical exploration tool available on the Gov.UK website.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Baroness Altmann more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2016-03-22T12:06:25.897Zmore like thismore than 2016-03-22T12:06:25.897Z
star this property answering member
4533
star this property label Biography information for Baroness Altmann more like this
star this property tabling member
4197
unstar this property label Biography information for Baroness Doocey more like this
713093
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-03-21more like thismore than 2017-03-21
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what estimate they have made of the number of people currently receiving the standard mobility rate of Personal Independence Payment who will not be entitled to receive any mobility rate following their next reassessment, following changes brought forward in the Social Security (Personal Independence Payment) (Amendment) Regulations 2017; and what assessment they have made of the impact of that change on those individuals. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Baroness Hollins more like this
star this property uin HL6213 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-04-04more like thismore than 2017-04-04
unstar this property answer text <p>No Personal Independence Payment (PIP) claimants will see a reduction in the amount of PIP previously awarded by the Department for Work and Pensions as a result of the regulations being introduced, including the point at which their claim is next reviewed.</p><p> </p><p>We are aware of a small number of cases, where people may have been awarded a higher level of PIP by a tribunal. This could occur if their case was heard at appeal and a tribunal made a higher award, applying the rulings of the Upper Tribunal. We will not be claiming back the money these individuals received during the period before the new regulations came into force and are considering whether to adjust their payments to bring them in line with the amended PIP regulations.</p><p> </p><p>I will place a copy of the Equality Impact Assessment in the House Library.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Henley more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
HL6211 more like this
HL6212 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-04-04T14:40:07.4Zmore like thismore than 2017-04-04T14:40:07.4Z
star this property answering member
2616
star this property label Biography information for Lord Henley more like this
star this property tabling member
4190
unstar this property label Biography information for Baroness Hollins more like this
713092
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-03-21more like thismore than 2017-03-21
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what estimate they have made of the number of people currently receiving the enhanced mobility rate of Personal Independence Payment who will not be entitled to receive any mobility rate following their next reassessment, following changes brought forward in the Social Security (Personal Independence Payment) (Amendment) Regulations 2017; and what assessment they have made of the impact of that change on those individuals. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Baroness Hollins more like this
star this property uin HL6212 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-04-04more like thismore than 2017-04-04
unstar this property answer text <p>No Personal Independence Payment (PIP) claimants will see a reduction in the amount of PIP previously awarded by the Department for Work and Pensions as a result of the regulations being introduced, including the point at which their claim is next reviewed.</p><p> </p><p>We are aware of a small number of cases, where people may have been awarded a higher level of PIP by a tribunal. This could occur if their case was heard at appeal and a tribunal made a higher award, applying the rulings of the Upper Tribunal. We will not be claiming back the money these individuals received during the period before the new regulations came into force and are considering whether to adjust their payments to bring them in line with the amended PIP regulations.</p><p> </p><p>I will place a copy of the Equality Impact Assessment in the House Library.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Henley more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
HL6211 more like this
HL6213 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-04-04T14:40:07.15Zmore like thismore than 2017-04-04T14:40:07.15Z
star this property answering member
2616
star this property label Biography information for Lord Henley more like this
star this property tabling member
4190
unstar this property label Biography information for Baroness Hollins more like this
713091
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-03-21more like thismore than 2017-03-21
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what estimate they have made of the number of people currently receiving the enhanced mobility rate of Personal Independence Payment who will move to the standard rate following their next reassessment, following changes brought forward in the Social Security (Personal Independence Payment) (Amendment) Regulations 2017; and what assessment they have made of the impact of that change on those individuals. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Baroness Hollins more like this
star this property uin HL6211 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-04-04more like thismore than 2017-04-04
unstar this property answer text <p>No Personal Independence Payment (PIP) claimants will see a reduction in the amount of PIP previously awarded by the Department for Work and Pensions as a result of the regulations being introduced, including the point at which their claim is next reviewed.</p><p> </p><p>We are aware of a small number of cases, where people may have been awarded a higher level of PIP by a tribunal. This could occur if their case was heard at appeal and a tribunal made a higher award, applying the rulings of the Upper Tribunal. We will not be claiming back the money these individuals received during the period before the new regulations came into force and are considering whether to adjust their payments to bring them in line with the amended PIP regulations.</p><p> </p><p>I will place a copy of the Equality Impact Assessment in the House Library.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Henley more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
HL6212 more like this
HL6213 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-04-04T14:40:06.947Zmore like thismore than 2017-04-04T14:40:06.947Z
star this property answering member
2616
star this property label Biography information for Lord Henley more like this
star this property tabling member
4190
unstar this property label Biography information for Baroness Hollins more like this