Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

176834

	registered interest
	date	29/01/2015
	answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
	answering dept id	29
	answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
	answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
	hansard heading	Personal Independence Payment
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people receiving personal independence payments have undergone an intervention to review their entitlement.
	tabling member constituency	Brecon and Radnorshire
	tabling member printed	Roger Williams
	uin	222766
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 03/02/2015 answer text <p /> <p>The information requested is not available at this time. We will make the statistics on PIP interventions available when they meet the standards required for them to be released in official statistics.</p> answering member constituency Forest of Dean answering member printed Mr Mark Harper question first answered 03/02/2015 11:40:07 answering member 1520 label Biography information for Mr Mark Harper
	tabling member	1394 label Biography information for Roger Williams

176835

	registered interest
	date	29/01/2015
	answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
	answering dept id	29
	answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
	answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
	hansard heading	Personal Independence Payment
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people with movement disorders have applied for personal independence payment.
	tabling member constituency	Brecon and Radnorshire
	tabling member printed	Roger Williams
	uin	222767
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 03/02/2015 answer text <p>Information on claims made to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) broken down by condition is not available.</p> answering member constituency Forest of Dean answering member printed Mr Mark Harper question first answered 03/02/2015 11:43:52 answering member 1520 label Biography information for Mr Mark Harper
	tabling member	1394 label Biography information for Roger Williams

176589

	registered interest
	date	28/01/2015
	answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
	answering dept id	29
	answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
	answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
	hansard heading	Personal Independence Payment
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what adjustments his Department has made to the number of people reassessed for personal independence payment to reflect the current backlog of claims.
	tabling member constituency	Dumfries and Galloway
	tabling member printed	Mr Russell Brown
	uin	222405
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 02/02/2015 answer text <p /> <p>Following our controlled approach, a further 29 postcode areas have gone live with reassessment. We are currently progressing detailed planning and assurance activity to identify postcode areas to be included in further phases of rollout.</p> answering member constituency Forest of Dean answering member printed Mr Mark Harper question first answered 02/02/2015 17:29:00 answering member 1520 label Biography information for Mr Mark Harper
	tabling member	588 label Biography information for Mr Russell Brown

176590

	registered interest
	date	28/01/2015
	answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
	answering dept id	29
	answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
	answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
	hansard heading	Personal Independence Payment
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people have undergone a reassessment for personal independence payment before the end of their award period.
	tabling member constituency	Dumfries and Galloway
	tabling member printed	Mr Russell Brown
	uin	222406
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 02/02/2015 answer text <p /> <p>The official statistics published in December show that to the end of October 2014, 29,900 claimants have had a reassessment and received their Personal Independence Payment decision. DLA remains in payment while the claimant goes through the process to claim Personal Independence Payment. <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/personal-independence-payment-statistics" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/personal-independence-payment-statistics</a></p> answering member constituency Forest of Dean answering member printed Mr Mark Harper question first answered 02/02/2015 17:27:01 answering member 1520 label Biography information for Mr Mark Harper
	tabling member	588 label Biography information for Mr Russell Brown

176593

	registered interest
	date	28/01/2015
	answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
	answering dept id	29
	answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
	answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
	hansard heading	Personal Independence Payment
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to Personal Independence Payment new claims: ad hoc statistics, published on 28 January 2015, how many of the 143,000 people disallowed personal independence payment (PIP) claims highlighted in that report were people who were described as not attending an assessment without good reason; what reasons for missing such assessments are permissible; whether the Department or assessment providers adjudicates on reasons for missed appointments; and how many of those people have since reapplied for PIP.
	tabling member constituency	Stretford and Urmston
	tabling member printed	Kate Green
	uin	222419
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 03/02/2015 answer text <p>As detailed in the PIP statistical ad hoc released on the 28th January, by the end of December 2014 143,400 claimants had been disallowed Personal Independence Payment post-referral to the assessment providers. We do not currently hold information that allows us to break this figure down to report how many were disallowed because they did not attend an assessment without good reason, and hence we do not know how many of these claimants have since reapplied for PIP. We do not have high volumes of complaints about disallowance due to non-attendance indicating this isn’t a serious issue.</p><p><em> </em></p><p>Good Reason is considered on an individual basis by the Department and will be dependent on the individual case. This might typically include a health or domestic emergency for example.</p><p> </p><p>Of the 63,600 claims that were disallowed pre-referral to the assessment providers, 94% of these were disallowed due to the claimant not returning the Part 2 form within the time limit (which represents 10% of all registrations up to 31st December 2014).</p><p> </p><p>Returning the Part 2 form within the deadline is a legal requirement. Individuals can request an extension if required. There are processes in place to provide additional support to those who need it and haven’t returned their form.</p><p>The table below provides a time series of these data since April 2013, for new claims normal rules.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><p>Normal Rules New Claims</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Disallowed pre-referral to the AP</p></td><td><p>Disallowed for non-return of Part 2</p></td><td><p>Total Registrations</p></td><td><p>Disallowed pre-referral to the AP as a % of Total Registrations</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Apr-13</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>3,000</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May-13</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>4,800</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jun-13</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>23,000</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jul-13</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>21%</p></td><td><p>34,200</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Aug-13</p></td><td><p>1,100</p></td><td><p>86%</p></td><td><p>30,600</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sep-13</p></td><td><p>1,300</p></td><td><p>89%</p></td><td><p>33,700</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oct-13</p></td><td><p>1,700</p></td><td><p>90%</p></td><td><p>35,500</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Nov-13</p></td><td><p>3,000</p></td><td><p>94%</p></td><td><p>32,600</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dec-13</p></td><td><p>2,400</p></td><td><p>95%</p></td><td><p>21,700</p></td><td><p>11%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan-14</p></td><td><p>1,900</p></td><td><p>92%</p></td><td><p>37,900</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Feb-14</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>10%</p></td><td><p>36,000</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mar-14</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>11%</p></td><td><p>36,800</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Apr-14</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>18%</p></td><td><p>32,600</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May-14</p></td><td><p>200</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>32,400</p></td><td><p>1%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jun-14</p></td><td><p>12,900</p></td><td><p>98%</p></td><td><p>32,900</p></td><td><p>39%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jul-14</p></td><td><p>4,900</p></td><td><p>96%</p></td><td><p>35,000</p></td><td><p>14%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Aug-14</p></td><td><p>6,000</p></td><td><p>94%</p></td><td><p>31,900</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sep-14</p></td><td><p>7,000</p></td><td><p>96%</p></td><td><p>37,300</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oct-14</p></td><td><p>6,800</p></td><td><p>94%</p></td><td><p>36,200</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Nov-14</p></td><td><p>6,600</p></td><td><p>91%</p></td><td><p>32,200</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dec-14</p></td><td><p>7,300</p></td><td><p>94%</p></td><td><p>24,800</p></td><td><p>29%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>63,600 </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>94%</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>624,900</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>10%</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Source: PIP Computer System claimant records</p><p> </p><p>Notes to table;</p><p>1. Figures have been rounded to the nearest 100. Components may not sum to totals due to rounding.</p><p>2. Figures are for normal rules (i.e. non special rules for the terminally ill) new claims only.</p><p>3. Disallowed pre-referral to the assessment providers (AP) includes claims that have been disallowed due to failure of basic eligibility criteria or non-return of the Part 2 form within the time limit and have not been marked as requiring additional support.</p><p>4. '-' Less than 50 claims in this category.</p><p>5. Great Britain only.</p><p>6. Between Feb-14 to May -14 numbers were understated due to an IT issue within the PIP computer system. Issue resolved in Jun-14, with previous months corrected in month, leading to an inflated figure for Jun-14.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Claims may also be withdrawn by the claimant at any point during the PIP claims process (either before or after the return of the PIP2). The latest published PIP ad hoc statistics show that between April 2013 and December 2014 a total of 19,300 claims were withdrawn by the claimant. DWP research with PIP claimants showed that some people reconsidered their claim on receipt of a PIP2 form and decided to withdraw or discontinue it for a range of reasons including improvements in their health condition (see section 4.1 <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/332622/rr_867-early-process-evaluation-of-new-claims-for-pip.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/332622/rr_867-early-process-evaluation-of-new-claims-for-pip.pdf</a>)</p> answering member constituency Forest of Dean answering member printed Mr Mark Harper grouped question UIN 222418 question first answered 03/02/2015 15:29:37 answering member 1520 label Biography information for Mr Mark Harper
	tabling member	4120 label Biography information for Kate Green

176594

	registered interest
	date	28/01/2015
	answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
	answering dept id	29
	answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
	answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
	hansard heading	Personal Independence Payment
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what proportion of personal independence payment claims was (a) disallowed or (b) considered to have been withdrawn due to claimants not returning the PIP2 form in each calendar month since April 2013.
	tabling member constituency	Stretford and Urmston
	tabling member printed	Kate Green
	uin	222418
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 03/02/2015 answer text <p /> <p>As detailed in the PIP statistical ad hoc released on the 28th January, by the end of December 2014 143,400 claimants had been disallowed Personal Independence Payment post-referral to the assessment providers. We do not currently hold information that allows us to break this figure down to report how many were disallowed because they did not attend an assessment without good reason, and hence we do not know how many of these claimants have since reapplied for PIP. We do not have high volumes of complaints about disallowance due to non-attendance indicating this isn’t a serious issue.</p><p><em> </em></p><p>Good Reason is considered on an individual basis by the Department and will be dependent on the individual case. This might typically include a health or domestic emergency for example.</p><p> </p><p>Of the 63,600 claims that were disallowed pre-referral to the assessment providers, 94% of these were disallowed due to the claimant not returning the Part 2 form within the time limit (which represents 10% of all registrations up to 31st December 2014).</p><p> </p><p>Returning the Part 2 form within the deadline is a legal requirement. Individuals can request an extension if required. There are processes in place to provide additional support to those who need it and haven’t returned their form.</p><p>The table below provides a time series of these data since April 2013, for new claims normal rules.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><p>Normal Rules New Claims</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Disallowed pre-referral to the AP</p></td><td><p>Disallowed for non-return of Part 2</p></td><td><p>Total Registrations</p></td><td><p>Disallowed pre-referral to the AP as a % of Total Registrations</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Apr-13</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>3,000</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May-13</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>4,800</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jun-13</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>23,000</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jul-13</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>21%</p></td><td><p>34,200</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Aug-13</p></td><td><p>1,100</p></td><td><p>86%</p></td><td><p>30,600</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sep-13</p></td><td><p>1,300</p></td><td><p>89%</p></td><td><p>33,700</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oct-13</p></td><td><p>1,700</p></td><td><p>90%</p></td><td><p>35,500</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Nov-13</p></td><td><p>3,000</p></td><td><p>94%</p></td><td><p>32,600</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dec-13</p></td><td><p>2,400</p></td><td><p>95%</p></td><td><p>21,700</p></td><td><p>11%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan-14</p></td><td><p>1,900</p></td><td><p>92%</p></td><td><p>37,900</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Feb-14</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>10%</p></td><td><p>36,000</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mar-14</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>11%</p></td><td><p>36,800</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Apr-14</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>18%</p></td><td><p>32,600</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May-14</p></td><td><p>200</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>32,400</p></td><td><p>1%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jun-14</p></td><td><p>12,900</p></td><td><p>98%</p></td><td><p>32,900</p></td><td><p>39%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jul-14</p></td><td><p>4,900</p></td><td><p>96%</p></td><td><p>35,000</p></td><td><p>14%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Aug-14</p></td><td><p>6,000</p></td><td><p>94%</p></td><td><p>31,900</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sep-14</p></td><td><p>7,000</p></td><td><p>96%</p></td><td><p>37,300</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oct-14</p></td><td><p>6,800</p></td><td><p>94%</p></td><td><p>36,200</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Nov-14</p></td><td><p>6,600</p></td><td><p>91%</p></td><td><p>32,200</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dec-14</p></td><td><p>7,300</p></td><td><p>94%</p></td><td><p>24,800</p></td><td><p>29%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>63,600 </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>94%</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>624,900</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>10%</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Source: PIP Computer System claimant records</p><p> </p><p>Notes to table;</p><p>1. Figures have been rounded to the nearest 100. Components may not sum to totals due to rounding.</p><p>2. Figures are for normal rules (i.e. non special rules for the terminally ill) new claims only.</p><p>3. Disallowed pre-referral to the assessment providers (AP) includes claims that have been disallowed due to failure of basic eligibility criteria or non-return of the Part 2 form within the time limit and have not been marked as requiring additional support.</p><p>4. '-' Less than 50 claims in this category.</p><p>5. Great Britain only.</p><p>6. Between Feb-14 to May -14 numbers were understated due to an IT issue within the PIP computer system. Issue resolved in Jun-14, with previous months corrected in month, leading to an inflated figure for Jun-14.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Claims may also be withdrawn by the claimant at any point during the PIP claims process (either before or after the return of the PIP2). The latest published PIP ad hoc statistics show that between April 2013 and December 2014 a total of 19,300 claims were withdrawn by the claimant. DWP research with PIP claimants showed that some people reconsidered their claim on receipt of a PIP2 form and decided to withdraw or discontinue it for a range of reasons including improvements in their health condition (see section 4.1 <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/332622/rr_867-early-process-evaluation-of-new-claims-for-pip.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/332622/rr_867-early-process-evaluation-of-new-claims-for-pip.pdf</a>)</p> answering member constituency Forest of Dean answering member printed Mr Mark Harper grouped question UIN 222419 question first answered 03/02/2015 15:29:36 answering member 1520 label Biography information for Mr Mark Harper
	tabling member	4120 label Biography information for Kate Green

175367

	registered interest
	date	22/01/2015
	answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
	answering dept id	29
	answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
	answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
	hansard heading	Personal Independence Payment
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many people receiving Personal Independence Payment have undergone an intervention to review their entitlement.
	tabling member printed	Lord Harrison
	uin	HL4370
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 29/01/2015 answer text <p>The information requested regarding interventions is not currently available.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Information on claims made to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) broken down by condition is not available. By 21 October 2014, 1,535 people classified as having a movement disorder as their primary condition were in receipt of PIP.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Department has robust processes in place to assure the quality of Personal Independence Payment assessments and decisions about benefit entitlement, through regular audit and quality checks by specialist teams. We continue to review processes to ensure they remain appropriate and effective.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Freud grouped question UIN HL4371 HL4372 HL4373 question first answered 29/01/2015 17:37:41 answering member 3893 label Biography information for Lord Freud
	tabling member	2488 label Biography information for Lord Harrison

175368

	registered interest
	date	22/01/2015
	answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
	answering dept id	29
	answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
	answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
	hansard heading	Personal Independence Payment
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many people with Parkinson's receiving Personal Independence Payment have undergone an intervention to review their entitlement.
	tabling member printed	Lord Harrison
	uin	HL4371
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 29/01/2015 answer text <p>The information requested regarding interventions is not currently available.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Information on claims made to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) broken down by condition is not available. By 21 October 2014, 1,535 people classified as having a movement disorder as their primary condition were in receipt of PIP.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Department has robust processes in place to assure the quality of Personal Independence Payment assessments and decisions about benefit entitlement, through regular audit and quality checks by specialist teams. We continue to review processes to ensure they remain appropriate and effective.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Freud grouped question UIN HL4370 HL4372 HL4373 question first answered 29/01/2015 17:37:42 answering member 3893 label Biography information for Lord Freud
	tabling member	2488 label Biography information for Lord Harrison

175369

	registered interest
	date	22/01/2015
	answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
	answering dept id	29
	answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
	answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
	hansard heading	Personal Independence Payment
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty’s Government what plans they have (1) to pilot the Personal Independence Payment quality assurance process, (2) to publish an evaluation of the Personal Independence Payment quality assurance process, and (3) to consult on the Personal Independence Payment quality assurance process.
	tabling member printed	Lord Harrison
	uin	HL4372
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 29/01/2015 answer text <p>The information requested regarding interventions is not currently available.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Information on claims made to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) broken down by condition is not available. By 21 October 2014, 1,535 people classified as having a movement disorder as their primary condition were in receipt of PIP.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Department has robust processes in place to assure the quality of Personal Independence Payment assessments and decisions about benefit entitlement, through regular audit and quality checks by specialist teams. We continue to review processes to ensure they remain appropriate and effective.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Freud grouped question UIN HL4370 HL4371 HL4373 question first answered 29/01/2015 17:37:42 answering member 3893 label Biography information for Lord Freud
	tabling member	2488 label Biography information for Lord Harrison

175370

	registered interest
	date	22/01/2015
	answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
	answering dept id	29
	answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
	answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
	hansard heading	Personal Independence Payment
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many people with movement disorders have applied for Personal Independence Payment.
	tabling member printed	Lord Harrison
	uin	HL4373
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 29/01/2015 answer text <p>The information requested regarding interventions is not currently available.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Information on claims made to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) broken down by condition is not available. By 21 October 2014, 1,535 people classified as having a movement disorder as their primary condition were in receipt of PIP.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Department has robust processes in place to assure the quality of Personal Independence Payment assessments and decisions about benefit entitlement, through regular audit and quality checks by specialist teams. We continue to review processes to ensure they remain appropriate and effective.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Freud grouped question UIN HL4370 HL4371 HL4372 question first answered 29/01/2015 17:37:42 answering member 3893 label Biography information for Lord Freud
	tabling member	2488 label Biography information for Lord Harrison