Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

542303
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2016-07-21more like thismore than 2016-07-21
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, within what period for time a mandatory reconsideration must be completed for a personal independence payment application. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency West Lancashire more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Rosie Cooper more like this
star this property uin 43832 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2016-09-05more like thismore than 2016-09-05
star this property answer text <p>We introduced Mandatory Reconsideration to make the system as fair as possible for those going through it. It gives people the opportunity to present new evidence and to have their case looked at again.</p><p> </p><p>The Department for Work and Pensions does not have a clearance time target for Mandatory Reconsiderations. Claimants have one calendar month from the date of their Personal Independence Payment (PIP) decision to request a Mandatory Reconsideration. Further information on Mandatory Reconsideration in PIP can be found at <a href="https://www.gov.uk/pip/appeals" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/pip/appeals</a>.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Portsmouth North more like this
star this property answering member printed Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2016-09-05T11:46:45.887Zmore like thismore than 2016-09-05T11:46:45.887Z
star this property answering member
4017
star this property label Biography information for Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property tabling member
1538
unstar this property label Biography information for Rosie Cooper more like this
601166
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2016-10-13
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the second table on page five of his Department's document, Personal Independence Payment: Official Statistics, if he will provide the data on reconsideration outcomes by (a) category or disabling condition, (b) sub-group and (c) disability in the most recent period for which figures are available. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull North more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Diana Johnson more like this
star this property uin 48513 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2016-10-19more like thismore than 2016-10-19
star this property answer text <p>The information requested is not readily available and to provide it would incur disproportionate cost.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Portsmouth North more like this
star this property answering member printed Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2016-10-19T14:21:04.133Zmore like thismore than 2016-10-19T14:21:04.133Z
star this property answering member
4017
star this property label Biography information for Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property tabling member
1533
unstar this property label Biography information for Diana Johnson more like this
65810
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2014-07-03more like thismore than 2014-07-03
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the letter of 6 March 2014 from the Minister for Disabled People to Macmillan Cancer Support, for what reason his Department does not consider data on clearance times of personal independence payment normal and special rules claims to be robust enough to be included in the published quarterly statistics. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Stockton North more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Alex Cunningham more like this
star this property uin 203902 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-07-08more like thismore than 2014-07-08
star this property answer text <p /> <p /> <p>Releasing information on clearance times at this stage would give an incorrect representation of the process since the system has not yet reached maturity.</p><p>Professional statisticians determine when a series meets the criteria for publication as official statistics. That stage has not yet in their judgement been reached for this information.</p><p><strong> </strong></p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Hemel Hempstead more like this
star this property answering member printed Mike Penning more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-07-08T14:38:58.9765676Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-08T14:38:58.9765676Z
star this property answering member
1528
star this property label Biography information for Sir Mike Penning more like this
star this property tabling member
4122
unstar this property label Biography information for Alex Cunningham more like this
91664
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2014-09-11more like thismore than 2014-09-11
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the letter dated 15 July 2014 from the then Minister of State for Disabled People to the hon. Member for Stockton North, ref. POS(5) 10214/92, if the Minister of State for Disabled People will uphold his predecessor's personal commitment to ensuring that personal independence payment claims for people who are terminally ill will be assessed within seven days where possible; and what the timeframe is for achieving this target. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Stockton North more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Alex Cunningham more like this
star this property uin 209152 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-10-13more like thismore than 2014-10-13
star this property answer text <p /> <p>We are already starting to see waiting times for special rules claims for terminally ill people reduce towards our expected level with indications that processing times are currently down to around 10 days. We will continue to identify further opportunities to streamline the process.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Forest of Dean more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr Mark Harper more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-10-13T09:10:55.5702917Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-13T09:10:55.5702917Z
star this property answering member
1520
star this property label Biography information for Mr Mark Harper more like this
star this property tabling member
4122
unstar this property label Biography information for Alex Cunningham more like this
519930
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2016-05-20more like thismore than 2016-05-20
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the Answer of 3 May 2016 to Question 35165, on Personal Independence Payments, what steps his Department is taking better to understand why sufficient documentary evidence is not being sought during the assessment and mandatory reconsideration stages. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Bermondsey and Old Southwark more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Neil Coyle more like this
star this property uin 37772 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2016-05-31more like thismore than 2016-05-31
star this property answer text <p>The 75% can be broken down as follows:</p><p> </p><p>Cogent oral evidence – 66%</p><p>Cogent documentary evidence supplied at the appeal – 9%</p><p> </p><p>These figures are from internal DWP systems, where only one of possible multiple reasons can be recorded, and are derived from unpublished information and have not been quality assured to National Statistics or Official Statistics standard.</p><p> </p><p>The Department encourages claimants to provide as much relevant evidence as necessary to support their claim. The “How your disability affects you” form and accompanying guidance sets out the range of information that can help the Department reach a decision. The guidance for Health Professionals also sets out sources of further evidence which could help inform their advice to the Department.</p><p> </p><p>At the Mandatory Reconsideration stage, again claimants are encouraged to provide any further evidence about their disability. Following the first independent review of Personal Independence by Paul Gray, the Department is reviewing all communications (including those used by Assessment Providers) it has with claimants throughout the claim, assessment and reconsideration process to ensure that claimants clearly understand the importance of providing sufficient evidence to support their claim and application.</p><p> </p><p>Further, once a claimant has submitted their claim, the Department has created a new Standard Work Instructions (SWI) for its decision making staff to gain further evidence, where appropriate. For Mandatory Reconsideration, the SWI puts a process in place to establish what the areas for dispute are, consider any gaps in the evidence, ensure any expected further medical evidence is received and referring that to the Assessment Provider. “</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p>
star this property answering member constituency North Swindon more like this
star this property answering member printed Justin Tomlinson more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
37773 more like this
37774 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2016-05-31T13:49:20.85Zmore like thismore than 2016-05-31T13:49:20.85Z
star this property answering member
4105
star this property label Biography information for Justin Tomlinson more like this
star this property tabling member
4368
unstar this property label Biography information for Neil Coyle more like this
519931
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2016-05-20more like thismore than 2016-05-20
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the Answer of 3 May 2016 to Question 35165, on Personal Independence Payments, what proportion of overturns resulted from (a) oral and (b) documentary evidence submitted to the Tribunal. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Bermondsey and Old Southwark more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Neil Coyle more like this
star this property uin 37773 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2016-05-31more like thismore than 2016-05-31
star this property answer text <p>The 75% can be broken down as follows:</p><p> </p><p>Cogent oral evidence – 66%</p><p>Cogent documentary evidence supplied at the appeal – 9%</p><p> </p><p>These figures are from internal DWP systems, where only one of possible multiple reasons can be recorded, and are derived from unpublished information and have not been quality assured to National Statistics or Official Statistics standard.</p><p> </p><p>The Department encourages claimants to provide as much relevant evidence as necessary to support their claim. The “How your disability affects you” form and accompanying guidance sets out the range of information that can help the Department reach a decision. The guidance for Health Professionals also sets out sources of further evidence which could help inform their advice to the Department.</p><p> </p><p>At the Mandatory Reconsideration stage, again claimants are encouraged to provide any further evidence about their disability. Following the first independent review of Personal Independence by Paul Gray, the Department is reviewing all communications (including those used by Assessment Providers) it has with claimants throughout the claim, assessment and reconsideration process to ensure that claimants clearly understand the importance of providing sufficient evidence to support their claim and application.</p><p> </p><p>Further, once a claimant has submitted their claim, the Department has created a new Standard Work Instructions (SWI) for its decision making staff to gain further evidence, where appropriate. For Mandatory Reconsideration, the SWI puts a process in place to establish what the areas for dispute are, consider any gaps in the evidence, ensure any expected further medical evidence is received and referring that to the Assessment Provider. “</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p>
star this property answering member constituency North Swindon more like this
star this property answering member printed Justin Tomlinson more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
37772 more like this
37774 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2016-05-31T13:49:20.93Zmore like thismore than 2016-05-31T13:49:20.93Z
star this property answering member
4105
star this property label Biography information for Justin Tomlinson more like this
star this property tabling member
4368
unstar this property label Biography information for Neil Coyle more like this
519932
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2016-05-20more like thismore than 2016-05-20
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the Answer of 3 May 2016 to Question 35165, on Personal Independence Payments, what changes his Department has put in place to take account of the finding that 75 per cent of successful appeals resulted from additional oral or documentary evidence being submitted. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Bermondsey and Old Southwark more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Neil Coyle more like this
star this property uin 37774 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2016-05-31more like thismore than 2016-05-31
star this property answer text <p>The 75% can be broken down as follows:</p><p> </p><p>Cogent oral evidence – 66%</p><p>Cogent documentary evidence supplied at the appeal – 9%</p><p> </p><p>These figures are from internal DWP systems, where only one of possible multiple reasons can be recorded, and are derived from unpublished information and have not been quality assured to National Statistics or Official Statistics standard.</p><p> </p><p>The Department encourages claimants to provide as much relevant evidence as necessary to support their claim. The “How your disability affects you” form and accompanying guidance sets out the range of information that can help the Department reach a decision. The guidance for Health Professionals also sets out sources of further evidence which could help inform their advice to the Department.</p><p> </p><p>At the Mandatory Reconsideration stage, again claimants are encouraged to provide any further evidence about their disability. Following the first independent review of Personal Independence by Paul Gray, the Department is reviewing all communications (including those used by Assessment Providers) it has with claimants throughout the claim, assessment and reconsideration process to ensure that claimants clearly understand the importance of providing sufficient evidence to support their claim and application.</p><p> </p><p>Further, once a claimant has submitted their claim, the Department has created a new Standard Work Instructions (SWI) for its decision making staff to gain further evidence, where appropriate. For Mandatory Reconsideration, the SWI puts a process in place to establish what the areas for dispute are, consider any gaps in the evidence, ensure any expected further medical evidence is received and referring that to the Assessment Provider. “</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p>
star this property answering member constituency North Swindon more like this
star this property answering member printed Justin Tomlinson more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
37772 more like this
37773 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2016-05-31T13:49:21Zmore like thismore than 2016-05-31T13:49:21Z
star this property answering member
4105
star this property label Biography information for Justin Tomlinson more like this
star this property tabling member
4368
unstar this property label Biography information for Neil Coyle more like this
519364
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2016-05-18more like thismore than 2016-05-18
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the Answer of 26 April 2016 to Question 35188, if he will estimate the cost of collecting information on the number of personal independence payment assessment appointments which are cancelled. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Corby more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Tom Pursglove more like this
star this property uin 37155 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2016-05-26more like thismore than 2016-05-26
star this property answer text <p>Information on cancelled appointments, and the reasons for them, is not held centrally within the Department. In order to obtain this information we would need to ask our providers to clerically collate, prepare and quality assure this information. We estimate this would take in excess of 5 days to complete and the cost would be disproportionately excessive.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency North Swindon more like this
star this property answering member printed Justin Tomlinson more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2016-05-26T13:39:53.523Zmore like thismore than 2016-05-26T13:39:53.523Z
star this property answering member
4105
star this property label Biography information for Justin Tomlinson more like this
star this property tabling member
4369
unstar this property label Biography information for Tom Pursglove more like this
601167
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2016-10-13
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to his Department's document, Personal Independence Payment: Detailed medical condition, July 2016 caseload, if he will provide the same subcategories of data broken down by the size of the award in the most recent period for which figures are available. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull North more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Diana Johnson more like this
star this property uin 48492 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2016-10-20more like thismore than 2016-10-20
star this property answer text <p>The information requested is not readily available and to provide it would incur disproportionate cost.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Portsmouth North more like this
star this property answering member printed Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2016-10-20T10:45:35.297Zmore like thismore than 2016-10-20T10:45:35.297Z
star this property answering member
4017
star this property label Biography information for Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property tabling member
1533
unstar this property label Biography information for Diana Johnson more like this
176593
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2015-01-28more like thismore than 2015-01-28
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to Personal Independence Payment new claims: ad hoc statistics, published on 28 January 2015, how many of the 143,000 people disallowed personal independence payment (PIP) claims highlighted in that report were people who were described as not attending an assessment without good reason; what reasons for missing such assessments are permissible; whether the Department or assessment providers adjudicates on reasons for missed appointments; and how many of those people have since reapplied for PIP. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Stretford and Urmston more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Kate Green more like this
star this property uin 222419 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2015-02-03more like thismore than 2015-02-03
star this property answer text <p>As detailed in the PIP statistical ad hoc released on the 28th January, by the end of December 2014 143,400 claimants had been disallowed Personal Independence Payment post-referral to the assessment providers. We do not currently hold information that allows us to break this figure down to report how many were disallowed because they did not attend an assessment without good reason, and hence we do not know how many of these claimants have since reapplied for PIP. We do not have high volumes of complaints about disallowance due to non-attendance indicating this isn’t a serious issue.</p><p><em> </em></p><p>Good Reason is considered on an individual basis by the Department and will be dependent on the individual case. This might typically include a health or domestic emergency for example.</p><p> </p><p>Of the 63,600 claims that were disallowed pre-referral to the assessment providers, 94% of these were disallowed due to the claimant not returning the Part 2 form within the time limit (which represents 10% of all registrations up to 31st December 2014).</p><p> </p><p>Returning the Part 2 form within the deadline is a legal requirement. Individuals can request an extension if required. There are processes in place to provide additional support to those who need it and haven’t returned their form.</p><p>The table below provides a time series of these data since April 2013, for new claims normal rules.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><p>Normal Rules New Claims</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Disallowed pre-referral to the AP</p></td><td><p>Disallowed for non-return of Part 2</p></td><td><p>Total Registrations</p></td><td><p>Disallowed pre-referral to the AP as a % of Total Registrations</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Apr-13</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>3,000</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May-13</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>4,800</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jun-13</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>23,000</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jul-13</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>21%</p></td><td><p>34,200</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Aug-13</p></td><td><p>1,100</p></td><td><p>86%</p></td><td><p>30,600</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sep-13</p></td><td><p>1,300</p></td><td><p>89%</p></td><td><p>33,700</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oct-13</p></td><td><p>1,700</p></td><td><p>90%</p></td><td><p>35,500</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Nov-13</p></td><td><p>3,000</p></td><td><p>94%</p></td><td><p>32,600</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dec-13</p></td><td><p>2,400</p></td><td><p>95%</p></td><td><p>21,700</p></td><td><p>11%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan-14</p></td><td><p>1,900</p></td><td><p>92%</p></td><td><p>37,900</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Feb-14</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>10%</p></td><td><p>36,000</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mar-14</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>11%</p></td><td><p>36,800</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Apr-14</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>18%</p></td><td><p>32,600</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May-14</p></td><td><p>200</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>32,400</p></td><td><p>1%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jun-14</p></td><td><p>12,900</p></td><td><p>98%</p></td><td><p>32,900</p></td><td><p>39%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jul-14</p></td><td><p>4,900</p></td><td><p>96%</p></td><td><p>35,000</p></td><td><p>14%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Aug-14</p></td><td><p>6,000</p></td><td><p>94%</p></td><td><p>31,900</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sep-14</p></td><td><p>7,000</p></td><td><p>96%</p></td><td><p>37,300</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oct-14</p></td><td><p>6,800</p></td><td><p>94%</p></td><td><p>36,200</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Nov-14</p></td><td><p>6,600</p></td><td><p>91%</p></td><td><p>32,200</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dec-14</p></td><td><p>7,300</p></td><td><p>94%</p></td><td><p>24,800</p></td><td><p>29%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>63,600 </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>94%</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>624,900</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>10%</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Source: PIP Computer System claimant records</p><p> </p><p>Notes to table;</p><p>1. Figures have been rounded to the nearest 100. Components may not sum to totals due to rounding.</p><p>2. Figures are for normal rules (i.e. non special rules for the terminally ill) new claims only.</p><p>3. Disallowed pre-referral to the assessment providers (AP) includes claims that have been disallowed due to failure of basic eligibility criteria or non-return of the Part 2 form within the time limit and have not been marked as requiring additional support.</p><p>4. '-' Less than 50 claims in this category.</p><p>5. Great Britain only.</p><p>6. Between Feb-14 to May -14 numbers were understated due to an IT issue within the PIP computer system. Issue resolved in Jun-14, with previous months corrected in month, leading to an inflated figure for Jun-14.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Claims may also be withdrawn by the claimant at any point during the PIP claims process (either before or after the return of the PIP2). The latest published PIP ad hoc statistics show that between April 2013 and December 2014 a total of 19,300 claims were withdrawn by the claimant. DWP research with PIP claimants showed that some people reconsidered their claim on receipt of a PIP2 form and decided to withdraw or discontinue it for a range of reasons including improvements in their health condition (see section 4.1 <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/332622/rr_867-early-process-evaluation-of-new-claims-for-pip.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/332622/rr_867-early-process-evaluation-of-new-claims-for-pip.pdf</a>)</p>
star this property answering member constituency Forest of Dean more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr Mark Harper more like this
star this property grouped question UIN 222418 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-02-03T15:29:37.01Zmore like thismore than 2015-02-03T15:29:37.01Z
star this property answering member
1520
star this property label Biography information for Mr Mark Harper more like this
star this property tabling member
4120
unstar this property label Biography information for Kate Green more like this