Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1023280
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2018-12-11more like thismore than 2018-12-11
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Multiple Sclerosis more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many new personal independence payment claimants with multiple sclerosis in (a) Scotland, (b) Northern Ireland and (c) Wales did not receive an award during their initial personal independence payment assessment and subsequently received an award at (i) mandatory reconsideration and (ii) tribunal in each year since 2013. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Airdrie and Shotts more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Neil Gray more like this
star this property uin 201192 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2018-12-18more like thismore than 2018-12-18
star this property answer text <p>The Northern Irish Assembly has devolved responsibility for social security benefits including Personal Independence Payment (PIP). Information regarding PIP in Northern Ireland is therefore the responsibility of the Department for Communities in Northern Ireland.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Tables 1 and 2 below show, for Scotland and Wales, the number of decisions, Mandatory Reconsiderations (MRs) and appeals for new claims for PIP where the initial decision was disallowance post-referral to the Assessment Provider (AP) due to failing the assessment, for claimants with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis.</p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><p><strong>Table 1: New claims decisions, MRs and appeals where the initial decision was disallowance post-referral to the AP due to failing the assessment, by year of initial decision - for claimants in Scotland with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions changed at MR</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan - Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><p><strong>Table 2: New claims decisions, MRs and appeals where the initial decision was disallowance post-referral to the AP due to failing the assessment, by year of initial decision - for claimants in Wales with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions changed at MR</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan - Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Tables 3 and 4 below show, for Scotland and Wales, the number of decisions, MRs and appeals relating to Disability Living Allowance (DLA) claimants with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis who have undergone a reassessment to PIP.</p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><p><strong>Table 3: Reassessment decisions, MRs and appeals by year of initial decision - for claimants in Scotland with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of MRs registered</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions maintained at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>230</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>1,040</p></td><td><p>170</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>1,180</p></td><td><p>180</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan - Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>530</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><p><strong>Table 4: Reassessment decisions, MRs and appeals by year of initial decision - for claimants in Wales with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of MRs registered</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions maintained at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>130</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>920</p></td><td><p>210</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>540</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan - Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>170</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Since PIP was introduced 3.7m decisions have been made until September 2018 in Great Britain, of these 10% have been appealed and 5% have been overturned.</p><p> </p><p>We’re committed to ensuring that disabled people get the full support that they need, and under PIP 52% of people with MS receive the highest possible award, compared with 39% under the previous benefit DLA. May 2013 is chosen for comparison as this is the last month with a full DLA caseload prior to claimants being reassessed from DLA to PIP.</p><p> </p><p>Data on the number of people who had the mobility award increased from none or standard rate to the enhanced rate is available from internal analytical datasets, but to assess the completeness of recording and quality assure the figures to answer this PQ would incur disproportionate cost.</p><p>'#' fewer than 5 decisions in this category.</p><p>The data relates to MRs and appeals recorded up to September 2018 (the latest published data on appeals). Claimants who have received benefit decisions more recently may not yet have had time to complete the claimant journey and progress to appeal.</p><p>PIP data includes normal rules and special rules for the terminally ill claimants.</p><p>Data is based on primary disabling condition as recorded on the PIP computer system. Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which the decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics.</p><p>Appeals data shown in the tables is taken from the DWP PIP computer system’s management information. Therefore this appeals data may differ from that held by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service for various reasons such as delays in data recording and other methodological differences in collating and preparing statistics.</p><p>Some decisions which are changed at mandatory reconsideration, and where the claimant continues to appeal for a higher PIP award, are then changed again at tribunal appeal. Therefore the number of people who had a decision changed at mandatory reconsideration and the number of people who had a decision changed at tribunal appeal cannot be added together.</p><p>Decisions overturned at appeal may include a number of appeals that have been lapsed (which is where DWP changed the decision after an appeal was lodged but before it was heard at Tribunal).</p>
star this property answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
star this property answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
201193 remove filter
201194 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2018-12-18T15:02:57.847Zmore like thismore than 2018-12-18T15:02:57.847Z
star this property answering member
4071
star this property label Biography information for Sarah Newton remove filter
star this property tabling member
4365
unstar this property label Biography information for Neil Gray more like this
1023282
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2018-12-11more like thismore than 2018-12-11
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Multiple Sclerosis more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people with multiple sclerosis in (a) Scotland, (b) Northern Ireland and (c) Wales who were previously in receipt of disability living allowance and have undergone a reassessment for personal independence payment applied for mandatory reconsideration of the decision in each year since 2013. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Airdrie and Shotts more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Neil Gray more like this
star this property uin 201194 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2018-12-18more like thismore than 2018-12-18
star this property answer text <p>The Northern Irish Assembly has devolved responsibility for social security benefits including Personal Independence Payment (PIP). Information regarding PIP in Northern Ireland is therefore the responsibility of the Department for Communities in Northern Ireland.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Tables 1 and 2 below show, for Scotland and Wales, the number of decisions, Mandatory Reconsiderations (MRs) and appeals for new claims for PIP where the initial decision was disallowance post-referral to the Assessment Provider (AP) due to failing the assessment, for claimants with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis.</p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><p><strong>Table 1: New claims decisions, MRs and appeals where the initial decision was disallowance post-referral to the AP due to failing the assessment, by year of initial decision - for claimants in Scotland with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions changed at MR</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan - Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><p><strong>Table 2: New claims decisions, MRs and appeals where the initial decision was disallowance post-referral to the AP due to failing the assessment, by year of initial decision - for claimants in Wales with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions changed at MR</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan - Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Tables 3 and 4 below show, for Scotland and Wales, the number of decisions, MRs and appeals relating to Disability Living Allowance (DLA) claimants with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis who have undergone a reassessment to PIP.</p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><p><strong>Table 3: Reassessment decisions, MRs and appeals by year of initial decision - for claimants in Scotland with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of MRs registered</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions maintained at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>230</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>1,040</p></td><td><p>170</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>1,180</p></td><td><p>180</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan - Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>530</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><p><strong>Table 4: Reassessment decisions, MRs and appeals by year of initial decision - for claimants in Wales with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of MRs registered</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions maintained at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>130</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>920</p></td><td><p>210</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>540</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan - Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>170</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Since PIP was introduced 3.7m decisions have been made until September 2018 in Great Britain, of these 10% have been appealed and 5% have been overturned.</p><p> </p><p>We’re committed to ensuring that disabled people get the full support that they need, and under PIP 52% of people with MS receive the highest possible award, compared with 39% under the previous benefit DLA. May 2013 is chosen for comparison as this is the last month with a full DLA caseload prior to claimants being reassessed from DLA to PIP.</p><p> </p><p>Data on the number of people who had the mobility award increased from none or standard rate to the enhanced rate is available from internal analytical datasets, but to assess the completeness of recording and quality assure the figures to answer this PQ would incur disproportionate cost.</p><p>'#' fewer than 5 decisions in this category.</p><p>The data relates to MRs and appeals recorded up to September 2018 (the latest published data on appeals). Claimants who have received benefit decisions more recently may not yet have had time to complete the claimant journey and progress to appeal.</p><p>PIP data includes normal rules and special rules for the terminally ill claimants.</p><p>Data is based on primary disabling condition as recorded on the PIP computer system. Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which the decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics.</p><p>Appeals data shown in the tables is taken from the DWP PIP computer system’s management information. Therefore this appeals data may differ from that held by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service for various reasons such as delays in data recording and other methodological differences in collating and preparing statistics.</p><p>Some decisions which are changed at mandatory reconsideration, and where the claimant continues to appeal for a higher PIP award, are then changed again at tribunal appeal. Therefore the number of people who had a decision changed at mandatory reconsideration and the number of people who had a decision changed at tribunal appeal cannot be added together.</p><p>Decisions overturned at appeal may include a number of appeals that have been lapsed (which is where DWP changed the decision after an appeal was lodged but before it was heard at Tribunal).</p>
star this property answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
star this property answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
201192 more like this
201193 remove filter
star this property question first answered
less than 2018-12-18T15:02:58.02Zmore like thismore than 2018-12-18T15:02:58.02Z
star this property answering member
4071
star this property label Biography information for Sarah Newton remove filter
star this property tabling member
4365
unstar this property label Biography information for Neil Gray more like this