Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label previous answer version answering member constituency answering member printed answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

100020

	registered interest
	date	15/10/2014
	answering body	Department of Health
	answering dept id	17
	answering dept short name	Health
	answering dept sort name	Health
	hansard heading	General Practitioners: Standards
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what progress has been made on improving access to GPs.
	tabling member constituency	Weaver Vale
	tabling member printed	Graham Evans
	uin	905556
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p>The Prime Minister’s £50 million Challenge Fund is currently improving general practitioner access for over two million patients across England. This includes offering evening and weekend appointments, as well as better use of technology, such as telehealth, to look after patients. By January, 7.5 million patients will be covered.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>And, we have recently announced another £100 million of funding for next year to improve access for even more patients.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency Central Suffolk and North Ipswich answering member printed Dr Daniel Poulter question first answered 21/10/2014 15:48:51 answering member 3932 label Biography information for Dr Dan Poulter
	tabling member	4081 label Biography information for Lord Evans of Rainow

100021

	registered interest
	date	15/10/2014
	answering body	Department of Health
	answering dept id	17
	answering dept short name	Health
	answering dept sort name	Health
	hansard heading	Home Care Services
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, if he will bring forward proposals to facilitate the portability of home-based care packages between local authorities in different countries in the UK.
	tabling member constituency	Edinburgh East
	tabling member printed	Sheila Gilmore
	uin	905560
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p>Adults with care and support needs should be able to move between countries within the United Kingdom knowing that their care will continue during the move.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>As the care and support systems in the four countries are different, we are developing principles with the Devolved Administrations to ensure continuity of care for people moving.</p><p> </p><p>These should be published in November.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency North Norfolk answering member printed Norman Lamb question first answered 21/10/2014 15:45:44 answering member 1439 label Biography information for Norman Lamb
	tabling member	3965 label Biography information for Sheila Gilmore

100023

	registered interest
	date	15/10/2014
	answering body	Department of Health
	answering dept id	17
	answering dept short name	Health
	answering dept sort name	Health
	hansard heading	Ovarian Cancer
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what steps he is taking to increase early identification of ovarian cancer.
	tabling member constituency	Washington and Sunderland West
	tabling member printed	Mrs Sharon Hodgson
	uin	905561
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p>We are investing £450 million in earlier diagnosis of cancer, including improving direct general practitioner access to non-obstetric ultrasound to support earlier diagnosis of ovarian cancer.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Public Health England ran a regional Be Clear on Cancer campaign early in 2014 to raise awareness of the symptoms of ovarian cancer. The findings of the pilot will be evaluated in 2015, and this evidence would inform any decision to move from a regional to national campaign.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency Battersea answering member printed Jane Ellison question first answered 21/10/2014 15:46:38 answering member 3918 label Biography information for Jane Ellison
	tabling member	1521 label Biography information for Mrs Sharon Hodgson

100024

	registered interest
	date	15/10/2014
	answering body	Department of Health
	answering dept id	17
	answering dept short name	Health
	answering dept sort name	Health
	hansard heading	Community Health Services: Devon
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, if he will increase funding from the Better Care Fund to improve the transition of community services in Devon.
	tabling member constituency	North Devon
	tabling member printed	Sir Nick Harvey
	uin	905558
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p>The Better Care Fund is a pooled budget of £3.8 billion to be spent on integrating Health and Social care. Local areas will decide how best to use their funding to transform the provision of services to their communities, both improving outcomes for people, and driving efficiencies.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency North Norfolk answering member printed Norman Lamb question first answered 21/10/2014 15:44:45 answering member 1439 label Biography information for Norman Lamb
	tabling member	231 label Biography information for Sir Nick Harvey

91230

	registered interest
	date	09/09/2014
	answering body	Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
	answering dept id	26
	answering dept short name	Business, Innovation and Skills
	answering dept sort name	Business, Innovation and Skills
	hansard heading	Higher Education: Admissions
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what proportion of pupils from each ethnic group were admitted to (a) the University of Oxford, (b) the University of Cambridge and (c) other Russell Group universities in the last six years for which figures are available.
	tabling member constituency	Ashfield
	tabling member printed	Gloria De Piero
	uin	208742
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p>Recent data for years since the tuition fee reforms and access agreements is not yet available, but the latest data from the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS) shows that entry rates to higher education for all ethnic groups in 2013 had increased and overall, there was a much higher representation of black and minority ethnic groups in university than in the overall population of England.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The table below shows the figures before these changes.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><br></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Estimated percentage of maintained school pupils aged 15 in each ethnic group who progressed to Oxford, Cambridge or Russell Group institutions by age 19</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="4"><p>Progression by age 19 in</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>2008/09</p></td><td><p>2009/10</p></td><td><p>2010/11</p></td><td><p>2011/12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Asian/Asian British</strong></p></td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oxford</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cambridge</p></td><td><p>0.3%</p></td><td><p>0.3%</p></td><td><p>0.3%</p></td><td><p>0.3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Russell Group</p></td><td><p>11.4%</p></td><td><p>11.5%</p></td><td><p>10.6%</p></td><td><p>10.7%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Black/Black British</strong></p></td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oxford</p></td><td><p>0.1%</p></td><td><p>0.1%</p></td><td><p>0.1%</p></td><td><p>0.1%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cambridge</p></td><td><p>0.1%</p></td><td><p>0.1%</p></td><td><p>0.1%</p></td><td><p>0.1%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Russell Group</p></td><td><p>4.6%</p></td><td><p>4.2%</p></td><td><p>4.4%</p></td><td><p>4.1%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Mixed/Multiple ethnic groups</strong></p></td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oxford</p></td><td><p>0.3%</p></td><td><p>0.4%</p></td><td><p>0.3%</p></td><td><p>0.3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cambridge</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td><td><p>0.4%</p></td><td><p>0.3%</p></td><td><p>0.3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Russell Group</p></td><td><p>8.5%</p></td><td><p>8.4%</p></td><td><p>7.8%</p></td><td><p>7.5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>White</strong></p></td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oxford</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cambridge</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Russell Group</p></td><td><p>7.2%</p></td><td><p>7.1%</p></td><td><p>6.9%</p></td><td><p>7.5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Other Ethnic Group</strong></p></td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oxford</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cambridge</p></td><td><p>0.3%</p></td><td><p>0.4%</p></td><td><p>0.3%</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Russell Group</p></td><td><p>10.8%</p></td><td><p>10.1%</p></td><td><p>9.6%</p></td><td><p>7.0%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>All Ethnic Groups</strong></p></td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oxford</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cambridge</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td><td><p>0.2%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Russell Group</p></td><td><p>7.4%</p></td><td><p>7.3%</p></td><td><p>7.1%</p></td><td><p>7.2%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Source: Matched data from the DfE National Pupil Database, the HESA Student Record and the SFA ILR</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Figures are not available for earlier age cohorts.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p> answering member constituency Tunbridge Wells answering member printed Greg Clark question first answered 21/10/2014 13:46:24 answering member 1578 label Biography information for Greg Clark previous answer version 19765 answering member constituency Tunbridge Wells answering member printed Greg Clark answering member 1578 label Biography information for Greg Clark
	tabling member	3915 label Biography information for Gloria De Piero

91525

	registered interest
	date	10/09/2014
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Offenders: Rehabilitation
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will place in the Library copies of all representations he has received on the consequences of excluding low risk offenders under community service orders from the payment by results model; and what estimate he has made of the potential effect of that conclusion on re-offending rates.
	tabling member constituency	Warrington North
	tabling member printed	Helen Jones
	uin	208833
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p>We are currently implementing major reforms to probation services in order to bring about a reduction in reoffending, with contracts to transfer ownership of the 21 Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) on track to be signed by the end of 2014.</p><p> </p><p>The two main elements of the payment mechanism for CRCs are the Fee For Service (FFS) and Payment by Results (PbR). The FFS is primarily paid for mandated activities that deliver the sentence of the court and licence conditions. PbR is paid for the achievement of reductions in reoffending against the baseline historical level and is designed to incentivise bidders to continuously innovate and improve performance throughout the life of the contract.</p><p> </p><p>PbR measurement will be based on a series of offender “cohorts”. These are the groups of offenders whose reoffending will determine the providers’ success or otherwise at reducing reoffending rates. Cohorts will be built up on a quarterly and annual basis and will include offenders released from a custodial sentence and offenders who begin a community order (CO) or a suspended sentence order (SSO). Cohorts will exclude offenders not subject to any of the above disposals, and offenders allocated to the National Probation Service. They will also exclude offenders on a CO or SSO which includes only a single electronically monitored requirement (as CRCs will not be responsible for supervising this group) and offenders who are subject only to an unpaid work requirement (as for this group, the court will not have imposed an additional rehabilitative intervention).</p><p> </p><p>CRCs will be paid for reducing reoffending rates significantly beyond historic levels. Those historic baselines are modelled to exclude the same types of offender that are excluded in the CRCs’ cohorts, thereby allowing a like-for-like comparison.</p><p> </p><p>We have consulted widely on the Transforming Rehabilitation reforms and received and responded to a balance of views. The design of the payment mechanism has been set out in the draft payment mechanism design overview and draft payment mechanism contract schedule, copies of which were deposited in the Library of the House and published on the MoJ website in February 2014.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency South West Bedfordshire answering member printed Andrew Selous question first answered 21/10/2014 12:46:49 answering member 1453 label Biography information for Andrew Selous
	tabling member	432 label Biography information for Helen Jones

92032

	registered interest
	date	26/09/2014
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Prisons: Drugs
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many incidents of confiscation of (a) mephedrone, (b) BZP, (c) spice and (d) ketamine there were in prisons in England and Wales in each year since 2010.
	tabling member constituency	Tooting
	tabling member printed	Sadiq Khan
	uin	209374
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p>The National Offender Management Service (NOMS) takes the issue of all contraband in prisons extremely seriously and deploys a comprehensive range of robust searching and security measures to detect items of contraband both at the point of entry to the prison and concealed within the prison. We do not tolerate drugs in prison and anyone caught with them will be punished and could face further prosecution.</p><p> </p><p>The success of NOMS Drug Strategy is illustrated by the reduction of drug misuse - as measured by the random mandatory drug testing programme - which has declined by 17.0 percentage points over the past 17 years (positive rates were 24.4% in 1996/7 and 7.4% in 2013/14) despite the fact that more drugs are being tested for.</p><p> </p><p>New psychoactive substances (NPS) are a recent issue affecting many parts of society, both here and abroad, including our prisons. NOMS is working with its partners to develop methods for testing for NPS and preventing them from entering establishments. Work is also taking place to increase levels of understanding about the risks that NPS present to offenders, with a view to providing them and those who work with them in prisons and the community with appropriate information, guidance and support.</p><p> </p><p>The Government recently introduced an amendment to the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill to expand prisons' powers to test prisoners for non-controlled drugs. This would allow prison staff to conduct mandatory drug tests on prisoners for non-controlled drugs, such as new psychoactive substances and medicines, if the required tests were available.</p><p> </p><p>All figures in this answer have been drawn from live administrative data systems which may be amended at any time. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system. The data has been extracted by searching for the exact terms given in the question and not any slang or alternative spellings. The data are not subject to audit.</p><p> </p><p>The table below gives the number of seizures in prisons in England and Wales in the timeframe requested of Mephedrone, BZP, Spice and Ketamine, and described exactly as such on the database.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td> </td><td><p><strong>2010</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2011</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2014 to 31 July</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mephedrone</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>BZP</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Spice</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>86</p></td><td><p>133</p></td><td><p>262</p></td><td><p>430</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ketamine</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>TOTAL</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>16</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>90</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>138</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>267</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>436</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>The term “Legal Highs” represents hundreds of different substances of which spice is just one. To try to calculate the instances of all such substances being confiscated would therefore only be possible at disproportionate cost.</p> answering member constituency South West Bedfordshire answering member printed Andrew Selous question first answered 21/10/2014 10:53:54 answering member 1453 label Biography information for Andrew Selous
	tabling member	1577 label Biography information for Sadiq Khan

92033

	registered interest
	date	26/09/2014
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Prisons: Drugs
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many incidents of confiscation of legal highs there were in prisons in England and Wales in each year since 2010.
	tabling member constituency	Tooting
	tabling member printed	Sadiq Khan
	uin	209371
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p>The National Offender Management Service (NOMS) takes the issue of all contraband in prisons extremely seriously and deploys a comprehensive range of robust searching and security measures to detect items of contraband both at the point of entry to the prison and concealed within the prison. We do not tolerate drugs in prison and anyone caught with them will be punished and could face further prosecution.</p><p> </p><p>The success of NOMS Drug Strategy is illustrated by the reduction of drug misuse - as measured by the random mandatory drug testing programme - which has declined by 17.0 percentage points over the past 17 years (positive rates were 24.4% in 1996/7 and 7.4% in 2013/14) despite the fact that more drugs are being tested for.</p><p> </p><p>New psychoactive substances are a recent issue affecting many parts of society, both here and abroad, including our prisons. NOMS is working with its partners to develop methods for testing for NPS and preventing them from entering establishments. Work is also taking place to increase levels of understanding about the risks that NPS present to offenders, with a view to providing them and those who work with them in prisons and the community with appropriate information, guidance and support.</p><p> </p><p>The Government recently introduced an amendment to the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill to expand prisons' powers to test prisoners for non-controlled drugs. This would allow prison staff to conduct mandatory drug tests on prisoners for non-controlled drugs, such as new psychoactive substances and medicines, if the required tests were available.</p><p> </p><p>All figures in this answer have been drawn from live administrative data systems which may be amended at any time. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system. The data has been extracted by searching for the exact terms given in the question and not any slang or alternative spellings. The data are not subject to audit.</p><p> </p><p>The table below gives the number of seizures in prisons in England and Wales in the timeframe requested of Mephedrone, BZP, Spice and Ketamine, and described exactly as such on the database.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td> </td><td><p><strong>2010</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2011</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2014 to 31 July</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mephedrone</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>BZP</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Spice</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>86</p></td><td><p>133</p></td><td><p>262</p></td><td><p>430</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ketamine</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>TOTAL</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>16</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>90</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>138</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>267</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>436</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>The term “Legal Highs” represents hundreds of different substances of which spice is just one. To try to calculate the instances of all such substances being confiscated would therefore only be possible at disproportionate cost.</p> answering member constituency South West Bedfordshire answering member printed Andrew Selous question first answered 21/10/2014 11:17:40 answering member 1453 label Biography information for Andrew Selous
	tabling member	1577 label Biography information for Sadiq Khan

92054

	registered interest
	date	26/09/2014
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Pay
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many (a) direct employees, (b) outsourced workers and (c) workers in agencies which report to his Department are paid less than the Living Wage as defined by the Living Wage Foundation.
	tabling member constituency	Birkenhead
	tabling member printed	Mr Frank Field
	uin	209471
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p>As of 1 August 2014 out of 68732 direct employees, 324 direct employees are paid less than the rate defined by the ‘Living Wage Foundation’. This calculation is based upon the UK living wage as of 4 November 2013.</p><p> </p><p>The direct employees included form part of the core Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and its agencies National Offender Management Service (NOMS), HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS), Legal Aid Agency (LAA) and Office of the Public Guardian (OPG).</p><p> </p><p>Pay rate decisions made on 1 August2014 mean that no permanent employee on core departmental terms and conditions are paid below the living wage rate. 11 permanent employees individuals on legacy terms &amp; conditions following Machinery of Government changes remain below living wage levels,. These employees have been offered the option to move onto MoJ terms and conditions.</p><p> </p><p>In NOMS, the number of direct employees who are paid below living wage levels currently stands at 313.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td><td><p>Number below living wage</p></td><td><p>On Strength Headcount</p></td><td><p>Proportion of staff employed</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>(i) Department</p></td><td><p>Includes HQ, NOMS, HMCTS OPG and LAA</p></td><td><p>324</p></td><td><p>68732</p></td><td><p>0.47%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>(ii) Agencies</p></td><td><p>Core MoJ</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>22982</p></td><td><p>0.05%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>NOMS</p></td><td><p>313</p></td><td><p>45750</p></td><td><p>0.68%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Information on contractors paid less than the rate defined by the ‘Living Wage Foundation’ as a living wage is not recorded centrally. We would need to approach all of our contractors and or their agencies and get them to provide the information. This could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency Bermondsey and Old Southwark answering member printed Simon Hughes question first answered 21/10/2014 12:55:59 answering member 194 label Biography information for Simon Hughes
	tabling member	478 label Biography information for Lord Field of Birkenhead

92451

	registered interest
	date	10/10/2014
	answering body	HM Treasury
	answering dept id	14
	answering dept short name	Treasury
	answering dept sort name	CaTreasury
	hansard heading	Stamp Duty Land Tax
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what proportion of total sales of residential properties fell below the threshold for one per cent stamp duty in (a) Esher and Walton constituency, (b) London, (c) the South East, (d) England and (e) the UK in each year since 2000.
	tabling member constituency	Esher and Walton
	tabling member printed	Mr Dominic Raab
	uin	209975
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p>The information requested is set out in the table below going back to 2005-06.</p><p> </p><p>Prior to this point the information requested is not held in the format required and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.</p><p>The transactions counted as falling below the one per cent stamp duty threshold are all transactions where Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have received a stamp duty return. There are numerous residential property transactions that are not required to submit a return to HMRC, most notably those where the consideration is less than £40,000. The detailed reasons for non-notification can be found at the following address.</p><p> </p><p><a title="http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/sdlt/reliefs-exemptions/no-sdlt-return.htm" href="http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/sdlt/reliefs-exemptions/no-sdlt-return.htm" target="_blank">http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/sdlt/reliefs-exemptions/no-sdlt-return.htm</a></p><p> </p><p>Please see our publication UK stamp tax statistics 2012 to 2013 to understand these tables further.</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-stamp-tax-statistics" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-stamp-tax-statistics</a></p><p>Tables are provided in three parts:</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Part A: Estimated Provisional Residential SDLT Revenue by Government Office Region and Consideration Band years 2005-06 to 2013-14 Part B: Estimated Provisional Residential SDLT Revenue for Esher and Walton Constituency by Consideration Band for years 2005-06 to 2013-14 Part C: Percentage of SDLT returns under £125,000 for Esher and Walton Constituency and Government Office Region for years 2005-06 to 2013-14</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Part A: Estimated Provisional Residential SDLT Revenue by Government Office Region and Consideration Band years 2005-06 to 2013-14:</p><p> </p><p>This data represents estimates that have been produced for this Parliamentary Question. The data has been rounded to the nearest £5million. As such, the sum of the individual entries may not be equal to the “all” totals given in the table but the “all” totals remain consistent with the published National Statistics.</p><p> </p><p>2013-14</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>95</p></td><td><p>605</p></td><td><p>2720</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>165</p></td><td><p>545</p></td><td><p>1385</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>780</p></td><td><p>2,050</p></td><td><p>6,130</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>880</p></td><td><p>2,205</p></td><td><p>6,450</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2012-13</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>85</p></td><td><p>465</p></td><td><p>2020</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>135</p></td><td><p>415</p></td><td><p>1080</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>615</p></td><td><p>1,565</p></td><td><p>4,650</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>690</p></td><td><p>1,675</p></td><td><p>4,905</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2011-12</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>420</p></td><td><p>1,640</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>105</p></td><td><p>375</p></td><td><p>940</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>475</p></td><td><p>1,440</p></td><td><p>3,985</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>545</p></td><td><p>1,560</p></td><td><p>4,220</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2010-11</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>380</p></td><td><p>1,345</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>105</p></td><td><p>400</p></td><td><p>955</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>475</p></td><td><p>1,470</p></td><td><p>3,790</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>540</p></td><td><p>1,575</p></td><td><p>4,040</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>2009-10</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>320</p></td><td><p>1,035</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>350</p></td><td><p>810</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>405</p></td><td><p>1,275</p></td><td><p>3,080</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>450</p></td><td><p>1,365</p></td><td><p>3,290</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2008-09</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>260</p></td><td><p>870</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>270</p></td><td><p>680</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>440</p></td><td><p>1,035</p></td><td><p>2,680</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>505</p></td><td><p>1,155</p></td><td><p>2,950</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2007-08</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>155</p></td><td><p>650</p></td><td><p>1,895</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>235</p></td><td><p>635</p></td><td><p>1,505</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>1,125</p></td><td><p>2,460</p></td><td><p>6,050</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>1,280</p></td><td><p>2,740</p></td><td><p>6,680</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2006-07</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>210</p></td><td><p>645</p></td><td><p>1,795</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>270</p></td><td><p>630</p></td><td><p>1,450</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>1,285</p></td><td><p>2,430</p></td><td><p>5,850</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>1,455</p></td><td><p>2,660</p></td><td><p>6,375</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2005-06</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>190</p></td><td><p>475</p></td><td><p>1,275</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>235</p></td><td><p>455</p></td><td><p>1,055</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>1,080</p></td><td><p>1,745</p></td><td><p>4,240</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>1,175</p></td><td><p>1,910</p></td><td><p>4,585</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Part B: Estimated Provisional Residential SDLT Revenue for Esher and Walton Constituency by Consideration Band for years 2005-06 to 2013-14</strong></p><p> </p><p>This data represents estimates that have been produced for this Parliamentary Question. The data for individual bands has been rounded to the nearest £1million. The data for All Bands has been rounded to the nearest £5million. As such, the sum of the individual entries may not be equal to the “all” totals given in the table but the “all” totals remain consistent with the published National Statistics.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>£120,001-250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2005-06</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>37</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2006-07</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>55</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2007-08</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>59</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2008-09</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>28</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009-10</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>35</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010-11</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>38</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011-12</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>56</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>81</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Part C: Estimated Percentage of SDLT returns under £125,000 for Esher and Walton Constituency and Government Office Region for years 2005-06 to 2013-14</strong></p><p> </p><p>This data represents estimates that have been produced for this Parliamentary Question. Data for individual areas given to the nearest percentage point.</p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>Esher and Walton</p></td><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>England</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2005-06</p></td><td><p>10%</p></td><td><p>23%</p></td><td><p>25%</p></td><td><p>42%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2006-07</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td><td><p>21%</p></td><td><p>36%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2007-08</p></td><td><p>10%</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td><td><p>34%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2008-09</p></td><td><p>11%</p></td><td><p>25%</p></td><td><p>25%</p></td><td><p>40%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009-10</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>17%</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td><td><p>35%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010-11</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>15%</p></td><td><p>18%</p></td><td><p>32%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011-12</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>13%</p></td><td><p>18%</p></td><td><p>32%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>7%</p></td><td><p>14%</p></td><td><p>17%</p></td><td><p>33%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>7%</p></td><td><p>12%</p></td><td><p>15%</p></td><td><p>30%</p></td></tr></tbody></table> answering member constituency South West Hertfordshire answering member printed Mr David Gauke grouped question UIN 209973 209974 question first answered 21/10/2014 09:34:59 answering member 1529 label Biography information for Mr David Gauke
	tabling member	4007 label Biography information for Dominic Raab