Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1138099
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-07-10more like thismore than 2019-07-10
star this property answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
unstar this property answering dept id 10 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
unstar this property answering dept sort name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport remove filter
star this property hansard heading National Gallery: Conditions of Employment remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what estimate he has made of the cost to the public purse of employment tribunal decision, Ms A Braine and others v The National Gallery: 2201625/2018. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Dulwich and West Norwood more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Helen Hayes more like this
star this property uin 275798 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-07-15more like thismore than 2019-07-15
star this property answer text <p>Following the decision of the Employment Tribunal, the National Gallery paid a total of £158,000 (inclusive of VAT) in backdated holiday pay to those individuals who were found by the Tribunal to have had ‘worker’ status while providing education services for the Gallery.</p><p> </p><p>In common with all publicly funded cultural institutions, the National Gallery operates independently and at arm’s length from Government. Arm’s Length Bodies are required to adhere to all relevant employment law, but their individual staffing structures and contractual arrangements are decisions to be taken solely by the gallery’s executive and trustees.</p><p> </p><p>I understand, however, that the National Gallery disputes the way in which aspects of this case have been characterised, including the notion that the employment tribunal was a test case for the ‘gig economy’ in the arts. More broadly, the 2017 Mendoza Review of Museums in England considered in detail the nature of employment in the museums sector; the Review Team found no evidence of widespread poor practice or insecure employment in the museums sector.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Taunton Deane more like this
unstar this property answering member printed Rebecca Pow more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
275799 more like this
275800 more like this
275801 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-07-15T15:05:34.917Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-15T15:05:34.917Z
star this property answering member
4522
star this property label Biography information for Rebecca Pow more like this
star this property tabling member
4510
unstar this property label Biography information for Helen Hayes more like this