Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

750657
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-07-11more like thismore than 2017-07-11
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to the 2017 UK Regular Armed Forces Continuous Attitudes Survey Results 2017, published on 25 May 2017, what discussions he has had with the Pay Review Body for Armed Forces on (a) the changes in levels of satisfaction and (b) how pay could help address those changes. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency York Central more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Rachael Maskell more like this
star this property uin 4132 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2017-07-19more like thismore than 2017-07-19
star this property answer text <p>Defence Ministers have had no discussions with the Armed Forces' Pay Review Body (AFPRB) since the 2017 results of the UK Regular Armed Forces Continuous Attitude Survey (AFCAS) were published on 25 May 2017. As part of informing the AFPRB's annual process, the Ministry of Defence provides papers of evidence and takes part in oral evidence sessions, all of which refer to AFCAS where relevant.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-07-19T15:01:22.163Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-19T15:01:22.163Z
star this property answering member
1487
star this property label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
star this property tabling member
4471
unstar this property label Biography information for Rachael Maskell more like this
506354
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2016-04-08more like thismore than 2016-04-08
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the average annual salary was for each military rank in the (a) Army, (b) Royal Air Force and (c) Royal Navy in each of the last five years; and what estimate he has made of the level of such salaries in each of the next five years. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Westmorland and Lonsdale more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Tim Farron more like this
star this property uin 33199 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2016-04-18more like thismore than 2016-04-18
star this property answer text <p>Information on the mode average annual salary for each military rank in the Army, Royal Air Force and Royal Navy between Financial Years (FY) 2009-10 and 2014-15 are set out in the tables below.</p><p> </p><p>The average used in the tables is the mode, the most frequently occurring salary at that rank.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 1a:</strong> This table shows the Illustrative rates of annual military salary (in terms of Navy ranks) for Navy Personnel as at 1 April 2015.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>Financial Year</strong> <strong>2011-12 (£)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Financial Year</strong> <strong>2012-13 (£)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Financial Year</strong> <strong>2013-14 (£)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Financial Year</strong> <strong>2014-15 (£)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Financial Year</strong> <strong>2015-16 (£)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Officers Annual salary</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Admiral (Level 4)</p></td><td><p>114,678</p></td><td><p>114,678</p></td><td><p>114,678</p></td><td><p>115,911</p></td><td><p>117,070</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Commodore (Level 1)</p></td><td><p>97,030</p></td><td><p>97,030</p></td><td><p>97,030</p></td><td><p>98,172</p></td><td><p>99,154</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Captain (Level 1)</p></td><td><p>81,310</p></td><td><p>81,310</p></td><td><p>81,310</p></td><td><p>82,381</p></td><td><p>83,205</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Commander (Level 9)</p></td><td><p>77,617</p></td><td><p>77,617</p></td><td><p>77,617</p></td><td><p>78,737</p></td><td><p>79,524</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lieutenant Commander (Level 9)</p></td><td><p>57,199</p></td><td><p>57,199</p></td><td><p>57,199</p></td><td><p>58,025</p></td><td><p>58,605</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lieutenant (Level 9)</p></td><td><p>45,090</p></td><td><p>45,090</p></td><td><p>45,090</p></td><td><p>45,741</p></td><td><p>46,199</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sub-Lieutenant (Level 7)</p></td><td><p>30,369</p></td><td><p>30,369</p></td><td><p>30,369</p></td><td><p>30,807</p></td><td><p>31,115</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sub-Lieutenant (Level 5)</p></td><td><p>24,615</p></td><td><p>24,615</p></td><td><p>24,971</p></td><td><p>25,220</p></td><td><p>25,472</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="6"><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Other Ranks annual salary</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Warrant Officer I (Level 7 H)</p></td><td><p>46,753</p></td><td><p>46,753</p></td><td><p>47,428</p></td><td><p>47,902</p></td><td><p>48,381</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Warrant Officer II (Level 9 H)</p></td><td><p>43,252</p></td><td><p>43,252</p></td><td><p>43,876</p></td><td><p>44,315</p></td><td><p>44,758</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Chief Petty Officer (Level 9 H)</p></td><td><p>43,252</p></td><td><p>43,252</p></td><td><p>43,876</p></td><td><p>44,315</p></td><td><p>44,758</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Petty Officer (Level 7 H)</p></td><td><p>36,929</p></td><td><p>36,929</p></td><td><p>37,462</p></td><td><p>37,836</p></td><td><p>38,215</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Leading Rate (Level 7 H)</p></td><td><p>33,182</p></td><td><p>33,182</p></td><td><p>33,661</p></td><td><p>33,998</p></td><td><p>34,338</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lance Corporal (Level 9 L)</p></td><td><p>24,230</p></td><td><p>24,230</p></td><td><p>24,580</p></td><td><p>24,826</p></td><td><p>25,074</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Able Rating (Level 2 L)</p></td><td><p>17,736</p></td><td><p>17,986</p></td><td><p>18,245</p></td><td><p>18,428</p></td><td><p>18,612</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong>Table 1b:</strong> This table shows the Illustrative rates of annual military salary (in terms of Army ranks) for Army Personnel as at 1 April 2015.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>Financial Year</strong> <strong>2011-12 (£)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Financial Year</strong> <strong>2012-13 (£)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Financial Year</strong> <strong>2013-14 (£)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Financial Year</strong> <strong>2014-15 (£)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Financial Year</strong> <strong>2015-16 (£)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Officers Annual salary</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>General (Level 3)</p></td><td><p>112,476</p></td><td><p>112,476</p></td><td><p>112,476</p></td><td><p>113,687</p></td><td><p>114,824</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Brigadier (Level 5)</p></td><td><p>100,964</p></td><td><p>100,964</p></td><td><p>100,964</p></td><td><p>102,145</p></td><td><p>103,167</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Colonel (Level 2)</p></td><td><p>82,321</p></td><td><p>82,321</p></td><td><p>82,321</p></td><td><p>83,402</p></td><td><p>84,236</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lieutenant Colonel (Level 2)</p></td><td><p>67,920</p></td><td><p>67,920</p></td><td><p>67,920</p></td><td><p>68,900</p></td><td><p>69,589</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Major (Level 6)</p></td><td><p>53,661</p></td><td><p>53,661</p></td><td><p>53,661</p></td><td><p>54,436</p></td><td><p>54,980</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Captain (Level 2)</p></td><td><p>38,932</p></td><td><p>38,932</p></td><td><p>38,932</p></td><td><p>39,493</p></td><td><p>39,888</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lieutenant (Level 8)</p></td><td><p>31,147</p></td><td><p>31,147</p></td><td><p>31,147</p></td><td><p>31,596</p></td><td><p>31,912</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2<sup>nd</sup> Lieutenant (Level 5)</p></td><td><p>24,615</p></td><td><p>24,615</p></td><td><p>24,971</p></td><td><p>25,220</p></td><td><p>25,472</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="6"><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Other Ranks annual salary</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Warrant Officer I (Level 4 H)</p></td><td><p>44,448</p></td><td><p>44,448</p></td><td><p>45,089</p></td><td><p>45,540</p></td><td><p>45,995</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Warrant Officer II (Level 9 H</p></td><td><p>43,252</p></td><td><p>43,252</p></td><td><p>43,876</p></td><td><p>44,315</p></td><td><p>44,758</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Staff Sergeant (Level 7 L)</p></td><td><p>38,256</p></td><td><p>38,256</p></td><td><p>38,808</p></td><td><p>39,196</p></td><td><p>39,588</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sergeant (Level 7 H)</p></td><td><p>36,929</p></td><td><p>36,929</p></td><td><p>37,462</p></td><td><p>37,836</p></td><td><p>38,215</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Corporal (Level 7 H)</p></td><td><p>33,182</p></td><td><p>33,182</p></td><td><p>33,661</p></td><td><p>33,998</p></td><td><p>34,338</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lance Corporal (Level 9 H)</p></td><td><p>28,940</p></td><td><p>28,940</p></td><td><p>29,357</p></td><td><p>29,651</p></td><td><p>29,947</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Private (Level 7 L)</p></td><td><p>22,359</p></td><td><p>22,359</p></td><td><p>22,682</p></td><td><p>22,908</p></td><td><p>23,138</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Note: The Rank of Lance Corporal was introduced in 2008 in the Royal Marines.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 1c:</strong> This table shows the Illustrative rates of annual military salary (in terms of RAF ranks) for RAF Personnel as at 1 April 2015.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>Financial Year</strong> <strong>2011-12 (£)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Financial Year</strong> <strong>2012-13 (£)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Financial Year</strong> <strong>2013-14 (£)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Financial Year</strong> <strong>2014-15 (£)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Financial Year</strong> <strong>2015-16 (£)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Officers Annual salary</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Air Chief Marshal (Level 3)</p></td><td><p>112,476</p></td><td><p>112,476</p></td><td><p>112,476</p></td><td><p>113,687</p></td><td><p>114,824</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Air Commodore (Level 3)</p></td><td><p>98,995</p></td><td><p>98,995</p></td><td><p>98,995</p></td><td><p>100,157</p></td><td><p>101,158</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Group Captain (Level 3)</p></td><td><p>83,336</p></td><td><p>83,336</p></td><td><p>83,336</p></td><td><p>84,427</p></td><td><p>85,272</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wing Commander (Level 9)</p></td><td><p>77,617</p></td><td><p>77,617</p></td><td><p>77,617</p></td><td><p>78,737</p></td><td><p>79,524</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Squadron Leader (Level 9)</p></td><td><p>57,199</p></td><td><p>57,199</p></td><td><p>57,199</p></td><td><p>58,025</p></td><td><p>58,605</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Flight Lieutenant (Level 9)</p></td><td><p>45,090</p></td><td><p>45,090</p></td><td><p>45,090</p></td><td><p>45,741</p></td><td><p>46,199</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Flying Officer (Level 6)</p></td><td><p>29,587</p></td><td><p>29,587</p></td><td><p>29,587</p></td><td><p>30,014</p></td><td><p>30,314</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Pilot Officer (Level 5)</p></td><td><p>24,615</p></td><td><p>24,615</p></td><td><p>24,971</p></td><td><p>25,220</p></td><td><p>25,472</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="6"><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Other Ranks annual salary</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Warrant Officer (Level 7 H)</p></td><td><p>46,753</p></td><td><p>46,753</p></td><td><p>47,428</p></td><td><p>47,902</p></td><td><p>48,381</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Flight Sergeant (Level 9 H)</p></td><td><p>43,252</p></td><td><p>43,252</p></td><td><p>43,876</p></td><td><p>44,315</p></td><td><p>44,758</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sergeant (Level 7 H)</p></td><td><p>36,929</p></td><td><p>36,929</p></td><td><p>37,462</p></td><td><p>37,836</p></td><td><p>38,215</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Corporal (Level 7 H)</p></td><td><p>33,182</p></td><td><p>33,182</p></td><td><p>33,661</p></td><td><p>33,998</p></td><td><p>34,338</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lance Corporal (Level 8 H)</p></td><td><p>27,592</p></td><td><p>27,592</p></td><td><p>27,991</p></td><td><p>28,270</p></td><td><p>28,553</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Junior Technician/Senior Aircraftman (Level 9 H)</p></td><td><p>28,940</p></td><td><p>28,940</p></td><td><p>29,357</p></td><td><p>29,651</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>The 2015 Summer Budget confirmed that the Government would fund public sector pay awards at one per cent for four years from 2016-17 onwards. Recommendations on individual salary levels are made annually to the Government by the independent Armed Forces Pay Review Body.</p><p> </p>
star this property answering member constituency Milton Keynes North more like this
star this property answering member printed Mark Lancaster more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2016-04-18T16:25:07.32Zmore like thismore than 2016-04-18T16:25:07.32Z
star this property answering member
1544
star this property label Biography information for Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton more like this
star this property tabling member
1591
unstar this property label Biography information for Tim Farron more like this
819157
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2018-01-09more like thismore than 2018-01-09
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will place in the Library a copy of the Living Overseas Allowance for each station. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency West Dunbartonshire more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Martin Docherty-Hughes more like this
star this property uin 121834 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2018-01-16more like thismore than 2018-01-16
star this property answer text <p>Local Overseas Allowance is paid to cover the additional local day to day living costs of service personnel when serving overseas. The current rates of Local Overseas Allowance for Main Stations are attached. Rates are updated periodically to reflect changes to currency exchange rates which affect the Forces Fixed Rate. I am withholding information regarding the rates of Local Overseas Allowance for Small Stations as its disclosure would prejudice commercial interests and release information provided in confidence.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2018-01-16T16:21:17.85Zmore like thismore than 2018-01-16T16:21:17.85Z
star this property answering member
1487
star this property label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
star this property attachment
1
star this property file name Main Stations.pdf more like this
star this property title 121834 - MOD Local Overseas Allowance more like this
star this property tabling member
4374
unstar this property label Biography information for Martin Docherty-Hughes more like this
805412
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-12-12more like thismore than 2017-12-12
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the starting salary for (a) cooks and (b) stewards is in (i) the Royal Navy and Royal Marines, (ii) the Army and (iii) the Royal Air Force; and what the starting salary is for stokers in the Royal Navy. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Andrew Bowie more like this
star this property uin 119083 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2017-12-19more like thismore than 2017-12-19
star this property answer text <p>Details are available at this link:</p><p>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/armed-forces-pay-review-body-forty-sixth-report-2017</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-12-19T15:01:50.81Zmore like thismore than 2017-12-19T15:01:50.81Z
star this property answering member
1487
star this property label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
star this property tabling member
4601
unstar this property label Biography information for Andrew Bowie more like this
1302563
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2021-03-15more like thismore than 2021-03-15
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the average median pay for armed forces personnel will be in 2021-22. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
star this property uin 168831 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2021-03-18more like thismore than 2021-03-18
star this property answer text <p>In November 2020 my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer set out, as part of the 2020 Spending Review, the rationale behind a public sector pay pause this year. As outlined in the Secretary of State for Defence's recent letter to the Chair of the Armed Forces' Pay Review Body, covering Pay Round 2021/22, and as detailed in HM Treasury's earlier Economic Evidence to the Pay Review Bodies 2020/21, the pay pause recognises that public sector pay has been shielded from the pandemic's economic effects. It also serves to protect public sector jobs at this time of crisis whilst ensuring fairness between the public and private sectors. As such, no consideration has been given to the effect of a pay pause on average median pay; the household income of Service personnel; or a comparison with projected rates of inflation.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Plymouth, Moor View more like this
star this property answering member printed Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
168832 more like this
168833 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2021-03-18T11:32:45.64Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-18T11:32:45.64Z
star this property answering member
4485
star this property label Biography information for Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property tabling member
400
unstar this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
1302564
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2021-03-15more like thismore than 2021-03-15
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the effect of the pay freeze on the household income of armed forces personnel in 2021-22. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
star this property uin 168832 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2021-03-18more like thismore than 2021-03-18
star this property answer text <p>In November 2020 my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer set out, as part of the 2020 Spending Review, the rationale behind a public sector pay pause this year. As outlined in the Secretary of State for Defence's recent letter to the Chair of the Armed Forces' Pay Review Body, covering Pay Round 2021/22, and as detailed in HM Treasury's earlier Economic Evidence to the Pay Review Bodies 2020/21, the pay pause recognises that public sector pay has been shielded from the pandemic's economic effects. It also serves to protect public sector jobs at this time of crisis whilst ensuring fairness between the public and private sectors. As such, no consideration has been given to the effect of a pay pause on average median pay; the household income of Service personnel; or a comparison with projected rates of inflation.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Plymouth, Moor View more like this
star this property answering member printed Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
168831 more like this
168833 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2021-03-18T11:32:45.707Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-18T11:32:45.707Z
star this property answering member
4485
star this property label Biography information for Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property tabling member
400
unstar this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
1302565
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2021-03-15more like thismore than 2021-03-15
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what comparative assessment he has made of the armed forces pay increase and the projected rate of inflation in 2021-22. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
star this property uin 168833 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2021-03-18more like thismore than 2021-03-18
star this property answer text <p>In November 2020 my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer set out, as part of the 2020 Spending Review, the rationale behind a public sector pay pause this year. As outlined in the Secretary of State for Defence's recent letter to the Chair of the Armed Forces' Pay Review Body, covering Pay Round 2021/22, and as detailed in HM Treasury's earlier Economic Evidence to the Pay Review Bodies 2020/21, the pay pause recognises that public sector pay has been shielded from the pandemic's economic effects. It also serves to protect public sector jobs at this time of crisis whilst ensuring fairness between the public and private sectors. As such, no consideration has been given to the effect of a pay pause on average median pay; the household income of Service personnel; or a comparison with projected rates of inflation.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Plymouth, Moor View more like this
star this property answering member printed Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
168831 more like this
168832 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2021-03-18T11:32:45.753Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-18T11:32:45.753Z
star this property answering member
4485
star this property label Biography information for Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property tabling member
400
unstar this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
1302566
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2021-03-15more like thismore than 2021-03-15
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the ratio of pay between an officer and a non-officer was in each year since 2010. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
star this property uin 168834 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2021-03-18more like thismore than 2021-03-18
star this property answer text <p>The requested information can be found it the table below:</p><p><br> <strong>Ratio of median annual salary (average Officer salary relative to average Other Ranks salary) in each year since 2010:</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Date</p></td><td><p>Other Ranks (OR) to Officer (OF) Pay Ratio (OR : OF)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2010</p></td><td><p>1:1.77</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2011</p></td><td><p>1:1.77</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2012</p></td><td><p>1:1.77</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2013</p></td><td><p>1:1.77</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2014</p></td><td><p>1:1.79</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2015</p></td><td><p>1:1.77</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2016</p></td><td><p>1:1.77</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2017</p></td><td><p>1:1.73</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2018</p></td><td><p>1:1.70</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2019</p></td><td><p>1:1.66</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2020</p></td><td><p>1:1.70</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Notes:</p><p>1. The median average (mid-point of the distribution of personnel within the rank) salaries provided in this response are calculated from the annual salaries for all Regular Officers and Other Ranks as at 1-April each year. This means that the averages are based on salary at that point in the year, not what each Service person will have been paid in total across the year, which may differ, for example due to pay rate changes and promotions. Where there was a promotion within the month of March, the new rank’s rate of pay was used in the calculation.</p><p>2. Median salaries are measured as at 1 April within the financial year. Changes in the medians can therefore reflect both changes in pay rates and changes in the relative distribution of personnel within the rank.</p><p>3. The year-on-year change in average pay should not be interpreted as the growth in pay that an average service person will have experienced. The data purely reflects the change in the median salary over time and it would be unrealistic to assume that an individual's pay would follow this path. Many Service personnel also benefit from an annual increment in addition to any rise recommended by the independent Armed Forces Pay Review Body and, for senior officers, the Senior Salaries Review Body</p><p>4. The pay structure changed significantly with the introduction of Pay 16 which accounts for the large change in ratio in 2017. A simple comparison of medians between years is not possible.</p><p>5. This data uses a different method for calculating the average than the Military Salaries Index (MSI) published in the Quarterly Service Personnel Statistics and are the actual average annual salaries as at April each year.</p><p> </p>
star this property answering member constituency Plymouth, Moor View more like this
star this property answering member printed Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2021-03-18T11:33:12.677Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-18T11:33:12.677Z
star this property answering member
4485
star this property label Biography information for Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property tabling member
400
unstar this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
1467778
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2022-06-06more like thismore than 2022-06-06
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether he has received the Armed Forces Pay Review Body's recommendation for Forces Pay for 2022-23. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
star this property uin 13049 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2022-06-13more like thismore than 2022-06-13
star this property answer text <p>The Secretary of State for Defence has not yet received the Armed Forces Pay Review Body's recommendations. When they are received, the Government intends to respond and publish an announcement as soon as practicable.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Horsham more like this
star this property answering member printed Jeremy Quin more like this
star this property grouped question UIN 13050 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2022-06-13T13:20:39.77Zmore like thismore than 2022-06-13T13:20:39.77Z
star this property answering member
4507
star this property label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Quin more like this
star this property tabling member
400
unstar this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
1467779
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2022-06-06more like thismore than 2022-06-06
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, when he plans to publish the Armed Forces Pay Review Body's recommendation on Forces pay for 2022-23. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
star this property uin 13050 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2022-06-13more like thismore than 2022-06-13
star this property answer text <p>The Secretary of State for Defence has not yet received the Armed Forces Pay Review Body's recommendations. When they are received, the Government intends to respond and publish an announcement as soon as practicable.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Horsham more like this
star this property answering member printed Jeremy Quin more like this
star this property grouped question UIN 13049 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2022-06-13T13:20:39.817Zmore like thismore than 2022-06-13T13:20:39.817Z
star this property answering member
4507
star this property label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Quin more like this
star this property tabling member
400
unstar this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
1473105
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2022-06-24more like thismore than 2022-06-24
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 13 June 2022 to Question 13049 on Armed Forces: Pay, when he expects to receive the Armed Forces Pay Review Body's recommendation for 2022-23. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
star this property uin 24542 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2022-06-29more like thismore than 2022-06-29
star this property answer text <p>The Government is considering the recommendations of the Armed Forces Pay Review Body and will respond as soon as is practicable.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Aldershot more like this
star this property answering member printed Leo Docherty more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2022-06-29T14:47:43.93Zmore like thismore than 2022-06-29T14:47:43.93Z
star this property answering member
4600
star this property label Biography information for Leo Docherty more like this
star this property tabling member
400
unstar this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
1611822
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2023-04-18more like thismore than 2023-04-18
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what estimate he has made of when the (a) Armed Forces Pay Review Body and (b) Senior Salaries Review Body will deliver their 2023 reports to his Department. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
star this property uin 181366 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2023-04-24more like thismore than 2023-04-24
star this property answer text <p>As outlined in the Defence Secretary's remit letter to the Armed Forces' Pay Review Body (AFPRB), he expects to receive their report by the end of May: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/remit-letter-to-the-armed-forces-pay-review-body-2023-to-2024/afprb-remit-letter-from-the-defence-secretary-2023-to-2024" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/remit-letter-to-the-armed-forces-pay-review-body-2023-to-2024/afprb-remit-letter-from-the-defence-secretary-2023-to-2024</a>. The Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB) report is also expected by the end of May.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency South West Wiltshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Dr Andrew Murrison more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2023-04-24T15:49:07.213Zmore like thismore than 2023-04-24T15:49:07.213Z
star this property answering member
1466
star this property label Biography information for Dr Andrew Murrison more like this
star this property tabling member
400
unstar this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
1612880
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2023-04-20more like thismore than 2023-04-20
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will publish in full the 2023 reports by the (a) Armed Forces Pay Review Body and (b) Senior Salaries Review Body. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
star this property uin 181898 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2023-04-26more like thismore than 2023-04-26
star this property answer text <p>The Armed Forces Pay Review Body 2023 annual report will be published in due course on the gov.uk website, as usual.</p><p> </p><p>The Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB) is an advisory non-departmental public body, sponsored by the Cabinet Office. When, and what, they publish is a matter for that organisation. However, Defence anticipates that they will publish their 2023 annual report on gov.uk, as usual.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency South West Wiltshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Dr Andrew Murrison more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2023-04-26T14:54:15.66Zmore like thismore than 2023-04-26T14:54:15.66Z
star this property answering member
1466
star this property label Biography information for Dr Andrew Murrison more like this
star this property tabling member
400
unstar this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
1644233
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2023-06-13more like thismore than 2023-06-13
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 24 April to Question 181366 on Armed Forces: Pay, whether he has received the report of the Armed Forces Pay Review Body. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
star this property uin 189183 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2023-06-19more like thismore than 2023-06-19
star this property answer text <p>The Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body’s 2023 report has now been received. The Government is considering their recommendations and will make an announcement shortly. Any pay award will be backdated to 1 April 2023.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency South West Wiltshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Dr Andrew Murrison more like this
star this property grouped question UIN 189184 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2023-06-19T15:20:01.137Zmore like thismore than 2023-06-19T15:20:01.137Z
star this property answering member
1466
star this property label Biography information for Dr Andrew Murrison more like this
star this property tabling member
400
unstar this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
1644234
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2023-06-13more like thismore than 2023-06-13
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 24 April to Question 181366 on Armed Forces: Pay, when he plans to publish the report of the Armed Forces Pay Review Body. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
star this property uin 189184 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2023-06-19more like thismore than 2023-06-19
star this property answer text <p>The Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body’s 2023 report has now been received. The Government is considering their recommendations and will make an announcement shortly. Any pay award will be backdated to 1 April 2023.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency South West Wiltshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Dr Andrew Murrison more like this
star this property grouped question UIN 189183 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2023-06-19T15:20:01.183Zmore like thismore than 2023-06-19T15:20:01.183Z
star this property answering member
1466
star this property label Biography information for Dr Andrew Murrison more like this
star this property tabling member
400
unstar this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
1656389
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2023-09-01more like thismore than 2023-09-01
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to the interview by the Minister for Defence People, Veterans and Service Families with the Financial Times on 9 August 2023, when his Department plans to introduce flexible pay models for the armed forces. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
star this property uin 195684 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2023-09-11more like thismore than 2023-09-11
star this property answer text <p>The Ministry of Defence is undertaking work to examine and take-forward the recommendations made within <em>Agency and Agility: Incentivising people in a new era. A review of UK Armed Forces incentivisation</em> by Rick Haythornthwaite. Regarding flexible pay, as outlined in recommendation 24, the Department will commence a trial of a 'total reward approach' through 2024. This approach finds the optimal point where personnel are best supported across all elements of reward, both financial and non-financial, to achieve organisational objectives in a sustainable manner. It will allow for tailored reward packages to be quickly and easily created to match the reality of what our personnel are asked to do according to their role and activity. Lessons will be learned from the trial and then we will look to roll this approach out more widely across the Armed Forces.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency South West Wiltshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Dr Andrew Murrison more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2023-09-11T15:08:33.11Zmore like thismore than 2023-09-11T15:08:33.11Z
star this property answering member
1466
star this property label Biography information for Dr Andrew Murrison more like this
star this property tabling member
400
unstar this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
1671359
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2023-11-20more like thismore than 2023-11-20
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the (a) mean, (b) median and (c) mode average salary is for personnel in the (i) Royal Navy, (ii) Royal Air Force, and (iii) Army. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
star this property uin 2491 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2023-11-28more like thismore than 2023-11-28
star this property answer text <p>The below table details the mean, median and mode average salary for personnel in the Navy, Army and Royal Air Force calculated based on JPA pay data.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Service</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Mean Salary</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Median Salary</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Modal Salary</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Navy</p></td><td><p>37,412</p></td><td><p>34,610</p></td><td><p>21,480</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Army</p></td><td><p>35,330</p></td><td><p>32,797</p></td><td><p>21,480</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Air</p></td><td><p>39,090</p></td><td><p>35,285</p></td><td><p>21,480</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>- An individuals salary information is based on the value given as their 'salary admin' on the JPA pay database as at 1 April 2022. Salary includes basic pay and X-Factor but excludes any other allowances.</p><p>- X-Factor is a pensionable addition to basic military pay, intended to recognise the special conditions of military life, as compared with civilian employment.</p><p>- Data are for all UK Regular Forces (which included all Trained and Untrained personnel) and Gurkhas who were on strengths in JPA as at 1 April 2022 and had a salary value. Data includes Officers and Other Ranks. Full-time reservists and mobilised reservists are excluded.</p><p>- Navy includes Royal Marines.</p><p>- Averages are rounded to the nearest pound.</p>
star this property answering member constituency South West Wiltshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Dr Andrew Murrison more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2023-11-28T12:34:30.597Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-28T12:34:30.597Z
star this property answering member
1466
star this property label Biography information for Dr Andrew Murrison more like this
star this property tabling member
400
unstar this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
1674165
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2023-11-29more like thismore than 2023-11-29
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 28 November 2023 to Question 2491 on Armed Forces: Pay, what the (a) mean, (b) median and (c) mode average salary was for personnel in the (i) Royal Navy, (ii) Royal Air Force, and (iii) Army in each year since 2010. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
star this property uin 4341 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2023-12-04more like thismore than 2023-12-04
star this property answer text <p>It is taking time to collate the required information to answer the hon. Member's Question. I will write to him when the information is available, and a copy of this letter will be placed in the Library of The House.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency South West Wiltshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Dr Andrew Murrison more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2023-12-04T15:35:07.257Zmore like thismore than 2023-12-04T15:35:07.257Z
star this property answering member
1466
star this property label Biography information for Dr Andrew Murrison more like this
star this property tabling member
400
unstar this property label Biography information for John Healey more like this
782704
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-11-02more like thismore than 2017-11-02
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will meet armed forces veterans and personnel in Weaver Vale constituency to discuss armed forces pay. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Weaver Vale more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mike Amesbury more like this
star this property uin 111139 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2017-11-07more like thismore than 2017-11-07
star this property answer text <p>Defence Ministers regularly meet and speak with members of the Armed Forces and veterans about a range of issues, including terms and conditions of service. If the hon. Member would like to contact my office, I would be happy to meet him to discuss this issue.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-11-07T17:39:17.657Zmore like thismore than 2017-11-07T17:39:17.657Z
star this property answering member
1487
star this property label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
star this property tabling member
4667
unstar this property label Biography information for Mike Amesbury more like this
647128
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2016-11-28more like thismore than 2016-11-28
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that levels of salary for armed forces personnel reflect changes in salaries for non-service personnel. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Strangford more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Jim Shannon more like this
star this property uin 55260 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2016-12-01more like thismore than 2016-12-01
star this property answer text <p>The independent Armed Forces' Pay Review Body (AFPRB) provides advice annually to the Prime Minister and the Secretary of State for Defence on pay levels for members of the Armed Forces. In reaching their recommendations, the AFPRB consider a number of factors including the need for the pay of the Armed Forces to be broadly comparable with pay levels in civilian life.</p><p> </p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Milton Keynes North more like this
star this property answering member printed Mark Lancaster more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2016-12-01T16:04:35.11Zmore like thismore than 2016-12-01T16:04:35.11Z
star this property answering member
1544
star this property label Biography information for Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton more like this
star this property tabling member
4131
unstar this property label Biography information for Jim Shannon more like this
1127391
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-05-20more like thismore than 2019-05-20
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text What recent discussions she has had with the Armed Forces' Pay Review Body on levels of pay for the armed forces. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Stockton North more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Alex Cunningham more like this
star this property uin 910988 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-05-20more like thismore than 2019-05-20
star this property answer text <p>The Ministry of Defence has provided the Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body with all its evidence to support their recommendations for Pay Round 2019-20 and is awaiting submission of the Pay Review Body’s final report. The Government will then consider the recommendations before agreeing the final 2019 Armed Forces Pay Award, taking into account the need to recruit, retain, and motivate suitably able and qualified personnel, as well as the long term affordability of the Armed Forces.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-20T16:45:11.767Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-20T16:45:11.767Z
star this property answering member
1487
star this property label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
star this property tabling member
4122
unstar this property label Biography information for Alex Cunningham more like this
1127959
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-05-21more like thismore than 2019-05-21
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what discussions she has had with the Armed Forces Pay Review Body on levels of pay for the armed forces. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Slough more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi more like this
star this property uin 257143 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-06-04more like thismore than 2019-06-04
star this property answer text <p>The Ministry of Defence has provided the Armed Forces' Pay Review Body with all its evidence to support their recommendations for Pay Round 2019-20. The Armed Forces' Pay Review Body have submitted their report and Her Majesty's Government is currently considering the recommendations before agreeing the final 2019 Armed Forces Pay Award.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-04T15:01:20.247Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-04T15:01:20.247Z
star this property answering member
1487
star this property label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
star this property tabling member
4638
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi more like this
427067
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2015-11-09more like thismore than 2015-11-09
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the Government's policy is on the provision of incremental annual pay rises for personnel of the armed forces; and if he will make a statement. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Romford more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Andrew Rosindell more like this
star this property uin 15679 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2015-11-16more like thismore than 2015-11-16
star this property answer text <p>As part of its New Employment Model programme, Defence is developing a new pay model which will be simpler, more transparent and provide Service personnel with greater pay predictability, removing some of the unpopular and divisive features of the current pay model. However, the details of this new pay model, including incremental progression arrangements, cannot be finalised until the outcome of the Spending Review is known.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Portsmouth North more like this
star this property answering member printed Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-11-16T17:16:36.61Zmore like thismore than 2015-11-16T17:16:36.61Z
star this property answering member
4017
star this property label Biography information for Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property tabling member
1447
unstar this property label Biography information for Andrew Rosindell more like this
1196622
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2020-05-18more like thismore than 2020-05-18
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, on what date the Government plans to issue the armed forces pay award. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Portsmouth South more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Stephen Morgan more like this
star this property uin 48586 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2020-06-02more like thismore than 2020-06-02
star this property answer text <p>The Government is currently considering the Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body’s (AFPRB) recommendations, taking into account the need to recruit, retain, and motivate personnel, as well as the long-term affordability of the Armed Forces. Once a decision has been reached, any pay rises will be backdated to 1 April 2020.</p><p> </p><p>The maintenance of morale in the Armed Forces is a high priority and is measured in a robust, consistent and scientific manner, through mechanisms such as the Armed Forces Continuous Attitude Survey (AFCAS). We have been unable to attribute fluctuations in morale to specific factors such as pay, and more specifically, to delay of the pay award. Neither do we anticipate that this would have a detrimental impact on recruitment or retention.</p><p> </p><p>There are a range of measures underway in the fields of recruitment and retention; these are kept under constant review. Last year we secured an across the board pay rise of 2.9% for all personnel up to 1-star rank and introduced other financial initiatives in certain priority areas. The Future Accommodation Model (FAM) is now being trialled at scale and will give our personnel greater choice of housing options to better suit their lifestyles. The introduction of Flexible Service has enabled our personnel to alter their career commitment for set periods of time so that may remain in the Armed Forces while balancing the demands of other domestic responsibilities. Lastly, we have also collaborated with industry to provide new opportunities for those with critical skills in order to improve retention within the wider Defence community.</p><p><strong><br> </strong></p><p> </p>
star this property answering member constituency Plymouth, Moor View more like this
star this property answering member printed Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
48587 more like this
48588 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-06-02T10:45:52.317Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-02T10:45:52.317Z
star this property answering member
4485
star this property label Biography information for Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property tabling member
4653
unstar this property label Biography information for Stephen Morgan more like this
1196623
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2020-05-18more like thismore than 2020-05-18
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the effect of the delay of the armed forces pay award on morale in the armed forces. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Portsmouth South more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Stephen Morgan more like this
star this property uin 48587 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2020-06-02more like thismore than 2020-06-02
star this property answer text <p>The Government is currently considering the Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body’s (AFPRB) recommendations, taking into account the need to recruit, retain, and motivate personnel, as well as the long-term affordability of the Armed Forces. Once a decision has been reached, any pay rises will be backdated to 1 April 2020.</p><p> </p><p>The maintenance of morale in the Armed Forces is a high priority and is measured in a robust, consistent and scientific manner, through mechanisms such as the Armed Forces Continuous Attitude Survey (AFCAS). We have been unable to attribute fluctuations in morale to specific factors such as pay, and more specifically, to delay of the pay award. Neither do we anticipate that this would have a detrimental impact on recruitment or retention.</p><p> </p><p>There are a range of measures underway in the fields of recruitment and retention; these are kept under constant review. Last year we secured an across the board pay rise of 2.9% for all personnel up to 1-star rank and introduced other financial initiatives in certain priority areas. The Future Accommodation Model (FAM) is now being trialled at scale and will give our personnel greater choice of housing options to better suit their lifestyles. The introduction of Flexible Service has enabled our personnel to alter their career commitment for set periods of time so that may remain in the Armed Forces while balancing the demands of other domestic responsibilities. Lastly, we have also collaborated with industry to provide new opportunities for those with critical skills in order to improve retention within the wider Defence community.</p><p><strong><br> </strong></p><p> </p>
star this property answering member constituency Plymouth, Moor View more like this
star this property answering member printed Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
48586 more like this
48588 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-06-02T10:45:52.393Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-02T10:45:52.393Z
star this property answering member
4485
star this property label Biography information for Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property tabling member
4653
unstar this property label Biography information for Stephen Morgan more like this
1196624
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2020-05-18more like thismore than 2020-05-18
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the effect of the armed forces pay award delay on (a) recruitment and (b) retention in the armed forces. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Portsmouth South more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Stephen Morgan more like this
star this property uin 48588 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2020-06-02more like thismore than 2020-06-02
star this property answer text <p>The Government is currently considering the Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body’s (AFPRB) recommendations, taking into account the need to recruit, retain, and motivate personnel, as well as the long-term affordability of the Armed Forces. Once a decision has been reached, any pay rises will be backdated to 1 April 2020.</p><p> </p><p>The maintenance of morale in the Armed Forces is a high priority and is measured in a robust, consistent and scientific manner, through mechanisms such as the Armed Forces Continuous Attitude Survey (AFCAS). We have been unable to attribute fluctuations in morale to specific factors such as pay, and more specifically, to delay of the pay award. Neither do we anticipate that this would have a detrimental impact on recruitment or retention.</p><p> </p><p>There are a range of measures underway in the fields of recruitment and retention; these are kept under constant review. Last year we secured an across the board pay rise of 2.9% for all personnel up to 1-star rank and introduced other financial initiatives in certain priority areas. The Future Accommodation Model (FAM) is now being trialled at scale and will give our personnel greater choice of housing options to better suit their lifestyles. The introduction of Flexible Service has enabled our personnel to alter their career commitment for set periods of time so that may remain in the Armed Forces while balancing the demands of other domestic responsibilities. Lastly, we have also collaborated with industry to provide new opportunities for those with critical skills in order to improve retention within the wider Defence community.</p><p><strong><br> </strong></p><p> </p>
star this property answering member constituency Plymouth, Moor View more like this
star this property answering member printed Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
48586 more like this
48587 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-06-02T10:45:52.44Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-02T10:45:52.44Z
star this property answering member
4485
star this property label Biography information for Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property tabling member
4653
unstar this property label Biography information for Stephen Morgan more like this
1121827
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-04-18more like thismore than 2019-04-18
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will publish the recommendations made by the Armed Forces Pay Review Body in each year since 2008-09 to date; and what the final settlement was for Royal Navy personnel in each such year. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Luke Pollard more like this
star this property uin 246002 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-04-30more like thismore than 2019-04-30
star this property answer text <p>The Armed Forces Pay Review Body (AFPRB) is an independent advisory non-departmental public body, sponsored by the Ministry of Defence (MOD). Copies of the AFPRB's reports, containing their recommendations, can be found at the following link:</p><p>https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/armed-forces-pay-review-body</p><p>The AFPRB's recommendations have always been accepted by the MOD. The reports contain the final settlements for the Armed Forces.</p><p>Copies of the AFPRB's reports are also available in the Vote Office.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-04-30T15:01:12.93Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-30T15:01:12.93Z
star this property answering member
1487
star this property label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
star this property tabling member
4682
unstar this property label Biography information for Luke Pollard more like this
1138860
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-07-15more like thismore than 2019-07-15
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether she plans to publish the results of the armed forces pay review before the 2019 summer recess. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Luke Pollard more like this
star this property uin 277300 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-07-23more like thismore than 2019-07-23
star this property answer text <p>I announced the 2019 pay award for the Armed Forces on Monday 22 July 2019 (HCWS1770).</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Portsmouth North more like this
star this property answering member printed Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-07-23T13:22:26.57Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-23T13:22:26.57Z
star this property answering member
4017
star this property label Biography information for Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property attachment
1
star this property file name Hansard Extract Monday 22 July 2019, HCWS 1770.docx more like this
star this property title Armed Forces' Pay Review Body Report 2019 more like this
star this property tabling member
4682
unstar this property label Biography information for Luke Pollard more like this
1423217
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2022-02-18more like thismore than 2022-02-18
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the terms of reference are for the comprehensive review into military pay. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Luke Pollard more like this
star this property uin 125483 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2022-02-28more like thismore than 2022-02-28
star this property answer text <p>The Comprehensive Review is to examine Armed Forces (Regular and Reserve) terms and conditions of service, and recommend changes required to render them appropriate to the needs of Defence as it delivers the Integrated Operating Concept into the 2040s. The full scope of the Review, including the terms of reference, will be discussed with the Chair of the Review when formally appointed. The review is due to report in spring 2023 and will cover all financial and non-financial aspects of the military offer.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Aldershot more like this
star this property answering member printed Leo Docherty more like this
star this property grouped question UIN 125488 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2022-02-28T14:23:47.737Zmore like thismore than 2022-02-28T14:23:47.737Z
star this property answering member
4600
star this property label Biography information for Leo Docherty more like this
star this property tabling member
4682
unstar this property label Biography information for Luke Pollard more like this
1423222
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2022-02-18more like thismore than 2022-02-18
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, when he expects the comprehensive review into military pay to be completed. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Luke Pollard more like this
star this property uin 125488 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2022-02-28more like thismore than 2022-02-28
star this property answer text <p>The Comprehensive Review is to examine Armed Forces (Regular and Reserve) terms and conditions of service, and recommend changes required to render them appropriate to the needs of Defence as it delivers the Integrated Operating Concept into the 2040s. The full scope of the Review, including the terms of reference, will be discussed with the Chair of the Review when formally appointed. The review is due to report in spring 2023 and will cover all financial and non-financial aspects of the military offer.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Aldershot more like this
star this property answering member printed Leo Docherty more like this
star this property grouped question UIN 125483 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2022-02-28T14:23:47.783Zmore like thismore than 2022-02-28T14:23:47.783Z
star this property answering member
4600
star this property label Biography information for Leo Docherty more like this
star this property tabling member
4682
unstar this property label Biography information for Luke Pollard more like this
1606386
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2023-03-22more like thismore than 2023-03-22
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether he has had discussions with Cabinet colleagues on the potential merits of increasing armed forces pay in line with inflation; and whether he has made a comparative assessment of the wages of armed forces staff and the wages of public service who have taken part in strikes in 2022-2023 that have been covered by the armed forces. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency North Wiltshire more like this
star this property tabling member printed
James Gray more like this
star this property uin 171349 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2023-03-29more like thismore than 2023-03-29
star this property answer text <p>The annual remit for the Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body (AFPRB) and Defence’s annual affordability for the AFPRB’s annual pay award are both agreed with Ministerial colleagues.</p><p> </p><p>Last year, the independent AFPRB recommended a 3.75% uplift in pay and other targeted measures, including a 1% cap on accommodation charges. At the same time, the independent Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB) recommended a 3.5% award to the most senior officers at two-Star rank and above. All these recommendations were accepted in full. Evidence for this year has been provided to both the AFPRB and SSRB and we are awaiting their 2023 reports.</p><p> </p><p>In determining their recommendations, the pay review bodies operate within their respective remits. For the AFPRB, this explicitly includes comparative assessments with other workforces as part of their consideration of the need for the pay of the Armed Forces to be broadly comparable with pay levels in civilian life.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency South West Wiltshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Dr Andrew Murrison more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2023-03-29T13:00:00.06Zmore like thismore than 2023-03-29T13:00:00.06Z
star this property answering member
1466
star this property label Biography information for Dr Andrew Murrison more like this
star this property tabling member
261
unstar this property label Biography information for James Gray more like this
1255314
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2020-11-25more like thismore than 2020-11-25
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether the armed forces will receive a pay rise in 2021-22. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency North Durham more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
star this property uin 120806 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2020-12-07more like thismore than 2020-12-07
star this property answer text <p>As announced on 25 November 2020 by my right. hon Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer, this Government will be taking three steps regarding public sector pay awards in 2021-22. First, taking account of the pay review bodies' advice, we will provide a pay rise to over a million nurses, doctors and others working in the NHS. Secondly, to protect jobs, pay rises in the rest of the public sector will be paused next year, including the Armed Forces. But, thirdly, we will protect those on lower incomes; the 2.1 million public sector workers who earn below the median wage of £24,000 will continue to receive a pay increase. It is important to note that over 35,000 of our most junior sailors, solders and aviators fall below the £24,000 threshold, meaning they will be unaffected by the pay freeze and still receive a guaranteed pay rise of £250 in the 2021-22 pay year.</p><p>Furthermore, military personnel also benefit from a progressive pay model where, subject to satisfactory performance, they can receive yearly incremental pay progression for every additional year spent in their rank after an initial two-year period, up to a certain cap. In the year 2019/20 45.3% of service personnel moved up a pay increment. This incremental progress is not affected by the pay pause and all personnel expecting to move up an increment next year will continue to do so provided they meet the normal criteria.</p><p>A further announcement will be made next year once we have received the recommendations from the independent Armed Forces' Pay Review Body.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Plymouth, Moor View more like this
star this property answering member printed Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-12-07T12:07:50.677Zmore like thismore than 2020-12-07T12:07:50.677Z
star this property answering member
4485
star this property label Biography information for Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property previous answer version
66766
star this property answering member constituency Plymouth, Moor View more like this
star this property answering member printed Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property answering member
4485
star this property label Biography information for Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property tabling member
1438
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this
1284791
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2021-02-08more like thismore than 2021-02-08
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the (a) recommendations of the Armed Forces Pay Review Body and (b) Government's pay increases were for the main remit group, in each year since 2010. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency North Durham more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
star this property uin 150701 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2021-02-11more like thismore than 2021-02-11
star this property answer text <p>he Armed Forces Pay Review Body (AFPRB) is an independent advisory non-departmental public body, sponsored by the Ministry of Defence (MOD). Copies of the AFPRB's reports, containing their recommendations, can be found at the following link:</p><p>https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/armed-forces-pay-review-body</p><p>The AFPRB's recommendations have always been accepted by the MOD. The reports contain the final settlements for the Armed Forces.</p><p>Copies of the AFPRB's reports are also available in the Vote Office.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Plymouth, Moor View more like this
star this property answering member printed Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2021-02-11T11:07:36.34Zmore like thismore than 2021-02-11T11:07:36.34Z
star this property answering member
4485
star this property label Biography information for Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property tabling member
1438
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this
1287517
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2021-02-19more like thismore than 2021-02-19
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 11 February 2021 to Question 150701 on Armed Forces: Pay, whether his Department has implemented the pay increase recommendations of the Armed Forces Pay Review Body. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency North Durham more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
star this property uin 154826 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2021-02-24more like thismore than 2021-02-24
star this property answer text <p>As stated in my answer of 11 February 2021, the recommendations of the Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body (AFPRB) have always been accepted by the Ministry of Defence. The Department has always implemented the AFPRB’s pay increase recommendations, including in 2013 when the 0.5% increase in X-Factor was delivered a month late, and in 2018 when the Government implemented a 2% consolidated uplift with a 0.9% non-consolidated payment to meet the spirit of the AFPRB’s 2.9% recommendation.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Plymouth, Moor View more like this
star this property answering member printed Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2021-02-24T11:03:05.457Zmore like thismore than 2021-02-24T11:03:05.457Z
star this property answering member
4485
star this property label Biography information for Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property tabling member
1438
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this
1300291
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2021-03-08more like thismore than 2021-03-08
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 24 February 2021 to Question 154826, on Armed Forces: Pay, for what reason the Office of Manpower Economics disagrees with his assessment that the recommendations of the Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body have always been accepted by his Department. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency North Durham more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
star this property uin 164373 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2021-03-11more like thismore than 2021-03-11
star this property answer text <p>The Ministry of Defence is not aware of any such disagreement and has nothing to add to the Answer provided to Question 154826 on 24 February 2021.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Plymouth, Moor View more like this
star this property answering member printed Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2021-03-11T08:33:31.83Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-11T08:33:31.83Z
star this property answering member
4485
star this property label Biography information for Johnny Mercer more like this
star this property attachment
1
star this property file name Armed Forces pay.docx more like this
star this property title 154826 - Armed Forces Pay more like this
star this property tabling member
1438
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this
1564978
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2023-01-09more like thismore than 2023-01-09
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether he has made an estimate of the cost to his Department of a 1 percent rise in armed forces salaries. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency North Durham more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
star this property uin 118840 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2023-01-17more like thismore than 2023-01-17
star this property answer text <p>A one percent increase in Armed Forces salaries is currently forecast to cost circa £120 million per year. This includes direct pay costs, SCAPE (Superannuation Contributions Adjusted for Past Experience), ERNIC (Earnings Related National Insurance Contributions), and other headcount related costs such as allowances.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency South West Wiltshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Dr Andrew Murrison more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2023-01-17T14:14:57.31Zmore like thismore than 2023-01-17T14:14:57.31Z
star this property answering member
1466
star this property label Biography information for Dr Andrew Murrison more like this
star this property tabling member
1438
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this
223579
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2015-02-25more like thismore than 2015-02-25
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, at what rate Accelerated Incremental Progression payments have been made in each year since 2010. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency North Durham more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
star this property uin 225421 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2015-03-04more like thismore than 2015-03-04
star this property answer text <p>Accelerated Incremental Progression (AIP) allows a Service person an immediate progression in their pay level as a result of a work-related course or a qualification. Each individual can qualify and claim for two AIPs during their career, at a point of their choosing.</p><p> </p><p>Our Service personnel do a difficult job and it is important they receive accurate pay for the hard work they do. While the majority of awards are made correctly, misinterpretation of the published qualifying criteria for AIP has resulted in some individuals receiving an incorrect award. Unfortunately, payment errors occur occasionally. We obviously regret such occurrences. It is right that we correct identified errors and ask for repayment of monies wrongly received. Allowing individuals to keep money that they are not entitled to would be unfair to both taxpayers and other Service personnel who did not receive this payment. It would also be inconsistent with HM Treasury instructions on the management of public money.</p><p> </p><p>If an individual overpayment to a Service person is equal to or less than four days’ gross pay then the full sum is recovered, without notification, from the next monthly salary payment. For overpayments greater than four days’ gross pay, a notification is made on the next available monthly payslip that a debt has been incurred. Recovery action is then scheduled after two subsequent pay periods, and any overpayments recovered are made at no more than four days’ gross pay per month.</p><p> </p><p>Service personnel who wish to challenge the reason for any recovery of an overpayment may submit a case through their Chain of Command to Defence Business Services. In addition, processes are in place for Service personnel: to agree to pay back any overpayment over a shorter period; to make a formal objection against recovery on hardship or other grounds and; to argue that the debt be written off or repaid over a longer period. All recoveries are postponed while casework or objections are being considered.</p><p> </p><p>Errors in the payment of AIP are dealt with in the same way as any other payment error - the account is corrected and any overpayment recovered. The calculation of money owed is simply the difference between what has been paid and what should have been paid had the error not occurred. AIP does not occur at a particular rate or have a defined cash value.</p><p> </p><p>Courses and qualifications which are eligible for AIP payments are listed in Joint Service Publication (JSP) 754 (Tri-Service Regulations for Pay and Charges), which is updated biannually as required to meet Service manning requirements. The single Services are responsible for decisions on which courses or qualifications should qualify for AIP payments. It is not possible to quantify the number of people who may have erroneously applied for AIP payments on the basis of the criteria relevant to any particular edition of this JSP. Overpayments can occur for a number of reasons which do not necessarily arise from changes to eligibility criteria set out in JSP 754, although erroneous claims for courses which are no longer eligible can be a factor.</p><p> </p><p>Information about the number of Service personnel who have repaid money as a result of AIP payment errors since 2010 could be provided only at disproportionate cost. However, our records indicate that 488 Army personnel who received erroneous AIP payments have repaid or are making repayments and 423 Royal Navy personnel who received an overpayment through the misapplication of Qualification Points have repaid or are making repayments. Additionally, approximately 1,500 Royal Air Force (RAF) personnel have been identified as having received erroneous AIP payments, which are required to be repaid; this represents 15% of all RAF AIP payments made.</p><p> </p><p>The total that has been overpaid and which is being paid back is in the region of £3.1 million. Each Service person or ex-Service person is required to repay the amount owed. As described above, each case may be subject to challenges and objections. The average amount to be repaid per person is in the region of £1,285 and the date by which payment must be paid varies according to the specific circumstances of each case.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Broxtowe more like this
star this property answering member printed Anna Soubry more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
225422 more like this
225423 more like this
225424 more like this
225641 more like this
225642 more like this
225643 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-03-04T17:39:08.75Zmore like thismore than 2015-03-04T17:39:08.75Z
star this property answering member
3938
star this property label Biography information for Anna Soubry more like this
star this property tabling member
1438
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this
223582
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2015-02-25more like thismore than 2015-02-25
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many members of the armed forces have had to repay money as a result of errors in Accelerated Incremental Progression payments in each year since 2010. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency North Durham more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
star this property uin 225424 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2015-03-04more like thismore than 2015-03-04
star this property answer text <p>Accelerated Incremental Progression (AIP) allows a Service person an immediate progression in their pay level as a result of a work-related course or a qualification. Each individual can qualify and claim for two AIPs during their career, at a point of their choosing.</p><p> </p><p>Our Service personnel do a difficult job and it is important they receive accurate pay for the hard work they do. While the majority of awards are made correctly, misinterpretation of the published qualifying criteria for AIP has resulted in some individuals receiving an incorrect award. Unfortunately, payment errors occur occasionally. We obviously regret such occurrences. It is right that we correct identified errors and ask for repayment of monies wrongly received. Allowing individuals to keep money that they are not entitled to would be unfair to both taxpayers and other Service personnel who did not receive this payment. It would also be inconsistent with HM Treasury instructions on the management of public money.</p><p> </p><p>If an individual overpayment to a Service person is equal to or less than four days’ gross pay then the full sum is recovered, without notification, from the next monthly salary payment. For overpayments greater than four days’ gross pay, a notification is made on the next available monthly payslip that a debt has been incurred. Recovery action is then scheduled after two subsequent pay periods, and any overpayments recovered are made at no more than four days’ gross pay per month.</p><p> </p><p>Service personnel who wish to challenge the reason for any recovery of an overpayment may submit a case through their Chain of Command to Defence Business Services. In addition, processes are in place for Service personnel: to agree to pay back any overpayment over a shorter period; to make a formal objection against recovery on hardship or other grounds and; to argue that the debt be written off or repaid over a longer period. All recoveries are postponed while casework or objections are being considered.</p><p> </p><p>Errors in the payment of AIP are dealt with in the same way as any other payment error - the account is corrected and any overpayment recovered. The calculation of money owed is simply the difference between what has been paid and what should have been paid had the error not occurred. AIP does not occur at a particular rate or have a defined cash value.</p><p> </p><p>Courses and qualifications which are eligible for AIP payments are listed in Joint Service Publication (JSP) 754 (Tri-Service Regulations for Pay and Charges), which is updated biannually as required to meet Service manning requirements. The single Services are responsible for decisions on which courses or qualifications should qualify for AIP payments. It is not possible to quantify the number of people who may have erroneously applied for AIP payments on the basis of the criteria relevant to any particular edition of this JSP. Overpayments can occur for a number of reasons which do not necessarily arise from changes to eligibility criteria set out in JSP 754, although erroneous claims for courses which are no longer eligible can be a factor.</p><p> </p><p>Information about the number of Service personnel who have repaid money as a result of AIP payment errors since 2010 could be provided only at disproportionate cost. However, our records indicate that 488 Army personnel who received erroneous AIP payments have repaid or are making repayments and 423 Royal Navy personnel who received an overpayment through the misapplication of Qualification Points have repaid or are making repayments. Additionally, approximately 1,500 Royal Air Force (RAF) personnel have been identified as having received erroneous AIP payments, which are required to be repaid; this represents 15% of all RAF AIP payments made.</p><p> </p><p>The total that has been overpaid and which is being paid back is in the region of £3.1 million. Each Service person or ex-Service person is required to repay the amount owed. As described above, each case may be subject to challenges and objections. The average amount to be repaid per person is in the region of £1,285 and the date by which payment must be paid varies according to the specific circumstances of each case.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Broxtowe more like this
star this property answering member printed Anna Soubry more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
225421 more like this
225422 more like this
225423 more like this
225641 more like this
225642 more like this
225643 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-03-04T17:39:09.12Zmore like thismore than 2015-03-04T17:39:09.12Z
star this property answering member
3938
star this property label Biography information for Anna Soubry more like this
star this property tabling member
1438
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this
223585
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2015-02-25more like thismore than 2015-02-25
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what method his Department uses to calculate money owed by members of the armed forces as a result of errors in Accelerated Incremental Progression payments. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency North Durham more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
star this property uin 225422 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2015-03-04more like thismore than 2015-03-04
star this property answer text <p>Accelerated Incremental Progression (AIP) allows a Service person an immediate progression in their pay level as a result of a work-related course or a qualification. Each individual can qualify and claim for two AIPs during their career, at a point of their choosing.</p><p> </p><p>Our Service personnel do a difficult job and it is important they receive accurate pay for the hard work they do. While the majority of awards are made correctly, misinterpretation of the published qualifying criteria for AIP has resulted in some individuals receiving an incorrect award. Unfortunately, payment errors occur occasionally. We obviously regret such occurrences. It is right that we correct identified errors and ask for repayment of monies wrongly received. Allowing individuals to keep money that they are not entitled to would be unfair to both taxpayers and other Service personnel who did not receive this payment. It would also be inconsistent with HM Treasury instructions on the management of public money.</p><p> </p><p>If an individual overpayment to a Service person is equal to or less than four days’ gross pay then the full sum is recovered, without notification, from the next monthly salary payment. For overpayments greater than four days’ gross pay, a notification is made on the next available monthly payslip that a debt has been incurred. Recovery action is then scheduled after two subsequent pay periods, and any overpayments recovered are made at no more than four days’ gross pay per month.</p><p> </p><p>Service personnel who wish to challenge the reason for any recovery of an overpayment may submit a case through their Chain of Command to Defence Business Services. In addition, processes are in place for Service personnel: to agree to pay back any overpayment over a shorter period; to make a formal objection against recovery on hardship or other grounds and; to argue that the debt be written off or repaid over a longer period. All recoveries are postponed while casework or objections are being considered.</p><p> </p><p>Errors in the payment of AIP are dealt with in the same way as any other payment error - the account is corrected and any overpayment recovered. The calculation of money owed is simply the difference between what has been paid and what should have been paid had the error not occurred. AIP does not occur at a particular rate or have a defined cash value.</p><p> </p><p>Courses and qualifications which are eligible for AIP payments are listed in Joint Service Publication (JSP) 754 (Tri-Service Regulations for Pay and Charges), which is updated biannually as required to meet Service manning requirements. The single Services are responsible for decisions on which courses or qualifications should qualify for AIP payments. It is not possible to quantify the number of people who may have erroneously applied for AIP payments on the basis of the criteria relevant to any particular edition of this JSP. Overpayments can occur for a number of reasons which do not necessarily arise from changes to eligibility criteria set out in JSP 754, although erroneous claims for courses which are no longer eligible can be a factor.</p><p> </p><p>Information about the number of Service personnel who have repaid money as a result of AIP payment errors since 2010 could be provided only at disproportionate cost. However, our records indicate that 488 Army personnel who received erroneous AIP payments have repaid or are making repayments and 423 Royal Navy personnel who received an overpayment through the misapplication of Qualification Points have repaid or are making repayments. Additionally, approximately 1,500 Royal Air Force (RAF) personnel have been identified as having received erroneous AIP payments, which are required to be repaid; this represents 15% of all RAF AIP payments made.</p><p> </p><p>The total that has been overpaid and which is being paid back is in the region of £3.1 million. Each Service person or ex-Service person is required to repay the amount owed. As described above, each case may be subject to challenges and objections. The average amount to be repaid per person is in the region of £1,285 and the date by which payment must be paid varies according to the specific circumstances of each case.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Broxtowe more like this
star this property answering member printed Anna Soubry more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
225421 more like this
225423 more like this
225424 more like this
225641 more like this
225642 more like this
225643 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-03-04T17:39:08.893Zmore like thismore than 2015-03-04T17:39:08.893Z
star this property answering member
3938
star this property label Biography information for Anna Soubry more like this
star this property tabling member
1438
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this
223587
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2015-02-25more like thismore than 2015-02-25
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what provisions are in place to ensure that service personnel receive adequate notice when they owe money because of errors in Accelerated Incremental Progression payments. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency North Durham more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
star this property uin 225423 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2015-03-04more like thismore than 2015-03-04
star this property answer text <p>Accelerated Incremental Progression (AIP) allows a Service person an immediate progression in their pay level as a result of a work-related course or a qualification. Each individual can qualify and claim for two AIPs during their career, at a point of their choosing.</p><p> </p><p>Our Service personnel do a difficult job and it is important they receive accurate pay for the hard work they do. While the majority of awards are made correctly, misinterpretation of the published qualifying criteria for AIP has resulted in some individuals receiving an incorrect award. Unfortunately, payment errors occur occasionally. We obviously regret such occurrences. It is right that we correct identified errors and ask for repayment of monies wrongly received. Allowing individuals to keep money that they are not entitled to would be unfair to both taxpayers and other Service personnel who did not receive this payment. It would also be inconsistent with HM Treasury instructions on the management of public money.</p><p> </p><p>If an individual overpayment to a Service person is equal to or less than four days’ gross pay then the full sum is recovered, without notification, from the next monthly salary payment. For overpayments greater than four days’ gross pay, a notification is made on the next available monthly payslip that a debt has been incurred. Recovery action is then scheduled after two subsequent pay periods, and any overpayments recovered are made at no more than four days’ gross pay per month.</p><p> </p><p>Service personnel who wish to challenge the reason for any recovery of an overpayment may submit a case through their Chain of Command to Defence Business Services. In addition, processes are in place for Service personnel: to agree to pay back any overpayment over a shorter period; to make a formal objection against recovery on hardship or other grounds and; to argue that the debt be written off or repaid over a longer period. All recoveries are postponed while casework or objections are being considered.</p><p> </p><p>Errors in the payment of AIP are dealt with in the same way as any other payment error - the account is corrected and any overpayment recovered. The calculation of money owed is simply the difference between what has been paid and what should have been paid had the error not occurred. AIP does not occur at a particular rate or have a defined cash value.</p><p> </p><p>Courses and qualifications which are eligible for AIP payments are listed in Joint Service Publication (JSP) 754 (Tri-Service Regulations for Pay and Charges), which is updated biannually as required to meet Service manning requirements. The single Services are responsible for decisions on which courses or qualifications should qualify for AIP payments. It is not possible to quantify the number of people who may have erroneously applied for AIP payments on the basis of the criteria relevant to any particular edition of this JSP. Overpayments can occur for a number of reasons which do not necessarily arise from changes to eligibility criteria set out in JSP 754, although erroneous claims for courses which are no longer eligible can be a factor.</p><p> </p><p>Information about the number of Service personnel who have repaid money as a result of AIP payment errors since 2010 could be provided only at disproportionate cost. However, our records indicate that 488 Army personnel who received erroneous AIP payments have repaid or are making repayments and 423 Royal Navy personnel who received an overpayment through the misapplication of Qualification Points have repaid or are making repayments. Additionally, approximately 1,500 Royal Air Force (RAF) personnel have been identified as having received erroneous AIP payments, which are required to be repaid; this represents 15% of all RAF AIP payments made.</p><p> </p><p>The total that has been overpaid and which is being paid back is in the region of £3.1 million. Each Service person or ex-Service person is required to repay the amount owed. As described above, each case may be subject to challenges and objections. The average amount to be repaid per person is in the region of £1,285 and the date by which payment must be paid varies according to the specific circumstances of each case.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Broxtowe more like this
star this property answering member printed Anna Soubry more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
225421 more like this
225422 more like this
225424 more like this
225641 more like this
225642 more like this
225643 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-03-04T17:39:09.01Zmore like thismore than 2015-03-04T17:39:09.01Z
star this property answering member
3938
star this property label Biography information for Anna Soubry more like this
star this property tabling member
1438
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this
223910
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2015-02-26more like thismore than 2015-02-26
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many service personnel have been overpaid after they applied for accelerated incremental progression payments; how much has been overpaid; how much will have to be paid back by service personnel; what the average amount to be repaid by a serviceman or woman is; and by what date such repayments must be made. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Moray more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Angus Robertson more like this
star this property uin 225641 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2015-03-04more like thismore than 2015-03-04
star this property answer text <p>Accelerated Incremental Progression (AIP) allows a Service person an immediate progression in their pay level as a result of a work-related course or a qualification. Each individual can qualify and claim for two AIPs during their career, at a point of their choosing.</p><p> </p><p>Our Service personnel do a difficult job and it is important they receive accurate pay for the hard work they do. While the majority of awards are made correctly, misinterpretation of the published qualifying criteria for AIP has resulted in some individuals receiving an incorrect award. Unfortunately, payment errors occur occasionally. We obviously regret such occurrences. It is right that we correct identified errors and ask for repayment of monies wrongly received. Allowing individuals to keep money that they are not entitled to would be unfair to both taxpayers and other Service personnel who did not receive this payment. It would also be inconsistent with HM Treasury instructions on the management of public money.</p><p> </p><p>If an individual overpayment to a Service person is equal to or less than four days’ gross pay then the full sum is recovered, without notification, from the next monthly salary payment. For overpayments greater than four days’ gross pay, a notification is made on the next available monthly payslip that a debt has been incurred. Recovery action is then scheduled after two subsequent pay periods, and any overpayments recovered are made at no more than four days’ gross pay per month.</p><p> </p><p>Service personnel who wish to challenge the reason for any recovery of an overpayment may submit a case through their Chain of Command to Defence Business Services. In addition, processes are in place for Service personnel: to agree to pay back any overpayment over a shorter period; to make a formal objection against recovery on hardship or other grounds and; to argue that the debt be written off or repaid over a longer period. All recoveries are postponed while casework or objections are being considered.</p><p> </p><p>Errors in the payment of AIP are dealt with in the same way as any other payment error - the account is corrected and any overpayment recovered. The calculation of money owed is simply the difference between what has been paid and what should have been paid had the error not occurred. AIP does not occur at a particular rate or have a defined cash value.</p><p> </p><p>Courses and qualifications which are eligible for AIP payments are listed in Joint Service Publication (JSP) 754 (Tri-Service Regulations for Pay and Charges), which is updated biannually as required to meet Service manning requirements. The single Services are responsible for decisions on which courses or qualifications should qualify for AIP payments. It is not possible to quantify the number of people who may have erroneously applied for AIP payments on the basis of the criteria relevant to any particular edition of this JSP. Overpayments can occur for a number of reasons which do not necessarily arise from changes to eligibility criteria set out in JSP 754, although erroneous claims for courses which are no longer eligible can be a factor.</p><p> </p><p>Information about the number of Service personnel who have repaid money as a result of AIP payment errors since 2010 could be provided only at disproportionate cost. However, our records indicate that 488 Army personnel who received erroneous AIP payments have repaid or are making repayments and 423 Royal Navy personnel who received an overpayment through the misapplication of Qualification Points have repaid or are making repayments. Additionally, approximately 1,500 Royal Air Force (RAF) personnel have been identified as having received erroneous AIP payments, which are required to be repaid; this represents 15% of all RAF AIP payments made.</p><p> </p><p>The total that has been overpaid and which is being paid back is in the region of £3.1 million. Each Service person or ex-Service person is required to repay the amount owed. As described above, each case may be subject to challenges and objections. The average amount to be repaid per person is in the region of £1,285 and the date by which payment must be paid varies according to the specific circumstances of each case.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Broxtowe more like this
star this property answering member printed Anna Soubry more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
225421 more like this
225422 more like this
225423 more like this
225424 more like this
225642 more like this
225643 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-03-04T17:39:09.277Zmore like thismore than 2015-03-04T17:39:09.277Z
star this property answering member
3938
star this property label Biography information for Anna Soubry more like this
star this property tabling member
1433
unstar this property label Biography information for Angus Robertson more like this
223912
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2015-02-26more like thismore than 2015-02-26
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of forgiving debt owed by service personnel who applied for accelerated incremental progression. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Moray more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Angus Robertson more like this
star this property uin 225642 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2015-03-04more like thismore than 2015-03-04
star this property answer text <p>Accelerated Incremental Progression (AIP) allows a Service person an immediate progression in their pay level as a result of a work-related course or a qualification. Each individual can qualify and claim for two AIPs during their career, at a point of their choosing.</p><p> </p><p>Our Service personnel do a difficult job and it is important they receive accurate pay for the hard work they do. While the majority of awards are made correctly, misinterpretation of the published qualifying criteria for AIP has resulted in some individuals receiving an incorrect award. Unfortunately, payment errors occur occasionally. We obviously regret such occurrences. It is right that we correct identified errors and ask for repayment of monies wrongly received. Allowing individuals to keep money that they are not entitled to would be unfair to both taxpayers and other Service personnel who did not receive this payment. It would also be inconsistent with HM Treasury instructions on the management of public money.</p><p> </p><p>If an individual overpayment to a Service person is equal to or less than four days’ gross pay then the full sum is recovered, without notification, from the next monthly salary payment. For overpayments greater than four days’ gross pay, a notification is made on the next available monthly payslip that a debt has been incurred. Recovery action is then scheduled after two subsequent pay periods, and any overpayments recovered are made at no more than four days’ gross pay per month.</p><p> </p><p>Service personnel who wish to challenge the reason for any recovery of an overpayment may submit a case through their Chain of Command to Defence Business Services. In addition, processes are in place for Service personnel: to agree to pay back any overpayment over a shorter period; to make a formal objection against recovery on hardship or other grounds and; to argue that the debt be written off or repaid over a longer period. All recoveries are postponed while casework or objections are being considered.</p><p> </p><p>Errors in the payment of AIP are dealt with in the same way as any other payment error - the account is corrected and any overpayment recovered. The calculation of money owed is simply the difference between what has been paid and what should have been paid had the error not occurred. AIP does not occur at a particular rate or have a defined cash value.</p><p> </p><p>Courses and qualifications which are eligible for AIP payments are listed in Joint Service Publication (JSP) 754 (Tri-Service Regulations for Pay and Charges), which is updated biannually as required to meet Service manning requirements. The single Services are responsible for decisions on which courses or qualifications should qualify for AIP payments. It is not possible to quantify the number of people who may have erroneously applied for AIP payments on the basis of the criteria relevant to any particular edition of this JSP. Overpayments can occur for a number of reasons which do not necessarily arise from changes to eligibility criteria set out in JSP 754, although erroneous claims for courses which are no longer eligible can be a factor.</p><p> </p><p>Information about the number of Service personnel who have repaid money as a result of AIP payment errors since 2010 could be provided only at disproportionate cost. However, our records indicate that 488 Army personnel who received erroneous AIP payments have repaid or are making repayments and 423 Royal Navy personnel who received an overpayment through the misapplication of Qualification Points have repaid or are making repayments. Additionally, approximately 1,500 Royal Air Force (RAF) personnel have been identified as having received erroneous AIP payments, which are required to be repaid; this represents 15% of all RAF AIP payments made.</p><p> </p><p>The total that has been overpaid and which is being paid back is in the region of £3.1 million. Each Service person or ex-Service person is required to repay the amount owed. As described above, each case may be subject to challenges and objections. The average amount to be repaid per person is in the region of £1,285 and the date by which payment must be paid varies according to the specific circumstances of each case.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Broxtowe more like this
star this property answering member printed Anna Soubry more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
225421 more like this
225422 more like this
225423 more like this
225424 more like this
225641 more like this
225643 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-03-04T17:39:09.39Zmore like thismore than 2015-03-04T17:39:09.39Z
star this property answering member
3938
star this property label Biography information for Anna Soubry more like this
star this property tabling member
1433
unstar this property label Biography information for Angus Robertson more like this
223914
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2015-02-26more like thismore than 2015-02-26
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what information his Department has given to service personnel who have been overpaid because they applied for an accelerated incremental progression; when the guidelines for who was eligible for such payments were changed to invalidate the extra pay; how many people applied for such payments before the guidance in Joint Service Publication 754 was changed; and who was responsible for changing that guidance. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Moray more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Angus Robertson more like this
star this property uin 225643 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2015-03-04more like thismore than 2015-03-04
star this property answer text <p>Accelerated Incremental Progression (AIP) allows a Service person an immediate progression in their pay level as a result of a work-related course or a qualification. Each individual can qualify and claim for two AIPs during their career, at a point of their choosing.</p><p> </p><p>Our Service personnel do a difficult job and it is important they receive accurate pay for the hard work they do. While the majority of awards are made correctly, misinterpretation of the published qualifying criteria for AIP has resulted in some individuals receiving an incorrect award. Unfortunately, payment errors occur occasionally. We obviously regret such occurrences. It is right that we correct identified errors and ask for repayment of monies wrongly received. Allowing individuals to keep money that they are not entitled to would be unfair to both taxpayers and other Service personnel who did not receive this payment. It would also be inconsistent with HM Treasury instructions on the management of public money.</p><p> </p><p>If an individual overpayment to a Service person is equal to or less than four days’ gross pay then the full sum is recovered, without notification, from the next monthly salary payment. For overpayments greater than four days’ gross pay, a notification is made on the next available monthly payslip that a debt has been incurred. Recovery action is then scheduled after two subsequent pay periods, and any overpayments recovered are made at no more than four days’ gross pay per month.</p><p> </p><p>Service personnel who wish to challenge the reason for any recovery of an overpayment may submit a case through their Chain of Command to Defence Business Services. In addition, processes are in place for Service personnel: to agree to pay back any overpayment over a shorter period; to make a formal objection against recovery on hardship or other grounds and; to argue that the debt be written off or repaid over a longer period. All recoveries are postponed while casework or objections are being considered.</p><p> </p><p>Errors in the payment of AIP are dealt with in the same way as any other payment error - the account is corrected and any overpayment recovered. The calculation of money owed is simply the difference between what has been paid and what should have been paid had the error not occurred. AIP does not occur at a particular rate or have a defined cash value.</p><p> </p><p>Courses and qualifications which are eligible for AIP payments are listed in Joint Service Publication (JSP) 754 (Tri-Service Regulations for Pay and Charges), which is updated biannually as required to meet Service manning requirements. The single Services are responsible for decisions on which courses or qualifications should qualify for AIP payments. It is not possible to quantify the number of people who may have erroneously applied for AIP payments on the basis of the criteria relevant to any particular edition of this JSP. Overpayments can occur for a number of reasons which do not necessarily arise from changes to eligibility criteria set out in JSP 754, although erroneous claims for courses which are no longer eligible can be a factor.</p><p> </p><p>Information about the number of Service personnel who have repaid money as a result of AIP payment errors since 2010 could be provided only at disproportionate cost. However, our records indicate that 488 Army personnel who received erroneous AIP payments have repaid or are making repayments and 423 Royal Navy personnel who received an overpayment through the misapplication of Qualification Points have repaid or are making repayments. Additionally, approximately 1,500 Royal Air Force (RAF) personnel have been identified as having received erroneous AIP payments, which are required to be repaid; this represents 15% of all RAF AIP payments made.</p><p> </p><p>The total that has been overpaid and which is being paid back is in the region of £3.1 million. Each Service person or ex-Service person is required to repay the amount owed. As described above, each case may be subject to challenges and objections. The average amount to be repaid per person is in the region of £1,285 and the date by which payment must be paid varies according to the specific circumstances of each case.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Broxtowe more like this
star this property answering member printed Anna Soubry more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
225421 more like this
225422 more like this
225423 more like this
225424 more like this
225641 more like this
225642 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-03-04T17:39:09.57Zmore like thismore than 2015-03-04T17:39:09.57Z
star this property answering member
3938
star this property label Biography information for Anna Soubry more like this
star this property tabling member
1433
unstar this property label Biography information for Angus Robertson more like this
1127776
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-05-21more like thismore than 2019-05-21
star this property answering body
Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept id 14 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what plans he has to publish a letter from the Chief Secretary to the Treasury to the Armed Forces Pay Review Body Chair providing information about Government policy on public sector pay for the forthcoming pay round. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Llanelli more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Nia Griffith more like this
star this property uin 256979 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-06-04more like thismore than 2019-06-04
star this property answer text <p>The Defence Secretary wrote to the Chair of the Armed Forces Pay Review Body in November 2018, setting out their remit for the 2019/20 pay round.</p><p> </p><p>This year’s pay round is currently in progress, and the Government will respond to the recommendations of the Pay Review Bodies in due course.</p><p> </p><p>The pay round for 2020/21 has not begun yet and will commence as usual in the Autumn.</p><p> </p><p>Last year, members of the Armed Forces received a well-above inflation increase of 2.9%, worth £680 in pay, plus a one-off payment of £300, to an average soldier.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency South West Norfolk more like this
star this property answering member printed Elizabeth Truss more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-04T06:59:33.587Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-04T06:59:33.587Z
star this property answering member
4097
star this property label Biography information for Elizabeth Truss more like this
star this property tabling member
1541
unstar this property label Biography information for Dame Nia Griffith more like this
1137462
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-07-08more like thismore than 2019-07-08
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, on what date she plans to agree the 2019-20 pay settlement with the Armed Forces Pay Review Body. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Llanelli more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Nia Griffith more like this
star this property uin 274485 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-07-11more like thismore than 2019-07-11
star this property answer text <p>The Armed Forces' Pay Review Body submitted their report in May 2019 alongside all other public sector pay review bodies. The Government is currently considering the recommendations before agreeing the final 2019 Armed Forces Pay Award, taking into account the need to recruit, retain, and motivate suitably able and qualified personnel, as well as the long term affordability of the Armed Forces. Once a decision has been reached, as with previous years, the Armed Forces' Pay Review Body report will be published and any pay rises backdated to 1 April 2019.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-07-11T15:04:34.227Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-11T15:04:34.227Z
star this property answering member
1487
star this property label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
star this property tabling member
1541
unstar this property label Biography information for Dame Nia Griffith more like this
714477
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-03-28more like thismore than 2017-03-28
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to paragraph 2.73 of the Armed Forces' Pay Review Body 46th Report, what steps his Department is taking to promote cohesion between Regulars and Reserves as part of the Whole Force approach. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Llanelli more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Nia Griffith more like this
star this property uin 69623 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2017-04-04more like thismore than 2017-04-04
star this property answer text <p>The Services are committed to achieving culture change to break down barriers between Regulars and Reserves and improve cohesion. This is being addressed through a number of programmes.</p><p>We continue to invest in more integrated training and in equipment for the Reserves. Reserves have access to the same equipment and technology as Regulars across all the Services. Army Reserve Units are now commonly paired with Regular Units and train alongside them using the same modern equipment and, when required, may also deploy with them. The Army also employs individual reservists alongside Regular personnel, for example in intelligence roles. The Maritime and RAF Reserves are most often used to provide individuals and small teams for specific roles. Their training is designed to integrate them with the Regulars.</p><p>We have streamlined the process for transferring from the Regulars to the Reserves to enable people with key skills to share their knowledge and expertise. We are also actively working to identify any policy or process issues that may hinder the use of reservists and to remove these barriers wherever possible.</p><p>We have developed a set of indicators of culture change and we have put in place a process through which the Services will assess their progress against these indicators and provide evidence of that progress to senior leadership in the Department. This will allow the Ministry of Defence to identify and share examples of good practice as well as issues to be addressed.</p><p>These initiatives have begun to have a positive effect. In the 2016 Armed Forces Continuous Attitude Survey, almost two thirds of Regulars who had served alongside Reservists rated them as professional, with a similar number rating the Reserves' contribution as valuable. This is a firm foundation on which we can build and we are working to do so.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Milton Keynes North more like this
star this property answering member printed Mark Lancaster more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-04-04T14:30:55.617Zmore like thismore than 2017-04-04T14:30:55.617Z
star this property answering member
1544
star this property label Biography information for Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton more like this
star this property tabling member
1541
unstar this property label Biography information for Dame Nia Griffith more like this
714481
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-03-28more like thismore than 2017-03-28
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to page 28, paragraph 3.34 of the 46th Report of the Armed Forces' Pay Review Body, published on 28 March 2017, what the implications are for his policies on recruitment and retention payments; and if he will make a statement. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Llanelli more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Nia Griffith more like this
star this property uin 69607 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2017-04-18more like thismore than 2017-04-18
star this property answer text <p>The Ministry of Defence takes seriously the recommendations of the Armed Forces Pay Review Body. Recruitment and Retention Payments (RRP) are paid at Departmental discretion to recruit and retain individuals in specific cadres. It is, therefore, right that RRP is removed when the Department is no longer able to retain the services of an individual to whom RRP is paid.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Hemel Hempstead more like this
star this property answering member printed Mike Penning more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-04-18T15:16:57.583Zmore like thismore than 2017-04-18T15:16:57.583Z
star this property answering member
1528
star this property label Biography information for Sir Mike Penning more like this
star this property tabling member
1541
unstar this property label Biography information for Dame Nia Griffith more like this
722967
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-04-20more like thismore than 2017-04-20
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to page 51, paragraph 4.49 of the 46th Report of the Armed Forces' Pay Review Body, published on 28 March 2017, on what basis his Department calculated that the future accommodation model would result in savings of £500 million over 10 years. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Llanelli more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Nia Griffith more like this
star this property uin 71485 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2017-04-25more like thismore than 2017-04-25
star this property answer text <p>The 2015 Spending Review committed the Ministry of Defence (MOD) to savings of around £500 million from accommodation over the next 10 years through reduced running costs, capital receipts and savings. Inefficiencies in the current model mean that it costs the MOD around two pounds for every pound of effective accommodation subsidy Service personnel receive; by making the model more efficient we aim to realise these savings and also create a fairer model that provides Service personnel with more choice.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Milton Keynes North more like this
star this property answering member printed Mark Lancaster more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-04-25T11:37:53.47Zmore like thismore than 2017-04-25T11:37:53.47Z
star this property answering member
1544
star this property label Biography information for Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton more like this
star this property tabling member
1541
unstar this property label Biography information for Dame Nia Griffith more like this
856195
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2018-03-06more like thismore than 2018-03-06
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the oral contribution of the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Defence of 5 March 2018, Official Report, column 15, whether he plans to set out parameters for revised armed forces pay in his letter to the Armed Forces Pay Review Body to commence the annual pay round; and if he will make a statement. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Llanelli more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Nia Griffith more like this
star this property uin 131361 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2018-03-12more like thismore than 2018-03-12
star this property answer text <p>The Secretary of State for Defence wrote to the Chair of the Armed Forces' Pay Review Body (AFPRB) on 7 December 2017 setting out parameters for the 2018/19 pay round. A copy of this letter can be found on the gov.uk website at the following address:</p><p>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/defence-secretary-gavin-williamson-letter-to-chair-of-afprb.</p><p>We look forward to receiving the AFPRB's 2018 report in due course.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2018-03-12T16:08:12.227Zmore like thismore than 2018-03-12T16:08:12.227Z
star this property answering member
1487
star this property label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
star this property tabling member
1541
unstar this property label Biography information for Dame Nia Griffith more like this
947412
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2018-07-24more like thismore than 2018-07-24
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Armed Forces: Pay remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Written Statement of 24 July 2018 on Ministry of Defence -Update, HCWS909, when the 0.9 per cent non-consolidated one-off payment will be implemented. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Llanelli more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Nia Griffith more like this
star this property uin 167982 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2018-09-05more like thismore than 2018-09-05
star this property answer text <p>The Ministry of Defence is working with its pay administration providers to agree when the non-consolidated payment will be implemented and will update Service personnel as soon as possible.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency South Staffordshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Gavin Williamson more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2018-09-05T14:59:15.557Zmore like thismore than 2018-09-05T14:59:15.557Z
star this property answering member
4108
star this property label Biography information for Sir Gavin Williamson more like this
star this property tabling member
1541
unstar this property label Biography information for Dame Nia Griffith more like this