Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

43188
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2014-03-13more like thismore than 2014-03-13
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what his policy is on alternative models of compensating small businesses for sickness absence after the abolition of the percentage threshold scheme for recovering statutory sick pay. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Chesterfield more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Toby Perkins more like this
star this property uin 192167 remove filter
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-03-20more like thismore than 2014-03-20
star this property answer text <p /> <p /> <p>The Government believes that reinvesting savings from the abolition of the Percentage Threshold Scheme to establish the Health and Work Service is the most effective means of targeting public funds to tackle sickness absence. The Health and Work Service will reduce the length of sickness absence and offers a more proactive approach to sickness absence management. Small businesses are least likely to have access to occupational health services, and will benefit from having access to occupational health assessments and advice through the Health and Work Service.</p><p> </p><p>We have considered an alternative approach along the lines of restricting access to a reimbursement scheme to employers with fewer than five employees. However, this was discounted because it resulted in additional burdens on employers and additional Statutory Sick Pay reimbursement costs for the state<em>.</em></p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Hemel Hempstead more like this
star this property answering member printed Mike Penning more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-03-20T12:00:00.00Zmore like thismore than 2014-03-20T12:00:00.00Z
star this property answering member
1528
star this property label Biography information for Sir Mike Penning more like this
star this property tabling member
3952
star this property label Biography information for Mr Toby Perkins more like this
1649762
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2023-07-03more like thismore than 2023-07-03
star this property answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology more like this
star this property answering dept id 216 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Science, Innovation and Technology more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Science, Innovation and Technology more like this
star this property hansard heading Department for Science, Innovation and Technology: Surveillance more like this
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, with reference to the Written Ministerial Statement of 24 November 2022 on Security Update on Surveillance Equipment, WMS 386, whether they have (a) ceased deployment of visual surveillance systems produced by companies subject to the National Intelligence Law of the People’s Republic of China onto sensitive sites, (b) ensured no such equipment is connected to their departmental core network, (c) considered whether there are sites outside the definition of sensitive sites to which they would wish to extend risk mitigation and (d) put in place any additional controls or taken any further steps. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Slough more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi more like this
star this property uin 192167 remove filter
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2023-07-11more like thismore than 2023-07-11
star this property answer text <p>On 24 November 2022, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster published a Written<br> Ministerial Statement noting that departments had been instructed to take a series of actions relating to surveillance equipment subject to the National Intelligence Law of the People’s Republic of China. This Government Department has been implementing this policy along with other protective security controls.</p><p>At Report Stage of the Procurement Bill, the Government committed that, within six months of Royal Assent, the Government will set out the timeline for the removal of surveillance equipment supplied by companies subject to the National Intelligence Law of China from sensitive sites. This department will be providing information to the Cabinet Office to support this commitment. It is a longstanding Government policy that specific security arrangements regarding Government estates are withheld on security grounds.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Mid Norfolk more like this
star this property answering member printed George Freeman more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2023-07-11T12:41:06.193Zmore like thismore than 2023-07-11T12:41:06.193Z
star this property answering member
4020
star this property label Biography information for George Freeman more like this
star this property tabling member
4638
star this property label Biography information for Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi more like this