Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

41946
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2014-03-06more like thismore than 2014-03-06
star this property answering body
Speaker's Committee for Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority more like this
star this property answering dept id 90 more like this
star this property answering dept short name
star this property answering dept sort name
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the hon. Member for Broxbourne, representing the Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, what criteria the IPSA Contingency Panel used to grant uplifts to hon. Members' staffing expenditure budgets in (a) 2012-13 and (b) 2013-14. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Colchester more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Sir Bob Russell more like this
star this property uin 190930 remove filter
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2014-03-18more like thismore than 2014-03-18
unstar this property answer text <p>The information requested falls within the responsibility of the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority. I have asked IPSA to reply.</p><p><em>Letter from Andrew McDonald, 3/10/2014 2013:</em></p><blockquote><p>As Chief Executive of the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, I have been asked to reply to your Parliamentary Question asking about IPSA's Contingency Panel.</p><p>The rules concerning the Contingency Panel are set out at Paragraph 10.12 of the MPs' Scheme of Business Costs and Expenses.</p><p>They set out that in relation to each application the Contingency Panel will consider:</p><p>a. whether there are exceptional circumstances warranting additional support;</p><p>b. whether the MP could reasonably have been expected to take any action to avoid the circumstances which gave rise to the expenditure or liability; and</p><p>c. whether the MP's performance of parliamentary functions will be significantly impaired by a refusal of the claim.</p><p>Given the significant increase in staffing budgets made in 2012/13, we have not provided contingency funding for MPs' staffing expenditure budgets on the basis of increased casework in 2013/14.</p></blockquote>
star this property answering member constituency Broxbourne more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr Charles Walker more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-03-18T12:00:00.00Zmore like thismore than 2014-03-18T12:00:00.00Z
star this property answering member
1493
star this property label Biography information for Sir Charles Walker more like this
star this property tabling member
35
star this property label Biography information for Sir Bob Russell more like this