Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1133727
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-06-20more like thismore than 2019-06-20
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Offenders: Rehabilitation remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 13 June 2019 to Question 262418, what the threshold for the number of participants is in an accredited programme below which his Department does not consider it suitable for impact evaluation. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Leeds East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
star this property uin 267349 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-06-25more like thismore than 2019-06-25
star this property answer text <p>The department seeks to deliver impact evaluations for all accredited programmes. However, the feasibility of an impact evaluation needs to be reviewed first in an evaluability study. The factors that are reviewed to determine whether an impact evaluation is possible include:</p><p> </p><ul><li>The expected reduction in reoffending rate for the specific offender cohort, and the appropriate number of years over which we expect reductions in reoffending to occur;</li><li>The number of programme completers required to detect this reduction (calculated using statistical power analysis); and</li><li>The quality of the data and information available.</li></ul><p> </p><p>Evaluability studies ensure that the best possible evaluation approach is identified. Therefore, it is not possible to provide a single threshold for the number of participants in an accredited programme below which it would not have an impact evaluation carried out, as it will differ by programme.</p><p> </p><p>The department is committed to publishing all research carried out in line with the Government Social Research guidelines.</p>
star this property answering member constituency South Swindon more like this
star this property answering member printed Robert Buckland more like this
unstar this property grouped question UIN 267350 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-25T15:43:20.033Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-25T15:43:20.033Z
star this property answering member
4106
star this property label Biography information for Sir Robert Buckland more like this
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
1133728
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-06-20more like thismore than 2019-06-20
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Offenders: Rehabilitation remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 13 June 2019 to Question 262418, if he will publish the research referred to in that Answer. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Leeds East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
star this property uin 267350 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-06-25more like thismore than 2019-06-25
star this property answer text <p>The department seeks to deliver impact evaluations for all accredited programmes. However, the feasibility of an impact evaluation needs to be reviewed first in an evaluability study. The factors that are reviewed to determine whether an impact evaluation is possible include:</p><p> </p><ul><li>The expected reduction in reoffending rate for the specific offender cohort, and the appropriate number of years over which we expect reductions in reoffending to occur;</li><li>The number of programme completers required to detect this reduction (calculated using statistical power analysis); and</li><li>The quality of the data and information available.</li></ul><p> </p><p>Evaluability studies ensure that the best possible evaluation approach is identified. Therefore, it is not possible to provide a single threshold for the number of participants in an accredited programme below which it would not have an impact evaluation carried out, as it will differ by programme.</p><p> </p><p>The department is committed to publishing all research carried out in line with the Government Social Research guidelines.</p>
star this property answering member constituency South Swindon more like this
star this property answering member printed Robert Buckland more like this
unstar this property grouped question UIN 267349 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-25T15:43:20.087Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-25T15:43:20.087Z
star this property answering member
4106
star this property label Biography information for Sir Robert Buckland more like this
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
1166809
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-10-28more like thismore than 2019-10-28
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Offenders: Rehabilitation remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 21 October 2019 to Question 944 on Reoffenders, how many offenders in each category were supervised by (a) the National Probation Service and (b) community rehabilitation companies. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts more like this
star this property uin 6477 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-10-31more like thismore than 2019-10-31
star this property answer text <p>The table below shows the number of Serious Further Offence (SFO) notifications – that is, cases of an offender under probation supervision charged with an SFO - received between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018, by SFO offence, where the offender was supervised by a) the National Probation Service (NPS) and b) Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRC).</p><p> </p><p>Not all charges for an SFO will result in a conviction. In any year, in about 50% of cases either the charges are dropped before trial, or the offender is acquitted following trial or the offender is convicted of a less serious offence.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2014*</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>SFO Offence</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Arson with intent to endanger life</em></p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Assault by penetration</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Attempt or conspiracy to commit murder</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>51</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>43</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Aggravated Burglary</em></p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Causing death by dangerous/careless driving/aggravated vehicle taking</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>11</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>False imprisonment</em></p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Firearms offences including possession with intent</em></p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Kidnapping</em></p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Manslaughter</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Murder</p></td><td><p>56</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>49</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>78</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Offences under the Explosive Substances Act</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other qualifying sexual offences</em></p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other serious violent offence</em></p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other specified offence causing death</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rape</p></td><td><p>129</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>112</p></td><td><p>105</p></td><td><p>118</p></td><td><p>127</p></td><td><p>111</p></td><td><p>131</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>60</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Robbery with firearm</em></p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Under 13 sexual offences including rape</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>391</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>90</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>310</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>238</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>350</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>274</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>425</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>315</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>338</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>224</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><ol><li>*CRCs were created as part of Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) in June 2014. Therefore data provided for NPS for 2014 include cases managed by former Probation Trusts prior to TR.</li><li>The NPS and CRCs are required to complete automatic reviews on any eligible offender who has been charged with (including attempted or conspiracy to commit offences): murder manslaughter, other specified offences causing death, rape or assault by penetration, or a sexual offence against a child under 13 years of age.</li><li>Conditional reviews are completed when an offender has been assessed as high risk of harm during the current sentence (NPS only) or where no risk assessment has been completed.</li><li>Not all SFO notifications result in the completion of a reviews as charges can be reduced or dropped. Not every offender charged with a SFO is convicted.</li><li>The data represents SFO charges and not a unique count of offenders.</li><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</li></ol>
star this property answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-10-31T17:45:16.63Zmore like thismore than 2019-10-31T17:45:16.63Z
star this property answering member
4517
star this property label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property tabling member
4521
unstar this property label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
1166860
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-10-28more like thismore than 2019-10-28
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Offenders: Rehabilitation remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to his Department's strategy entitled, Transforming Rehabilitation, what key success indicators his Department plans to include in its programmes to reduce reoffending. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Leeds East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
star this property uin 6455 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-11-04more like thismore than 2019-11-04
star this property answer text <p>Performance indicators will give providers the incentives to ensure quality delivery which secures rehabilitative outcomes whilst delivering the sentence of the court and protecting the public.</p><p> </p><p>There will be performance indicators to assess whether accredited programmes and other interventions have been delivered to service users referred to them by offender managers. There will also be quality indicators on whether accredited programmes and other interventions are of sufficient quality to enable individuals to complete the intervention and address problems related to their offending.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-11-04T16:22:35.957Zmore like thismore than 2019-11-04T16:22:35.957Z
star this property answering member
4517
star this property label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
1166861
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-10-28more like thismore than 2019-10-28
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Offenders: Rehabilitation remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether his Department plans to include targeted programmes for offenders that are dependent on (a) drugs, (b) alcohol and (c) gambling as a commissioning requirement under the proposed new probation system. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Leeds East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
star this property uin 6456 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-11-04more like thismore than 2019-11-04
star this property answer text <p>The Probation Reform Programme seeks to support the protocol agreed between the Ministry of Justice, Department of Health and Social Care, NHS England and Public Health England to promote the use of Mental Health Treatment, Alcohol Treatment and Drug Rehabilitation requirements as the intervention of choice for eligible offenders.</p><p> </p><p>We also intend to procure additional rehabilitative interventions that support offenders on release from custody and under community supervision to access treatment and stay safe while awaiting treatment and/or access to specialist services which address both substance misuse and gambling.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-11-04T16:38:51.44Zmore like thismore than 2019-11-04T16:38:51.44Z
star this property answering member
4517
star this property label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
1166863
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-10-28more like thismore than 2019-10-28
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Offenders: Rehabilitation remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will publish the criteria used by Her Majesty's Prisons and Probation Service expert panel to assess accredited rehabilitation programmes. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Leeds East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
star this property uin 6457 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-11-04more like thismore than 2019-11-04
star this property answer text <p>The criteria used by the Correctional Services Accreditation and Advice Panel (CSAAP) to accredit programmes for Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) are being updated and prepared for publication.</p><p> </p><p>There are 18 HMPPS accredited programmes, of which:</p><ul><li>Two programmes have published impact studies which set out the programme’s impact on proven reoffending.</li><li>A further four programmes have published short-term outcomes studies which assess the programme’s effect on variables that are expected to change (such as treatment targets like problem solving) to then assess impact (reduced likelihood of reconviction).</li><li>In addition, seven programmes have not been in operation long enough to generate sufficient data for a reoffending impact analysis, and three have small or specialist samples that make constructing a suitable comparison group for a robust evaluation challenging at this time.</li></ul><ul><li>Impact studies to assess reoffending are currently being scoped or are underway for four HMPPS programmes. Short-term outcome studies are underway for two other programmes.</li></ul><p> </p><p>While several evaluations have been published for accredited offending behaviour programmes, are being scoped, or are underway, not all courses have had an impact evaluation. There are several reasons for this:</p><ul><li>Some are relatively new and insufficient time has passed to observe outcomes – especially for programmes that target individuals likely to be on long sentences. It can take many years (sometimes upwards of eight years) to generate the data needed to evaluate proven reoffending.</li><li>Some programmes are delivered to a low volume of participants or are targeted at specific cohorts, which makes it difficult to construct a suitable comparison group for a robust impact evaluation to assess reoffending.</li><li>The Department has delivered other types of evaluations such as process studies or short-term outcome studies (for example, effects on institutional behaviour) to assess the implementation and delivery of the programmes. This is particularly valuable for new programmes, where we want to learn about how they are being received (as per Cabinet Office guidance on evaluation).</li></ul>
star this property answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
unstar this property grouped question UIN 6458 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-11-04T15:50:09.397Zmore like thismore than 2019-11-04T15:50:09.397Z
star this property answering member
4517
star this property label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
1166864
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-10-28more like thismore than 2019-10-28
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Offenders: Rehabilitation remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what proportion of HMPPS accredited programmes have had impact evaluations. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Leeds East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
star this property uin 6458 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-11-04more like thismore than 2019-11-04
star this property answer text <p>The criteria used by the Correctional Services Accreditation and Advice Panel (CSAAP) to accredit programmes for Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) are being updated and prepared for publication.</p><p> </p><p>There are 18 HMPPS accredited programmes, of which:</p><ul><li>Two programmes have published impact studies which set out the programme’s impact on proven reoffending.</li><li>A further four programmes have published short-term outcomes studies which assess the programme’s effect on variables that are expected to change (such as treatment targets like problem solving) to then assess impact (reduced likelihood of reconviction).</li><li>In addition, seven programmes have not been in operation long enough to generate sufficient data for a reoffending impact analysis, and three have small or specialist samples that make constructing a suitable comparison group for a robust evaluation challenging at this time.</li></ul><ul><li>Impact studies to assess reoffending are currently being scoped or are underway for four HMPPS programmes. Short-term outcome studies are underway for two other programmes.</li></ul><p> </p><p>While several evaluations have been published for accredited offending behaviour programmes, are being scoped, or are underway, not all courses have had an impact evaluation. There are several reasons for this:</p><ul><li>Some are relatively new and insufficient time has passed to observe outcomes – especially for programmes that target individuals likely to be on long sentences. It can take many years (sometimes upwards of eight years) to generate the data needed to evaluate proven reoffending.</li><li>Some programmes are delivered to a low volume of participants or are targeted at specific cohorts, which makes it difficult to construct a suitable comparison group for a robust impact evaluation to assess reoffending.</li><li>The Department has delivered other types of evaluations such as process studies or short-term outcome studies (for example, effects on institutional behaviour) to assess the implementation and delivery of the programmes. This is particularly valuable for new programmes, where we want to learn about how they are being received (as per Cabinet Office guidance on evaluation).</li></ul>
star this property answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
unstar this property grouped question UIN 6457 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-11-04T15:50:09.45Zmore like thismore than 2019-11-04T15:50:09.45Z
star this property answering member
4517
star this property label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
1181967
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2020-03-02more like thismore than 2020-03-02
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Offenders: Rehabilitation remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 31 October 2019 to Question 6477 on Offenders: Rehabilitation, if he will update the information provided in that table with 2019 data. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts more like this
star this property uin 23575 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2020-03-05more like thismore than 2020-03-05
star this property answer text <p>Serious Further Offences (SFOs) are rare. Less than 0.5% of offenders under statutory supervision are convicted of an SFO; for murder, the proportion will be lower. Nonetheless, every single SFO is taken extremely seriously, and in all cases a review is carried out to identify any necessary actions which need to be taken to improve the management of other cases. As a proportion of the offenders managed by the NPS and CRCs respectively, there is no evidence of a difference between the National Probation Service (NPS) and the Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) when it comes to offenders committing murder.</p><p> </p><p>SFO reviews are initiated where the NPS or a CRC <em>notifies</em> HM Prison and Probation Service that an offender under supervision has been charged with an SFO. The number of SFO <em>notifications</em> is not equivalent to the number of SFO convictions in any year. About half of all SFO notifications do not result in SFO convictions. In other cases, after initial notification charges will be dropped or an offender acquitted or an offender convicted of a lesser offence.</p><p> </p><p>Table 1 below shows the number of SFO <em>notifications</em> – that is, cases of an offender under probation supervision <em>charged</em> with an SFO - received between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2019, by SFO offence, where the offender was supervised by (a) the National Probation Service (NPS) and (b) Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRC).</p><p> </p><p>Table 1<strong>.</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2014*</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2019</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>SFO Offence</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Arson with intent to endanger life</em></p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Assault by penetration</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Attempt or conspiracy to commit murder</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>51</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>51</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Aggravated Burglary</em></p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Causing death by dangerous/careless driving/aggravated vehicle taking</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>False imprisonment</em></p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Firearms offences including possession with intent</em></p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Kidnapping</em></p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Manslaughter</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Murder</p></td><td><p>56</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>49</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>78</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>90</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Offences under the Explosive Substances Act</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other qualifying sexual offences</em></p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other serious violent offence</em></p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Female genital mutilation</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other specified offence causing death</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rape</p></td><td><p>129</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>112</p></td><td><p>105</p></td><td><p>118</p></td><td><p>127</p></td><td><p>111</p></td><td><p>131</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>41</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Robbery with firearm</em></p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Under 13 sexual offences including rape</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>391</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>90</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>310</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>238</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>350</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>274</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>425</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>315</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>338</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>224</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>329</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>215</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Notes for Table 1:</p><ol><li>*CRCs were created as part of Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) in June 2014. Therefore, data provided for NPS for 2014 include cases managed by former Probation Trusts prior to TR.</li><li>The NPS and CRCs are required to complete automatic reviews on any eligible offender who has been charged with (including attempted or conspiracy to commit offences): murder manslaughter, other specified offences causing death, rape or assault by penetration, or a sexual offence against a child under 13 years of age.</li><li>Conditional reviews are completed when an offender has been assessed as high risk of harm during the current sentence (NPS only) or where no risk assessment has been completed.</li><li>The data represents SFO charges and not a unique count of offenders.</li><li>Not all notifications result in the completion of a review as charges are reduced or dropped. Not every offender charged with a SFO is convicted.</li><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</li></ol><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Similarly, the number of SFO reviews completed is not equivalent to the number of SFO convictions in any year.</p><p> </p><p>The Honourable Member may be referring to the Freedom of Information Act response 200121016 on 11 February 2020. However, that response did <em>not</em> show the number of people murdered by offenders under supervision. Rather, it showed the number of SFO reviews completed in each calendar year for 2014 to 2019, where the offender had been <em>charged with</em> murder.</p><p> </p><p>Table 2 shows the total number of SFO reviews completed in 2014 as a whole, the number of reviews completed for those who were charged with murder, and the number of subsequent convictions for murder. Tables 3 and 4 below show the number of offenders being supervised by the NPS and CRC respectively who were charged with murder, where a review was completed in the years 2015, 2016, 2017, and the offender subsequently <em>convicted of murder. W</em>e have provided the number of SFO reviews in 2014 as a separate table (Table 2), as Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) created CRCs mid-year and prior to this, Probation Trusts managed the cases.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 2</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>404</p></td><td><p>71</p></td><td><p>49</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Table 3</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All NPS Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p>291</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p>281</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p>362</p></td><td><p>47</p></td><td><p>28</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Table 4</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All CRC Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p>202</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>24</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p>235</p></td><td><p>47</p></td><td><p>26</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p>273</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>39</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Notes for Tables 2, 3,4</p><ol><li>Conviction data are as at 27 January 2020</li><li>Not all SFO notifications result in the completion of a review as charges can be reduced or dropped. Not every offender charged with a SFO is convicted.</li><li>The data represent SFO reviews conducted following charge and not a unique count of offenders.</li><li>We have not included the three month data relating to 1 January-31 March 2018.</li><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</li></ol><p>In October, the Ministry of Justice will publish annual reconviction data, including murder for 2018/19, with an accompanying narrative which also explains the correct interpretation of the figures. The current publication can be found at: <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843382/Serious_Further_Offences_-Bulletin.pdf" target="_blank">https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843382/Serious_Further_Offences_-Bulletin.pdf</a></p><p> </p><p>Tables 2, 3 and 4 provide the number of reviews completed in respect of offenders supervised by the NPS or CRCs who were charged with and subsequently convicted of murder between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017. We have not provided data specific to individual CRCs as the total figure in some cases amounts to five people or fewer. We consider that we would be in breach of our obligations under the General Data Protection Regulation and / or the Data Protection Act 2018 if we release information that would risk identification of the individuals concerned.</p>
star this property answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
23576 more like this
23577 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-03-05T16:52:31.377Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-05T16:52:31.377Z
star this property answering member
4517
star this property label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property tabling member
4521
unstar this property label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
1216292
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2020-06-22more like thismore than 2020-06-22
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Offenders: Rehabilitation remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will take steps to ensure (a) the adequacy of resources allocated to rehabilitative courses and (b) that there is a sufficient number of tutors to deliver those courses throughout the prison estate in a timely manner. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency St Albans more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Daisy Cooper more like this
star this property uin 62644 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2020-06-29more like thismore than 2020-06-29
star this property answer text <p>Rehabilitation courses can mean a variety of activities, including Accredited offending behaviour programmes (OBPs) which are designed to change an individual’s attitudes, thinking and behaviour for those who meet the specific criteria for access. Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) reviews the OBPs and other activity provided across the estate on an annual basis and seeks to ensure courses meet the needs of the population. The level of investment has been maintained and each course has an agreed pool of facilitators depending on the type and volume of programmes to be run, for which the necessary funding is provided.</p><p>Due to COVID-19, a restricted regime has been in place in prisons in order to ensure the safety of both staff and prisoners. It has therefore not been possible to continue with many accredited programmes and other rehabilitative courses. However, we are now in a place where we are looking to restart programmes in a way that will ensure the health and safety of staff and offenders.</p>
star this property answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-06-29T16:20:44.817Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-29T16:20:44.817Z
star this property answering member
4517
star this property label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property tabling member
4769
unstar this property label Biography information for Daisy Cooper more like this
1285246
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2021-02-09more like thismore than 2021-02-09
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Offenders: Rehabilitation remove filter
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to statistics on alcohol and drug treatment in secure settings 2019 to 2020, published on 28 January 2021, if he will make an assessment of the effect on reoffending levels of the finding that 65.5% of adults with a substance misuse treatment need do not successfully engage in community-based structured treatment following release from prison. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency West Ham more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Ms Lyn Brown more like this
star this property uin 151649 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2021-02-17more like thismore than 2021-02-17
star this property answer text <p>The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and Her Majesty's Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) are committed to meeting the health needs of offenders in custody and the community, including those with substance misuse issues. NHS England and NHSE Improvement (NHSE/I) are responsible for commissioning healthcare services in all prisons in England, this includes integrated substance misuse services. Local authorities are responsible for commissioning treatment services in the community.</p><p> </p><p>Although there is not a simple linear relationship between the 12-month rate of reoffending among prison leavers in England &amp; Wales, and the proportion of adults with a drug or alcohol dependency who do not engage with treatment programmes following their release from prison, we do recognise that engagement in substance misuse treatment can reduce the likelihood of reoffending.</p><p> </p><p>In 2017, a joint MoJ and PHE study[1] found that, over a two-year period following the start of treatment, only 34% of all offenders misusing alcohol, opiates and/or non-opiates who <em>dropped out</em> of treatment did not reoffend, whereas 53% of substance misusing offenders who <em>successfully completed</em> treatment did not reoffend.</p><p> </p><p>That is why the government has awarded an additional £80 million to the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) to fund drug treatment in 2021/22, as part of a £148 million overall funding package for reducing crime. This is the biggest increase in drug treatment funding for 15 years. The £80 million will be used to enhance drug treatment and the numbers of treatment places available, reduce reoffending and tackle the rise in drug-related deaths. Importantly, most of this funding will support delivery of additional services to reduce drug-related crime including treatment places for delivering Community Sentence Treatment Requirements (CSTRs), continuity of care for prison leavers and interventions to reduce drug related deaths. The funding will also include extending the NHS England RECONNECT service, a care after custody service for prison leavers with vulnerabilities, who would otherwise struggle to engage with community health services.</p><p> </p><p>Officials across MoJ and HMPPS will continue to work with DHSC and health partners, including on the development of the additional £80m allocation, to ensure substance misuse services meet the needs of the offender cohort, address significant health inequalities in this patient cohort and reduce crime across communities.</p><p>[1] Ministry of Justice, Public health England (2017). Table 4, page 18, “The Effect of Drug and Alcohol Treatment on re-offending”: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-effect-of-drug-and-alcohol-treatment-on-re-offending" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-effect-of-drug-and-alcohol-treatment-on-re-offending</a></p>
star this property answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2021-02-17T11:10:11.64Zmore like thismore than 2021-02-17T11:10:11.64Z
star this property answering member
4517
star this property label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property tabling member
1583
unstar this property label Biography information for Ms Lyn Brown more like this