Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1186560
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2020-03-19more like thismore than 2020-03-19
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Cemeteries more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what economic assessment he has made of the effect of transferring closed burial grounds from the Church of England to local authorities. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Newcastle-under-Lyme more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Aaron Bell more like this
star this property uin 32213 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2020-03-27more like thismore than 2020-03-27
unstar this property answer text <p>Historically, the Church of England has made burial provision for local communities, and continues to do so. The transfer of responsibility for closed churchyards to local authorities returns the accountability for their maintenance to the community as a whole. Local authority spending priorities are a matter for local discretion.</p><p>Data on the transfer of responsibility for closed churchyards to local authorities is not held centrally.</p><p>The Law Commission’s current Programme of Law Reform includes a project to consider streamlining and modernising the law governing the disposal of human remains, with a view to putting forward a legal framework for the future.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Cheltenham more like this
star this property answering member printed Alex Chalk more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
32214 more like this
32215 more like this
32216 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-03-27T10:07:22.733Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-27T10:07:22.733Z
star this property answering member
4481
star this property label Biography information for Alex Chalk more like this
star this property tabling member
4837
unstar this property label Biography information for Aaron Bell more like this
1186561
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2020-03-19more like thismore than 2020-03-19
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Cemeteries more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what funding is available for local authorities to maintain burial grounds. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Newcastle-under-Lyme more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Aaron Bell more like this
star this property uin 32214 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2020-03-27more like thismore than 2020-03-27
unstar this property answer text <p>Historically, the Church of England has made burial provision for local communities, and continues to do so. The transfer of responsibility for closed churchyards to local authorities returns the accountability for their maintenance to the community as a whole. Local authority spending priorities are a matter for local discretion.</p><p>Data on the transfer of responsibility for closed churchyards to local authorities is not held centrally.</p><p>The Law Commission’s current Programme of Law Reform includes a project to consider streamlining and modernising the law governing the disposal of human remains, with a view to putting forward a legal framework for the future.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Cheltenham more like this
star this property answering member printed Alex Chalk more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
32213 more like this
32215 more like this
32216 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-03-27T10:07:22.797Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-27T10:07:22.797Z
star this property answering member
4481
star this property label Biography information for Alex Chalk more like this
star this property tabling member
4837
unstar this property label Biography information for Aaron Bell more like this
1186562
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2020-03-19more like thismore than 2020-03-19
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Churches: Staffordshire more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many closed churchyards have been transferred from the Church of England to local authorities in Staffordshire since 2010. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Newcastle-under-Lyme more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Aaron Bell more like this
star this property uin 32215 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2020-03-27more like thismore than 2020-03-27
unstar this property answer text <p>Historically, the Church of England has made burial provision for local communities, and continues to do so. The transfer of responsibility for closed churchyards to local authorities returns the accountability for their maintenance to the community as a whole. Local authority spending priorities are a matter for local discretion.</p><p>Data on the transfer of responsibility for closed churchyards to local authorities is not held centrally.</p><p>The Law Commission’s current Programme of Law Reform includes a project to consider streamlining and modernising the law governing the disposal of human remains, with a view to putting forward a legal framework for the future.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Cheltenham more like this
star this property answering member printed Alex Chalk more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
32213 more like this
32214 more like this
32216 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-03-27T10:07:22.86Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-27T10:07:22.86Z
star this property answering member
4481
star this property label Biography information for Alex Chalk more like this
star this property tabling member
4837
unstar this property label Biography information for Aaron Bell more like this
1186563
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2020-03-19more like thismore than 2020-03-19
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Burial Act 1853 more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will make an assessment of the adequacy of the Burial Act 1854 and the financial effect of its provision on local authorities. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Newcastle-under-Lyme more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Aaron Bell more like this
star this property uin 32216 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2020-03-27more like thismore than 2020-03-27
unstar this property answer text <p>Historically, the Church of England has made burial provision for local communities, and continues to do so. The transfer of responsibility for closed churchyards to local authorities returns the accountability for their maintenance to the community as a whole. Local authority spending priorities are a matter for local discretion.</p><p>Data on the transfer of responsibility for closed churchyards to local authorities is not held centrally.</p><p>The Law Commission’s current Programme of Law Reform includes a project to consider streamlining and modernising the law governing the disposal of human remains, with a view to putting forward a legal framework for the future.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Cheltenham more like this
star this property answering member printed Alex Chalk more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
32213 more like this
32214 more like this
32215 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2020-03-27T10:07:22.907Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-27T10:07:22.907Z
star this property answering member
4481
star this property label Biography information for Alex Chalk more like this
star this property tabling member
4837
unstar this property label Biography information for Aaron Bell more like this
1537361
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2022-10-31more like thismore than 2022-10-31
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Non-molestation Orders more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will make an assessment with Cabinet colleagues of the potential merits of increasing the period of time for which non-molestation orders can be issued. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Newcastle-under-Lyme more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Aaron Bell more like this
star this property uin 74983 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2022-11-07more like thismore than 2022-11-07
unstar this property answer text <p>Non-molestation orders are civil orders made by the family court to protect victims and their children from the harms of domestic abuse and there is no time limit on the duration of an order.</p><p>Non-molestation orders can be made for a specified time or until a further order is made. As non-molestation orders have no statutory minimum or maximum time limit, the duration of each order is at the discretion of the court. The duration of each order will be determined by a number of factors, including, the risks of further domestic abuse, whether the order was made on notice or without notice to the respondent, and whether there has been a follow-up hearing (known as a return hearing).</p><p>In practice, these orders are often made for a period of 6-12 months, during which time the order can be varied (including to extend it) or discharged.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Charnwood more like this
star this property answering member printed Edward Argar more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2022-11-07T12:49:26.243Zmore like thismore than 2022-11-07T12:49:26.243Z
star this property answering member
4362
star this property label Biography information for Edward Argar more like this
star this property tabling member
4837
unstar this property label Biography information for Aaron Bell more like this
1316296
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2021-05-19more like thismore than 2021-05-19
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Prisoners: Erith and Thamesmead more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people are serving (a) prison sentences and (b) Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences in prisons in Erith and Thamesmead constituency; how many of those people serving IPP sentences are (i) post-tariff, (ii) have been recalled to custody and (iii) have been recalled to custody for non-compliance as opposed to further offending. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Erith and Thamesmead more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Abena Oppong-Asare more like this
star this property uin 4065 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2021-05-28more like thismore than 2021-05-28
unstar this property answer text <p>For prisons in Erith and Thamesmead constituency (HM Prisons Isis, Belmarsh and Thameside), as at 31 March 2021:</p><p>(a) 1,347 people were serving prison sentences;</p><p>(b) 28 of these were serving Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences, of which:</p><p>(i) 28 were post-tariff;</p><p>(ii) 22 of which had been recalled; and</p><p>(iii) 8 of the recalled prisoners were recalled solely for reasons other than further offending.</p><p> </p><p>There is often more than one reason for recalling an offender, specifically in relation to recalls taking place on the basis of non-compliance. For the purpose of this answer, all reasons for recall other than further offending have been amalgamated to provide the answer for (b)(iii). The figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p><p> </p><p>The power to recall is a vital public protection measure. Offenders on licence in the community will be recalled to custody where they breach their licence conditions in such a way as to indicate that their risk has increased to the level where it may no longer be managed effectively in the community.</p><p> </p><p>Our primary responsibility is to protect the public; however, HMPPS remains committed to safely reducing the number of prisoners serving IPP sentences in custody.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Cheltenham more like this
star this property answering member printed Alex Chalk more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2021-05-28T13:35:35.47Zmore like thismore than 2021-05-28T13:35:35.47Z
star this property answering member
4481
star this property label Biography information for Alex Chalk more like this
star this property tabling member
4820
unstar this property label Biography information for Abena Oppong-Asare more like this
1420676
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2022-02-08more like thismore than 2022-02-08
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Administration of Justice: Crimes of Violence more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps his Department is taking to ensure justice sector staff are protected from abuse and assaults at work. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Erith and Thamesmead more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Abena Oppong-Asare more like this
star this property uin 905520 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2022-02-08more like thismore than 2022-02-08
unstar this property answer text <p>The Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018 doubled the maximum penalty for those who assault emergency workers, including prison officers and custody officers, from 6 to 12 months’ imprisonment for common assault or battery, with higher maximum penalties for serious offences.</p><p>Through the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, we are again doubling the maximum penalty for the assault of an emergency worker, from 12 months’ to two years’ imprisonment.</p><p>The bill will also create a new statutory aggravating factor for offences committed against those staff providing a public service, performing a public duty or providing a service to the public.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency South Suffolk more like this
star this property answering member printed James Cartlidge more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2022-02-08T17:22:17.593Zmore like thismore than 2022-02-08T17:22:17.593Z
star this property answering member
4519
star this property label Biography information for James Cartlidge more like this
star this property tabling member
4820
unstar this property label Biography information for Abena Oppong-Asare more like this
1484362
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2022-06-28more like thismore than 2022-06-28
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Legal Aid Scheme: Fees and Charges more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of the proposed 15 per cent increase in legal aid fees in the context of how remuneration from those fees for junior barristers compares with minimum wage. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Erith and Thamesmead more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Abena Oppong-Asare more like this
star this property uin 26887 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2022-07-14more like thismore than 2022-07-14
unstar this property answer text <p>We are introducing a 15% uplift across most fee schemes in line with the recommendations made in the Criminal Legal Aid Independent Review. This, alongside longer-term reforms, will increase spend by £135m a year – alongside our investment in court recovery this would take expected criminal legal aid spend to £1.2 billion per year. We have given careful consideration to the idea of increasing fees on current cases but there are a number of reasons why our current approach is the fastest process possible.</p><p>The median figure after expenses for specialist criminal barristers in the first three years is around £19,000 with the figure increasing significantly after the first year. Thus, the median income after expenses for barristers with 2 years of practice is around £32,000. Between 3 to 7 years of practice, their median income after expenses is around £50,000. The figures above are based on the evidence published by Independent Review into Criminal Legal Aid. It should be noted that this, in its turn, was based on a common dataset shared by the MoJ and Bar Council, constructed following a data share agreement between the MoJ (Legal Aid Agency), Bar Council and Crown Prosecution Service. It has not been possible to compare our estimates on barristers’ annual income after expenses with the minimum wage per hour as we do not hold information on the number of weeks and hours per week that barristers work.</p><p>The 15% pay increase would mean a typical criminal barrister earning around £7,000 extra per year. We are moving as quickly as possible to introduce fee rises by the end of September. Solicitors and barristers will start to receive increased fees this year and our modelling suggests that over two thirds of the additional funding will have entered the system within the first year.</p><p>Criminal barristers play a crucial role in upholding the rule of law and are a fundamental part of our criminal justice system. Our plans to increase legal aid fees will put criminal legal aid on a sustainable footing and ensure there is a sustainable supply of practitioners.</p><p>The Government is committed to supporting recovery across the court system. Over the next three financial years, we are investing an extra £477 million for the Criminal Justice System to help improve waiting times for victims of crime and reduce the Crown Court backlog to an estimated 53,000 cases by March 2025.</p><p>The outstanding caseload in the Crown Court has reduced from around 60,600 cases in June 2021 to around 58,300 cases at the end of April 2022.</p><p>We have removed the limit of sitting days in the Crown Court for the second year in a row, extended 30 Nightingale courtrooms and raised the mandatory judicial retirement age from 70 to 75. We have also opened two new ‘super courtrooms’ in Manchester and Loughborough, allowing up to an extra 250 cases a year to be heard across England and Wales.</p><p>We are also expanding our plans for judicial recruitment to secure enough judicial capacity to sit at the required levels in 2022/2023 and beyond.</p><p>By the end of March 2023, we expect to get through 20% more Crown Court cases than we did pre-Covid (117,000 in 2022/23 compared to 97,000 in 2019/20).</p>
star this property answering member constituency Derbyshire Dales more like this
star this property answering member printed Miss Sarah Dines more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
26888 more like this
26889 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2022-07-14T16:51:18.937Zmore like thismore than 2022-07-14T16:51:18.937Z
star this property answering member
4816
star this property label Biography information for Miss Sarah Dines more like this
star this property tabling member
4820
unstar this property label Biography information for Abena Oppong-Asare more like this
1484363
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2022-06-28more like thismore than 2022-06-28
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Barristers and Courts more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps he plans to take to (a) improve the retention of criminal barristers and (b) reduce court backlogs. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Erith and Thamesmead more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Abena Oppong-Asare more like this
star this property uin 26888 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2022-07-14more like thismore than 2022-07-14
unstar this property answer text <p>We are introducing a 15% uplift across most fee schemes in line with the recommendations made in the Criminal Legal Aid Independent Review. This, alongside longer-term reforms, will increase spend by £135m a year – alongside our investment in court recovery this would take expected criminal legal aid spend to £1.2 billion per year. We have given careful consideration to the idea of increasing fees on current cases but there are a number of reasons why our current approach is the fastest process possible.</p><p>The median figure after expenses for specialist criminal barristers in the first three years is around £19,000 with the figure increasing significantly after the first year. Thus, the median income after expenses for barristers with 2 years of practice is around £32,000. Between 3 to 7 years of practice, their median income after expenses is around £50,000. The figures above are based on the evidence published by Independent Review into Criminal Legal Aid. It should be noted that this, in its turn, was based on a common dataset shared by the MoJ and Bar Council, constructed following a data share agreement between the MoJ (Legal Aid Agency), Bar Council and Crown Prosecution Service. It has not been possible to compare our estimates on barristers’ annual income after expenses with the minimum wage per hour as we do not hold information on the number of weeks and hours per week that barristers work.</p><p>The 15% pay increase would mean a typical criminal barrister earning around £7,000 extra per year. We are moving as quickly as possible to introduce fee rises by the end of September. Solicitors and barristers will start to receive increased fees this year and our modelling suggests that over two thirds of the additional funding will have entered the system within the first year.</p><p>Criminal barristers play a crucial role in upholding the rule of law and are a fundamental part of our criminal justice system. Our plans to increase legal aid fees will put criminal legal aid on a sustainable footing and ensure there is a sustainable supply of practitioners.</p><p>The Government is committed to supporting recovery across the court system. Over the next three financial years, we are investing an extra £477 million for the Criminal Justice System to help improve waiting times for victims of crime and reduce the Crown Court backlog to an estimated 53,000 cases by March 2025.</p><p>The outstanding caseload in the Crown Court has reduced from around 60,600 cases in June 2021 to around 58,300 cases at the end of April 2022.</p><p>We have removed the limit of sitting days in the Crown Court for the second year in a row, extended 30 Nightingale courtrooms and raised the mandatory judicial retirement age from 70 to 75. We have also opened two new ‘super courtrooms’ in Manchester and Loughborough, allowing up to an extra 250 cases a year to be heard across England and Wales.</p><p>We are also expanding our plans for judicial recruitment to secure enough judicial capacity to sit at the required levels in 2022/2023 and beyond.</p><p>By the end of March 2023, we expect to get through 20% more Crown Court cases than we did pre-Covid (117,000 in 2022/23 compared to 97,000 in 2019/20).</p>
star this property answering member constituency Derbyshire Dales more like this
star this property answering member printed Miss Sarah Dines more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
26887 more like this
26889 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2022-07-14T16:51:18.987Zmore like thismore than 2022-07-14T16:51:18.987Z
star this property answering member
4816
star this property label Biography information for Miss Sarah Dines more like this
star this property tabling member
4820
unstar this property label Biography information for Abena Oppong-Asare more like this
1484364
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2022-06-28more like thismore than 2022-06-28
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Legal Aid Scheme: Fees and Charges more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will make an assessment of the potential merits of extending the proposed 15 per cent increase in legal aid fees to the approximately 58,000 cases that are currently backlogged in the Crown courts. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Erith and Thamesmead more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Abena Oppong-Asare more like this
star this property uin 26889 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2022-07-14more like thismore than 2022-07-14
unstar this property answer text <p>We are introducing a 15% uplift across most fee schemes in line with the recommendations made in the Criminal Legal Aid Independent Review. This, alongside longer-term reforms, will increase spend by £135m a year – alongside our investment in court recovery this would take expected criminal legal aid spend to £1.2 billion per year. We have given careful consideration to the idea of increasing fees on current cases but there are a number of reasons why our current approach is the fastest process possible.</p><p>The median figure after expenses for specialist criminal barristers in the first three years is around £19,000 with the figure increasing significantly after the first year. Thus, the median income after expenses for barristers with 2 years of practice is around £32,000. Between 3 to 7 years of practice, their median income after expenses is around £50,000. The figures above are based on the evidence published by Independent Review into Criminal Legal Aid. It should be noted that this, in its turn, was based on a common dataset shared by the MoJ and Bar Council, constructed following a data share agreement between the MoJ (Legal Aid Agency), Bar Council and Crown Prosecution Service. It has not been possible to compare our estimates on barristers’ annual income after expenses with the minimum wage per hour as we do not hold information on the number of weeks and hours per week that barristers work.</p><p>The 15% pay increase would mean a typical criminal barrister earning around £7,000 extra per year. We are moving as quickly as possible to introduce fee rises by the end of September. Solicitors and barristers will start to receive increased fees this year and our modelling suggests that over two thirds of the additional funding will have entered the system within the first year.</p><p>Criminal barristers play a crucial role in upholding the rule of law and are a fundamental part of our criminal justice system. Our plans to increase legal aid fees will put criminal legal aid on a sustainable footing and ensure there is a sustainable supply of practitioners.</p><p>The Government is committed to supporting recovery across the court system. Over the next three financial years, we are investing an extra £477 million for the Criminal Justice System to help improve waiting times for victims of crime and reduce the Crown Court backlog to an estimated 53,000 cases by March 2025.</p><p>The outstanding caseload in the Crown Court has reduced from around 60,600 cases in June 2021 to around 58,300 cases at the end of April 2022.</p><p>We have removed the limit of sitting days in the Crown Court for the second year in a row, extended 30 Nightingale courtrooms and raised the mandatory judicial retirement age from 70 to 75. We have also opened two new ‘super courtrooms’ in Manchester and Loughborough, allowing up to an extra 250 cases a year to be heard across England and Wales.</p><p>We are also expanding our plans for judicial recruitment to secure enough judicial capacity to sit at the required levels in 2022/2023 and beyond.</p><p>By the end of March 2023, we expect to get through 20% more Crown Court cases than we did pre-Covid (117,000 in 2022/23 compared to 97,000 in 2019/20).</p>
star this property answering member constituency Derbyshire Dales more like this
star this property answering member printed Miss Sarah Dines more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
26887 more like this
26888 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2022-07-14T16:51:19.033Zmore like thismore than 2022-07-14T16:51:19.033Z
star this property answering member
4816
star this property label Biography information for Miss Sarah Dines more like this
star this property tabling member
4820
unstar this property label Biography information for Abena Oppong-Asare more like this