Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1149864
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-10-16more like thismore than 2019-10-16
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
unstar this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Ministry of Justice: Energy Supply more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to the Answer of 2 October 2019 to Question 291004 and to the Answer of 1 October 2019 to Question 290324, if he will introduce the same policy as the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy and switch to an electricity provider that supplies electricity solely from renewable resources within the next 12 months; and for what reason his Department has not already ensured its electricity is supplied solely from renewable resources. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Scunthorpe more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Nic Dakin more like this
star this property uin 1004 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-10-21more like thismore than 2019-10-21
star this property answer text <p>Government departments are mandated to use Crown Commercial Services (CCS) Energy frameworks for the supply of electricity. EDF is the current supplier and the current arrangement lasts until March 2022.</p><p> </p><p>We are exploring with CCS how to increase the percentage of energy sourced from renewables. This includes the feasibility of changing the current percentage mix, the costs of securing matched renewable energy through obtaining Renewable Energy Guarantees of Origination (REGOs), and the timescales for doing so.</p><p> </p><p>To date the Department has prioritised energy efficiency and spend to save investment on its estate. But as part of the MoJ’s commitment to achieve net zero by 2050 or sooner, the Department is exploring options for increased on-site renewable energy generation, and low and no carbon energy supply.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Croydon South more like this
star this property answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-10-21T14:46:13.92Zmore like thismore than 2019-10-21T14:46:13.92Z
star this property answering member
4503
unstar this property label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
star this property tabling member
4056
unstar this property label Biography information for Nic Dakin more like this
1149966
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-10-16more like thismore than 2019-10-16
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
unstar this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Suspended Sentences: Electronic Tagging more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people serving suspended sentences were made subject to an electronic monitoring condition, broken down by offence; and on how many occasions was that condition breached in each of the last five years. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Kettering more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Philip Hollobone more like this
star this property uin 942 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-10-21more like thismore than 2019-10-21
star this property answer text <p>Electronic Monitoring (EM), both of curfews and using satellite enabled tags to monitor an individual’s whereabouts, is a vital tool in protecting the public and robustly monitoring offenders in the community. It supports probation staff and the police in managing offenders and defendants safely in the community, delivering the orders of the court and helping to tackle the problems which lead to offending.</p><p>The below table shows the number of suspended sentence orders with an EM requirement by offence type. Data is only available from 2016.</p><p>Summary motoringÈ</p><p>Violence against the personÈNon-compliance of ordersÈFailed Bail condition È</p><p>Failed Bail condition È</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Suspended sentence orders with an electronic monitoring requirement by offence type(1)</p></td><td><p>2016/17</p></td><td><p>2017/18</p></td><td><p>2018/19</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal damage and arson</p></td><td><p>241</p></td><td><p>172</p></td><td><p>117</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Drug offences</p></td><td><p>1021</p></td><td><p>906</p></td><td><p>764</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Fraud offences</p></td><td><p>461</p></td><td><p>389</p></td><td><p>284</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Miscellaneous crimes against society</p></td><td><p>1093</p></td><td><p>952</p></td><td><p>664</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Offence not recorded</p></td><td><p>83</p></td><td><p>46</p></td><td><p>23</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Possession of weapons</p></td><td><p>538</p></td><td><p>561</p></td><td><p>656</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Public order offences</p></td><td><p>312</p></td><td><p>295</p></td><td><p>259</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Robbery</p></td><td><p>546</p></td><td><p>579</p></td><td><p>470</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sexual offences</p></td><td><p>214</p></td><td><p>239</p></td><td><p>183</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Summary motoring</p></td><td><p>1141</p></td><td><p>1045</p></td><td><p>761</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Theft offences</p></td><td><p>1093</p></td><td><p>886</p></td><td><p>495</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Violence against the person</p></td><td><p>2030</p></td><td><p>1647</p></td><td><p>1312</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Non-compliance of orders</p></td><td><p>1064</p></td><td><p>896</p></td><td><p>701</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Failed Bail condition</p></td><td><p>140</p></td><td><p>114</p></td><td><p>61</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>9977</p></td><td><p>8727</p></td><td><p>6750</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>The below table shows the number of tagged subjects who failed to comply with their suspended sentence order electronic monitoring requirement at least once. Data on compliance is only available for completed suspended sentence orders.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>2016/17(3)</p></td><td><p>2017/18</p></td><td><p>2018/19</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total completed suspended sentence orders with an electronic monitoring requirement with equip install(2)(3)</p></td><td><p>7421</p></td><td><p>8193</p></td><td><p>6430</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Compliance</p></td><td><p>2585</p></td><td><p>3040</p></td><td><p>2666</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Non-compliance</p></td><td><p>4836</p></td><td><p>5153</p></td><td><p>3764</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2016/17(3) 2017/18 2018/19</p><p>Total completed suspended sentence orders with an electronic monitoring requirement with equip install(2)(3) 7421 8193 6430</p><p>Compliance 2585 3040 2666</p><p>Non-compliance 4836 5153 3764</p><p> </p><p>(1) Derived from electronic monitoring new starts files</p><p>(2) Derived from number of completions of orders with equipment on</p><p>(3) Electronic monitoring completions data only available from June 2016 onwards. A person may have more than one completion.</p><p> </p><p>Some orders are for multiple offences, in these cases orders have been assigned to first offence type recorded on the orders.</p><p>Note for reference: Failed bail conditions = not surrendering to bail, and non-compliance of orders = BREACH OF ACTION PLAN ORDER, Breach of Criminal Behaviour Order, Breach of Restraining order, Failure to attend supervision appointments, Failure to comply with Notification Requirements, FAILURE TO NOTIFY OF CHANGE OF CIRCUMSTANCES etc.</p><p>If a subject on tag does not comply with an Electronic Monitoring condition or requirement, for example by being absent during curfew hours or tampering with a tag, an instantaneous alert is generated that is sent to Electronic Monitoring Services (EMS). The appropriate authorities decide, based on the evidence, whether the non-compliance event constitutes a breach and if so what action should be taken. The nature of breaches vary, and not all non-compliance events are classed as formal breaches requiring further action – for example, if the subject was at hospital or in custody at the time, and therefore unable to return to their curfew location in time for their curfew. While the majority of non-compliance events will generate an alert than can lead to a breach there are a range of other circumstances that can lead to breach action being taken.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
star this property answering member constituency Croydon South more like this
star this property answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-10-21T16:11:12.997Zmore like thismore than 2019-10-21T16:11:12.997Z
star this property answering member
4503
unstar this property label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
star this property tabling member
1537
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr Philip Hollobone more like this
1149988
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-10-16more like thismore than 2019-10-16
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
unstar this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Offenders: Electronic Tagging more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to the Answer of 20 June 2019 to Question 267275 on Offenders: Electronic Tagging, how many events were classed as formal breaches requiring further action. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Kettering more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Philip Hollobone more like this
star this property uin 943 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-10-21more like thismore than 2019-10-21
star this property answer text <table><tbody><tr><td><p>Electronic monitoring, both of curfews and using satellite enabled tags to monitor an individual’s whereabouts, is a vital tool in protecting the public and robustly monitoring offenders in the community. It supports probation staff and the police in managing offenders and defendants safely in the community, delivering the orders of the court and helping to tackle the problems which lead to offending. Data that identifies the number of non-compliance events that lead to breach action is not held centrally and could only be identified at a disproportionate cost.</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-10-21T16:44:04.307Zmore like thismore than 2019-10-21T16:44:04.307Z
star this property answering member
4517
unstar this property label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property tabling member
1537
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr Philip Hollobone more like this
1149991
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-10-16more like thismore than 2019-10-16
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
unstar this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Reoffenders more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to the Answer of 03 October 2019 to Question 292174 on Re-offenders: Homicide, how many offenders under statutory supervision have been charged with serious further offences, broken down by offence, in each of the last five years. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Kettering more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Philip Hollobone more like this
star this property uin 944 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-10-21more like thismore than 2019-10-21
star this property answer text <p>The table below sets out the number of offenders under the statutory supervision of the NPS and CRCs who were charged with a serious further offence, broken down by offence in each of the last five years.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>SFO offence</p></td><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>2018</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Arson with intent to endanger life</em></p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>18</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Assault by penetration</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>37</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Attempt or conspiracy to commit murder</p></td><td><p>46</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>85</p></td><td><p>79</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Aggravated Burglary</em></p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>35</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Causing death by dangerous/careless driving/aggravated vehicle taking</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>16</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>False imprisonment</em></p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>17</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Firearms offences including possession with intent</em></p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>17</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Kidnapping</em></p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>28</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Manslaughter</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>13</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Murder</p></td><td><p>71</p></td><td><p>69</p></td><td><p>86</p></td><td><p>114</p></td><td><p>132</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Offences under the Explosive Substances Act</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other offences against the person</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other qualifying sexual offences</em></p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>21</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other serious violent offence</em></p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other specified offence causing death</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rape</p></td><td><p>172</p></td><td><p>217</p></td><td><p>245</p></td><td><p>242</p></td><td><p>130</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Robbery with firearm</em></p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>13</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Under 13 sexual offences including rape</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>23</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>481</p></td><td><p>548</p></td><td><p>624</p></td><td><p>740</p></td><td><p>562</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><ol><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording systems, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing</li><li>The NPS and CRCs are required to complete reviews on any eligible offender who has been charged with (including attempted or conspiracy to commit offences): murder manslaughter, other specified offences causing death, rape or assault by penetration, or a sexual offence against a child under 13 years of age.</li><li>Data provided for offences should in italics are “conditional” reviews completed by the NPS only when an offender has been assessed as high risk of harm during the current sentence.</li><li>Not all SFO notifications result in the completion of a reviews as charges can be reduced or dropped. Not every offender charged with a SFO is convicted.</li><li>The data represents SFO charges and not a unique count of offenders.</li></ol><p> </p><p>You have also asked for what reason the figures on the number of offenders convicted of murder, who at the time they committed the offence were being supervised on a life licence between 2016 and 2018 are different from the figures for offenders released from a life sentence for murder who went on to commit another murder while on life licence in the same period.</p><p> </p><p>The figures in PQ 267272 relate to the number of offenders being supervised on life licence, not restricted to those on life licence for a mandatory life sentence for the offence of murder, charged in the years 2016, 2017 and 2018 and subsequently convicted of murder.</p><p> </p><p>The corresponding figures stated in PQ 292174 are lower because they refer to the number of offenders released in 2016, 2017 and 2018 on life licence following a conviction for murder who have since been convicted of another murder.</p>
star this property answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property grouped question UIN 945 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-10-21T16:57:06.24Zmore like thismore than 2019-10-21T16:57:06.24Z
star this property answering member
4517
unstar this property label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property tabling member
1537
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr Philip Hollobone more like this
1150014
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-10-16more like thismore than 2019-10-16
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
unstar this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Reoffenders: Homicide more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to the Answer of 3 October to Question 292174 on Re-offenders: Homicide and the Answer of 28 June 2019 to Question 267272 on Homicide, for what reason the figures on the number of offenders convicted of murder, who at the time they committed the offence were being supervised on a life licence between 2016 and 2018 are different from the figures for offenders released from a life sentence for murder who went on to commit another murder while on life licence in the same period. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Kettering more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Philip Hollobone more like this
star this property uin 945 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-10-21more like thismore than 2019-10-21
star this property answer text <p>The table below sets out the number of offenders under the statutory supervision of the NPS and CRCs who were charged with a serious further offence, broken down by offence in each of the last five years.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>SFO offence</p></td><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>2018</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Arson with intent to endanger life</em></p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>18</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Assault by penetration</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>37</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Attempt or conspiracy to commit murder</p></td><td><p>46</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>85</p></td><td><p>79</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Aggravated Burglary</em></p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>35</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Causing death by dangerous/careless driving/aggravated vehicle taking</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>16</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>False imprisonment</em></p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>17</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Firearms offences including possession with intent</em></p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>17</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Kidnapping</em></p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>28</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Manslaughter</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>13</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Murder</p></td><td><p>71</p></td><td><p>69</p></td><td><p>86</p></td><td><p>114</p></td><td><p>132</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Offences under the Explosive Substances Act</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other offences against the person</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other qualifying sexual offences</em></p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>21</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other serious violent offence</em></p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other specified offence causing death</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rape</p></td><td><p>172</p></td><td><p>217</p></td><td><p>245</p></td><td><p>242</p></td><td><p>130</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Robbery with firearm</em></p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>13</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Under 13 sexual offences including rape</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>23</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>481</p></td><td><p>548</p></td><td><p>624</p></td><td><p>740</p></td><td><p>562</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><ol><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording systems, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing</li><li>The NPS and CRCs are required to complete reviews on any eligible offender who has been charged with (including attempted or conspiracy to commit offences): murder manslaughter, other specified offences causing death, rape or assault by penetration, or a sexual offence against a child under 13 years of age.</li><li>Data provided for offences should in italics are “conditional” reviews completed by the NPS only when an offender has been assessed as high risk of harm during the current sentence.</li><li>Not all SFO notifications result in the completion of a reviews as charges can be reduced or dropped. Not every offender charged with a SFO is convicted.</li><li>The data represents SFO charges and not a unique count of offenders.</li></ol><p> </p><p>You have also asked for what reason the figures on the number of offenders convicted of murder, who at the time they committed the offence were being supervised on a life licence between 2016 and 2018 are different from the figures for offenders released from a life sentence for murder who went on to commit another murder while on life licence in the same period.</p><p> </p><p>The figures in PQ 267272 relate to the number of offenders being supervised on life licence, not restricted to those on life licence for a mandatory life sentence for the offence of murder, charged in the years 2016, 2017 and 2018 and subsequently convicted of murder.</p><p> </p><p>The corresponding figures stated in PQ 292174 are lower because they refer to the number of offenders released in 2016, 2017 and 2018 on life licence following a conviction for murder who have since been convicted of another murder.</p>
star this property answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property grouped question UIN 944 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-10-21T16:57:06.317Zmore like thismore than 2019-10-21T16:57:06.317Z
star this property answering member
4517
unstar this property label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property tabling member
1537
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr Philip Hollobone more like this
1150015
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-10-16more like thismore than 2019-10-16
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
unstar this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Life Imprisonment more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to the Answer of 3 October 2019 to Question 292174 on Re-offenders: Homicide, how many lifers on licence have been subsequently returned to prison on (a) fixed term recall and (b) standard recall. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Kettering more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Philip Hollobone more like this
star this property uin 946 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-10-21more like thismore than 2019-10-21
star this property answer text <p>Public protection is our priority. Offenders on licence are subject to strict licence conditions and supervision. They can also be recalled potentially to serve the rest of their sentence in prison if they breach the terms of their release.</p><p> </p><p>The legislation allowing Fixed Term Recalls (Criminal Justice Act 2003) does not apply to offenders on a life sentence; consequently, offenders on a life licence may receive only a standard recall.</p><p>Published data recording the number of offenders on a life licence returned (recalled) to prison each year is available from 2010 and is set out in the table below:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>2010</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2011</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2014</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>95</p></td><td><p>118</p></td><td><p>124</p></td><td><p>174</p></td><td><p>201</p></td><td><p>212</p></td><td><p>212</p></td><td><p>222</p></td><td><p>288</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
star this property answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-10-21T14:42:45.19Zmore like thismore than 2019-10-21T14:42:45.19Z
star this property answering member
4517
unstar this property label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property tabling member
1537
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr Philip Hollobone more like this
1150034
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-10-16more like thismore than 2019-10-16
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
unstar this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Probate: Computer Software more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to the Answer of 2 September 2019 to Question 284794 on Probate: Computer Software, what steps he is taking to ensure applicants can give feedback on their satisfaction with the probate application process after a grant has been issued. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts more like this
star this property uin 1080 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-10-21more like thismore than 2019-10-21
star this property answer text <p>Probate Services provided by Her Majesty’s Courts &amp; Tribunals Service (HMCTS) have been designed and developed incorporating user feedback. The user satisfaction rate measured at the time the customer submits their application (the point at which they finish their interaction with our online process) remains consistent at 92%.</p><p> </p><p>HMCTS welcomes customer views throughout their interaction with its services, including after the application has been made. The agency’s formal complaints and praise procedure is available for this purpose and customers can engage with it at the court, on the phone, or online at GOV.UK. Feedback is used to inform ongoing service improvement. In respect of probate HMCTS received feedback from applicants on their concerns in a number of ways. The agency has recruited more staff to address a peak of workload and is now issuing in excess of 1,000 grants a day, which has led to reductions in waiting times.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Croydon South more like this
star this property answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-10-21T15:14:37.273Zmore like thismore than 2019-10-21T15:14:37.273Z
star this property answering member
4503
unstar this property label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
star this property tabling member
4521
unstar this property label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
1150066
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-10-16more like thismore than 2019-10-16
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
unstar this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Prisons: Security more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to his Department’s press release, £100 million crackdown on crime in prison, published on 13 August 2019, what the previously announced £70 million to increase security and stability in prisons was spent on. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Leeds East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
star this property uin 1071 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-10-21more like thismore than 2019-10-21
star this property answer text <p>The Government announced an additional £100 million investment in prison security to combat crime inside prisons. The illicit economy drives a significant amount of crime in the prison estate, so it is a priority to ensure security is robust to prevent contraband being smuggled into the prison system.</p><p> </p><p>This announcement is the latest in a series of significant investments to increase security and stability in prisons, including the £70m announced previously. The £70 million was announced over the course of the financial year 2018/19 and is broken down as follows:</p><ul><li>£10m for the Ten Prisons Project;</li><li>£30.5m to improve decency;</li><li>£11.5m for security; and</li><li>£17m for in-cell telephony and associated cabling.<sup>1</sup></li></ul><p> </p><p>The new £100m investment will now help us to go further and faster to improve prison security by investing in more enhanced gate security such as baggage scanners, body scanners and metal detectors. We are also stepping up our counter-corruption capability and strengthening (in scale and reach) intelligence-led operations and investigations with law enforcement partners against those that present the greatest threat of harm to prison security and the community.</p><p> </p><p><sup>1</sup> These figures are subject to rounding but would otherwise total £70m.</p>
star this property answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-10-21T16:54:49.077Zmore like thismore than 2019-10-21T16:54:49.077Z
star this property answering member
4517
unstar this property label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
1150086
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-10-16more like thismore than 2019-10-16
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
unstar this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Criminal Justice System Common Platform Programme more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the estimated completion date is for the Criminal Justice System Common Platform programme. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Hemsworth more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Jon Trickett more like this
star this property uin 889 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-10-21more like thismore than 2019-10-21
star this property answer text <p>The timelines regarding the Crime Programme can be found within the regularly published HMCTS Reform Update <a href="https://www.gov.uk/guidance/hmcts-reform-programme-reform-update" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/guidance/hmcts-reform-programme-reform-update</a> which confirms a programme end date of March 2021.</p><p>As with all programmes, timelines are under continuous review.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Croydon South more like this
star this property answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-10-21T14:51:51.043Zmore like thismore than 2019-10-21T14:51:51.043Z
star this property answering member
4503
unstar this property label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
star this property tabling member
410
unstar this property label Biography information for Jon Trickett more like this
1150087
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-10-16more like thismore than 2019-10-16
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
unstar this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property hansard heading Criminal Justice System Common Platform Programme more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the estimated total cost is of the Criminal Justice System Common Platform programme. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Hemsworth more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Jon Trickett more like this
star this property uin 890 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-10-21more like thismore than 2019-10-21
star this property answer text <p>The cost as set out in the 2018 HMT approved Business Case for the development of the CJS Common Platform is £237m.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Croydon South more like this
star this property answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-10-21T14:48:07.503Zmore like thismore than 2019-10-21T14:48:07.503Z
star this property answering member
4503
unstar this property label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
star this property tabling member
410
unstar this property label Biography information for Jon Trickett more like this