Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1138078
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-07-10more like thismore than 2019-07-10
star this property answering body
Department of Health and Social Care remove filter
star this property answering dept id 17 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
star this property hansard heading Prisons: Mental Health Services more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to improve the mental health of prisoners. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Richmond Park more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Zac Goldsmith more like this
star this property uin 275743 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-07-15more like thismore than 2019-07-15
star this property answer text <p>NHS England and NHS Improvement are currently working across the entire criminal justice pathway to develop and improve services for offenders with mental health difficulties.</p><p> </p><p>NHS England and NHS Improvement are working with partners to intervene at the earliest opportunity to ensure that offenders receive the right care, in the right place, at the right time.</p><p> </p><p>Liaison and Diversion Services operate in police stations and courts to identify and assess people with vulnerabilities including mental health issues. Where that individual is subsequently sent to prison the receiving prison will have the relevant information of the individual’s mental health needs to inform the reception healthcare staff so that they can implement appropriate interventions as soon as possible after they arrive.</p><p> </p><p>Health services are available across the estate where assessment identifies treatment needs.</p><p> </p><p>The service specification for prison mental health services was reviewed in 2017-18. This review, led by clinicians in conjunction with stakeholders and informed by experts with experience, was published in March 2018, with all new services being commissioned against it from April 2018. The new specification includes the Royal College of Psychiatrists Quality Network for Prison Mental Health Services standards, ensuring equity of quality across the estate.</p><p> </p><p>NHS England and NHS Improvement are currently consulting on revised Transfer and Remission guidance to ensure that new clinically developed timescales are set which ensure timely and appropriate access to mental health treatment in hospital when necessary, in a clinically safe and well managed way. The consultation ends on 19 July 2019.</p><p> </p><p>The NHS Long Term Plan committed to a new service to support people leaving custody to remain engaged with community-based healthcare services. The reconnect service will support continuity of care when people return to the community.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p>
star this property answering member constituency Thurrock more like this
star this property answering member printed Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-07-15T13:33:03.727Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-15T13:33:03.727Z
star this property answering member
4065
unstar this property label Biography information for Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property tabling member
4062
unstar this property label Biography information for Zac Goldsmith more like this
1138079
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-07-10more like thismore than 2019-07-10
star this property answering body
Department of Health and Social Care remove filter
star this property answering dept id 17 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
star this property hansard heading Mental Illness: Prisoners more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what estimate he has made of the proportion of the prison population with mental health problems. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Richmond Park more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Zac Goldsmith more like this
star this property uin 275744 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-07-15more like thismore than 2019-07-15
star this property answer text <p>No estimate has been made of the proportion of the prison health population with mental health problems.</p><p> </p><p>Currently a closed system is used to record clinical data in prisons. The Health and Justice Information Service system, being rolled out between 2018-20, will have the ability to share information with community healthcare services; this is integral to the collection of relevant data that is quality assured and robust.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Thurrock more like this
star this property answering member printed Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-07-15T13:33:41.877Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-15T13:33:41.877Z
star this property answering member
4065
unstar this property label Biography information for Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property tabling member
4062
unstar this property label Biography information for Zac Goldsmith more like this
1146691
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-09-26more like thismore than 2019-09-26
star this property answering body
Department of Health and Social Care remove filter
star this property answering dept id 17 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
star this property hansard heading GP Surgeries: Capital Investment more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what funding for capital investment is being made available for GP surgery expansion and refurbishment by (a) constituency, (b) local authority and (c) region. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Normanton, Pontefract and Castleford more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Yvette Cooper more like this
star this property uin 291232 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-10-01more like thismore than 2019-10-01
star this property answer text <p>The information requested on capital investment made available for general practitioner surgery expansion and refurbishment is not held centrally in the format required and could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Bury St Edmunds more like this
star this property answering member printed Jo Churchill more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-10-01T16:05:18.423Zmore like thismore than 2019-10-01T16:05:18.423Z
star this property answering member
4380
unstar this property label Biography information for Jo Churchill more like this
star this property tabling member
420
unstar this property label Biography information for Yvette Cooper more like this
1105699
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-03-27more like thismore than 2019-03-27
star this property answering body
Department of Health and Social Care remove filter
star this property answering dept id 17 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
star this property hansard heading Pregnancy Tests more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he has taken to ensure the (a) impartiality and (b) independence of panels members on the Commission on Human Medicines’ independent scientific review of the publication by Professor Carl Heneghan into hormone pregnancy tests. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Bolton South East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Yasmin Qureshi more like this
star this property uin 237673 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-04-04more like thismore than 2019-04-04
star this property answer text <p>Since publication of the report of the Commission on Human Medicines Expert Working Group on Hormone Pregnancy Tests (HPTs) the Government has committed to review any important new evidence that arises. In response to publication of the study by Heneghan et al. the Commission on Human Medicines convened an Expert Group to advise on the suitability and robustness of the methodology (including the selection and application of the data quality score) and any clinical implications.</p><p> </p><p>To ensure impartiality none of the members of the Group was involved in the previous review by the Expert Working Group on HPTs. A specific conflict of interest policy was developed and all participants were required to complete and sign a declaration of interests form. Participants were asked to declare personal or non-personal interests in the companies who marketed HPTs or whose predecessors marketed them, current or previous involvement in any studies or reviews on HPTs, the expression in public of a strong opinion about HPTs or any of the companies that produced them, and direct or indirect involvement with, or peer review of, the publication by Heneghan et al. The conflict of interest policy and declarations of participants will be made public in due course.</p><p> </p><p>For complete transparency the meeting was observed by the Chair of the Association for Children Damaged by HPTs, an advocate for those affected by thalidomide, a Lay representative and a representative from the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review.</p><p> </p><p>In parallel, the European Medicines Agency is conducting an independent review of the publication by Heneghan et al. Both reviews are ongoing, and we expect the conclusions to be made public within a month of their completion, likely to be May 2019.</p><p> </p>
star this property answering member constituency Thurrock more like this
star this property answering member printed Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property grouped question UIN 237674 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-04-04T13:11:53.637Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-04T13:11:53.637Z
star this property answering member
4065
unstar this property label Biography information for Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property tabling member
3924
unstar this property label Biography information for Yasmin Qureshi more like this
1105733
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-03-27more like thismore than 2019-03-27
star this property answering body
Department of Health and Social Care remove filter
star this property answering dept id 17 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
star this property hansard heading Pregnancy Tests more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what the timetable is for the publication of the findings of the Commission on Human Medicines’ independent scientific review of the publication by Professor Carl Heneghan into hormone pregnancy tests. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Bolton South East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Yasmin Qureshi more like this
star this property uin 237674 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-04-04more like thismore than 2019-04-04
star this property answer text <p>Since publication of the report of the Commission on Human Medicines Expert Working Group on Hormone Pregnancy Tests (HPTs) the Government has committed to review any important new evidence that arises. In response to publication of the study by Heneghan et al. the Commission on Human Medicines convened an Expert Group to advise on the suitability and robustness of the methodology (including the selection and application of the data quality score) and any clinical implications.</p><p> </p><p>To ensure impartiality none of the members of the Group was involved in the previous review by the Expert Working Group on HPTs. A specific conflict of interest policy was developed and all participants were required to complete and sign a declaration of interests form. Participants were asked to declare personal or non-personal interests in the companies who marketed HPTs or whose predecessors marketed them, current or previous involvement in any studies or reviews on HPTs, the expression in public of a strong opinion about HPTs or any of the companies that produced them, and direct or indirect involvement with, or peer review of, the publication by Heneghan et al. The conflict of interest policy and declarations of participants will be made public in due course.</p><p> </p><p>For complete transparency the meeting was observed by the Chair of the Association for Children Damaged by HPTs, an advocate for those affected by thalidomide, a Lay representative and a representative from the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review.</p><p> </p><p>In parallel, the European Medicines Agency is conducting an independent review of the publication by Heneghan et al. Both reviews are ongoing, and we expect the conclusions to be made public within a month of their completion, likely to be May 2019.</p><p> </p>
star this property answering member constituency Thurrock more like this
star this property answering member printed Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property grouped question UIN 237673 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-04-04T13:11:53.7Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-04T13:11:53.7Z
star this property answering member
4065
unstar this property label Biography information for Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property tabling member
3924
unstar this property label Biography information for Yasmin Qureshi more like this
1105850
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-03-28more like thismore than 2019-03-28
star this property answering body
Department of Health and Social Care remove filter
star this property answering dept id 17 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
star this property hansard heading Pregnancy Tests more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how much was spent from the public purse on the Commission on Human Medicines Expert Working Group on Hormone Pregnancy Tests. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Bolton South East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Yasmin Qureshi more like this
star this property uin 238314 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-04-02more like thisremove minimum value filter
star this property answer text <p>The Commission on Human Medicines (CHM) advises health ministers on the safety, efficacy and quality of medicinal products. Expert Working Groups of the CHM are comprised of independent experts who work on a voluntary basis and receive reasonable expenses. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency provide a secretariat function to the CHM and its Expert Working Groups. This is included in Agency costs. The Agency is an Executive Agency of the Department and it is established as a Government trading fund, with its work predominantly funded by fees charged to the industry it regulates.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Thurrock more like this
star this property answering member printed Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-04-02T16:08:11.597Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-02T16:08:11.597Z
star this property answering member
4065
unstar this property label Biography information for Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property tabling member
3924
unstar this property label Biography information for Yasmin Qureshi more like this
1109206
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-04-02more like thismore than 2019-04-02
star this property answering body
Department of Health and Social Care remove filter
star this property answering dept id 17 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
star this property hansard heading Pregnancy Tests more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether a meta-analysis was carried out as part of the Commission on Human Medicines' Expert Working Group review into Hormone Pregnancy Tests. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Bolton South East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Yasmin Qureshi more like this
star this property uin 239925 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-04-09more like thismore than 2019-04-09
star this property answer text <p>The Commission on Human Medicines’ Expert Working Group (EWG) review into Hormone Pregnancy Tests (HPTs) was comprehensive, scientifically robust and independent. Based on the totality of the data, the review concluded the available scientific evidence did not support a causal association between the use of HPTs during early pregnancy and birth defects or miscarriage. All evidence considered by the EWG has been published online.</p><p> </p><p>The EWG did not undertake a meta-analysis as part of the review. The EWG examined a large number of epidemiological studies, many of which were conducted under different designs. The EWG considered whether meta-analysis was possible and ultimately concluded that because the studies were so different such an analysis would not be informative. Meta-analysis was also not considered appropriate because the studies were not sufficiently robust and suffered from extensive limitations.</p><p> </p><p>The EWG comprised independent experts from a wide range of relevant specialisms and its report was further scrutinised by the Commission on Human Medicines, the Government’s independent scientific advisory body on the safety of medicines. There are no plans for further peer review of the report. The Government is committed to reviewing any important new evidence that arises.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Thurrock more like this
star this property answering member printed Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property grouped question UIN 239926 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-04-09T11:23:15.05Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-09T11:23:15.05Z
star this property answering member
4065
unstar this property label Biography information for Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property previous answer version
112745
star this property answering member constituency Thurrock more like this
star this property answering member printed Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property answering member
4065
star this property label Biography information for Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property tabling member
3924
unstar this property label Biography information for Yasmin Qureshi more like this
1109215
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-04-02more like thismore than 2019-04-02
star this property answering body
Department of Health and Social Care remove filter
star this property answering dept id 17 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
star this property hansard heading Pregnancy Tests more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what plans his Department has for peer review the report of the Commission on Human Medicines Expert Working Group on Hormone Pregnancy Tests. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Bolton South East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Yasmin Qureshi more like this
star this property uin 239926 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-04-09more like thismore than 2019-04-09
star this property answer text <p>The Commission on Human Medicines’ Expert Working Group (EWG) review into Hormone Pregnancy Tests (HPTs) was comprehensive, scientifically robust and independent. Based on the totality of the data, the review concluded the available scientific evidence did not support a causal association between the use of HPTs during early pregnancy and birth defects or miscarriage. All evidence considered by the EWG has been published online.</p><p> </p><p>The EWG did not undertake a meta-analysis as part of the review. The EWG examined a large number of epidemiological studies, many of which were conducted under different designs. The EWG considered whether meta-analysis was possible and ultimately concluded that because the studies were so different such an analysis would not be informative. Meta-analysis was also not considered appropriate because the studies were not sufficiently robust and suffered from extensive limitations.</p><p> </p><p>The EWG comprised independent experts from a wide range of relevant specialisms and its report was further scrutinised by the Commission on Human Medicines, the Government’s independent scientific advisory body on the safety of medicines. There are no plans for further peer review of the report. The Government is committed to reviewing any important new evidence that arises.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Thurrock more like this
star this property answering member printed Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property grouped question UIN 239925 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-04-09T11:23:15.287Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-09T11:23:15.287Z
star this property answering member
4065
unstar this property label Biography information for Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property previous answer version
112746
star this property answering member constituency Thurrock more like this
star this property answering member printed Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property answering member
4065
star this property label Biography information for Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property tabling member
3924
unstar this property label Biography information for Yasmin Qureshi more like this
1111113
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-04-10more like thismore than 2019-04-10
star this property answering body
Department of Health and Social Care remove filter
star this property answering dept id 17 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
star this property hansard heading Pregnancy Tests more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 9 April 2019 to Question 239926 on Pregnancy Tests, for what reason previous studies were not considered robust; and what the extensive limitations were. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Bolton South East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Yasmin Qureshi more like this
star this property uin 243382 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-04-15more like thismore than 2019-04-15
star this property answer text <p>The Commission on Human Medicines Expert Working Group on Hormone Pregnancy Tests considered that the key limitations of previous studies related to the accuracy of recording of what drug was taken by the women; clarity over the timing of administration during pregnancy; adjustment for confounding factors; selection of controls; and the statistical methodology.</p><p> </p><p>The Expert Group used a quality scoring system to evaluate the quality of each individual study according to a set of seven pre-defined quality criteria. The criteria and score agreed by the Expert Working Group for each study are published in Annex 27 of the final report.</p><p> </p><p>The criteria for selecting members of the Expert Working Group were based on the expertise needed to evaluate all aspects of the questions before the Group and the types of data that would need to be assessed. Membership included those with expertise in pharmaco-epidemiology, including perinatal and paediatric epidemiology, medical statistics, embryology, clinical genetics, gynaecology, reproductive endocrinology, toxicology and pharmacology.</p><p> </p><p>The process for selecting members was in line with established policy for expert groups of the Commission on Human Medicines, with the nominations being agreed by the Commission and endorsed by Ministers.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Thurrock more like this
star this property answering member printed Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property grouped question UIN 243383 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-04-15T14:23:24.243Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-15T14:23:24.243Z
star this property answering member
4065
unstar this property label Biography information for Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property tabling member
3924
unstar this property label Biography information for Yasmin Qureshi more like this
1111114
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2019-04-10more like thismore than 2019-04-10
star this property answering body
Department of Health and Social Care remove filter
star this property answering dept id 17 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
star this property hansard heading Hormone Pregnancy Tests Expert Working Group more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what the criteria were for selecting members of the Expert Working Group for Hormone Pregnancy Tests. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Bolton South East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Yasmin Qureshi more like this
star this property uin 243383 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2019-04-15more like thismore than 2019-04-15
star this property answer text <p>The Commission on Human Medicines Expert Working Group on Hormone Pregnancy Tests considered that the key limitations of previous studies related to the accuracy of recording of what drug was taken by the women; clarity over the timing of administration during pregnancy; adjustment for confounding factors; selection of controls; and the statistical methodology.</p><p> </p><p>The Expert Group used a quality scoring system to evaluate the quality of each individual study according to a set of seven pre-defined quality criteria. The criteria and score agreed by the Expert Working Group for each study are published in Annex 27 of the final report.</p><p> </p><p>The criteria for selecting members of the Expert Working Group were based on the expertise needed to evaluate all aspects of the questions before the Group and the types of data that would need to be assessed. Membership included those with expertise in pharmaco-epidemiology, including perinatal and paediatric epidemiology, medical statistics, embryology, clinical genetics, gynaecology, reproductive endocrinology, toxicology and pharmacology.</p><p> </p><p>The process for selecting members was in line with established policy for expert groups of the Commission on Human Medicines, with the nominations being agreed by the Commission and endorsed by Ministers.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Thurrock more like this
star this property answering member printed Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property grouped question UIN 243382 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-04-15T14:23:24.29Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-15T14:23:24.29Z
star this property answering member
4065
unstar this property label Biography information for Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
star this property tabling member
3924
unstar this property label Biography information for Yasmin Qureshi more like this