Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

758321
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-09-06more like thismore than 2017-09-06
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions remove filter
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Employment and Support Allowance more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what transitional arrangements are in place for claimants whose health deteriorates when in receipt of jobseeker's allowance if their claim is stopped and they are advised to claim employment support allowance. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency East Kilbride, Strathaven and Lesmahagow more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Dr Lisa Cameron more like this
star this property uin 9203 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction true more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-09-28more like thismore than 2017-09-28
star this property answer text <p><del class="ministerial">Since August 2017 we have been focussing on more proactive case management to reduce delays and speed up the clearance of mandatory reconsiderations for personal independence payment. A similar exercise for mandatory reconsiderations for employment and support allowance has started, looking at the entire journey from when the customer first challenges the Department’s decision, from which we expect to be able to identify opportunities to reduce delays in the current process and speed up clearance of mandatory reconsiderations.</del></p><p> </p><p><del class="ministerial">The median monthly clearance time for employment and support allowance mandatory reconsiderations in July 2017 was 13 days, 1 day less than in April 2017. However it is important that sufficient time is allowed for customers to provide any additional evidence that will help to support their case. Accordingly there is no target time for clearing mandatory reconsiderations – each is done without delay, but based on its merits.</del></p><p> </p><p><ins class="ministerial"> <p><ins class="ministerial">If a JSA claimant’s health deteriorates, and the period of sickness is expected to exceed 13 weeks, a claim should be made to ESA or Universal Credit (UC) in relevant geographical areas.</ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial"> </ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial">In this instance the claimant would need to close their JSA claim and make a new claim to ESA. ESA can be claimed immediately following the closure of a JSA claim and, provided the claim to ESA was made within 12 weeks of closing their JSA claim, the claimant would not have to serve waiting days.</ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial"> </ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial">There are no transitional arrangements between the benefits however, the aim is for there to be no unnecessary interruption of funds to the individual. Where a claimant is in urgent financial need whilst their ESA claim is being processed, they can apply for additional support in the form of an advance on their first payment, known as a “short term benefit advance”, or a hardship payment. The claimant will receive a benefit advance payment on the same or next working day.</ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial"> </ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial">If the JSA claimant’s period of sickness is likely to be for less than 13 weeks (referred to as an Extended Period of Sickness (EPS)), the claimant may choose to remain in receipt of JSA rather than claiming ESA/UC. If they choose to do this, they will receive the same amount of JSA benefit.</ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial"> </ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial">To qualify for an EPS the claimant must not be fit for any work and this will be determined based on the medical evidence supplied. During this period the claimant will be treated as being available for work, and the Work Coach will tailor the conditionality requirements on their Claimant Commitment, taking into account the claimant’s health condition.</ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial"> </ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial">An EPS can only be declared for one continuous period of sickness of 13 weeks or less in any 12 month period calculated from the start of the period of sickness. Once it is clear the period of sickness will last for 13 weeks or more, the claimant will be advised to make a claim to ESA or UC.</ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial"> </ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial">In areas where UC Full Service is in place, the claimant will be advised to claim UC rather than ESA.</ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial"> </ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial">One of the policy designs of Universal Credit is that it removes the need for claimants to switch between different benefits as their circumstances change, simplifying the system and ensuring continuity for claimants.</ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial"> </ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial">As stated, there are no transitional arrangements for UC. Where a claimant advises they cannot manage financially until their pay day (UC is paid monthly, unlike JSA and ESA which are fortnightly), an advance can be made. This advance is recoverable from further payments of UC, at a rate agreed between the claimant and the Work Coach.</ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial"> </ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial">Universal Credit is a much simpler system with clearer rules and clearer rates. It has an easy to use online account, where claimants can report changes of circumstance in real time. UC Support for disabled people under UC reflects two core components of the old ESA system, ensuring that more severely disabled people benefit from higher payments.</ins></p></ins></p><p> </p>
star this property answering member constituency Portsmouth North more like this
star this property answering member printed Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-09-28T14:56:40.15Zmore like thisremove minimum value filter
star this property question first ministerially corrected
less than 2017-10-04T11:07:49.617Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-04T11:07:49.617Z
star this property answering member
4017
star this property label Biography information for Penny Mordaunt remove filter
star this property previous answer version
13091
star this property answering member constituency Portsmouth North more like this
star this property answering member printed Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property answering member
4017
star this property label Biography information for Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property tabling member
4412
unstar this property label Biography information for Dr Lisa Cameron more like this
758885
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-09-07more like thismore than 2017-09-07
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions remove filter
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Social Security Benefits: Disability more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what progress his Department has made in reducing the time taken to process mandatory reconsiderations for personal independence payments and employment and support allowance; and at what level the target is set for the time taken to process such reconsiderations. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Birkenhead more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Frank Field more like this
star this property uin 9525 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-09-28more like thismore than 2017-09-28
star this property answer text <p>Since August 2017 we have been focussing on more proactive case management to reduce delays and speed up the clearance of mandatory reconsiderations for personal independence payment. A similar exercise for mandatory reconsiderations for employment and support allowance has started, looking at the entire journey from when the customer first challenges the Department’s decision, from which we expect to be able to identify opportunities to reduce delays in the current process and speed up clearance of mandatory reconsiderations.</p><p> </p><p>The median monthly clearance time for employment and support allowance mandatory reconsiderations in July 2017 was 13 days, 1 day less than in April 2017. However it is important that sufficient time is allowed for customers to provide any additional evidence that will help to support their case. Accordingly there is no target time for clearing mandatory reconsiderations – each is done without delay, but based on its merits.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Portsmouth North more like this
star this property answering member printed Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-09-28T15:08:28.997Zmore like thismore than 2017-09-28T15:08:28.997Z
star this property answering member
4017
star this property label Biography information for Penny Mordaunt remove filter
star this property tabling member
478
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Field of Birkenhead more like this
759853
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-09-12more like thismore than 2017-09-12
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions remove filter
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Post- traumatic Stress Disorder more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment he has made of the effect on the health of people with post-traumatic stress disorder of annual assessments for personal independence payments. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Derby North more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Chris Williamson more like this
star this property uin 10121 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-10-09more like thismore than 2017-10-09
star this property answer text <p>No such assessment has been made. Reviews of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) are a key part of the benefit and ensure that not only do awards remain correct where needs may change but that we also maintain contact with the claimant, both features missing from its predecessor Disability Living Allowance. The length of an award is based on an individual’s circumstances and can vary from nine months to an on-going award with a light touch review at the ten year point.</p><p> </p><p>PIP recognises that for the most severely disabled claimants, the award review process could seem unnecessarily intrusive. Existing PIP claimants with the most severe, lifetime disabilities, whose functional ability has remained the same, are more likely to have their evidence reviewed by a DWP Decision-Maker and will not need to have another face-to-face assessment with a healthcare professional.</p><p> </p><p>We will continue to closely monitor developments across the health and disability landscape and engage with stakeholders to improve the service we provide. We are committed to ensuring that the PIP review process works effectively across the spectrum of disabilities and health conditions, including post traumatic stress disorder, other mental health conditions, cognitive impairments and physical disabilities.</p>
star this property answering member constituency Portsmouth North more like this
star this property answering member printed Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-10-09T12:37:56.22Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-09T12:37:56.22Z
star this property answering member
4017
star this property label Biography information for Penny Mordaunt remove filter
star this property tabling member
3976
unstar this property label Biography information for Chris Williamson more like this
760180
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-09-13more like thismore than 2017-09-13
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions remove filter
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Department for Work and Pensions: Standards more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the DWP response to FOI request 1740 on key performance indicators, if he will set out the wording of the key performance indicator referred to in the FOI response; and whether that the key performance indicator is provided to officials (a) taking initial decisions on benefit claims and (b) conducting mandatory reconsiderations. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Battersea more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Marsha De Cordova more like this
star this property uin 10482 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-10-11more like thismore than 2017-10-11
star this property answer text <p>The wording of the key performance indicator was set out in the reply to Freedom of Information request 1740, that the honourable lady referred to. It is not provided to decision makers at either the initial decision or mandatory reconsideration stages.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Portsmouth North more like this
star this property answering member printed Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-10-11T15:52:03.75Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-11T15:52:03.75Z
star this property answering member
4017
star this property label Biography information for Penny Mordaunt remove filter
star this property tabling member
4676
unstar this property label Biography information for Marsha De Cordova more like this
760286
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-09-13more like thismore than 2017-09-13
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions remove filter
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Appeals more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what proportion of appeals against awards of personal independence payments to residents of (a) East Dunbartonshire, (b) Scotland and (c) the UK to date have resulted in (a) an increase and (b) no increase in the award. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency East Dunbartonshire more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Jo Swinson more like this
star this property uin 105008 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-10-09more like thismore than 2017-10-09
star this property answer text <p>PIP data is collated at GB (England, Scotland and Wales only) rather than UK level.</p><p> </p><p>The Department only holds data on PIP awards changed and unchanged at appeal. Therefore the awards changed may include a very small number of appeals where the award may have reduced.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>The table below shows the proportion of appeals against awards of Personal Independent Payment where the award was changed and unchanged at appeal for East Dunbartonshire, Scotland and Great Britain.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Award changed at appeal</p></td><td><p>Award unchanged at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>East Dunbartonshire</p></td><td><p>69%</p></td><td><p>31%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Scotland</p></td><td><p>69%</p></td><td><p>31%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GB</p></td><td><p>74%</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td></tr></tbody></table> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Portsmouth North more like this
star this property answering member printed Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-10-09T12:28:36.543Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-09T12:28:36.543Z
star this property answering member
4017
star this property label Biography information for Penny Mordaunt remove filter
star this property tabling member
1513
unstar this property label Biography information for Jo Swinson more like this
760287
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-09-13more like thismore than 2017-09-13
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions remove filter
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Mobility more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what proportion of applicants for personal independence payments to residents of (a) East Dunbartonshire, (b) Scotland and (c) the UK were awarded (i) no support for mobility needs, (ii) the standard mobility component and (iii) the enhanced mobility component in each quarter for which data is available. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency East Dunbartonshire more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Jo Swinson more like this
star this property uin 105009 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-10-09more like thismore than 2017-10-09
star this property answer text <p>The table below shows the number of applicants for personal independence payments to residents of (a) East Dunbartonshire (Parliamentary Constituency), (b) Scotland and (c) Great Britain who were awarded (i) no support for mobility needs, (ii) the standard mobility component and (iii) the enhanced mobility component in each quarter for which data is available.</p><p> </p><p>Note that PIP data is collated at GB rather than UK level</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>(a) East Dunbartonshire (Parliamentary Constituency)</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Mobility Award - Enhanced</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>%age</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Mobility Award - Standard</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>%age</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Mobility Award - Nil</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>%age</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013 Q2</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p><em>#</em></p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p><em>#</em></p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p><em>#</em></p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013 Q3</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p><em>#</em></p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p><em>#</em></p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p><em>#</em></p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013 Q4</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p><em>40%</em></p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p><em>15%</em></p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p><em>45%</em></p></td><td><p>40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014 Q1</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p><em>#</em></p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p><em>#</em></p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p><em>#</em></p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014 Q2</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p><em>44%</em></p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p><em>18%</em></p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p><em>38%</em></p></td><td><p>50</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014 Q3</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p><em>28%</em></p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p><em>29%</em></p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p><em>43%</em></p></td><td><p>90</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014 Q4</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p><em>29%</em></p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p><em>19%</em></p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p><em>52%</em></p></td><td><p>90</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015 Q1</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p><em>27%</em></p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p><em>20%</em></p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p><em>53%</em></p></td><td><p>110</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015 Q2</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p><em>31%</em></p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p><em>22%</em></p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p><em>47%</em></p></td><td><p>140</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015 Q3</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p><em>27%</em></p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p><em>28%</em></p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p><em>46%</em></p></td><td><p>110</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015 Q4</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p><em>28%</em></p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p><em>20%</em></p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p><em>51%</em></p></td><td><p>100</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016 Q1</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p><em>33%</em></p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p><em>21%</em></p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p><em>47%</em></p></td><td><p>140</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016 Q2</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p><em>30%</em></p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p><em>18%</em></p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p><em>52%</em></p></td><td><p>180</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016 Q3</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p><em>33%</em></p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p><em>20%</em></p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p><em>47%</em></p></td><td><p>200</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016 Q4</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p><em>39%</em></p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p><em>24%</em></p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p><em>38%</em></p></td><td><p>190</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017 Q1</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p><em>36%</em></p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p><em>22%</em></p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p><em>41%</em></p></td><td><p>230</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017 Q2</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p><em>38%</em></p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p><em>26%</em></p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p><em>36%</em></p></td><td><p>200</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017 Q3 (to July 2017)</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p><em>18%</em></p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p><em>28%</em></p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p><em>54%</em></p></td><td><p>70</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>640</p></td><td><p><em>33%</em></p></td><td><p>430</p></td><td><p><em>22%</em></p></td><td><p>890</p></td><td><p><em>45%</em></p></td><td><p>1,970</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>(b) Scotland</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Mobility Award - Enhanced</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>%age</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Mobility Award - Standard</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>%age</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Mobility Award - Nil</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>%age</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013 Q2</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p><em>#</em></p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p><em>#</em></p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p><em>#</em></p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013 Q3</p></td><td><p>420</p></td><td><p><em>69%</em></p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p><em>10%</em></p></td><td><p>130</p></td><td><p><em>21%</em></p></td><td><p>620</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013 Q4</p></td><td><p>1,160</p></td><td><p><em>30%</em></p></td><td><p>760</p></td><td><p><em>20%</em></p></td><td><p>1,970</p></td><td><p><em>51%</em></p></td><td><p>3,890</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014 Q1</p></td><td><p>1,350</p></td><td><p><em>32%</em></p></td><td><p>860</p></td><td><p><em>20%</em></p></td><td><p>1,990</p></td><td><p><em>47%</em></p></td><td><p>4,190</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014 Q2</p></td><td><p>1,610</p></td><td><p><em>30%</em></p></td><td><p>1,100</p></td><td><p><em>21%</em></p></td><td><p>2,610</p></td><td><p><em>49%</em></p></td><td><p>5,320</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014 Q3</p></td><td><p>3,030</p></td><td><p><em>26%</em></p></td><td><p>2,570</p></td><td><p><em>22%</em></p></td><td><p>6,190</p></td><td><p><em>53%</em></p></td><td><p>11,800</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014 Q4</p></td><td><p>3,350</p></td><td><p><em>22%</em></p></td><td><p>3,220</p></td><td><p><em>21%</em></p></td><td><p>8,490</p></td><td><p><em>56%</em></p></td><td><p>15,060</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015 Q1</p></td><td><p>3,430</p></td><td><p><em>20%</em></p></td><td><p>3,920</p></td><td><p><em>23%</em></p></td><td><p>9,720</p></td><td><p><em>57%</em></p></td><td><p>17,070</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015 Q2</p></td><td><p>3,800</p></td><td><p><em>24%</em></p></td><td><p>3,680</p></td><td><p><em>23%</em></p></td><td><p>8,450</p></td><td><p><em>53%</em></p></td><td><p>15,940</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015 Q3</p></td><td><p>3,370</p></td><td><p><em>25%</em></p></td><td><p>3,000</p></td><td><p><em>23%</em></p></td><td><p>6,880</p></td><td><p><em>52%</em></p></td><td><p>13,240</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015 Q4</p></td><td><p>3,280</p></td><td><p><em>24%</em></p></td><td><p>3,060</p></td><td><p><em>22%</em></p></td><td><p>7,400</p></td><td><p><em>54%</em></p></td><td><p>13,740</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016 Q1</p></td><td><p>4,450</p></td><td><p><em>28%</em></p></td><td><p>3,490</p></td><td><p><em>22%</em></p></td><td><p>8,040</p></td><td><p><em>50%</em></p></td><td><p>15,980</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016 Q2</p></td><td><p>6,020</p></td><td><p><em>28%</em></p></td><td><p>4,610</p></td><td><p><em>21%</em></p></td><td><p>11,010</p></td><td><p><em>51%</em></p></td><td><p>21,640</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016 Q3</p></td><td><p>6,640</p></td><td><p><em>30%</em></p></td><td><p>4,800</p></td><td><p><em>22%</em></p></td><td><p>10,370</p></td><td><p><em>48%</em></p></td><td><p>21,810</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016 Q4</p></td><td><p>6,730</p></td><td><p><em>31%</em></p></td><td><p>4,840</p></td><td><p><em>22%</em></p></td><td><p>10,100</p></td><td><p><em>47%</em></p></td><td><p>21,670</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017 Q1</p></td><td><p>7,910</p></td><td><p><em>36%</em></p></td><td><p>4,870</p></td><td><p><em>22%</em></p></td><td><p>9,060</p></td><td><p><em>41%</em></p></td><td><p>21,840</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017 Q2</p></td><td><p>6,950</p></td><td><p><em>35%</em></p></td><td><p>4,250</p></td><td><p><em>21%</em></p></td><td><p>8,790</p></td><td><p><em>44%</em></p></td><td><p>19,980</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017 Q3 (to July 2017)</p></td><td><p>1,810</p></td><td><p><em>23%</em></p></td><td><p>1,510</p></td><td><p><em>19%</em></p></td><td><p>4,440</p></td><td><p><em>57%</em></p></td><td><p>7,750</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>65,330</p></td><td><p><em>28%</em></p></td><td><p>50,590</p></td><td><p><em>22%</em></p></td><td><p>115,620</p></td><td><p><em>50%</em></p></td><td><p>231,540</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>(c) Great Britain</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Mobility Award - Enhanced</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>%age</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Mobility Award - Standard</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>%age</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Mobility Award - Nil</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>%age</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013 Q2</p></td><td><p>620</p></td><td><p><em>93%</em></p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p><em>6%</em></p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p><em>1%</em></p></td><td><p>670</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013 Q3</p></td><td><p>4,780</p></td><td><p><em>72%</em></p></td><td><p>640</p></td><td><p><em>10%</em></p></td><td><p>1,240</p></td><td><p><em>19%</em></p></td><td><p>6,660</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013 Q4</p></td><td><p>8,460</p></td><td><p><em>38%</em></p></td><td><p>3,950</p></td><td><p><em>18%</em></p></td><td><p>9,580</p></td><td><p><em>44%</em></p></td><td><p>21,980</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014 Q1</p></td><td><p>13,430</p></td><td><p><em>35%</em></p></td><td><p>7,580</p></td><td><p><em>20%</em></p></td><td><p>16,960</p></td><td><p><em>45%</em></p></td><td><p>37,960</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014 Q2</p></td><td><p>16,750</p></td><td><p><em>33%</em></p></td><td><p>10,490</p></td><td><p><em>21%</em></p></td><td><p>23,730</p></td><td><p><em>47%</em></p></td><td><p>50,960</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014 Q3</p></td><td><p>31,260</p></td><td><p><em>28%</em></p></td><td><p>24,560</p></td><td><p><em>22%</em></p></td><td><p>57,680</p></td><td><p><em>51%</em></p></td><td><p>113,500</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014 Q4</p></td><td><p>41,130</p></td><td><p><em>24%</em></p></td><td><p>36,500</p></td><td><p><em>21%</em></p></td><td><p>93,150</p></td><td><p><em>55%</em></p></td><td><p>170,790</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015 Q1</p></td><td><p>37,910</p></td><td><p><em>21%</em></p></td><td><p>38,070</p></td><td><p><em>21%</em></p></td><td><p>104,820</p></td><td><p><em>58%</em></p></td><td><p>180,800</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015 Q2</p></td><td><p>29,390</p></td><td><p><em>20%</em></p></td><td><p>29,710</p></td><td><p><em>21%</em></p></td><td><p>84,490</p></td><td><p><em>59%</em></p></td><td><p>143,590</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015 Q3</p></td><td><p>27,330</p></td><td><p><em>21%</em></p></td><td><p>26,270</p></td><td><p><em>20%</em></p></td><td><p>76,690</p></td><td><p><em>59%</em></p></td><td><p>130,290</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015 Q4</p></td><td><p>32,410</p></td><td><p><em>24%</em></p></td><td><p>26,870</p></td><td><p><em>20%</em></p></td><td><p>75,420</p></td><td><p><em>56%</em></p></td><td><p>134,690</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016 Q1</p></td><td><p>41,730</p></td><td><p><em>27%</em></p></td><td><p>31,160</p></td><td><p><em>20%</em></p></td><td><p>82,750</p></td><td><p><em>53%</em></p></td><td><p>155,640</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016 Q2</p></td><td><p>51,560</p></td><td><p><em>26%</em></p></td><td><p>39,410</p></td><td><p><em>20%</em></p></td><td><p>105,030</p></td><td><p><em>54%</em></p></td><td><p>196,010</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016 Q3</p></td><td><p>62,260</p></td><td><p><em>29%</em></p></td><td><p>44,600</p></td><td><p><em>21%</em></p></td><td><p>109,800</p></td><td><p><em>51%</em></p></td><td><p>216,660</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016 Q4</p></td><td><p>67,270</p></td><td><p><em>32%</em></p></td><td><p>42,620</p></td><td><p><em>20%</em></p></td><td><p>100,010</p></td><td><p><em>48%</em></p></td><td><p>209,900</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017 Q1</p></td><td><p>72,380</p></td><td><p><em>35%</em></p></td><td><p>39,980</p></td><td><p><em>20%</em></p></td><td><p>91,950</p></td><td><p><em>45%</em></p></td><td><p>204,320</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017 Q2</p></td><td><p>61,800</p></td><td><p><em>33%</em></p></td><td><p>35,050</p></td><td><p><em>19%</em></p></td><td><p>92,610</p></td><td><p><em>49%</em></p></td><td><p>189,460</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017 Q3 (to July 2017)</p></td><td><p>17,510</p></td><td><p><em>27%</em></p></td><td><p>11,220</p></td><td><p><em>17%</em></p></td><td><p>37,000</p></td><td><p><em>56%</em></p></td><td><p>65,730</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>617,960</p></td><td><p><em>28%</em></p></td><td><p>448,710</p></td><td><p><em>20%</em></p></td><td><p>1,162,900</p></td><td><p><em>52%</em></p></td><td><p>2,229,570</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>‘# ‘used to avoid the release of confidential data including instances where there are fewer than 5 cases</p>
star this property answering member constituency Portsmouth North more like this
star this property answering member printed Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-10-09T12:14:29.12Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-09T12:14:29.12Z
star this property answering member
4017
star this property label Biography information for Penny Mordaunt remove filter
star this property tabling member
1513
unstar this property label Biography information for Jo Swinson more like this
760288
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-09-13more like thismore than 2017-09-13
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions remove filter
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Employment and Support Allowance more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many claimants who were placed in the work-related activity group for employment and support allowance during the financial year 2014-15 remained in that group for two or more years. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Glenrothes more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Peter Grant more like this
star this property uin 10498 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-10-09more like thismore than 2017-10-09
star this property answer text <p>The information requested is not readily available and to provide it would incur disproportionate cost.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Portsmouth North more like this
star this property answering member printed Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-10-09T12:24:02.64Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-09T12:24:02.64Z
star this property answering member
4017
star this property label Biography information for Penny Mordaunt remove filter
star this property tabling member
4466
unstar this property label Biography information for Peter Grant more like this
765388
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-10-06more like thismore than 2017-10-06
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions remove filter
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Hartlepool more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people in Hartlepool have appealed against his Department's decision not to grant them personal independence payments in the last 12 months. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Hartlepool more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mike Hill more like this
star this property uin 105660 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-10-13more like thismore than 2017-10-13
star this property answer text <p>The number of appeals lodged against Personal Independence Payment claims which were disallowed at initial decision and where this decision was upheld at mandatory reconsideration for Hartlepool in the last 12 months is 110.</p><p> </p><p>Period covered: August 2016 – July 2017 (latest available data).</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Portsmouth North more like this
star this property answering member printed Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-10-13T14:06:19.463Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-13T14:06:19.463Z
star this property answering member
4017
star this property label Biography information for Penny Mordaunt remove filter
star this property tabling member
4644
unstar this property label Biography information for Mike Hill more like this
765464
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-10-06more like thismore than 2017-10-06
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions remove filter
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Appeals more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment he has made of the reasons for the recent trends in the number of successful personal independence payment tribunal appeals; and if he will make a statement. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Wallasey more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Ms Angela Eagle more like this
star this property uin 106173 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-10-11more like thismore than 2017-10-11
star this property answer text <p>The main reason that decisions are overturned at appeal is additional evidence provided by the claimant at appeal stage.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Portsmouth North more like this
star this property answering member printed Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-10-11T14:28:06.157Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-11T14:28:06.157Z
star this property answering member
4017
star this property label Biography information for Penny Mordaunt remove filter
star this property tabling member
491
unstar this property label Biography information for Dame Angela Eagle more like this
765466
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-10-06more like thismore than 2017-10-06
star this property answering body
Department for Work and Pensions remove filter
star this property answering dept id 29 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Hearing Impairment more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to the Answer of 12 September 2017 to Question 8352, on personal independence payment (PIP): hearing impairment, what estimate he has made of the cost of developing a joined-up digital journey for PIP claimants with health and disability needs. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Stockton North more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Alex Cunningham more like this
star this property uin 106301 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-10-11more like thismore than 2017-10-11
star this property answer text <p>I refer the hon. Member to my previous answer on 12 September, PQ <a href="http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-question/Commons/2017-09-04/8352/" target="_blank">8352</a>.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Portsmouth North more like this
star this property answering member printed Penny Mordaunt more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-10-11T17:00:12.72Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-11T17:00:12.72Z
star this property answering member
4017
star this property label Biography information for Penny Mordaunt remove filter
star this property tabling member
4122
unstar this property label Biography information for Alex Cunningham more like this