Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

1232854

	registered interest
	date	09/09/2020
	answering body	Attorney General
	answering dept id	88
	answering dept short name	Attorney General
	answering dept sort name	Attorney General
	hansard heading	International Law
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Attorney General, with reference to the oral contribution of the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland on 8 September 2020, Official Report, column 509, on how many occasions since May 2010 the Government has brought forward legislative proposals giving powers to Ministers to breach international law.
	tabling member constituency	Bermondsey and Old Southwark
	tabling member printed	Neil Coyle
	uin	87561
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/09/2020 answer text <p>Parliament is sovereign as a matter of domestic law and can pass legislation, even if such legislation is in breach of the UK’s treaty obligations. From time to time tensions arise between our international obligations and domestic legislation. In 2012, The House of Lords Reform Bill 2012-13 was brought forward with the statement that the Deputy Prime Minister at the time was ‘unable to make a statement of compatibility under section 19(1)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1998’ which reflects the UK’s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights (this Bill was later withdrawn for other reasons). Whilst pre-dating 2010, a further example from 2002 was when the then Government introduced the Communications Bill with a section 19(1)(b) certificate under the Human Rights Act 1998 (ie that whilst the Minster is unable to make a statement of compatibility the government nevertheless wishes to proceed with the Bill) because it was perceived that clause 309 of that Bill could be considered to violate our international obligations under article 10 of the ECHR. The current legislative proposal, if enacted, would deliver the wider objectives of the Protocol, which is to protect peace in NI and the Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement.</p> answering member constituency Fareham answering member printed Suella Braverman question first answered 14/09/2020 17:47:29 answering member 4475 label Biography information for Suella Braverman
	tabling member	4368 label Biography information for Neil Coyle

1232954

	registered interest
	date	09/09/2020
	answering body	Attorney General
	answering dept id	88
	answering dept short name	Attorney General
	answering dept sort name	Attorney General
	hansard heading	Attorney General: Staff
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Attorney General, how many members of staff in their Department have one or more of the words equality, diversity, inclusion, gender, LGBT or race in their job title.
	tabling member constituency	Harborough
	tabling member printed	Neil O'Brien
	uin	87658
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 18/09/2020 answer text <p>No job titles in the Attorney General’s Office (AGO), the Government Legal Department (GLD), and Her Majesty’s Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate (HMCPSI) include the words equality, diversity, inclusion, gender, LGBT or race.</p><p> </p><p>The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) employs 6260 members of staff and 21 members of staff within the Department have one or more of the words equality, diversity, inclusion, gender, LGBT or race in their job title.</p><p> </p><p>The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has no staff with these words in their job titles, however, one of the SFO’s Strategic Objectives is to build an effective and inclusive workforce, treating their staff fairly and with respect and dignity. There are also a large number of people in the organisation engaged on improving equality, diversity and inclusion across the office.</p> answering member constituency Northampton North answering member printed Michael Ellis question first answered 18/09/2020 13:39:32 answering member 4116 label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis
	tabling member	4679 label Biography information for Neil O'Brien

1230657

	registered interest
	date	02/09/2020
	answering body	Attorney General
	answering dept id	88
	answering dept short name	Attorney General
	answering dept sort name	Attorney General
	hansard heading	Attorney General: Personnel Management
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Attorney General, how many full-time equivalent staff were employed in his Department's human resources section in April 2020.
	tabling member constituency	Carlisle
	tabling member printed	John Stevenson
	uin	84194
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 11/09/2020 answer text <p>The following table shows the number of full-time equivalent HR staff at the Attorney General’s Office (AGO), the Government Legal Department (GLD) and HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate (HMCPSI), Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and Serious Fraud Office (SFO) for April 2020:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Department</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>FTE</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>AGO*</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GLD</p></td><td><p>67.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>HMCPSI*</p></td><td><p>3.6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>CPS</p></td><td><p>134.45</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>SFO</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>*These staff also perform other non-HR duties in their roles.</p> answering member constituency Northampton North answering member printed Michael Ellis question first answered 11/09/2020 11:15:13 answering member 4116 label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis
	tabling member	3942 label Biography information for John Stevenson

1228799

	registered interest
	date	28/08/2020
	answering body	Attorney General
	answering dept id	88
	answering dept short name	Attorney General
	answering dept sort name	Attorney General
	hansard heading	Trespass: Prosecutions
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Attorney General, what is the prosecution rate is for trespass committed in (a) Sussex and (b) England.
	tabling member constituency	Arundel and South Downs
	tabling member printed	Andrew Griffith
	uin	82648
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 08/09/2020 answer text <p>The CPS does not maintain a central record of prosecutions which involved trespass. This information could only be obtained by an examination of CPS case files, which would incur disproportionate cost.</p><p> </p><p>Trespass is not of itself a criminal offence. However, there are some offences in which trespass is an essential element. The tables below set out the most common examples of such offences, where a prosecution commenced in the Sussex Police Force Area and in England, during each of the last three years.</p><p> </p><p>Offences recorded in the CPS Case Management Information System are those which reached a hearing. There is no indication of the final outcome or if the charged offence was the substantive charge at finalisation.</p><p> </p><p>It should be noted that the figures relate to the number of offences and not the number of individual defendants. It may be the case that an individual defendant is charged with more than one offence.</p><p><strong>TABLE (A) SUSSEX POLICE FORCE AREA</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>2017-2018</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2018-2019</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2019-2020</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 { 61(4) }</p></td><td><p>Failing to comply with a police direction to leave land</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 { 62B }</p></td><td><p>Failure to comply with a direction under s62A to leave land: alternative site available</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 { 63 }</p></td><td><p>Failure to comply with a direction to leave land: attending or preparing for a rave</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 { 65 }</p></td><td><p>Failing to comply with a direction not to proceed to a rave</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 { 68 }</p></td><td><p>Aggravated trespass</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 { 69 }</p></td><td><p>Failing to comply with a direction: aggravated trespass</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 { 76 }</p></td><td><p>Trespassing during the currency of an interim possession order (“IPO”)</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Law Act 1977 { 6 }</p></td><td><p>Violence to secure entry</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>19</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Law Act 1977 { 7 }</p></td><td><p>Adverse occupation of residential premises.</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Law Act 1977 { 8 }</p></td><td><p>Trespassing with a weapon of offence</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Law Act 1977 { 9 }</p></td><td><p>Trespassing on premises of a foreign mission</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Firearms Act 1968 { 20(1) of and Schedule 6 }</p></td><td><p>Trespass in a building with a firearm or imitation firearm</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Firearms Act 1968 { 20(2) of and Schedule 6 }</p></td><td><p>Trespass on land with a firearm</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Public Order Act 1986 { 14B(3) and (7) }</p></td><td><p>Inciting another knowingly to take part in a prohibited assembly</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Public Order Act 1986 { 14C(3) and (5) }</p></td><td><p>Failing to comply with a direction: trespassory assembly.</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment Act 2012 { 144(1) and (5) }</p></td><td><p>Squatting in residential premises.</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong> </strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Data Source: CPS Case Management Information System</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>TABLE (B) ENGLAND </strong></p><p> </p><p><strong> <strong> </strong></strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>2017-2018</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2018-2019</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2019-2020</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 { 61(4) }</p></td><td><p>Failing to comply with a police direction to leave land</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 { 62B }</p></td><td><p>Failure to comply with a direction under s62A to leave land: alternative site available</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 { 63 }</p></td><td><p>Failure to comply with a direction to leave land: attending or preparing for a rave</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 { 65 }</p></td><td><p>Failing to comply with a direction not to proceed to a rave</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 { 68 }</p></td><td><p>Aggravated trespass</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>45</p></td><td><p>114</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 { 69 }</p></td><td><p>Failing to comply with a direction: aggravated trespass</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>36</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 { 76 }</p></td><td><p>Trespassing during the currency of an interim possession order (“IPO”)</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Law Act 1977 { 6 }</p></td><td><p>Violence to secure entry</p></td><td><p>1,413</p></td><td><p>1,271</p></td><td><p>1,081</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Law Act 1977 { 7 }</p></td><td><p>Adverse occupation of residential premises.</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Law Act 1977 { 8 }</p></td><td><p>Trespassing with a weapon of offence</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Law Act 1977 { 9 }</p></td><td><p>Trespassing on premises of a foreign mission</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Firearms Act 1968 { 20(1) of and Schedule 6 }</p></td><td><p>Trespass in a building with a firearm or imitation firearm</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Firearms Act 1968 { 20(2) of and Schedule 6 }</p></td><td><p>Trespass on land with a firearm</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Public Order Act 1986 { 14B(3) and (7) }</p></td><td><p>Inciting another knowingly to take part in a prohibited assembly</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Public Order Act 1986 { 14C(3) and (5) }</p></td><td><p>Failing to comply with a direction: trespassory assembly.</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment Act 2012 { 144(1) and (5) }</p></td><td><p>Squatting in residential premises.</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>39</p></td><td><p>25</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong> </strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Data Source: CPS Case Management Information System</p></td></tr></tbody></table> answering member constituency Northampton North answering member printed Michael Ellis question first answered 08/09/2020 09:00:32 answering member 4116 label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis
	tabling member	4874 label Biography information for Andrew Griffith

1227862

	registered interest
	date	23/07/2020
	answering body	Attorney General
	answering dept id	88
	answering dept short name	Attorney General
	answering dept sort name	Attorney General
	hansard heading	Forced Marriage: Prosecutions
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government how many prosecutions were initiated in relation to forced marriage in (1) 2014, (2) 2015, (3) 2016, (4) 2017, (5) 2018, and (5) 2019; and how many such prosecutions were successful in each year.
	tabling member printed	The Lord Bishop of St Albans
	uin	HL7247
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 03/08/2020 answer text <p>From 2014 to date, CPS data for the number of cases prosecuted and the outcomes is:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>2014-2015</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015-2016</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2016-2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2017-2018</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2018-2019</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2019-2020</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Convictions</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>37</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Non-Convictions</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p><strong>46</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>53</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>44</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>50</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>12</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>8</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Between 2014 – 15 and 2017 – 18, this data included cases that included the forced marriage flag on the CPS’s case management system as well as cases charged as forced marriage. In 2018 – 19, the CPS conducted quality assurance checks on the guidance for applying the forced marriage flag. The data for that year does not include flagged cases but only cases charged as a forced marriage offence. The most recent data (2019 – 20) includes flagged cases but reflects the updated guidance on applying the flag which has resulted in improved accuracy.</p> answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie question first answered 03/08/2020 13:26:48 answering member 4538 label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie
	tabling member	4308 label Biography information for The Lord Bishop of St Albans

1227325

	registered interest
	date	22/07/2020
	answering body	Attorney General
	answering dept id	88
	answering dept short name	Attorney General
	answering dept sort name	Attorney General
	hansard heading	Sexual Offences: Private Rented Housing
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Attorney General, pursuant to the Answer of 21 July 2020 to Question 75406 on Sexual Offences: Private Rented Housing, what assessment she has made of the effectiveness of the updated January 2019 CPS guidance on sex for rent arrangements and advertisements; and whether that guidance has resulted on prosecutions.
	tabling member constituency	Hove
	tabling member printed	Peter Kyle
	uin	78763
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 01/09/2020 answer text <p>The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) does not maintain a central record of the number of prosecutions for sex for rent arrangements and advertisements under section 52 or 53 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. This information could only be obtained by an examination of individual CPS case files, which would incur disproportionate cost. Therefore, the CPS is unable to make an assessment of the effectiveness of updated CPS guidance on prosecutions of sex for rent arrangements and advertisements.</p><p>Prosecutors will consider all guidance available to them when applying the Code for Crown Prosecutors to determine whether there is enough evidence to charge and if it is in the public interest to bring a case to court.</p> answering member constituency Northampton North answering member printed Michael Ellis grouped question UIN 78764 question first answered 01/09/2020 15:41:01 answering member 4116 label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis
	tabling member	4505 label Biography information for Peter Kyle

1227347

	registered interest
	date	22/07/2020
	answering body	Attorney General
	answering dept id	88
	answering dept short name	Attorney General
	answering dept sort name	Attorney General
	hansard heading	Sexual Offences: Private Rented Housing
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Attorney General, pursuant to the Answer of 21 July 2020 to Question 75406 on Sexual Offences: Private Rented Housing, what estimate she has made of the number of prosecutions for Sex for Rent Arrangements and Advertisements under section 52 or 53 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 in the last 12 months.
	tabling member constituency	Hove
	tabling member printed	Peter Kyle
	uin	78764
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 01/09/2020 answer text <p>The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) does not maintain a central record of the number of prosecutions for sex for rent arrangements and advertisements under section 52 or 53 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. This information could only be obtained by an examination of individual CPS case files, which would incur disproportionate cost. Therefore, the CPS is unable to make an assessment of the effectiveness of updated CPS guidance on prosecutions of sex for rent arrangements and advertisements.</p><p>Prosecutors will consider all guidance available to them when applying the Code for Crown Prosecutors to determine whether there is enough evidence to charge and if it is in the public interest to bring a case to court.</p> answering member constituency Northampton North answering member printed Michael Ellis grouped question UIN 78763 question first answered 01/09/2020 15:41:01 answering member 4116 label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis
	tabling member	4505 label Biography information for Peter Kyle

1227411

	registered interest
	date	22/07/2020
	answering body	Attorney General
	answering dept id	88
	answering dept short name	Attorney General
	answering dept sort name	Attorney General
	hansard heading	Emergency Services: Crimes of Violence
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Attorney General, how many prosecutions for assaulting an emergency worker have related to assaults against (a) police officers, (b) NHS staff, (c) prison officers, (d) firefighters and (e) other emergency workers since the offence was introduced.
	tabling member constituency	Shipley
	tabling member printed	Philip Davies
	uin	78585
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 01/09/2020 answer text <p>The Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018 is legislation that amended section39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 to provide offences relating to common assault or battery committed against an emergency worker while carrying out their duties.</p><p> </p><p>The CPS maintains records of the number of offences in which a CPS prosecution commenced, including offences of assaulting an emergency worker. The data provided in the table detailed below shows the total number of offences in which a prosecution by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) commenced at magistrates’ courts under the Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018 since it came into force on the 13<sup>th</sup> November 2018. However the CPS does not hold any central record of the details of complainants’ occupations.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>2018/19 (Nov 18 - Mar 19)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2019/20</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total offences: Criminal Justice Act 1988 and section 1 of the Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018 {39}</p></td><td><p>4,395</p></td><td><p>23,492</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>It should be noted that the figures relate to the number of offences and not the number of individual defendants. It may be the case that an individual defendant is charged with more than one offence. No data are held on the final outcome or if the charged offence was the substantive charge at finalisation.</p><p> </p><p>The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) does not maintain a central record of the number of defendants charged with, or prosecuted for these offences. This information could only be obtained by examining CPS case files, which would incur disproportionate cost.</p> answering member constituency Northampton North answering member printed Michael Ellis question first answered 01/09/2020 15:54:45 answering member 4116 label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis
	tabling member	1565 label Biography information for Sir Philip Davies

1227423

	registered interest
	date	22/07/2020
	answering body	Attorney General
	answering dept id	88
	answering dept short name	Attorney General
	answering dept sort name	Attorney General
	hansard heading	Retail Trade: Crimes of Violence
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Attorney General, what estimate she has made of the proportion of assaults on shop workers that were prosecuted in each of the last three years.
	tabling member constituency	Shipley
	tabling member printed	Philip Davies
	uin	78588
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 01/09/2020 answer text <p>The CPS does not maintain a central record of complainants’ occupations, nor of the specific circumstances under which a person has been charged with an offence. This information could only be obtained by an examination of CPS case files, which would incur disproportionate cost.</p> answering member constituency Northampton North answering member printed Michael Ellis question first answered 01/09/2020 16:00:10 answering member 4116 label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis
	tabling member	1565 label Biography information for Sir Philip Davies

1227475

	registered interest
	date	22/07/2020
	answering body	Attorney General
	answering dept id	88
	answering dept short name	Attorney General
	answering dept sort name	Attorney General
	hansard heading	Sentencing: Appeals
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Attorney General, what recent sentences she has extended through the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme.
	tabling member constituency	South Holland and The Deepings
	tabling member printed	Sir John Hayes
	uin	78506
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 01/09/2020 answer text <p>The Court of Appeal has recently increased the sentences upon a reference by the Law Officers in the following cases. In the first, the offender Habte stabbed a lone female who was a stranger to him: his sentence was increased to reflect a finding of dangerousness, to one of five years’ detention with a three year licence extension. In a case of manslaughter, the offender Taiwo’s sentence was increased to seven years’ two months imprisonment, building on another case the Law Officers referred which emphasises the seriousness of “one-punch” attacks, Coyle. Most recently, the sentence of a Manchester man who raped his 15 year old girlfriend when he was 19 was referred to the Court and increased to three years’ imprisonment.</p> answering member constituency Northampton North answering member printed Michael Ellis question first answered 01/09/2020 15:45:44 answering member 4116 label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis
	tabling member	350 label Biography information for Sir John Hayes