Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1251919
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-11-13more like thismore than 2020-11-13
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer of 15 October 2020 to Question 102112, what estimate his Department has made of the amount of monies voluntarily returned as part of the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme since 13 October 2020. more like this
tabling member constituency Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey more like this
tabling member printed
Drew Hendry more like this
uin 91986 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-11-18more like thismore than 2020-11-18
answer text <p>As of 3 November 2020, Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) grants to the value of £382m have been recorded as returned. This figure consists of £198m in payments being repaid and £184m in adjustments to existing claims.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire more like this
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-11-18T12:31:08.72Zmore like thismore than 2020-11-18T12:31:08.72Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
4467
label Biography information for Drew Hendry more like this
1251953
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-11-13more like thismore than 2020-11-13
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Self-employment Income Support Scheme: Mortgages more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether his Department have provided any guidance to mortgage lenders on the potential merits of including SEISS payments as income for the purposes of assessing affordability of a mortgage applicant. more like this
tabling member constituency Gateshead more like this
tabling member printed
Ian Mearns more like this
uin 91961 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-11-18more like thismore than 2020-11-18
answer text <p>HM Treasury is in regular conversations with mortgage lenders about market conditions. However, the decision of a lender to offer products to customers is a commercial one, in which the government does not seek to interfere.</p><p> </p><p>In 2014 the FCA introduced regulations under the Mortgage Market Review which required lenders to conduct a rigorous affordability assessment for new borrowers, obtaining evidence of income and expenditure. Lenders have significant flexibility in determining how to assess the affordability and circumstances of individual customers.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Salisbury more like this
answering member printed John Glen more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-11-18T11:55:29.06Zmore like thismore than 2020-11-18T11:55:29.06Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
4000
label Biography information for Ian Mearns more like this
1251384
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-11-12more like thismore than 2020-11-12
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Beer: Excise Duties more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will make an estimate of the cost to the public purse of retaining the Small Brewers Relief threshold at 5000 hectolitres rather than lowering that threshold to 2100 hectolitres. more like this
tabling member constituency Easington more like this
tabling member printed
Grahame Morris more like this
uin 114833 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-11-17more like thismore than 2020-11-17
answer text <p>An estimate is not possible at this stage as the Government has not consulted on its announced plans for a new, more gradual taper for the SBR scheme. This will take place later this year.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Saffron Walden more like this
answering member printed Kemi Badenoch more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-11-17T11:52:54.113Zmore like thismore than 2020-11-17T11:52:54.113Z
answering member
4597
label Biography information for Kemi Badenoch more like this
tabling member
3973
label Biography information for Grahame Morris more like this
1251393
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-11-12more like thismore than 2020-11-12
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Redundancy: Coronavirus more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will make an estimate of the number of employees that would have been eligible for the coronavirus job retention scheme that have been made redundant as a result of their employer being unable to meet the cost of Class 1 National Insurance contributions for those employees, since the removal of the grant to cover that cost on 1 August 2020. more like this
tabling member constituency Manchester Central more like this
tabling member printed
Lucy Powell more like this
uin 114897 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-11-18more like thismore than 2020-11-18
answer text <p>Of the employees who left the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) furlough scheme between April and July, 90% were still on their original payroll in August, suggesting they remained working for their original employer.</p><p> </p><p>HMRC do not collect information on the reasons why employers choose to make employees redundant, and so it is not possible to estimate how many employees have been made redundant as a result of their employer being unable to meet the cost of Class 1 National Insurance contributions for those employees. For the average claim, employer National Insurance and pension contributions account for 5% of total employment costs.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire more like this
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-11-18T09:14:08.92Zmore like thismore than 2020-11-18T09:14:08.92Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
4263
label Biography information for Lucy Powell more like this
1251413
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-11-12more like thismore than 2020-11-12
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Buildings: VAT more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what plans he has to reduce VAT on essential repairs to pre-1919 properties. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow North West more like this
tabling member printed
Carol Monaghan more like this
uin 114942 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-11-17more like thismore than 2020-11-17
answer text <p>There was previously a zero rate of VAT on restorative work to listed and historic buildings. However, the relief was mainly being used to carry out extension work, which was contrary to the intent of the legislation to preserve heritage, and was removed following consultation in 2012.</p><p> </p><p>The Government has no current plans to change the VAT treatment of restorative construction work on listed and historic buildings.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire more like this
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-11-17T10:40:17.517Zmore like thismore than 2020-11-17T10:40:17.517Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
4443
label Biography information for Carol Monaghan more like this
1251452
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-11-12more like thismore than 2020-11-12
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Companies: Registration more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many supervised company formation agents HMRC visited from (a) 1 Jan 2018 to 31 Dec 2018 and (b) 1 Jan 2019 to 31 Dec 2019. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow Central more like this
tabling member printed
Alison Thewliss more like this
uin 114930 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-11-17more like thismore than 2020-11-17
answer text <p>HMRC supervises businesses in nine sectors under the Money Laundering Regulations (MLRs), including those Trust or Company Service Providers (TCSPs) not supervised by other bodies. HMRC does not publish information relating to targeting of supervisory visits in particular sectors. Such information could be used by criminals to aid their efforts to attempt to launder money or finance terrorism.</p><p>HM Treasury publishes aggregate details of HMRC’s supervision activity in its annual “Anti-money laundering and counter terrorist finance supervision report”.</p><p>Since 8 May 2019, HMRC has not identified any company formation agents who should be but are not registered with HMRC.</p><p>HMRC’s Anti Money Laundering Supervision team employs 16 full time equivalent staff to identify businesses that should be registered with HMRC under the MLRs but are not. These ‘policing the perimeter’ staff are not designated to specific sectors.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Salisbury more like this
answering member printed John Glen more like this
grouped question UIN
114931 more like this
114932 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-11-17T11:45:41.473Zmore like thismore than 2020-11-17T11:45:41.473Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
4430
label Biography information for Alison Thewliss more like this
1251453
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-11-12more like thismore than 2020-11-12
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Companies: Registration more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many and what proportion of company formation agents that should be registered for supervision but are not have been identified by HMRC since 8 May 2019. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow Central more like this
tabling member printed
Alison Thewliss more like this
uin 114931 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-11-17more like thismore than 2020-11-17
answer text <p>HMRC supervises businesses in nine sectors under the Money Laundering Regulations (MLRs), including those Trust or Company Service Providers (TCSPs) not supervised by other bodies. HMRC does not publish information relating to targeting of supervisory visits in particular sectors. Such information could be used by criminals to aid their efforts to attempt to launder money or finance terrorism.</p><p>HM Treasury publishes aggregate details of HMRC’s supervision activity in its annual “Anti-money laundering and counter terrorist finance supervision report”.</p><p>Since 8 May 2019, HMRC has not identified any company formation agents who should be but are not registered with HMRC.</p><p>HMRC’s Anti Money Laundering Supervision team employs 16 full time equivalent staff to identify businesses that should be registered with HMRC under the MLRs but are not. These ‘policing the perimeter’ staff are not designated to specific sectors.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Salisbury more like this
answering member printed John Glen more like this
grouped question UIN
114930 more like this
114932 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-11-17T11:45:41.533Zmore like thismore than 2020-11-17T11:45:41.533Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
4430
label Biography information for Alison Thewliss more like this
1251454
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-11-12more like thismore than 2020-11-12
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Companies: Registration more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many HMRC full time equivalent staff are tasked with identifying company formation agents that should be registered for supervision but are not. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow Central more like this
tabling member printed
Alison Thewliss more like this
uin 114932 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-11-17more like thismore than 2020-11-17
answer text <p>HMRC supervises businesses in nine sectors under the Money Laundering Regulations (MLRs), including those Trust or Company Service Providers (TCSPs) not supervised by other bodies. HMRC does not publish information relating to targeting of supervisory visits in particular sectors. Such information could be used by criminals to aid their efforts to attempt to launder money or finance terrorism.</p><p>HM Treasury publishes aggregate details of HMRC’s supervision activity in its annual “Anti-money laundering and counter terrorist finance supervision report”.</p><p>Since 8 May 2019, HMRC has not identified any company formation agents who should be but are not registered with HMRC.</p><p>HMRC’s Anti Money Laundering Supervision team employs 16 full time equivalent staff to identify businesses that should be registered with HMRC under the MLRs but are not. These ‘policing the perimeter’ staff are not designated to specific sectors.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Salisbury more like this
answering member printed John Glen more like this
grouped question UIN
114930 more like this
114931 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-11-17T11:45:41.58Zmore like thismore than 2020-11-17T11:45:41.58Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
4430
label Biography information for Alison Thewliss more like this
1251468
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-11-12more like thismore than 2020-11-12
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Mortgages more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the implications for his policies of the proposals made by the London School of Economics on mortgage prisoners, published 11 November 2020. more like this
tabling member constituency Belfast South more like this
tabling member printed
Claire Hanna more like this
uin 115040 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-11-17more like thismore than 2020-11-17
answer text <p>We are grateful to London School of Economics (LSE) and Martin Lewis for their contribution to this conversation.</p><p> </p><p>We remain committed to supporting these borrowers and are pleased that active lenders have started offering switching options specifically for mortgage prisoners taking advantage of the new flexibilities given to them by the FCA. We will monitor the impact of this in the coming months.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Salisbury more like this
answering member printed John Glen more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-11-17T11:16:42.37Zmore like thismore than 2020-11-17T11:16:42.37Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
4827
label Biography information for Claire Hanna more like this
1251477
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-11-12more like thismore than 2020-11-12
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Wholesale Trade: Coronavirus more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the effect of the ineligibility of wholesalers for Business Rates Relief on the integrity of public sector supply chains. more like this
tabling member constituency Denton and Reddish more like this
tabling member printed
Andrew Gwynne more like this
uin 114797 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-11-17more like thismore than 2020-11-17
answer text <p>The Government has provided unprecedented levels of support for workers and businesses to protect, as much as possible, against the current economic emergency. Food and drink wholesalers have been eligible for a number of these support schemes, with the most relevant likely to include:</p><p> </p><ul><li>The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme to help keep millions of people in employment;</li><li>£10,000 cash grants for all business properties in receipt of Small Business Rates Relief and Rural Rates Relief;</li><li>The Bounce Back Loan Scheme for small businesses to borrow between £2,000 and £50,000, with no interest payments or fees for the first 12 months.</li></ul><p> </p><p>Food and drink wholesalers have also benefited from the Eat Out to Help Out Scheme which provided over 100 million half price meals during August and helped to protect the livelihoods of the 1.8 million people working in the hospitality sector.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Saffron Walden more like this
answering member printed Kemi Badenoch more like this
grouped question UIN 114951 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-11-17T11:48:03.687Zmore like thismore than 2020-11-17T11:48:03.687Z
answering member
4597
label Biography information for Kemi Badenoch more like this
tabling member
1506
label Biography information for Andrew Gwynne more like this