Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

993655

registered interest
date	23/10/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Public Sector: Pay
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what modelling the Treasury has undertaken of the potential economic effect (a) regionally and (b) nationally of regional pay for public sector workers.
tabling member constituency	Bootle
tabling member printed	Peter Dowd
uin	182847
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 26/10/2018 answer text <p>HMT has not undertaken modelling to assess the economic effect of regional pay for public sector workers.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency South West Norfolk answering member printed Elizabeth Truss question first answered 26/10/2018 11:08:01 answering member 4097 label Biography information for Elizabeth Truss
tabling member	4397 label Biography information for Peter Dowd

984565

registered interest
date	09/10/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Tax Avoidance
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the potential contribution to the public purse of the new anti-avoidance rule involving profit fragmentation arrangements in each financial year from 2017-8 to 2021-22.
tabling member constituency	Bootle
tabling member printed	Peter Dowd
uin	177336
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 15/10/2018 answer text <p>Estimates approved by the Office for Budget Responsibility are not available.</p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 15/10/2018 16:54:29 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4397 label Biography information for Peter Dowd

984566

registered interest
date	09/10/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Gambling: Excise Duties
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the contribution to the public purse of proposed changes to the way gaming duty is calculated in each year from 2017-18 to 2021-22.
tabling member constituency	Bootle
tabling member printed	Peter Dowd
uin	177337
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 15/10/2018 answer text <p>We expect the ability to carry forward losses will have a negligible negative impact on public finances but this has not yet been determined by the OBR. The government is currently engaging with the OBR on the impact of this measure.</p><p> </p><p>This impact was set out in the summary of responses to the “Gaming Duty: review of accounting periods” consultation. This is available here: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/722409/Gaming_Duty_review_of_accounting_periods_summary_of_responses.pdf</p> answering member constituency Newark answering member printed Robert Jenrick question first answered 15/10/2018 14:56:09 answering member 4320 label Biography information for Robert Jenrick
tabling member	4397 label Biography information for Peter Dowd

984567

registered interest
date	09/10/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Corporation Tax
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the contribution to the public purse of proposed changes to corporate interest restriction rules in each year from 2017-18 to 2021-22.
tabling member constituency	Bootle
tabling member printed	Peter Dowd
uin	177338
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 15/10/2018 answer text <p>Corporate interest restriction rules</p><p>Three changes to the original corporate interest restriction (CIR) rules have been announced since the measure was introduced.</p><p>Technical amendments to ensure the regime works as intended were announced at Autumn Budget 2017. These amendments are not expected to have an Exchequer impact in each year from 2017-18 to 2021-22. Further information can be found in the tax impact and information note (TIIN): <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/corporation-tax-amendments-to-the-corporate-interest-restriction-rules/corporation-tax-amendments-to-the-corporate-interest-restriction-rules" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/corporation-tax-amendments-to-the-corporate-interest-restriction-rules/corporation-tax-amendments-to-the-corporate-interest-restriction-rules</a></p><p>Further technical amendments to ensure the regime works as intended were announced alongside the Finance Bill 2018-19. These amendments will not apply in 2017-18 and are not expected to have an Exchequer impact in each year from 2018-19 to 2021-22. Further information can be found in the TIIN: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/corporation-tax-changes-to-the-corporate-interest-restriction-rules/corporation-tax-amendments-to-the-corporate-interest-restriction-rules" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/corporation-tax-changes-to-the-corporate-interest-restriction-rules/corporation-tax-amendments-to-the-corporate-interest-restriction-rules</a></p><p>Technical amendments to a number of parts of the tax legislation, including the CIR rules, were also announced alongside Finance Bill 2018-19 in response to changes to the accounting treatment of leases. These amendments will not apply in 2017-18 and are expected to have a negligible impact on the Exchequer in each year from 2018-19 to 2021-22. Further information can be found in the TIIN: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/income-tax-and-corporation-tax-response-to-accounting-changes-for-leasing/income-tax-and-corporation-tax-response-to-accounting-changes-for-leasing" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/income-tax-and-corporation-tax-response-to-accounting-changes-for-leasing/income-tax-and-corporation-tax-response-to-accounting-changes-for-leasing</a></p><p> </p><p>Carried forward losses for insurance companies</p><p>Estimates approved by the Office for Budget Responsibility are not available.</p><p> </p><p> </p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride grouped question UIN 177339 question first answered 15/10/2018 16:54:47 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4397 label Biography information for Peter Dowd

984568

registered interest
date	09/10/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Insurance Companies
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the contribution to the public purse of proposed changes to carried forward losses for insurance companies in each year from 2017-18 to 2021-22.
tabling member constituency	Bootle
tabling member printed	Peter Dowd
uin	177339
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 15/10/2018 answer text <p>Corporate interest restriction rules</p><p>Three changes to the original corporate interest restriction (CIR) rules have been announced since the measure was introduced.</p><p>Technical amendments to ensure the regime works as intended were announced at Autumn Budget 2017. These amendments are not expected to have an Exchequer impact in each year from 2017-18 to 2021-22. Further information can be found in the tax impact and information note (TIIN): <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/corporation-tax-amendments-to-the-corporate-interest-restriction-rules/corporation-tax-amendments-to-the-corporate-interest-restriction-rules" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/corporation-tax-amendments-to-the-corporate-interest-restriction-rules/corporation-tax-amendments-to-the-corporate-interest-restriction-rules</a></p><p>Further technical amendments to ensure the regime works as intended were announced alongside the Finance Bill 2018-19. These amendments will not apply in 2017-18 and are not expected to have an Exchequer impact in each year from 2018-19 to 2021-22. Further information can be found in the TIIN: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/corporation-tax-changes-to-the-corporate-interest-restriction-rules/corporation-tax-amendments-to-the-corporate-interest-restriction-rules" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/corporation-tax-changes-to-the-corporate-interest-restriction-rules/corporation-tax-amendments-to-the-corporate-interest-restriction-rules</a></p><p>Technical amendments to a number of parts of the tax legislation, including the CIR rules, were also announced alongside Finance Bill 2018-19 in response to changes to the accounting treatment of leases. These amendments will not apply in 2017-18 and are expected to have a negligible impact on the Exchequer in each year from 2018-19 to 2021-22. Further information can be found in the TIIN: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/income-tax-and-corporation-tax-response-to-accounting-changes-for-leasing/income-tax-and-corporation-tax-response-to-accounting-changes-for-leasing" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/income-tax-and-corporation-tax-response-to-accounting-changes-for-leasing/income-tax-and-corporation-tax-response-to-accounting-changes-for-leasing</a></p><p> </p><p>Carried forward losses for insurance companies</p><p>Estimates approved by the Office for Budget Responsibility are not available.</p><p> </p><p> </p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride grouped question UIN 177338 question first answered 15/10/2018 16:54:47 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4397 label Biography information for Peter Dowd

984569

registered interest
date	09/10/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Business Expenses
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the contribution to the public purse of the introduction of overseas scale rates for employee travel expenses in each year from 2017-18 to 2021-22.
tabling member constituency	Bootle
tabling member printed	Peter Dowd
uin	177340
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 15/10/2018 answer text <p>The Government’s estimates of the effect of the introduction of overseas scale rates for employee travel expenses is set out in the policy paper “Abolition of receipt checking for benchmark scale rates and changes to overseas scale rates”.</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/abolition-of-receipt-checking-for-benchmark-scale-rates-and-changes-to-overseas-scale-rates/abolition-of-receipt-checking-for-benchmark-scale-rates-and-changes-to-overseas-scale-rates" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/abolition-of-receipt-checking-for-benchmark-scale-rates-and-changes-to-overseas-scale-rates/abolition-of-receipt-checking-for-benchmark-scale-rates-and-changes-to-overseas-scale-rates</a></p><p> </p><p>Overseas scale rates have been in HMRC guidance since 2008, and are now being put on a statutory basis. The change described in the policy paper is not expected to have any significant economic impacts and the Exchequer impact from legislating overseas scale rates is estimated to be negligible.</p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 15/10/2018 16:55:10 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4397 label Biography information for Peter Dowd

968397

registered interest
date	05/09/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Emergency Services: Fringe Benefits
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate his Department has made of the number of emergency service staff using emergency vehicles for private use that have been affected by the changes to taxable benefits: asset made available without transfer introduced in the Finance Act 2017.
tabling member constituency	Bootle
tabling member printed	Peter Dowd
uin	170942
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 10/09/2018 answer text <p>The government has already announced it will be introducing changes to provide transitional protection, retrospective to 6 April 2017, to mitigate the impact to users of emergency vehicles of the changes to the taxation of assets made available without transfer.</p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 10/09/2018 16:37:24 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4397 label Biography information for Peter Dowd

946781

registered interest
date	23/07/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	VAT: Ports
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate his Department has made of the cost to the public purse on not collecting VAT at UK ports after the UK leaves the EU.
tabling member constituency	Bootle
tabling member printed	Peter Dowd
uin	167298
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 04/09/2018 answer text <p>After the UK leaves the EU, goods brought into the UK from the EU and non-EU countries will continue to be subject to VAT as they are now. HM Revenue and Customs will continue to promote compliance and tackle avoidance and evasion to support a level and competitive playing field for law abiding UK businesses.</p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 04/09/2018 15:59:55 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4397 label Biography information for Peter Dowd

946782

registered interest
date	23/07/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	VAT: Port of Dover
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much VAT was raised from goods coming through the Port of Dover in 2017.
tabling member constituency	Bootle
tabling member printed	Peter Dowd
uin	167299
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 04/09/2018 answer text <p>HM Revenue and Customs does not hold the requested information. Most goods passing through the Port of Dover into the UK are EU acquisitions. VAT registered businesses account for VAT due on EU acquisitions via their domestic VAT returns. Information on the specific point of entry for EU acquisitions is not collected as part of this process.</p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 04/09/2018 15:53:47 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4397 label Biography information for Peter Dowd

937515

registered interest
date	09/07/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Off-payroll Working
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what methodology his Department used to calculate the cost of non-compliance with IR35 in the private sector.
tabling member constituency	Bootle
tabling member printed	Peter Dowd
uin	162078
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 17/07/2018 answer text <p>The cost of non-compliance with IR35 in the private sector is projected to increase from £700 million in 2017/18 to £1.2 billion in 2022/23.</p><p> </p><p>The costing is an estimate of the tax revenue lost due to companies considered to have taxable income within the scope of the intermediaries’ legislation not applying the legislation in full. The costing is underpinned by analysis of Corporation Tax data, Companies House data and Self-Assessment tax returns.</p><p> </p><p>The methodology and assumptions used to produce the estimate are similar to the policy costing for the off-payroll working measure (applying only to intermediary engagements with public sector bodies) announced at Budget 2016, which has been certified by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR).</p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 17/07/2018 15:53:20 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4397 label Biography information for Peter Dowd