Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1006873
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-14more like thismore than 2018-11-14
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading VAT: Electronic Government more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what progress has been made on implementing the pilot system for VAT ahead of the introduction of the Making Tax Digital regime in April 2019. more like this
tabling member constituency East Londonderry more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Gregory Campbell more like this
uin 191318 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>In October HMRC opened the pilot to around half a million businesses which meet the initial eligibility criteria. This means that around half of businesses with turnover above the VAT threshold will be able to join the new service now, and begin familiarising themselves with it, with further businesses eligible to join shortly.</p><p><strong> </strong></p> more like this
answering member constituency Central Devon more like this
answering member printed Mel Stride more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-19T15:59:24.003Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-19T15:59:24.003Z
answering member
3935
label Biography information for Mel Stride more like this
tabling member
1409
label Biography information for Mr Gregory Campbell more like this
1006896
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-14more like thismore than 2018-11-14
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Gaming Machines: Excise Duties more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the value of tax receipts as a result of the decision to delay reducing the Fixed Odds Betting Terminal stake. more like this
tabling member constituency Oldham West and Royton more like this
tabling member printed
Jim McMahon more like this
uin 191444 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>As the Chancellor set out to the Treasury Select Committee on 5 November, changes to Fixed Odds Betting Terminals and Remote Gaming Duty will be implemented simultaneously. This ensures that regardless of when changes to Fixed Odds Betting Terminals and Remote Gaming Duty are implemented, there will be no significant change to the exchequer impact.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Newark more like this
answering member printed Robert Jenrick more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-19T13:41:11.95Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-19T13:41:11.95Z
answering member
4320
label Biography information for Robert Jenrick more like this
tabling member
4569
label Biography information for Jim McMahon more like this
1007007
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-14more like thismore than 2018-11-14
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Tax Avoidance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much revenue has accrued to the public purse since 2011 from preventing individuals and companies using accounting derecognition rules in relation to loans and derivatives to avoid paying corporation tax. more like this
tabling member constituency Bootle more like this
tabling member printed
Peter Dowd more like this
uin 191458 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Legislation was introduced with effect from 6 December 2010 to address avoidance schemes under which profits were said to fall out of account, or tax relief for losses were claimed, as a result of the way in which financial assets were recognised in accounts. Since that date, existing schemes have been unwound and there have been no further known iterations of these schemes. The measure has therefore been successful in protecting revenues, but it is not possible to say how much would otherwise have been lost.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Central Devon more like this
answering member printed Mel Stride more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-19T15:35:42.03Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-19T15:35:42.03Z
answering member
3935
label Biography information for Mel Stride more like this
tabling member
4397
label Biography information for Peter Dowd more like this
1007010
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-14more like thismore than 2018-11-14
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Tax Avoidance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much revenue has accrued to the public purse since 2011 through the prevention of tax avoidance resulting from the creation for corporate investors of a credit for UK tax where no tax has been paid. more like this
tabling member constituency Bootle more like this
tabling member printed
Peter Dowd more like this
uin 191459 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Legislation was introduced with effect from 27 February 2012 to address a tax avoidance scheme which sought to obtain tax credits for a corporate investor in relation to distributions made by an Authorised Investment Fund where no underlying tax had in fact been suffered. Separately, legislation was introduced with effect from 15 September 2011 to address tax avoidance which sought to obtain a tax advantage in relation to manufactured overseas dividends, involving claims to repay or set-off withholding tax which had not actually been suffered.</p><p> </p><p>Since these measures were introduced, there have been no known further iterations of these avoidance schemes. They have therefore been successful in protecting revenues, but it is not possible to say how much would otherwise have been lost.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Central Devon more like this
answering member printed Mel Stride more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-19T15:49:21.177Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-19T15:49:21.177Z
answering member
3935
label Biography information for Mel Stride more like this
tabling member
4397
label Biography information for Peter Dowd more like this
1007013
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-14more like thismore than 2018-11-14
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Tax Avoidance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much revenue has accrued to the public purse since 2011 from enabling HMRC to require a security from employers where there is a serious risk that tax due under PAYE or class 1 NICs will go unpaid. more like this
tabling member constituency Bootle more like this
tabling member printed
Peter Dowd more like this
uin 191460 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>HMRC do not measure revenue accruals from Security payments relating to PAYE and/or NICs as this type of intervention is a deposit in absolute terms, which is either used against unpaid liabilities as may be appropriate, or returned to the customer once the risk of non- payment has been reasonably mitigated; therefore the deposits are not additional monies outside of any such liability.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Central Devon more like this
answering member printed Mel Stride more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-19T15:55:36.77Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-19T15:55:36.77Z
answering member
3935
label Biography information for Mel Stride more like this
tabling member
4397
label Biography information for Peter Dowd more like this
1007014
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-14more like thismore than 2018-11-14
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Tax Avoidance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much revenue has accrued to the public purse since 2011 from the (a) introduction of anti-avoidance measures which have modified tax rules that apply to overseas life insurance companies and (b) application of the transfer of business rules when non-profit business is transferred to a non-EEA country. more like this
tabling member constituency Bootle more like this
tabling member printed
Peter Dowd more like this
uin 191461 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Legislation was introduced following the 2010 Summer Budget to counter an avoidance scheme involving the transfer of insurance business with unrecognised profits. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) is not aware of any instances of this avoidance entered into after the legislation was announced, but it is not possible to say how much tax would otherwise have been lost.</p><p>The changes referred to in the question relating to overseas life insurance companies and to transfers of business to non-EEA countries, also proposed in the 2010 Summer Budget, were not anti-avoidance measures. Subsequently Ministers decided not proceed with these measures so HMRC and industry could focus on the substantial changes to the tax rules for life insurance companies introduced in Finance Act 2012.</p><p> </p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Central Devon more like this
answering member printed Mel Stride more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-19T15:52:56.803Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-19T15:52:56.803Z
answering member
3935
label Biography information for Mel Stride more like this
tabling member
4397
label Biography information for Peter Dowd more like this
1007030
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-14more like thismore than 2018-11-14
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Tax Avoidance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much revenue has accrued to the public purse since 2013 from the introduction of anti-avoidance measures related to the introduction of a General Anti-Abuse Rule. more like this
tabling member constituency Bootle more like this
tabling member printed
Peter Dowd more like this
uin 191462 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The General Anti-Abuse Rule (GAAR), introduced in 2013, is expected to raise £235m. The success of the GAAR should not be measured by how much it is expected to raise or the number of times the rule has been invoked.</p><p> </p><p>The principle purpose of the GAAR is to deter taxpayers from entering into abusive tax arrangements in the first place, and initial evidence suggests that GAAR is having this effect. Before HMRC can use the GAAR, it must first refer the case to the GAAR Advisory Panel, an external body separate to HMRC. To date the GAAR Advisory Panel has agreed with HMRC’s view on all cases referred to them. Their opinions are published on GOV.UK.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Central Devon more like this
answering member printed Mel Stride more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-19T15:42:11.91Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-19T15:42:11.91Z
answering member
3935
label Biography information for Mel Stride more like this
tabling member
4397
label Biography information for Peter Dowd more like this
1007163
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-14more like thismore than 2018-11-14
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Double Taxation: Crown Dependencies more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether his Department took steps to seek to include an increase in transparency for beneficial ownership registers in the negotiations for the double taxation treaties with Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man. more like this
tabling member constituency Oxford East more like this
tabling member printed
Anneliese Dodds more like this
uin 191479 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Beneficial ownership registers are outside of the scope of a double taxation treaty and so did not feature in the negotiations with Jersey, Guernsey or the Isle of Man. Double taxation treaties are based on the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s Model Tax Convention, which does not include beneficial ownership registers.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Salisbury more like this
answering member printed John Glen more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-19T15:54:53.367Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-19T15:54:53.367Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
4657
label Biography information for Anneliese Dodds more like this
1005995
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-13more like thismore than 2018-11-13
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Digital Technology: Training more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will ring-fence additional funding to enhance further education training in digital capability. more like this
tabling member constituency Strangford more like this
tabling member printed
Jim Shannon more like this
uin 190886 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The Government will introduce an entitlement to full funding for basic digital courses from 2020. Adults will have the opportunity to undertake improved digital courses based on new national standards free of charge.</p><p> </p><p>As is the case for the English and maths adult entitlements, the new basic digital skills entitlement will be funded through the Adult Education Budget.</p><p> </p><p>In the interim, we will continue to support the provision of basic digital skills training for adults in colleges and community learning centres across England through the Adult Education Budget and other programmes.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South West Norfolk more like this
answering member printed Elizabeth Truss more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-19T14:00:02.83Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-19T14:00:02.83Z
answering member
4097
label Biography information for Elizabeth Truss more like this
tabling member
4131
label Biography information for Jim Shannon more like this
1006098
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-13more like thismore than 2018-11-13
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Private Finance Initiative more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what his Department's definition is of privately financed in relation to infrastructure projects. more like this
tabling member constituency Richmond Park more like this
tabling member printed
Zac Goldsmith more like this
uin 190874 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Private finance is a way to deliver infrastructure projects in which the private sector invests equity and/or lends in order to facilitate the development, delivery, and/or operation of a project, asset or entity with the expectation of earning a return on the investment.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South West Norfolk more like this
answering member printed Elizabeth Truss more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-19T13:38:37.357Zmore like thisremove minimum value filter
answering member
4097
label Biography information for Elizabeth Truss more like this
tabling member
4062
label Biography information for Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park more like this