Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1544815
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-11-23more like thismore than 2022-11-23
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 remove filter
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Remote Working more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many and proportion of people were working from home (a) one, (b) two, (c) three, (d) four and (e) five days a week (i) as of 16 November 2022 and (ii) in November 2021; if he will make an assessment of the potential impact of trends in the number of people working from home on the economy; and if he will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency East Yorkshire more like this
tabling member printed
Sir Greg Knight more like this
uin 94692 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text According to ONS Annual Population Survey and Opinions and Lifestyle Survey data, the pandemic resulted in an increase in the proportion of workers that worked at least partially from home: from an average of 19 per cent of workers across 2019 to a peak of around 50 per cent in June 2020. This proportion fell to 30 per cent in November 2021. The latest data indicates that 38 per cent of workers were working at least partly from home in the period between 26 October and 6 November 2022.<p> </p>The long-term economic impacts of greater remote working are still highly uncertain. The Government is committed to supporting individuals and businesses to work flexibly. more like this
answering member constituency South Suffolk more like this
answering member printed James Cartlidge remove filter
question first answered
less than 2022-11-28T16:16:14.85Zmore like thismore than 2022-11-28T16:16:14.85Z
answering member
4519
label Biography information for James Cartlidge more like this
tabling member
1200
label Biography information for Sir Greg Knight more like this
1545063
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-11-23more like thismore than 2022-11-23
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 remove filter
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Tobacco: Smuggling more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps his Department is taking to include Trading Standards officers in the HMRC with the power to fine retailers for selling illicit tobacco products. more like this
tabling member constituency Ealing, Southall more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Virendra Sharma more like this
uin 94724 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Trading Standards officers are not part of HMRC. They are a separate local government service.</p><p> </p><p>However, HMRC works very closely with TS to tackle illicit tobacco. HMRC introduced legislation for tougher sanctions to tackle illicit tobacco sales in Finance Act 2022 including a new civil penalty of up to £10,000 for serious breaches. The new sanctions will take the innovative approach of HMRC and Trading Standards (TS) both working together to enforce them. Secondary legislation will be introduced next year setting out the detail on how the sanctions will operate.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South Suffolk more like this
answering member printed James Cartlidge remove filter
question first answered
less than 2022-11-28T16:14:49.863Zmore like thismore than 2022-11-28T16:14:49.863Z
answering member
4519
label Biography information for James Cartlidge more like this
tabling member
1604
label Biography information for Mr Virendra Sharma more like this
1543653
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-11-18more like thismore than 2022-11-18
answering body
Treasury remove filter
answering dept id 14 remove filter
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Energy: Taxation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, for what reason he decided not to introduce a higher windfall tax levy on oil and gas companies as part of the Autumn Statement 2022. more like this
tabling member constituency York Central more like this
tabling member printed
Rachael Maskell more like this
uin 90840 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>At Autumn Statement, the Chancellor announced that the rate of the Energy Profits Levy will increase by ten percentage points, taking it from 25% to 35%, effective from 1 January 2023. This is on top of the 40% tax rate under the permanent regime bringing the combined headline tax rate for the sector to 75%. In addition, the levy has been extended until 31 March 2028.</p><p> </p><p>The government has always sought to balance delivering a fair return for the UK from the use of its resources while providing the right conditions to attract investment in the North Sea that is key to support domestic jobs and the nation’s energy security.</p><p> </p><p>The Office for Budget Responsibility’s most recent published forecast, provided for Autumn Statement 2022, estimates revenues from the levy are expected to be £41.6 billion between 2022-23 and 2027-28.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South Suffolk more like this
answering member printed James Cartlidge remove filter
question first answered
less than 2022-11-28T16:12:56.373Zmore like thismore than 2022-11-28T16:12:56.373Z
answering member
4519
label Biography information for James Cartlidge more like this
tabling member
4471
label Biography information for Rachael Maskell more like this