Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1522951
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-10-17more like thismore than 2022-10-17
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Television Licences: Non-payment more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what data his Department holds on the amount of money that magistrates’ courts in England and Wales imposed in fines for non-payment of the TV licence fee, from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2021. more like this
tabling member constituency Huddersfield more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Barry Sheerman remove filter
uin 63957 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-10-25more like thismore than 2022-10-25
answer text <p>The Ministry of Justice publishes figures on the number of people fined for non-payment of a TV licence, broken down by fine amounts, on an annual basis on the GOV.UK website. These figures were most recently updated in May 2022, in the ‘Sentencing Outcomes’ worksheet in the <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1076465/magistrates-court-tool-2021.xlsx" target="_blank">Magistrates' court data tool (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 17.1 MB)</a> as part of the Criminal Justice System statistics quarterly: December 2021 publication. The number of people fined for this offence can be found by filtering for HO Offence Code ‘19101 – Television licence evasion’ and breaking this down by fine amount. These figures can also be broken down by various demographics such as age and gender. The average fine amount is available on the ‘Average Amounts’ worksheet.</p><p>The penalty for TV licence evasion is a fine. A person cannot receive a custodial sentence for TV licence evasion but can be committed to prison for wilfully refusing to pay the fine or culpably neglecting to pay. In 2021, there were no admissions into prison associated with failing to pay a fine in respect of the non-payment of a TV licence in England and Wales.</p>
answering member constituency Redditch more like this
answering member printed Rachel Maclean more like this
grouped question UIN 63958 more like this
question first answered
remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2022-10-25T15:19:28.563Z
answering member
4668
label Biography information for Rachel Maclean more like this
tabling member
411
label Biography information for Mr Barry Sheerman more like this
1491068
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-07-20more like thismore than 2022-07-20
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Aiding and Abetting: Appeals more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will make a comparative assessment of access to appeals for people who were convicted (a) before and (b) after the abolition of parasitic accessory liability (PAL) as a basis for criminal liability in cases in which (i) PAL and (ii) secondary liability was relevant. more like this
tabling member constituency Huddersfield more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Barry Sheerman remove filter
uin 40738 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-09-05more like thismore than 2022-09-05
answer text <p>The Government has no plans to conduct a comparative assessment of appeals where a defendant was convicted of a criminal offence where parasitic accessory liability or secondary liability was a factor.</p><p>The Ministry of Justice Court Proceedings database only holds information on people who have been proceeded against, found guilty and sentenced for specific criminal offences in England and Wales (i.e. murder, manslaughter, etc). This centrally held information does not include information on whether a defendant proceeded against or found guilty of an offence was party to a joint enterprise that involved parasitic accessory liability.</p><p>Similarly, data on individual appeals against convictions where parasitic accessory liability or secondary may have been a factor is not held centrally.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Derbyshire Dales more like this
answering member printed Miss Sarah Dines more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-09-05T10:30:17.457Zmore like thismore than 2022-09-05T10:30:17.457Z
answering member
4816
label Biography information for Miss Sarah Dines more like this
tabling member
411
label Biography information for Mr Barry Sheerman more like this
1490709
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-07-19more like thismore than 2022-07-19
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Sentencing: Appeals more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what recent assessment he has made of the implications for his policies of the Supreme Court judgement of 18 February 2016 in R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8; and if he will consider the potential merits of reviewing the operation of the Criminal Appeal Act 1995 in relation to joint enterprise convictions and the right to appeal. more like this
tabling member constituency Huddersfield more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Barry Sheerman remove filter
uin 39763 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-09-05more like thismore than 2022-09-05
answer text <p>The Government has no plans to specifically review the operation of the Criminal Appeal Act 1995 for joint enterprise convictions.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Derbyshire Dales more like this
answering member printed Miss Sarah Dines more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-09-05T10:23:19.927Zmore like thismore than 2022-09-05T10:23:19.927Z
answering member
4816
label Biography information for Miss Sarah Dines more like this
tabling member
411
label Biography information for Mr Barry Sheerman more like this
1472845
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-06-23more like thismore than 2022-06-23
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Roads: Accidents more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 26 May 2022 to Question 5346 on Roads: Accidents, if he will publish further details on the schemes available to provide compensation and support to victims and families of road crash fatalities. more like this
tabling member constituency Huddersfield more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Barry Sheerman remove filter
uin 23708 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-06-30more like thismore than 2022-06-30
answer text <p>The Fatal Accidents Act 1976 provides for an award of bereavement damages to certain family members which could be applied for in relation to road traffic accident fatalities. The size of the award is set by legislation and is currently £15,120.</p><p>Victims and bereaved families may be eligible to apply to the Government-funded Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme (the Scheme), which exists to compensate for serious physical or mental injury attributable to being a direct victim of a crime of violence. Bereavement and other payments are also available to qualifying relatives in fatal cases. As the Scheme is publicly funded, strict eligibility criteria apply. For the purposes of eligibility, an incident involving a vehicle will amount to a crime of violence only where the vehicle was used with intent to cause injury to a person.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Corby more like this
answering member printed Tom Pursglove more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-06-30T13:29:11.837Zmore like thismore than 2022-06-30T13:29:11.837Z
answering member
4369
label Biography information for Tom Pursglove more like this
tabling member
411
label Biography information for Mr Barry Sheerman more like this
1472637
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-06-22more like thismore than 2022-06-22
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Criminal Liability more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to the Law Commission’s discussion paper, entitled Criminal Liability: Insanity and Automatism, published on 23 July 2013, if his Department will conduct a review into the use of automatism as a legal defence. more like this
tabling member constituency Huddersfield more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Barry Sheerman remove filter
uin 23229 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-06-30more like thismore than 2022-06-30
answer text <p>The government is grateful to the Law Commission for their discussion paper on “Criminal Liability: Insanity and Automatism” published in 2013. The government has noted their proposals and has no immediate plans to conduct a further review as the defence of automatism is used so rarely, however, we have not ruled out the possibility of reform in the future. We keep the law in this area under appraisal alongside related law on insanity and unfitness to plead.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South Suffolk more like this
answering member printed James Cartlidge more like this
grouped question UIN 23230 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-06-30T13:23:28.58Zmore like thismore than 2022-06-30T13:23:28.58Z
answering member
4519
label Biography information for James Cartlidge more like this
tabling member
411
label Biography information for Mr Barry Sheerman more like this
1472638
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-06-22more like thismore than 2022-06-22
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Criminal Liability more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to the Answer of 20 June 2022 to Question 17873 on Criminal Liability, for what reasons his Department has no plans to bring forward reform to the use of automatism as a legal defence. more like this
tabling member constituency Huddersfield more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Barry Sheerman remove filter
uin 23230 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-06-30more like thismore than 2022-06-30
answer text <p>The government is grateful to the Law Commission for their discussion paper on “Criminal Liability: Insanity and Automatism” published in 2013. The government has noted their proposals and has no immediate plans to conduct a further review as the defence of automatism is used so rarely, however, we have not ruled out the possibility of reform in the future. We keep the law in this area under appraisal alongside related law on insanity and unfitness to plead.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South Suffolk more like this
answering member printed James Cartlidge more like this
grouped question UIN 23229 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-06-30T13:23:28.627Zmore like thismore than 2022-06-30T13:23:28.627Z
answering member
4519
label Biography information for James Cartlidge more like this
tabling member
411
label Biography information for Mr Barry Sheerman more like this
1472640
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-06-22more like thismore than 2022-06-22
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Expert Evidence: Health Professions more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps he is taking to help ensure that evidence provided to (a) Government and (b) legal proceedings from medical witnesses is of a high standard. more like this
tabling member constituency Huddersfield more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Barry Sheerman remove filter
uin 23231 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-06-30more like thismore than 2022-06-30
answer text <p>There is currently dedicated legislation, that is underpinned by detailed guidance and protocols for each jurisdiction in the courts, to govern the admissibility of expert medical evidence. These procedures include opportunities for any unreliable evidence to be challenged and, if necessary, be excluded by the court.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South Suffolk more like this
answering member printed James Cartlidge more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-06-30T13:25:10.337Zmore like thismore than 2022-06-30T13:25:10.337Z
answering member
4519
label Biography information for James Cartlidge more like this
tabling member
411
label Biography information for Mr Barry Sheerman more like this
1470240
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-06-14more like thismore than 2022-06-14
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Criminal Liability more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether his Department has plans to reconsider the recommendations in the Law Commission's report, Criminal Liability: Insanity and Automatism, published in 2013. more like this
tabling member constituency Huddersfield more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Barry Sheerman remove filter
uin 17873 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-06-20more like thismore than 2022-06-20
answer text <p>The Government has considered the proposals in the Law Commission’s 2013 discussion paper.</p><p>Whilst we note the Law Commission’s proposals on the potential to update the law in this area, we have no immediate plans to bring forward legislative proposals in relation to this rarely-used defence. However, we continue to keep this, and the wider and related law on unfitness to plead, under review.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South Suffolk more like this
answering member printed James Cartlidge more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-06-20T14:56:20.21Zmore like thismore than 2022-06-20T14:56:20.21Z
answering member
4519
label Biography information for James Cartlidge more like this
tabling member
411
label Biography information for Mr Barry Sheerman more like this
1464550
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-05-19more like thismore than 2022-05-19
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Roads: Accidents more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will take steps to ensure that road crash victims and their families receive adequate compensation and support following a successful defence of automatism. more like this
tabling member constituency Huddersfield more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Barry Sheerman remove filter
uin 5346 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-05-26more like thismore than 2022-05-26
answer text <p>Automatism is a lawful defence in both civil and criminal cases and, where no agreement on liability and compensation for those injured in a road crash can be reached between a claimant and defendant, the courts will decide each case on its merits. Therefore, the Government currently has no plans to make changes in this area.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South Suffolk more like this
answering member printed James Cartlidge more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-05-26T13:18:36.19Zmore like thismore than 2022-05-26T13:18:36.19Z
answering member
4519
label Biography information for James Cartlidge more like this
tabling member
411
label Biography information for Mr Barry Sheerman more like this
1464551
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-05-19more like thismore than 2022-05-19
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Roads: Accidents more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what plans he has to improve access to justice for road crash victims and their families. more like this
tabling member constituency Huddersfield more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Barry Sheerman remove filter
uin 5347 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-05-27more like thismore than 2022-05-27
answer text <p>In relation to a civil claim for personal injury, Official Injury Claim (OIC), an accessible self-service, online service, was launched in May 2021 in partnership with the Motor Insurers Bureau. This service enables those who suffer injury as a result of a road traffic accident to claim up to £5000 in damages, with or without the need for legal representation.</p><p> </p><p>The service and its accompanying guidance have been carefully designed with the claimant firmly at their heart. A dedicated telephone customer support centre is also available, with trained assistants to guide users through any questions or issues they may have about the process of completing a claim. Since May 2021, around 240,000 claims have been made on the OIC service.</p><p> </p><p>For claims above £5000 the existing Claims Portal should be used. Information about these reforms and the OIC service can be found at <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/whiplash-reform-programme-information-and-faq" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/whiplash-reform-programme-information-and-faq</a>.</p>
answering member constituency South Suffolk more like this
answering member printed James Cartlidge more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-05-27T13:13:17.227Zmore like thismore than 2022-05-27T13:13:17.227Z
answering member
4519
label Biography information for James Cartlidge more like this
tabling member
411
label Biography information for Mr Barry Sheerman more like this