Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1310647
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2021-04-20
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Secure Schools: Medway more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, when the the application submitted by Oasis Charitable Trust to run Medway Secure School will be published on the secure schools page of GOV.UK; and if he will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency Coventry South more like this
tabling member printed
Zarah Sultana more like this
uin 184562 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-04-26more like thismore than 2021-04-26
answer text <p>We are unable to publish the Oasis application documents as had been intended as it has not been possible to produce it in an accessible format as required for all documents published on GOV.UK. A copy of the application and related documents in the form it had been intended to be published will be placed in the House library. We have made the document available on request as stated on the page providing guidance on secure schools.</p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/secure-schools-how-to-apply" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/secure-schools-how-to-apply</a></p><p> </p><p>The application submitted by Oasis in March 2019 outlined the foundation for their operating concept and proposed principles for the secure school, in line with the criteria set out in the secure schools ‘how to apply’ guide. Since they were approved as the successful applicant for the first secure school in July 2019, Oasis have continued to develop and refine their operating model. All policies submitted by Oasis were accurate for academic year 2018-19.</p>
answering member constituency Cheltenham more like this
answering member printed Alex Chalk more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-04-26T14:39:21.25Zmore like thismore than 2021-04-26T14:39:21.25Z
answering member
4481
label Biography information for Alex Chalk more like this
tabling member
4786
label Biography information for Zarah Sultana more like this
1310701
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2021-04-20
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisoners: Veterans more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 20 April 2021 to Question 180635, how many prisoners serving a custodial sentence who were formerly members of the armed forces were sentenced for (a) violent crime and (b) non-violent crime. more like this
tabling member constituency Wakefield more like this
tabling member printed
Imran Ahmad Khan more like this
uin 184574 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-04-28more like thismore than 2021-04-28
answer text <p>The information requested is shown on the attached spreadsheets. These are broken down by offence group and prison service establishment.</p><p>The Ministry of Justice publishes a yearly snapshot which estimates the number of former service personnel in the prison population. This takes place in June each year.</p><p>Since 2015 all new prisoners coming into custody have been asked if they have a military background as part of the basic custody screening (BCS) interview. The attached data is therefore the percentage of sentenced prisoners within each offence group and prison for which we have a matched response to the BCS armed forces question. Those who entered prison prior to Jan 2015 (and are still in custody) will not have completed the BCS and so we will not have a matched response for these individuals.</p><p>Declaring one’s military background is not obligatory and there is anecdotal evidence that some offenders may be reluctant to disclose having served in the armed forces. The MoJ is focussed on increasing declaration rates amongst this important group.</p><p>We remain committed to ensuring that those who have served in the Armed Forces and who find themselves in the criminal justice system are able to access support, whether they are serving their sentence in custody or in the community. Through the Armed Forces Covenant Trust Fund, we have committed to support programmes worth £5.7 million targeted at former service personnel in the criminal justice system.</p>
answering member constituency Cheltenham more like this
answering member printed Alex Chalk more like this
grouped question UIN 184575 more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-04-28T12:36:38.983Zmore like thismore than 2021-04-28T12:36:38.983Z
answering member
4481
label Biography information for Alex Chalk more like this
attachment
1
file name PQ 184574 - 184575_final.xlsx more like this
title Table more like this
tabling member
4841
label Biography information for Imran Ahmad Khan more like this
1310702
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2021-04-20
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisoners: Veterans more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 20 April 2021 to Question 180635, if he will publish the information on how many prisoners serving a custodial sentence who were formerly members of the armed forces by prison. more like this
tabling member constituency Wakefield more like this
tabling member printed
Imran Ahmad Khan more like this
uin 184575 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-04-28more like thismore than 2021-04-28
answer text <p>The information requested is shown on the attached spreadsheets. These are broken down by offence group and prison service establishment.</p><p>The Ministry of Justice publishes a yearly snapshot which estimates the number of former service personnel in the prison population. This takes place in June each year.</p><p>Since 2015 all new prisoners coming into custody have been asked if they have a military background as part of the basic custody screening (BCS) interview. The attached data is therefore the percentage of sentenced prisoners within each offence group and prison for which we have a matched response to the BCS armed forces question. Those who entered prison prior to Jan 2015 (and are still in custody) will not have completed the BCS and so we will not have a matched response for these individuals.</p><p>Declaring one’s military background is not obligatory and there is anecdotal evidence that some offenders may be reluctant to disclose having served in the armed forces. The MoJ is focussed on increasing declaration rates amongst this important group.</p><p>We remain committed to ensuring that those who have served in the Armed Forces and who find themselves in the criminal justice system are able to access support, whether they are serving their sentence in custody or in the community. Through the Armed Forces Covenant Trust Fund, we have committed to support programmes worth £5.7 million targeted at former service personnel in the criminal justice system.</p>
answering member constituency Cheltenham more like this
answering member printed Alex Chalk more like this
grouped question UIN 184574 more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-04-28T12:36:39.013Zmore like thismore than 2021-04-28T12:36:39.013Z
answering member
4481
label Biography information for Alex Chalk more like this
attachment
1
file name PQ 184574 - 184575_final.xlsx more like this
title Table more like this
tabling member
4841
label Biography information for Imran Ahmad Khan more like this
1310704
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2021-04-20
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Courts: Tees Valley more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the backlog of outstanding cases was at (a) Teesside Magistrates' Court, (b) Teesside Combined Court and (c) Peterlee Magistrates' Court at the end of March in each year since 2010; and what the backlog of outstanding cases was at Hartlepool Magistrates' Court in each year since 2010 until that court was closed. more like this
tabling member constituency Tottenham more like this
tabling member printed
Mr David Lammy more like this
uin 184356 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-04-27more like thismore than 2021-04-27
answer text <p>The information requested can be found in the tables below.</p><p>The first table represents the number of outstanding cases for Teesside Crown Court cases.</p><p>The second table represents the number of outstanding cases at Teesside, Peterlee and Hartlepool Magistrates Courts.</p><p>Teesside Crown Court cases are reported separately to Teesside Magistrates Court cases as they are different courts.</p><p>HMCTS refer to all cases as outstanding rather than a backlog. Strictly speaking, the data below provided below is thus based on outstanding cases and not backlog of cases. There will always be a ‘stock’ of outstanding cases based on the size of each site and mix of cases.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Teesside Crown</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Trials</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Sentences</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Appeals</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2020</p></td><td><p>497</p></td><td><p>133</p></td><td><p>50</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2019</p></td><td><p>413</p></td><td><p>109</p></td><td><p>45</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2018</p></td><td><p>435</p></td><td><p>82</p></td><td><p>24</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2017</p></td><td><p>567</p></td><td><p>88</p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2016</p></td><td><p>604</p></td><td><p>77</p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2015</p></td><td><p>735</p></td><td><p>51</p></td><td><p>46</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2014</p></td><td><p>702</p></td><td><p>77</p></td><td><p>28</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2013</p></td><td><p>474</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>23</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2012</p></td><td><p>457</p></td><td><p>67</p></td><td><p>16</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2011</p></td><td><p>556</p></td><td><p>51</p></td><td><p>26</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2010</p></td><td><p>615</p></td><td><p>63</p></td><td><p>28</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><p><strong>Magistrates</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Date</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Teesside</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Peterlee</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Hartlepool</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mar-20</p></td><td><p>5,279</p></td><td><p>1,209</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mar-19</p></td><td><p>4,935</p></td><td><p>1,441</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mar-18</p></td><td><p>5,407</p></td><td><p>1,052</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mar-17</p></td><td><p>5,970</p></td><td><p>1,125</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mar-16</p></td><td><p>2,630</p></td><td><p>1,263</p></td><td><p>301</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mar-15</p></td><td><p>2,387</p></td><td><p>1,570</p></td><td><p>473</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mar-14</p></td><td><p>2,882</p></td><td><p>1,515</p></td><td><p>492</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mar-13</p></td><td><p>3,396</p></td><td><p>797</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mar-12</p></td><td><p>3,382</p></td><td><p>919</p></td><td><p>601</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mar-11</p></td><td><p>2,685</p></td><td><p>632</p></td><td><p>614</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mar-10</p></td><td><p>2,827</p></td><td><p>666</p></td><td><p>934</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
answering member constituency Croydon South more like this
answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-04-27T08:43:22.987Zmore like thismore than 2021-04-27T08:43:22.987Z
answering member
4503
label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
tabling member
206
label Biography information for Mr David Lammy more like this
1310709
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2021-04-20
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Dogs: Tagging more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many prosecutions there have been under the Microchipping of Dogs (England) Regulations 2015, and how many convictions secured. more like this
tabling member constituency Warley more like this
tabling member printed
John Spellar more like this
uin 184357 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-04-29more like thismore than 2021-04-29
answer text <p>The Ministry of Justice has published information on prosecutions and convictions for offences under the Microchipping of Dogs (England) Regulations 2015, in England and Wales, up to December 2019, available in the ‘Principal offence proceedings and outcomes by Home Office offence code’ data tool, which can be found here:</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/938554/HO-code-tool-principal-offence-2019.xlsx" target="_blank">https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/938554/HO-code-tool-principal-offence-2019.xlsx</a></p><p> </p><p>In the data tool linked above, use the ‘Offence code’ filter to select the following offence code:</p><ul><li>111/26 - Various summary offences contrary to regulations under the Microchipping of Dogs (England) Regulations 2015. (And the Microchipping of Dogs (Wales) Regulations 2015).</li></ul><p> </p><p>Number of prosecutions will populate Row 31; number of convictions will populate Row 32.</p><p> </p><p>Please note that this offence code includes offences under both Microchipping of Dogs (<strong>England</strong>) Regulations 2015 and Microchipping of Dogs (<strong>Wales</strong>) Regulations 2015. In order to identify defendants dealt with in England, specifically, use the ‘Police Force Area’ filter to select all options excluding those in Wales (i.e. Gwent, North Wales, South Wales and Dyfed-Powys).</p>
answering member constituency Croydon South more like this
answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-04-29T10:36:05.04Zmore like thismore than 2021-04-29T10:36:05.04Z
answering member
4503
label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
tabling member
318
label Biography information for John Spellar more like this