Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1713644
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-04-24more like thismore than 2024-04-24
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Homicide: Reoffenders remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the reoffending rate was for people convicted of murder in each year since 2005. more like this
tabling member constituency Luton South more like this
tabling member printed
Rachel Hopkins more like this
uin 23616 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-04-29more like thismore than 2024-04-29
answer text <p>Between 2011/12 and 2021/22, the overall proven reoffending rate decreased from 31.3% to 25.2%. As shown in the attached table, the most recent data shows that reoffending rates for both murderers and rapists are at their lowest levels since 2005. In particular, the proportion of rapists who reoffend has fallen from 10.2% in 2005/06 to 5.3% in 2021/22.</p><p> </p><p>We are taking action to drive down the reoffending rate for all offenders by investing in a wide range of rehabilitative interventions to get them into skills training, work, and stable accommodation. Since 2021, we’ve rolled out Employment Hubs and Prison Employment Leads in all resettlement prisons and are delivering our temporary accommodation service for all prisoners at risk of homelessness.</p><p> </p><p>The full information requested can be found in the attached table.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Charnwood more like this
answering member printed Edward Argar more like this
grouped question UIN 23617 more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-04-29T16:55:11.21Zmore like thismore than 2024-04-29T16:55:11.21Z
answering member
4362
label Biography information for Edward Argar more like this
attachment
1
file name 2024-04-29 PQ 23616 23617 table.xlsx more like this
title Table more like this
tabling member
4873
label Biography information for Rachel Hopkins more like this
1672382
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-11-22more like thismore than 2023-11-22
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Homicide: Reoffenders remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many offenders have been convicted of a serious further offence of murder, by type of index sentence in each year between 2010 and 2015. more like this
tabling member constituency Luton North more like this
tabling member printed
Sarah Owen more like this
uin 3360 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-11-27more like thismore than 2023-11-27
answer text <p>The table below sets out the total number of convictions, where an offender subject to probation supervision was <em>charged </em>with a serious further offence (SFO), which resulted subsequently in a conviction for murder, for all cases notified to what is now HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2015.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Index Sentence</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2010</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2011</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2014</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Community Supervision</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>45</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>23</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Determinate Prison Sentence</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>17</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Life Licence</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>IPP</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>50</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>73</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>51</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>53</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>48</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>43</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>1. Time period for conviction data relates to the date of SFO notification to HMPPS not the date of conviction.</p><p>2. Index sentence refers to the sentencing disposal imposed by the court which led to probation services supervision of the offender.</p><p>3. The data only includes convictions for serious further offences of murder that have been notified to the national SFO Team, HMPPS.</p><p>4. Conviction data also includes cases where the offender committed suicide or died prior to the trial, where the judicial process concluded that they were responsible.</p><p>5. The data for January 2010 to December 2015 has been updated and may differ to any original publication due to data cleansing, re-categorising and re-grouping.</p><p>6. Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording systems, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p><p> </p><p>Serious further offences are incredibly rare, with fewer than 0.5% of offenders supervised by the Probation Service going on to commit serious further offences but each one is investigated fully so we can take action where necessary. We have also injected extra funding of more than £155 million a year into the Probation Service to deliver tougher supervision, reduce caseloads and recruit thousands more staff to keep the public safer.</p>
answering member constituency Charnwood more like this
answering member printed Edward Argar more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-27T12:44:40.657Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-27T12:44:40.657Z
answering member
4362
label Biography information for Edward Argar more like this
tabling member
4777
label Biography information for Sarah Owen more like this
1657819
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-09-04more like thismore than 2023-09-04
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Homicide: Reoffenders remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people who were convicted of murder were released at the end of their original tariff in each of the last five years; how many people who were convicted of murder were recalled to prison after they were released in each of the past 5 years; and how many people who were convicted of domestic homicide were recalled to prison after they were released in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member constituency Lewisham West and Penge more like this
tabling member printed
Ellie Reeves more like this
uin 197505 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-09-12more like thismore than 2023-09-12
answer text <p>Figures for question 1 are in Table 1. These are the number of first-time releases at the end of the original tariff following a mandatory life sentence.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 1. The number of people convicted of murder who were released at the end of their original tariff in each of the last five years:</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="5"><p>Release Year</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>2022</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Count</p></td><td><p>264</p></td><td><p>230</p></td><td><p>236</p></td><td><p>193</p></td><td><p>197</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Figures for question 2 are in Table 2. These are the number of recalls in the last five years for offenders who at the time of recall had a conviction for murder. The power to recall is a vital public protection measure and all individuals supervised under licence in the community are liable to recall to prison if they fail to comply with their licence conditions.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 2. The number of people convicted of murder who were recalled to prison after they were released in each of the last five years:</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="5"><p>Licence Revocation Year</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>2022</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Count</p></td><td><p>168</p></td><td><p>195</p></td><td><p>188</p></td><td><p>196</p></td><td><p>219</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>For question three, which relates specifically to those offenders convicted of domestic homicide, the data is not routinely available and the work to identify such cases would exceed the appropriate cost limit under the request for the provision of data.</p><p> </p><p>Notes:</p><ol><li>Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that this data has been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by HM Prison &amp; Probation Service. Consequently, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.</li></ol><p>2. Lifer Migration; These are prisoners who were sentenced prior to the introduction of the Public Protection Unit Database (PPUD), there records were migrated from paper files when the database was introduced in 2009.</p>
answering member constituency East Hampshire more like this
answering member printed Damian Hinds more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-09-12T15:07:12.9Zmore like thismore than 2023-09-12T15:07:12.9Z
answering member
3969
label Biography information for Damian Hinds more like this
tabling member
4620
label Biography information for Ellie Reeves more like this
1362974
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-10-25more like thismore than 2021-10-25
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Homicide: Reoffenders remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many and what proportion of homicides were committed by people on (a) parole and (b) a life licence in England and Wales in each of the last three years. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts more like this
uin 62798 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-10-28more like thismore than 2021-10-28
answer text <p>The link below sets out the number of offenders convicted of murder, who at the time they committed the offence were being supervised on: a) an IPP licence; and b) life licence, in England and Wales between 2014/15 to 2019/20.</p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/proven-reoffending-statistics" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/proven-reoffending-statistics</a></p><p><strong>Steps</strong>:</p><p>1. Go to the landing page <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/proven-reoffending-statistics" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/proven-reoffending-statistics</a></p><p>2. Click on the latest October publication of the Proven Reoffending Statistics</p><p>3. The requested information is in Table 3 of the Serious Further Offence Tables</p><p> </p><p>The information provided by financial years will be updated at 9:30 am on 28 October 2021.</p><p> </p><p>We have interpreted ‘parole’ to mean offenders subject to an indeterminate sentence of imprisonment for public protection (IPP) and released by the Parole Board.</p><p> </p><p>We cannot provide the proportion of all murders in a given year which are committed by offenders subject to probation supervision due to differences in the way the respective data sets are produced. Published Homicide Index data are based on the year when the offence was recorded as a crime, not when the offence took place or when the case was heard in court.</p>
answering member constituency North West Hampshire more like this
answering member printed Kit Malthouse more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-10-28T15:53:16.867Zmore like thismore than 2021-10-28T15:53:16.867Z
answering member
4495
label Biography information for Kit Malthouse more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
1331054
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-06-08more like thismore than 2021-06-08
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Homicide: Reoffenders remove filter
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many people have been killed by someone who has previously been found guilty of homicide, imprisoned, and subsequently released, for the years for which figures are available. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Tebbit more like this
uin HL904 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-06-22more like thismore than 2021-06-22
answer text <p>The table below provides the number of people killed by offenders who were at the time on licence for an earlier homicide offence, for which they had served a prison sentence and been released. As they were on licence, when they were charged with a new offence of killing [homicide], it would have generated a formal serious further offence (SFO) notification to HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS), and the number in each calendar year reflects the year in which HMPPS received the notification. The answer interprets homicide to include offences of murder, manslaughter, death by dangerous driving and death by careless driving when under the influence of drink or drugs.</p><p> </p><p>Data are not available on offenders with a previous conviction for homicide who had completed their sentence and associated statutory probation supervision by probation and then went on to commit a further homicide.</p><p> </p><p>SFOs are rare. Fewer than 0.5% of offenders under statutory supervision are convicted of serious further offences. Nonetheless every single serious further offence is taken extremely seriously, and in all cases a review is carried out to identify any lessons for the better management of future cases.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year SFO notification received</p></td><td><p>Total number of people killed in a SFO by someone convicted of homicide offences at both index offence and SFO</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019<sup>[1]</sup></p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><ol><li>We will publish SFO conviction data for 2019/20 in October 2021, therefore data for 2019 can only be provided for January, February and March.</li><li>Figures are based on conviction data that was produced in September 2020.</li><li>Data are derived from the date of SFO notification to HMPPS</li><li>This figure only includes convictions for serious further offences that have been notified to the national SFO Team, HMPPS.</li><li>The data provided are provisional figures subject to change when any outstanding cases are concluded at court.</li><li>The data also includes cases where the offender committed suicide or died prior to the trial, where a Court has subsequently ruled that they were responsible.</li></ol><p>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p>
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-06-22T16:40:04.927Zmore like thismore than 2021-06-22T16:40:04.927Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
952
label Biography information for Lord Tebbit more like this
1309525
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-04-15more like thismore than 2021-04-15
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Homicide: Reoffenders remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many offenders with previous suspended sentences have received convictions for murder in each of the last 10 years. more like this
tabling member constituency Barnsley Central more like this
tabling member printed
Dan Jarvis more like this
uin 181276 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-04-20more like thismore than 2021-04-20
answer text <p>Obtaining the necessary information to answer these questions involves accessing the secure Police National Computer (PNC) system, which my relevant officials are unable to do at this time due to the current national restrictions and the need to minimise non-essential travel.</p><p>I will write to the Hon Member in due course with the information requested, once my officials are able to safely access the PNC system, and will place a copy of my letter in the Library.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Croydon South more like this
answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
grouped question UIN
181275 more like this
181277 more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-04-20T15:30:14.387Zmore like thismore than 2021-04-20T15:30:14.387Z
answering member
4503
label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
tabling member
4243
label Biography information for Dan Jarvis more like this
1186778
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-03-20more like thismore than 2020-03-20
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Homicide: Reoffenders remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people have been murdered by people that were previously convicted of attempted murder and then released having served their prison sentences in each of the last 20 years. more like this
tabling member constituency Shipley more like this
tabling member printed
Philip Davies more like this
uin 32649 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-30more like thismore than 2020-03-30
answer text <p>Serious Further Offences (SFOs) are rare. Less than 0.5% of offenders under statutory supervision are convicted of an SFO; for murder, the proportion will be lower. Nonetheless, every single SFO is taken extremely seriously, and in all cases a review is carried out to identify any necessary actions which need to be taken to improve the management of other cases.</p><p> </p><p><strong>PQ 32649</strong></p><p>The most recent data available are for the period from 1 April 2010 to 31 March 2018 and relate only relates to convictions for SFOs by offenders under the supervision of the Probation Service at the time they committed the SFO. There have been no people murdered by an offender during their period of supervision following release from prison for the offence of attempted murder. There may be a small number of cases where the offender might have had a previous conviction for attempted murder, but these cases will not have been captured by the SFO Review Procedures.</p><p> </p><p><strong>PQ 32664</strong></p><p> </p><p>The table below shows how many SFOs were committed (convictions) by offenders that were automatically released from prison between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2018, which are the most recent data available. We will publish conviction data for 2018/19 in October 2020.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Number of offenders convicted of a SFO following an automatic release from prison</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1 April 2015 – 31 March 2016</p></td><td><p>115</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1 April 2016 – 31 March 2017</p></td><td><p>164</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1 April 2017 – 31 April 2018</p></td><td><p>145</p></td></tr></tbody></table><ol><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording systems, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing</li><li>The data do not include a small number of offenders who were (i) sentenced to a hospital order, (ii) died before the conclusion of criminal proceedings (iii) sentenced to an extended determinate sentence or an extended sentence for public protection who may have been released by the Parole Board and (iv) released automatically from prison, who were then recalled to prison and re-released via a decision by the Parole Board or by executive release by the Public Protection Casework Section prior to committing the SFO.</li></ol><p>The data do include any offender who was sentenced to imprisonment of under 12 months, who may have been released directly onto post sentence supervision (PSS) rather than a licence.</p>
answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
grouped question UIN 32664 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-30T15:10:57.56Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-30T15:10:57.56Z
answering member
4517
label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
tabling member
1565
label Biography information for Sir Philip Davies more like this
1181966
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-03-02more like thisremove minimum value filter
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Homicide: Reoffenders remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many instances of a Serious Further Offence review of murder have resulted in the perpetrator being (a) charged and (b) convicted where the supervisory agency has been (i) the National Probation Service and (ii) a community rehabilitation company by each geographic area of those community rehabilitation companies in each year since 2014. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts more like this
uin 23577 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-05more like thismore than 2020-03-05
answer text <p>Serious Further Offences (SFOs) are rare. Less than 0.5% of offenders under statutory supervision are convicted of an SFO; for murder, the proportion will be lower. Nonetheless, every single SFO is taken extremely seriously, and in all cases a review is carried out to identify any necessary actions which need to be taken to improve the management of other cases. As a proportion of the offenders managed by the NPS and CRCs respectively, there is no evidence of a difference between the National Probation Service (NPS) and the Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) when it comes to offenders committing murder.</p><p> </p><p>SFO reviews are initiated where the NPS or a CRC <em>notifies</em> HM Prison and Probation Service that an offender under supervision has been charged with an SFO. The number of SFO <em>notifications</em> is not equivalent to the number of SFO convictions in any year. About half of all SFO notifications do not result in SFO convictions. In other cases, after initial notification charges will be dropped or an offender acquitted or an offender convicted of a lesser offence.</p><p> </p><p>Table 1 below shows the number of SFO <em>notifications</em> – that is, cases of an offender under probation supervision <em>charged</em> with an SFO - received between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2019, by SFO offence, where the offender was supervised by (a) the National Probation Service (NPS) and (b) Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRC).</p><p> </p><p>Table 1<strong>.</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2014*</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2019</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>SFO Offence</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Arson with intent to endanger life</em></p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Assault by penetration</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Attempt or conspiracy to commit murder</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>51</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>51</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Aggravated Burglary</em></p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Causing death by dangerous/careless driving/aggravated vehicle taking</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>False imprisonment</em></p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Firearms offences including possession with intent</em></p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Kidnapping</em></p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Manslaughter</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Murder</p></td><td><p>56</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>49</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>78</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>90</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Offences under the Explosive Substances Act</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other qualifying sexual offences</em></p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other serious violent offence</em></p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Female genital mutilation</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other specified offence causing death</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rape</p></td><td><p>129</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>112</p></td><td><p>105</p></td><td><p>118</p></td><td><p>127</p></td><td><p>111</p></td><td><p>131</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>41</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Robbery with firearm</em></p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Under 13 sexual offences including rape</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>391</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>90</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>310</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>238</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>350</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>274</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>425</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>315</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>338</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>224</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>329</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>215</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Notes for Table 1:</p><ol><li>*CRCs were created as part of Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) in June 2014. Therefore, data provided for NPS for 2014 include cases managed by former Probation Trusts prior to TR.</li><li>The NPS and CRCs are required to complete automatic reviews on any eligible offender who has been charged with (including attempted or conspiracy to commit offences): murder manslaughter, other specified offences causing death, rape or assault by penetration, or a sexual offence against a child under 13 years of age.</li><li>Conditional reviews are completed when an offender has been assessed as high risk of harm during the current sentence (NPS only) or where no risk assessment has been completed.</li><li>The data represents SFO charges and not a unique count of offenders.</li><li>Not all notifications result in the completion of a review as charges are reduced or dropped. Not every offender charged with a SFO is convicted.</li><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</li></ol><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Similarly, the number of SFO reviews completed is not equivalent to the number of SFO convictions in any year.</p><p> </p><p>The Honourable Member may be referring to the Freedom of Information Act response 200121016 on 11 February 2020. However, that response did <em>not</em> show the number of people murdered by offenders under supervision. Rather, it showed the number of SFO reviews completed in each calendar year for 2014 to 2019, where the offender had been <em>charged with</em> murder.</p><p> </p><p>Table 2 shows the total number of SFO reviews completed in 2014 as a whole, the number of reviews completed for those who were charged with murder, and the number of subsequent convictions for murder. Tables 3 and 4 below show the number of offenders being supervised by the NPS and CRC respectively who were charged with murder, where a review was completed in the years 2015, 2016, 2017, and the offender subsequently <em>convicted of murder. W</em>e have provided the number of SFO reviews in 2014 as a separate table (Table 2), as Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) created CRCs mid-year and prior to this, Probation Trusts managed the cases.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 2</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>404</p></td><td><p>71</p></td><td><p>49</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Table 3</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All NPS Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p>291</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p>281</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p>362</p></td><td><p>47</p></td><td><p>28</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Table 4</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All CRC Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p>202</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>24</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p>235</p></td><td><p>47</p></td><td><p>26</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p>273</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>39</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Notes for Tables 2, 3,4</p><ol><li>Conviction data are as at 27 January 2020</li><li>Not all SFO notifications result in the completion of a review as charges can be reduced or dropped. Not every offender charged with a SFO is convicted.</li><li>The data represent SFO reviews conducted following charge and not a unique count of offenders.</li><li>We have not included the three month data relating to 1 January-31 March 2018.</li><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</li></ol><p>In October, the Ministry of Justice will publish annual reconviction data, including murder for 2018/19, with an accompanying narrative which also explains the correct interpretation of the figures. The current publication can be found at: <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843382/Serious_Further_Offences_-Bulletin.pdf" target="_blank">https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843382/Serious_Further_Offences_-Bulletin.pdf</a></p><p> </p><p>Tables 2, 3 and 4 provide the number of reviews completed in respect of offenders supervised by the NPS or CRCs who were charged with and subsequently convicted of murder between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017. We have not provided data specific to individual CRCs as the total figure in some cases amounts to five people or fewer. We consider that we would be in breach of our obligations under the General Data Protection Regulation and / or the Data Protection Act 2018 if we release information that would risk identification of the individuals concerned.</p>
answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
grouped question UIN
23575 more like this
23576 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-05T16:52:31.627Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-05T16:52:31.627Z
answering member
4517
label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
1181968
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-03-02more like thisremove minimum value filter
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Homicide: Reoffenders remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will publish his Department's recent Freedom of Information Act response showing the number of people murdered by reoffenders. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts more like this
uin 23576 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-05more like thismore than 2020-03-05
answer text <p>Serious Further Offences (SFOs) are rare. Less than 0.5% of offenders under statutory supervision are convicted of an SFO; for murder, the proportion will be lower. Nonetheless, every single SFO is taken extremely seriously, and in all cases a review is carried out to identify any necessary actions which need to be taken to improve the management of other cases. As a proportion of the offenders managed by the NPS and CRCs respectively, there is no evidence of a difference between the National Probation Service (NPS) and the Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) when it comes to offenders committing murder.</p><p> </p><p>SFO reviews are initiated where the NPS or a CRC <em>notifies</em> HM Prison and Probation Service that an offender under supervision has been charged with an SFO. The number of SFO <em>notifications</em> is not equivalent to the number of SFO convictions in any year. About half of all SFO notifications do not result in SFO convictions. In other cases, after initial notification charges will be dropped or an offender acquitted or an offender convicted of a lesser offence.</p><p> </p><p>Table 1 below shows the number of SFO <em>notifications</em> – that is, cases of an offender under probation supervision <em>charged</em> with an SFO - received between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2019, by SFO offence, where the offender was supervised by (a) the National Probation Service (NPS) and (b) Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRC).</p><p> </p><p>Table 1<strong>.</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2014*</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2019</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>SFO Offence</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Arson with intent to endanger life</em></p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Assault by penetration</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Attempt or conspiracy to commit murder</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>51</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>51</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Aggravated Burglary</em></p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Causing death by dangerous/careless driving/aggravated vehicle taking</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>False imprisonment</em></p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Firearms offences including possession with intent</em></p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Kidnapping</em></p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Manslaughter</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Murder</p></td><td><p>56</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>49</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>78</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>90</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Offences under the Explosive Substances Act</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other qualifying sexual offences</em></p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other serious violent offence</em></p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Female genital mutilation</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other specified offence causing death</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rape</p></td><td><p>129</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>112</p></td><td><p>105</p></td><td><p>118</p></td><td><p>127</p></td><td><p>111</p></td><td><p>131</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>41</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Robbery with firearm</em></p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Under 13 sexual offences including rape</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>391</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>90</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>310</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>238</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>350</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>274</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>425</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>315</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>338</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>224</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>329</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>215</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Notes for Table 1:</p><ol><li>*CRCs were created as part of Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) in June 2014. Therefore, data provided for NPS for 2014 include cases managed by former Probation Trusts prior to TR.</li><li>The NPS and CRCs are required to complete automatic reviews on any eligible offender who has been charged with (including attempted or conspiracy to commit offences): murder manslaughter, other specified offences causing death, rape or assault by penetration, or a sexual offence against a child under 13 years of age.</li><li>Conditional reviews are completed when an offender has been assessed as high risk of harm during the current sentence (NPS only) or where no risk assessment has been completed.</li><li>The data represents SFO charges and not a unique count of offenders.</li><li>Not all notifications result in the completion of a review as charges are reduced or dropped. Not every offender charged with a SFO is convicted.</li><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</li></ol><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Similarly, the number of SFO reviews completed is not equivalent to the number of SFO convictions in any year.</p><p> </p><p>The Honourable Member may be referring to the Freedom of Information Act response 200121016 on 11 February 2020. However, that response did <em>not</em> show the number of people murdered by offenders under supervision. Rather, it showed the number of SFO reviews completed in each calendar year for 2014 to 2019, where the offender had been <em>charged with</em> murder.</p><p> </p><p>Table 2 shows the total number of SFO reviews completed in 2014 as a whole, the number of reviews completed for those who were charged with murder, and the number of subsequent convictions for murder. Tables 3 and 4 below show the number of offenders being supervised by the NPS and CRC respectively who were charged with murder, where a review was completed in the years 2015, 2016, 2017, and the offender subsequently <em>convicted of murder. W</em>e have provided the number of SFO reviews in 2014 as a separate table (Table 2), as Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) created CRCs mid-year and prior to this, Probation Trusts managed the cases.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 2</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>404</p></td><td><p>71</p></td><td><p>49</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Table 3</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All NPS Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p>291</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p>281</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p>362</p></td><td><p>47</p></td><td><p>28</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Table 4</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All CRC Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p>202</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>24</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p>235</p></td><td><p>47</p></td><td><p>26</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p>273</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>39</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Notes for Tables 2, 3,4</p><ol><li>Conviction data are as at 27 January 2020</li><li>Not all SFO notifications result in the completion of a review as charges can be reduced or dropped. Not every offender charged with a SFO is convicted.</li><li>The data represent SFO reviews conducted following charge and not a unique count of offenders.</li><li>We have not included the three month data relating to 1 January-31 March 2018.</li><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</li></ol><p>In October, the Ministry of Justice will publish annual reconviction data, including murder for 2018/19, with an accompanying narrative which also explains the correct interpretation of the figures. The current publication can be found at: <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843382/Serious_Further_Offences_-Bulletin.pdf" target="_blank">https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843382/Serious_Further_Offences_-Bulletin.pdf</a></p><p> </p><p>Tables 2, 3 and 4 provide the number of reviews completed in respect of offenders supervised by the NPS or CRCs who were charged with and subsequently convicted of murder between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017. We have not provided data specific to individual CRCs as the total figure in some cases amounts to five people or fewer. We consider that we would be in breach of our obligations under the General Data Protection Regulation and / or the Data Protection Act 2018 if we release information that would risk identification of the individuals concerned.</p>
answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
grouped question UIN
23575 more like this
23577 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-05T16:52:31.503Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-05T16:52:31.503Z
answering member
4517
label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this