Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

692005
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Restraining Orders more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many restraining orders were issued by courts in England and Wales in each of the last three years; how many of those orders were breached (a) once, (b) twice, (c) three times and (d) on four or more occasions; and for each category of numbers of breaches, how often a custodial sentence was handed down. more like this
tabling member constituency Birmingham, Yardley more like this
tabling member printed
Jess Phillips more like this
uin 64617 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-02-28more like thismore than 2017-02-28
answer text <p>The number of restraining orders issued and sentences given for breaches of restraining orders, from 2013 to 2015, in England and Wales, can be viewed in the following tables.</p><p> </p><p>Court proceedings data for 2016 are planned for publication in May 2017.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><p><strong>Table 1: Restraining orders issued by the courts and offenders convicted and sentenced for breach of restraining orders, with sentencing outcomes, England &amp; Wales, 2013 to 2015<sup>(1)(2)</sup></strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>2013<sup>(3)</sup></p></td><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>2015</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Restraining orders issued<sup>(4)(5)(6)</sup></p></td><td><p>20,356</p></td><td><p>21,508</p></td><td><p>23,057</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Offenders convicted of breaching a restraining order</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Convicted</p></td><td><p>6,348</p></td><td><p>7,371</p></td><td><p>8,395</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sentenced</p></td><td><p>6,205</p></td><td><p>7,083</p></td><td><p>8,194</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Immediate custody</p></td><td><p>2,237</p></td><td><p>2,606</p></td><td><p>2,989</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Suspended sentence</p></td><td><p>827</p></td><td><p>1,068</p></td><td><p>1,346</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Community sentence</p></td><td><p>1,565</p></td><td><p>1,524</p></td><td><p>1,815</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Fine</p></td><td><p>848</p></td><td><p>1,020</p></td><td><p>1,137</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Absolute discharge</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>47</p></td><td><p>57</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Conditional discharge</p></td><td><p>469</p></td><td><p>532</p></td><td><p>624</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Otherwise dealt with</p></td><td><p>211</p></td><td><p>281</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Compensation</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><p>(1) The figures given in the table relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><p>(2) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><p>(3) Previously issued figures for 2013 have been revised following the receipt of a small amount of late data.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><p>(4) Includes restraining orders issued on conviction or acquittal.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><p>(5) Issued under either S.5 Protection from Harassment Act 1997 or S.5A Sex Offenders Act 1997.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><p>(6) SOPOs replaced restraining orders under s.5A Sex Offenders Act 1997 and sex offender orders under s.2 Crime and Disorder Act 1998. However, it is possible for cases to still appear where an offender is subject to one of the orders that pre-date the Sexual Offences Act 2003.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services - Ministry of Justice.</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>PQ: 64617</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="9"><p><strong>Table 2: Offenders convicted for breaching restraining orders and sentences received, England and Wales, April 2013 to March 2016 <sup>1,2,3</sup></strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Financial year</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>Number of breaches</strong></p></td><td colspan="3"><p><strong>Occasions on which the offender received<sup>4</sup></strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>Number of offenders<sup>6</sup></strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>Custodial sentence<sup>5</sup></strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Non-custodial sentence<sup>5</sup></strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013/14</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>996</p></td><td><p>2,364</p></td><td><p>3,360</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>3,360</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>887</p></td><td><p>1,173</p></td><td><p>2,060</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,030</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>623</p></td><td><p>568</p></td><td><p>1,191</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>397</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>4 or more</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,489</p></td><td><p>909</p></td><td><p>2,398</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>446</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014/15</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,115</p></td><td><p>2,679</p></td><td><p>3,794</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>3,794</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>982</p></td><td><p>1,292</p></td><td><p>2,274</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,137</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>734</p></td><td><p>673</p></td><td><p>1,407</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>469</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>4 or more</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,893</p></td><td><p>1,124</p></td><td><p>3,017</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>538</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015/16</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,154</p></td><td><p>3,162</p></td><td><p>4,316</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>4,316</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,131</p></td><td><p>1,545</p></td><td><p>2,676</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,338</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>939</p></td><td><p>909</p></td><td><p>1,848</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>616</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>4 or more</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>2,191</p></td><td><p>1,350</p></td><td><p>3,541</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>635</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><p><strong>Source: </strong>MoJ's extract of the Police National Computer</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Notes:</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="6"><p>1) Figures exclude those who were cautioned rather than convicted</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="9"><p>2) A restraining order refers to a restraining order under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 Sec.5</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="9"><p>3) Figures refer to convictions in which breach of a restraining order was the main offence</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="6"><p>4) Occasion refers to an occasion which an offender is sentenced</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="9"><p>5) Custodial sentence refers to immediate custodial sentences only. Other sentences are non-custodial</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="9"><p>6) The number of breaches an individual offender has been convicted for is taken at the offender's last conviction for the offence in each financial year. The offender may appear in multiple years where they were convicted of the offence in more than one year</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
answering member constituency East Surrey more like this
answering member printed Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-02-28T17:42:53.907Zmore like thisremove minimum value filter
answering member
3980
label Biography information for Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
tabling member
4370
label Biography information for Jess Phillips more like this
692128
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Offenders: Females more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what consultations they have conducted in the preparation of their strategy for improving the safety and reform of female offenders in custody and in the community; and when that strategy will be published. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Beecham more like this
uin HL5423 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-03-02more like thismore than 2017-03-02
answer text <p>We are engaging with a wide range of interested parties as we develop our strategy to improve outcomes for female offenders in the community and custody, including through the Department’s Advisory Board for Female Offenders, which brings together key stakeholders, criminal justice partners and senior officials from other Government Departments to provide expert advice and challenge on policy and practice that has an impact on female offenders. We will set out our strategy in due course.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-03-02T13:31:58.683Zmore like thismore than 2017-03-02T13:31:58.683Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
4181
label Biography information for Lord Beecham more like this
692131
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Young Offenders: Travellers more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Keen of Elie on 13 February (HL5073), whether governors will be encouraged to work with specialist Gypsy, Traveller and Roma education providers. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Beecham more like this
uin HL5426 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-03-02more like thismore than 2017-03-02
answer text <p>As part of our youth justice reforms, we will ensure governors have increased flexibility to work with providers to decide how education is best delivered. It will be for them to decide how best to meet the different needs of all young people in their establishments.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
question first answered
remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2017-03-02T13:32:22.147Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
4181
label Biography information for Lord Beecham more like this