Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1455784
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-30more like thismore than 2022-03-30
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisoners: Restraint Techniques more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many of the instances of the use of force by prison officers on prisoners aged 18–24 in the men’s estate have been recorded in each of the last 10 years; and what proportion this was of the total instances of the use of force. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Bradley more like this
uin HL7489 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-04-07more like thismore than 2022-04-07
answer text <p>The information requested could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.</p><p> </p><p>Every use of physical force is reviewed, and prison officers receive appropriate training to ensure that it is only used when necessary, reasonable and proportionate, and as a last resort.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar remove filter
question first answered
less than 2022-04-07T14:25:48.6Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-07T14:25:48.6Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
452
label Biography information for Lord Bradley more like this
1455634
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-29more like thismore than 2022-03-29
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisoners: Location more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what proportion of prisoners with a home address in London are being held in prisons in (1) Wales, and (2) the North of England. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Bradley more like this
uin HL7415 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-04-07more like thismore than 2022-04-07
answer text <p>As of Friday 25th March 2022, there were 14,711 individuals with an origin address in London who were in HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) custody.</p><p> </p><p>Of these, 94 (0.2%) were housed in prisons in Wales. 2,734 (18.6%) were housed within the geographical area covered by the HMPPS North Region.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar remove filter
question first answered
less than 2022-04-07T14:25:17.063Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-07T14:25:17.063Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
452
label Biography information for Lord Bradley more like this
1455646
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-29more like thismore than 2022-03-29
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Lugano Convention more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government why they have delayed seeking membership to join the Lugano Convention. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Goudie more like this
uin HL7431 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-04-12more like thismore than 2022-04-12
answer text <p>The UK applied to join the Lugano Convention in April 2020. This provided ample time for the contracting parties to consider the application so that it could have been brought into force by the end of the Transition Period. Switzerland, Norway and Iceland gave their consent within that timescale. However, the European Union declined to begin to consider the UK’s application until after the end of the Transition Period and has to date not provided a definitive response to our application. The Government maintains that the UK meets the criteria for accession.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar remove filter
question first answered
less than 2022-04-12T14:16:54.26Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-12T14:16:54.26Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
3575
label Biography information for Baroness Goudie more like this
1455647
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-29more like thismore than 2022-03-29
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Lugano Convention more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to engage with EU countries, particularly Denmark, to seek a (1) speedy, and (2) satisfactory, resolution regarding membership to the Lugano Convention. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Goudie more like this
uin HL7432 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-04-12more like thismore than 2022-04-12
answer text <p>The Government continues to engage with EU member states, including Denmark, about the UK’s application to join the Lugano Convention when opportunities arise. We maintain that the UK meets the criteria for accession both because Lugano is open to countries outside the EU and all non-EU members have already supported the UK's membership. However, the Government understands that the EU is unlikely to return to considering our application for some months. The UK remains a leader in Private International Law. We are committed to ensuring cross-border legal disputes can be resolved smoothly, in the interests of families, consumers and businesses in the UK, across Europe and beyond.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar remove filter
question first answered
less than 2022-04-12T14:17:48.227Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-12T14:17:48.227Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
3575
label Biography information for Baroness Goudie more like this
1453814
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-23more like thismore than 2022-03-23
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisoners: Older People more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many (1) males, and (2) females, who are currently serving prison sentences in England and Wales are over the age of 80. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Bradley more like this
uin HL7259 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-04-06more like thismore than 2022-04-06
answer text <p>As of 31 December 2021, there were 329 sentenced male prisoners and 2 sentenced female prisoners aged 80 or over in England and Wales.</p><p> </p><p>These figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar remove filter
question first answered
less than 2022-04-06T12:25:52.827Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-06T12:25:52.827Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
452
label Biography information for Lord Bradley more like this
1453815
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-23more like thismore than 2022-03-23
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Remand in Custody: Females more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government (1) how many, and (2) what proportion, of women who were remanded into custody at (a) magistrates' courts, and (b) crown courts, did not subsequently receive an immediate custodial sentence, in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Bradley more like this
uin HL7260 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-04-06more like thismore than 2022-04-06
answer text <p>The Ministry of Justice publishes information on the remand status and outcome of defendants in England and Wales at magistrates’ courts in the <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/987718/remands-magistrates-court-tool-2020.xlsx" target="_blank">Remands: Magistrates' Court data tool</a>: <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/987718/remands-magistrates-court-tool-2020.xlsx" target="_blank">https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/987718/remands-magistrates-court-tool-2020.xlsx</a> and at Crown Court in the <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/987720/remands-crown-court-tool-2020.xlsx" target="_blank">Remands: Crown Court data tool</a> here: <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/987720/remands-crown-court-tool-2020.xlsx" target="_blank">https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/987720/remands-crown-court-tool-2020.xlsx</a>.</p><p>The data requested is in the tables below:</p><p><strong>Table 1: Number of female defendents with remand status of custody at magistrates' court and outcome of immediate custody, England and Wales, 2016-2020*</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2019</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2020</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total remanded in custody</p></td><td><p>3756</p></td><td><p>3860</p></td><td><p>3460</p></td><td><p>3345</p></td><td><p>3022</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total outcome: not immediate custody</p></td><td><p>2990</p></td><td><p>3164</p></td><td><p>2851</p></td><td><p>2769</p></td><td><p>2551</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total outcome: immediate custoday</p></td><td><p>766</p></td><td><p>696</p></td><td><p>609</p></td><td><p>576</p></td><td><p>471</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion remanded in custody not receiving an immediate custodial sentence</p></td><td><p>80%</p></td><td><p>82%</p></td><td><p>82%</p></td><td><p>83%</p></td><td><p>84%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: Remands: Magistrates' Court data tool (Ministry of Justice: Data &amp; Analysis)</p><p><strong>Table 2: Number of female defendents with remand status of custody at Crown Court and outcome of immediate custody, England and Wales, 2016-2020*</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2019</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2020</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total remanded in custody</p></td><td><p>2068</p></td><td><p>2045</p></td><td><p>1806</p></td><td><p>1912</p></td><td><p>1775</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total outcome: not immediate custody</p></td><td><p>892</p></td><td><p>844</p></td><td><p>728</p></td><td><p>771</p></td><td><p>730</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total outcome: immediate custody</p></td><td><p>1176</p></td><td><p>1201</p></td><td><p>1078</p></td><td><p>1141</p></td><td><p>1045</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion remanded in custody not receiving an immediate custodial sentence</p></td><td><p>43%</p></td><td><p>41%</p></td><td><p>40%</p></td><td><p>40%</p></td><td><p>41%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: Remands: Remands: Crown Court data tool (Ministry of Justice: Data &amp; Analysis)</p><p><strong>Notes</strong></p><p>*Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.</p>
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar remove filter
question first answered
less than 2022-04-06T13:32:19.99Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-06T13:32:19.99Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
452
label Biography information for Lord Bradley more like this
1453860
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-23more like thismore than 2022-03-23
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Homicide: Sentencing more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the average tariff length in months imposed for murder in each year since 2000. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Bradley more like this
uin HL7261 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-04-06more like thismore than 2022-04-06
answer text <p>The average length of the minimum term (sometimes known as a ‘tariff’) for life sentences for murder convictions since 2000 is as follows:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of Sentence</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Mean Tariff (years)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Mean Tariff (months)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2000</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>165</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2001</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>161</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2002</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>156</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2003</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>163</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2004</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>172</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2005</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>190</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2006</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>208</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2007</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>190</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2008</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>212</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>209</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>227</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>227</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>244</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>246</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>245</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>248</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>251</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>248</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>253</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>255</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>254</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>252</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong>Data sources and quality</strong></p><p>Note that the minimum term is the time between date of sentence and tariff expiry date. The figures do not include whole-life orders. The numbers are subject to revision as more data become available; any changes in the numbers since the last publication of this information is as a result of more sentencing data becoming available.</p><p> </p><p>The figures in these tables have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Source: Public Protection Unit Database. </strong></p>
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar remove filter
question first answered
less than 2022-04-06T10:38:39.55Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-06T10:38:39.55Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
452
label Biography information for Lord Bradley more like this
1453865
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-23more like thismore than 2022-03-23
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prerogative of Mercy more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many royal pardons have been issued in the last 10 years. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Hay of Ballyore more like this
uin HL7278 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-04-06more like thismore than 2022-04-06
answer text <p>One Royal Prerogative of Mercy has been issued to Her Majesty the Queen in the last 10 years. Alan Turing was pardoned in December 2013.</p><p> </p><p>In addition, five remission pardons have been granted since 2015. We have not been able to provide the requested information regarding sentence remissions from 2012 to 2015. Information prior to 2015 could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar remove filter
question first answered
less than 2022-04-06T12:28:22.753Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-06T12:28:22.753Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
4352
label Biography information for Lord Hay of Ballyore more like this
1453447
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-22more like thismore than 2022-03-22
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Parole more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many prisoners subject to Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences have had two or more post tariff parole reviews with no progression to (1) open conditions, or (2) release, in each year since 2017. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Moylan more like this
uin HL7216 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-04-04more like thismore than 2022-04-04
answer text <p>The IPP Action Plan is regularly reviewed to ensure that it is responsive to the needs of those serving IPP sentences, whether in prison or in the community. During the COVID-19 pandemic, and in accordance with measures mandated in the interests of public health, HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) implemented exceptional delivery models which inevitably had some impact on all operational work. A large number of IPP prisoners have been released each year since the IPP Action Plan was first introduced in 2016, and the Plan will be refreshed, reviewed and republished after careful consideration of the forthcoming Justice Select Committee’s Report and recommendations.</p><p>HL7157 &amp; HL7158:</p><p>HMPPS operate four Progression Regimes in closed, adult male category C prisons which provide opportunities for parole-eligible prisoners who are not making anticipated progress, and particularly prioritise places for those serving an IPP sentence. The first Progression Regime opened at HMP Warren Hill in December 2014. Following the success of the Regime at HMP Warren Hill, a further three Progression Regimes were opened in 2018 at HMP The Humber, Erlestoke and Buckley Hall.</p><p>The following table shows the number of prisoners in England and Wales subject to Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences that have been (1) received into, and (2) released from, Progression Regimes in each year since 2017.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Received onto a Progression Regimes</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Release from a Progression Regime</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>47</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018*</p></td><td><p>124</p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>119</p></td><td><p>43</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>92</p></td><td><p>43</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>44</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>* Progression Regimes opened at HMPs Erlestoke, Humber and Buckley Hall.</p><p> </p><p>These data have been drawn from local spreadsheets and databases held by the Progression Regimes, as national data systems can only capture movement for a whole prison, rather than individual units within a prison. As with any large scale recording systems, the figures are subject to possible errors with data migration and processing.</p><p>The total capacity of the Progression Regimes was 202 in 2017, with only the Progression Regime at HMP Warren Hill operational at that time. This number rose to 350 spaces (202 in HMP Warren Hill, 40 in HMP Erlestoke, 48 in HMP Humber and 60 in HMP Buckley Hall) with the opening of the three additional Progression Regime sites by the end of 2018. In 2019 a further 40 places were opened in HMP Erlestoke, however last year one of their Progression Regime units closed, affecting their number of places. This unit is being replaced with a new one later this year.</p><p>HL7160:</p><p>Psychology reviews for IPP prisoners commenced in 2016 and targeted those serving IPP sentences where no progress had been made to either open conditions or release despite 2 or more post tariff parole reviews. In 2019, the cohort was widened to incorporate IPP prisoners with tariffs of fewerless than 2 years. In 2021, the cohort was again expanded to include all those 5 or more years post tariff irrespective of whether they had been to open prison previously, those serving IPP sentences for non-sexual and non-violent offences, and those serving IPP sentences for robbery.</p><p>The following table shows the number of IPP psychology reviews completed for eligible IPP prisoners, as described above, each year since 2016. The high figure in 2016 reflects the fact that a large proportion of those eligible had their reviews in the first year the central reviews were introduced:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews completed </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>873</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>209</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>225</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>159</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>107</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>212</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>HL7161:</p><p>HMPPS Women’s Estate Psychology Services have implemented an indeterminate sentence prisoners strategy which includes the IPP cohort. The overarching goal of the strategy is to ensure that all are supported to progress through their prison sentences as quickly as possible. Psychologists regularly review cases and work with prison and probation colleagues to remove barriers to progression and expedite completion of interventions and services.</p><p>HL7216:</p><p>The following table shows the number of prisoners subject to IPP sentences that have had two or more post-tariff parole reviews with no progression to (1) open conditions, or (2) release, in each year since 2017:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Snapshot Date</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total number of IPP prisoners with two or more “no release” decisions in their latest two reviews (up to the snapshot date)*</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-17</p></td><td><p>1,173</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-18</p></td><td><p>1,028</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-19</p></td><td><p>943</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-20</p></td><td><p>887</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-21</p></td><td><p>874</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>*Caveats:</p><p>1. The figures in these tables have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p><p>2. These figures include both the recalled and unreleased IPP populations.</p><p> </p><p>HL7217 &amp; HL7218:</p><p>The following data are produced from service provider returns and, whilst quality assured, are subject to reporter error. As of 31 December 2021 there were 4,869 people with IPP sentences who had been identified as meeting the screening criteria for the Offender Personality Disorder Pathway. OPD pathway screening is an administrative activity which does not necessarily mean someone needs a specific intervention to address a personality disorder. Such a need would be identified when the prisoner’s probation officer reviews the prisoner’s sentence plan to take account of the OPD pathway screening.</p><p>Of those identified as meeting the screening criteria, 2,780 are currently in custody (with 1,200 of these in custody on recall).</p><p>From 1st January 2017 to 31st December 2021, a total of 1,892 offenders serving IPP sentences have been referred to OPD Services as follows:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of referral</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>No of IPP Referrals</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>177</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>358</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total (2017-2021)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1892</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>To note: in the breakdown of protected characteristics below, some categories have been merged where necessary to avoid the risk of identifying individual offenders.</p><p>By Age:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of referral</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>18-29</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>30-39</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>40-49</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>50-59</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>60+</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>72</p></td><td><p>53</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>177</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>94</p></td><td><p>66</p></td><td><p>44</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>159</p></td><td><p>99</p></td><td><p>61</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>358</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>238</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>86</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>276</p></td><td><p>184</p></td><td><p>101</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>76</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>839</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>552</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>325</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>100</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1892</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>By Ethnicity:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of referral</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Asian: Asian British</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Black: Black British</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Mixed/</strong> <strong>Multiple Ethnic Groups</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Other /</strong> <strong>Not Stated</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>White</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>144</p></td><td><p>177</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>182</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>295</p></td><td><p>358</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>422</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>63</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>505</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>53</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>197</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>86</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>8</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1548</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1892</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>By Sex:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of referral</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Female</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Male</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Unspecified</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>174</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>177</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>214</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>347</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>358</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>490</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>39</p></td><td><p>577</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>87</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1802</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>3</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1892</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar remove filter
grouped question UIN
HL7157 more like this
HL7158 more like this
HL7160 more like this
HL7161 more like this
HL7217 more like this
HL7218 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-04-04T16:39:50.22Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-04T16:39:50.22Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
4883
label Biography information for Lord Moylan more like this
1453448
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-22more like thismore than 2022-03-22
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisoners: Personality Disorders more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many prisoners subject to Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences have been referred into the offender personality disorder pathway in each year since 2017. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Moylan more like this
uin HL7217 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-04-04more like thismore than 2022-04-04
answer text <p>The IPP Action Plan is regularly reviewed to ensure that it is responsive to the needs of those serving IPP sentences, whether in prison or in the community. During the COVID-19 pandemic, and in accordance with measures mandated in the interests of public health, HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) implemented exceptional delivery models which inevitably had some impact on all operational work. A large number of IPP prisoners have been released each year since the IPP Action Plan was first introduced in 2016, and the Plan will be refreshed, reviewed and republished after careful consideration of the forthcoming Justice Select Committee’s Report and recommendations.</p><p>HL7157 &amp; HL7158:</p><p>HMPPS operate four Progression Regimes in closed, adult male category C prisons which provide opportunities for parole-eligible prisoners who are not making anticipated progress, and particularly prioritise places for those serving an IPP sentence. The first Progression Regime opened at HMP Warren Hill in December 2014. Following the success of the Regime at HMP Warren Hill, a further three Progression Regimes were opened in 2018 at HMP The Humber, Erlestoke and Buckley Hall.</p><p>The following table shows the number of prisoners in England and Wales subject to Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences that have been (1) received into, and (2) released from, Progression Regimes in each year since 2017.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Received onto a Progression Regimes</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Release from a Progression Regime</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>47</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018*</p></td><td><p>124</p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>119</p></td><td><p>43</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>92</p></td><td><p>43</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>44</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>* Progression Regimes opened at HMPs Erlestoke, Humber and Buckley Hall.</p><p> </p><p>These data have been drawn from local spreadsheets and databases held by the Progression Regimes, as national data systems can only capture movement for a whole prison, rather than individual units within a prison. As with any large scale recording systems, the figures are subject to possible errors with data migration and processing.</p><p>The total capacity of the Progression Regimes was 202 in 2017, with only the Progression Regime at HMP Warren Hill operational at that time. This number rose to 350 spaces (202 in HMP Warren Hill, 40 in HMP Erlestoke, 48 in HMP Humber and 60 in HMP Buckley Hall) with the opening of the three additional Progression Regime sites by the end of 2018. In 2019 a further 40 places were opened in HMP Erlestoke, however last year one of their Progression Regime units closed, affecting their number of places. This unit is being replaced with a new one later this year.</p><p>HL7160:</p><p>Psychology reviews for IPP prisoners commenced in 2016 and targeted those serving IPP sentences where no progress had been made to either open conditions or release despite 2 or more post tariff parole reviews. In 2019, the cohort was widened to incorporate IPP prisoners with tariffs of fewerless than 2 years. In 2021, the cohort was again expanded to include all those 5 or more years post tariff irrespective of whether they had been to open prison previously, those serving IPP sentences for non-sexual and non-violent offences, and those serving IPP sentences for robbery.</p><p>The following table shows the number of IPP psychology reviews completed for eligible IPP prisoners, as described above, each year since 2016. The high figure in 2016 reflects the fact that a large proportion of those eligible had their reviews in the first year the central reviews were introduced:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews completed </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>873</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>209</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>225</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>159</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>107</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>212</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>HL7161:</p><p>HMPPS Women’s Estate Psychology Services have implemented an indeterminate sentence prisoners strategy which includes the IPP cohort. The overarching goal of the strategy is to ensure that all are supported to progress through their prison sentences as quickly as possible. Psychologists regularly review cases and work with prison and probation colleagues to remove barriers to progression and expedite completion of interventions and services.</p><p>HL7216:</p><p>The following table shows the number of prisoners subject to IPP sentences that have had two or more post-tariff parole reviews with no progression to (1) open conditions, or (2) release, in each year since 2017:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Snapshot Date</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total number of IPP prisoners with two or more “no release” decisions in their latest two reviews (up to the snapshot date)*</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-17</p></td><td><p>1,173</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-18</p></td><td><p>1,028</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-19</p></td><td><p>943</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-20</p></td><td><p>887</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-21</p></td><td><p>874</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>*Caveats:</p><p>1. The figures in these tables have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p><p>2. These figures include both the recalled and unreleased IPP populations.</p><p> </p><p>HL7217 &amp; HL7218:</p><p>The following data are produced from service provider returns and, whilst quality assured, are subject to reporter error. As of 31 December 2021 there were 4,869 people with IPP sentences who had been identified as meeting the screening criteria for the Offender Personality Disorder Pathway. OPD pathway screening is an administrative activity which does not necessarily mean someone needs a specific intervention to address a personality disorder. Such a need would be identified when the prisoner’s probation officer reviews the prisoner’s sentence plan to take account of the OPD pathway screening.</p><p>Of those identified as meeting the screening criteria, 2,780 are currently in custody (with 1,200 of these in custody on recall).</p><p>From 1st January 2017 to 31st December 2021, a total of 1,892 offenders serving IPP sentences have been referred to OPD Services as follows:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of referral</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>No of IPP Referrals</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>177</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>358</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total (2017-2021)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1892</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>To note: in the breakdown of protected characteristics below, some categories have been merged where necessary to avoid the risk of identifying individual offenders.</p><p>By Age:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of referral</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>18-29</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>30-39</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>40-49</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>50-59</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>60+</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>72</p></td><td><p>53</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>177</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>94</p></td><td><p>66</p></td><td><p>44</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>159</p></td><td><p>99</p></td><td><p>61</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>358</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>238</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>86</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>276</p></td><td><p>184</p></td><td><p>101</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>76</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>839</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>552</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>325</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>100</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1892</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>By Ethnicity:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of referral</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Asian: Asian British</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Black: Black British</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Mixed/</strong> <strong>Multiple Ethnic Groups</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Other /</strong> <strong>Not Stated</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>White</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>144</p></td><td><p>177</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>182</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>295</p></td><td><p>358</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>422</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>63</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>505</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>53</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>197</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>86</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>8</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1548</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1892</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>By Sex:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of referral</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Female</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Male</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Unspecified</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>174</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>177</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>214</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>347</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>358</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>490</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>39</p></td><td><p>577</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>87</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1802</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>3</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1892</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar remove filter
grouped question UIN
HL7157 more like this
HL7158 more like this
HL7160 more like this
HL7161 more like this
HL7216 more like this
HL7218 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-04-04T16:39:50.283Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-04T16:39:50.283Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
4883
label Biography information for Lord Moylan more like this